OotGwgRoV,
Your id has me intrigued. I tried seaching on USCHO (to no avail) for the Volonnino article mentioned in your signature. Do you have a valid link to the article?
It's actually from an article in The Harvard Crimson: http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=99351
And here's the original article, that provoked my actions: http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=99307
These links both go to the same article?
Not for me.
One article caused OotGwgRoV to spam V. The other is V "thanking" him for it.
Love this quote from V's article
[Q]The real transformation will happen after Mazzoleni has the opportunity to bring in recruiting classes of his own. Though nothing is official, next year's group appears to be extremely good. Mazzoleni has the track record and the vision to return Harvard to national prominence.[/Q]
So, Mazz has had how many years to bring in his own recruits? Was his vision to keep Harvard in mediocrity? Cause from where I stand, Harvard has not returned to national prominence by any standards. (I know, I'm preaching to the choir)
QuoteRedAR wrote:
Love this quote from V's article
[Q]The real transformation will happen after Mazzoleni has the opportunity to bring in recruiting classes of his own. Though nothing is official, next year's group appears to be extremely good. Mazzoleni has the track record and the vision to return Harvard to national prominence.[/Q]
So, Mazz has had how many years to bring in his own recruits? Was his vision to keep Harvard in mediocrity? Cause from where I stand, Harvard has not returned to national prominence by any standards. (I know, I'm preaching to the choir)
Hey, now we know who thought that the draft picks meant that Harvard has talent!
With back to back NCAA appearances, and notwithstanding this season to date, Harvard is a lot closer to national prominence than they were in the immediate pre-Spazz era.
Post Edited (12-23-03 18:31)