ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: atb9 on January 24, 2005, 11:53:25 PM

Title: Trouble in Sioux Country
Post by: atb9 on January 24, 2005, 11:53:25 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=1974594
Title: Re: Trouble in Sioux Country
Post by: Greg Berge on January 25, 2005, 03:56:53 AM
I was wondering how on Earth the officer thought he would ever keep his job until I realized [Q]University of North Dakota hockey defenseman Matt Greene failed a field sobriety test in Minnesota[/Q].  
Title: Re: Trouble in Sioux Country
Post by: Will on January 25, 2005, 08:54:18 AM
The officer probably got a promotion for that. :-D
Title: Re: Trouble in Sioux Country
Post by: billhoward on January 25, 2005, 09:02:36 AM
Overall, his pending DUI charge, the affairs at Clarkson last year and this, etcetera, all make hockey players look like jerks and offset the good done by people like Baby.

I scanned the article and didn't see his age listed. Technically, you're not supposed to be drinking until you're 21.

Interesting to see what ND does once his BAC comes back if it's over .08 or .10. Does the team suspend him then and there or does it wimp out and wait for the judicial process which effectively puts it over until the season is over. Since it's a team not a court of law, the team doesn't have to follow all the courtroom kinds of due process if it's convinced, say, that the BAC test wasn't tainted.
Title: Re: Trouble in Sioux Country
Post by: BCrespi on January 25, 2005, 10:15:08 AM
His bio on the North Dakota page says that he's a Junior but doesn't list his age.  However, he graduated high school in 2001.  This should make him of age at least.

Also, while he has only 6 points this year, he leads his team in penalty minutes and will clearly be missed if there are reamifications (sorry I had to).  In actuallity he seems to be a strong player having represented the USA in the World Juniors in 2003 and being a team captain.  This should be tough for a captain to explain to his coach, eh?
Title: Re: Trouble in Sioux Country
Post by: KeithK on January 25, 2005, 10:57:04 AM
USCHO lists his birthdate as 13 May 1983.  So he's over 21.  Which was implicit in the article - it clearly would've mentioned underage if he were.
Title: Re: Trouble in Sioux Country
Post by: RichH on January 25, 2005, 01:11:08 PM
[Q]billhoward Wrote:
I scanned the article and didn't see his age listed. Technically, you're not supposed to be drinking until you're 21. [/q]
They have now updated the article to mention his age in the 2nd paragraph of the story.

"He does not have a listed telephone number in Grand Forks."  Sorry, Lynah Faithful.
Title: Re: Trouble in Sioux Country
Post by: billhoward on January 25, 2005, 01:54:48 PM
One interesting thing about online sites is they see reader feedback right away (if they'r elooking) and they can shape the story to get more stuff in. Like the guys age. You'd assume he's of drinking age but then it's always possible the writer just forgot to put it in. Mistakes do happen in writing.
Title: Re: Trouble in Sioux Country
Post by: jeh25 on January 25, 2005, 04:35:43 PM
[Q]billhoward Wrote:

. You'd assume he's of drinking age but then it's always possible the writer just forgot to put it in. Mistakes do happen in writing. [/q]

Either that, or reporters can't do simple math.... ;)

{/meta-joke}

Title: Re: Trouble in Sioux Country
Post by: tolya on January 25, 2005, 05:56:11 PM
The paragraph about his age was likely edited out, since you can do pretty much anything to a wire story.