I am thinking we'll go 6-2 the rest of the way and finish at 19-6-2 which should be good for a at-large and probably a 2nd seed. Great season for the boys. The the great part of it is that next year should be even better. Schafer is the man
If we go 6-2 the rest of the way, with the weak SOS, it might not be good for a 2nd seed. Look what happened to Colgate after they lost just one game... 8th -> 13th?
I do think, however, especially with Colgate boosting our SOS, that 6-2, with one possible playoff loss (please not two! :-P), should be enough for an at large bid of some seed.
I'm thinkin' Red Man meant 2nd seed in the ECACs. BTW, if Cornell goes 6-2, they will finish the RS 21-6-2.
[Q]Greg Berge Wrote:
I'm thinkin' Red Man meant 2nd seed in the ECACs. BTW, if Cornell goes 6-2, they will finish the RS 21-6-2.[/q]
Only there's no such thing as an "at-large" bid to the ECAC tournament. I'm thinking he meant NCAAs.
I did mean NCAAs and I was assuming that they would at least make it to albany..