ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: KateThe15Fan on January 30, 2004, 10:38:07 AM

Title: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Post by: KateThe15Fan on January 30, 2004, 10:38:07 AM
Thought some of the Faithful might be interested in this recent posting on the University of Maryland website:  http://www.umd.edu/umnews/sportsmanship0104.html

I hate to get the "profanity vs. no profanity" argument going again, but as always it's interesting to see that we're not alone in these issues.
Title: Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Post by: Greg Berge on January 30, 2004, 10:56:47 AM
Big story on it in the Washington Post today.
Title: Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Post by: mwf14850 on January 30, 2004, 12:08:20 PM
JUST STICK WITH ROUGH AND FLUFF IN THE 3RD PERIOD CHEER AND THE USHERS WILL LEAVE YOU ALONE
Title: Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Post by: jtwcornell91 on January 30, 2004, 12:12:06 PM
Quote wrote:
JUST STICK WITH ROUGH AND FLUFF IN THE 3RD PERIOD CHEER AND THE USHERS WILL LEAVE YOU ALONE
"Fluff 'em up"?  Is that some sort of porn reference?  'Cause I don't think being a fluffer is really the right sort of dominant althletic image.   ::help::



Post Edited (01-30-04 12:12)
Title: Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Post by: Micaela on January 30, 2004, 03:34:13 PM
I'm in favor of reserving "fluffer" for referees who, um, suck a lot.
Title: Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Post by: LynahFaithfulS on January 30, 2004, 04:49:28 PM
QuoteJohn T. Whelan '91 wrote:
Quote"Fluff 'em up"?  Is that some sort of porn reference?  'Cause I don't think being a fluffer is really the right sort of dominant althletic image.

 ::laugh:: !

Title: Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Post by: JDeafvCornell on January 30, 2004, 06:42:33 PM
In the Washington Time article linked at the bottom of the page ("Terps turn to state to muzzle vulgar fans") they say:


[The university's chief counsel says] school policy prevents them from stopping fans from screaming expletives at opposing teams or wearing T-shirts that bear vulgar slogans because those actions are protected by the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech.  

I didn't realize your rights to free speech extended in a place like a stadium, or is that just Maryland covering their ass-ets.

Does Cornell not protect its student's first amendment right to free speech and that's why they can get away with kicking people out of Lynah?  

Has anybody tried to argue their vulgar chants are protected by the first ammendment after getting kicked out of Lynah?  

LGR!  Beat 'gate.

Title: Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Post by: Shorts on January 31, 2004, 11:07:58 AM
in response to JDeafvCornell, from the Baltimore Sun http://www.sunspot.net/sports/college/basketball/bal-sp.accnotes30jan30,0,4123369.story?coll=bal-college-mbasketball

[Q][University of Maryland Athletic Director Debbie] Yow said there is not much the school can do. She said the university's legal counsel maintains that, since Maryland is a state university and its basketball team plays in a public building, any use of free speech is protected under the First Amendment.[/q]

Although Cornell is partly a state school, I suspect (although I don't know for sure) that the Athletics department is part of the private segment of the school, and so is not constrained by the 1st Amendment.
Title: Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Post by: dss28 on February 01, 2004, 06:13:04 PM
So does this mean you can use profanity if you're an Ag, Hum Ec, or ILR student? ;-)
Title: Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Post by: Ack on February 02, 2004, 02:22:26 AM
Being engineers, we swear in numbers...not exactly profanity if no one else in the world understands   ::screwy::
Title: Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Post by: Greg Berge on February 02, 2004, 09:18:42 AM
QuoteMike Ack wrote:

Being engineers, we swear in numbers.

Hex, no doubt.