Because 2025 can't end fast enough. What a kidney stone of a calendar year. Let's Go Red!
https://youtu.be/pZmKRaOcoLI
Quote from: Trotsky on December 09, 2025, 05:54:44 AMBecause 2025 can't end fast enough. What a kidney stone of a calendar year. Let's Go Red!
https://youtu.be/pZmKRaOcoLI
Haha thats great, i liked Where Angels Fear...
Looks like UNO's goalie went out with an injury a minute into fridays game and wasn't dressed Saturday. Omaha plays Augustana this weekend so they could help us out and pick up some NPI points there.
Quote from: chimpfood on December 16, 2025, 10:00:59 PMLooks like UNO's goalie went out with an injury a minute into fridays game and wasn't dressed Saturday. Omaha plays Augustana this weekend so they could help us out and pick up some NPI points there.
How dare you suggest we root against the good Vikings of Sioux Falls.
Looks like anyone can buy student section tickets for the Omaha and Alaska series, plenty of good seats still available.
Finally game day again tomorrow. Big questions are if Walsh and Latkoczy (their goalie) will play. Both are super important to their teams.
Bernie and I are hanging out at the basketball game... the topic of faceoff% came up. We ran the numbers manually because the Cornell site doesn't display them. Did y'all know Castagna is running a 63.9% on the dot this year? That's gotta be some sort of leader with a minimum fo%. Bernie's saying it could be a NCAA record if he keeps up the pace.
Walsh, btw, with a still-impressive 54.7%.
Quote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 02:57:55 PMBernie and I are hanging out at the basketball game... the topic of faceoff% came up. We ran the numbers manually because the Cornell site doesn't display them. Did y'all know Castagna is running a 63.9% on the dot this year? That's gotta be some sort of leader with a minimum fo%. Bernie's saying it could be a NCAA record if he keeps up the pace.
Walsh, btw, with a still-impressive 54.7%.
If I remember correctly, Walsh was our go to faceoff guy last year, even in empty net situations when they were both on the ice. Wonder if the FO% differences are just due to Walsh being a better defensive playing and so he's put in for more D zone and PK draws.
Also helps Castagna to be going against the other team's 2C
Quote from: chimpfood on January 02, 2026, 03:10:20 PMQuote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 02:57:55 PMBernie and I are hanging out at the basketball game... the topic of faceoff% came up. We ran the numbers manually because the Cornell site doesn't display them. Did y'all know Castagna is running a 63.9% on the dot this year? That's gotta be some sort of leader with a minimum fo%. Bernie's saying it could be a NCAA record if he keeps up the pace.
Walsh, btw, with a still-impressive 54.7%.
If I remember correctly, Walsh was our go to faceoff guy last year, even in empty net situations when they were both on the ice. Wonder if the FO% differences are just due to Walsh being a better defensive playing and so he's put in for more D zone and PK draws.
Also helps Castagna to be going against the other team's 2C
I didn't feel like doing the math, but at a glance looks like a few other players in the low 60s for FO%.
https://www.ncaa.com/stats/icehockey-men/d1/current/individual/1258
Quote from: chimpfood on January 02, 2026, 03:10:20 PMQuote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 02:57:55 PMBernie and I are hanging out at the basketball game... the topic of faceoff% came up. We ran the numbers manually because the Cornell site doesn't display them. Did y'all know Castagna is running a 63.9% on the dot this year? That's gotta be some sort of leader with a minimum fo%. Bernie's saying it could be a NCAA record if he keeps up the pace.
Walsh, btw, with a still-impressive 54.7%.
If I remember correctly, Walsh was our go to faceoff guy last year, even in empty net situations when they were both on the ice. Wonder if the FO% differences are just due to Walsh being a better defensive playing and so he's put in for more D zone and PK draws.
Also helps Castagna to be going against the other team's 2C
131 w 74 l for Casty. 122 w 101 l for Walshy. Looks like they're getting roughly even faceoff numbers, idk about game tilt.
I feel like face off dominance has been one of the most consistent features of Cornell hockey since I started watching in 2004-2005.
Quote from: chimpfood on December 28, 2025, 05:22:38 PMLooks like anyone can buy student section tickets for the Omaha and Alaska series, plenty of good seats still available.
~20 of my relatives (mostly alums) will be in Section B tonight.
Wish I were there......
Walsh took warmups :)
Also, the ice looks good now.
Quote from: Dafatone on January 02, 2026, 06:15:41 PMI feel like face off dominance has been one of the most consistent features of Cornell hockey since I started watching in 2004-2005.
Sure seems like it.
Program-record 8-game homestand.
Nice early pressure.
ATTABOY FEGSY
Goal at 4:20. 8)
Here comes the powerplay.
VEILLEUX
LET'S GO LONGER
Quote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 07:08:53 PMATTABOY FEGSY
nice of fegaras. possibly his first shot
on goal all season!
oooh Aidan Long
So, this isn't a bad start.
Fegaras in the box. Fork found in kitchen.
Just as the penalty expires, they score. Well. That's why you have a 3 goal lead.
STAY OUTTA DA BOX
I'm not saying the next 5+ periods are going to be like this but so far it's like watching Union play those bar league jokers, including somehow giving up a goal.
We are consistently planting a guy in front. Nice.
Quote from: ugarte on January 02, 2026, 07:27:13 PMI'm not saying the next 5+ periods are going to be like this but so far it's like watching Union play those bar league jokers, including somehow giving up a goal.
Games that start this way have a nasty habit of tightening up.
Now 3-2. Never count the Mavericks out.
Quote from: Trotsky on January 02, 2026, 07:28:56 PMQuote from: ugarte on January 02, 2026, 07:27:13 PMI'm not saying the next 5+ periods are going to be like this but so far it's like watching Union play those bar league jokers, including somehow giving up a goal.
Games that start this way have a nasty habit of tightening up.
Duly noted
Shouldn't be within one. That Veilleux turnover resulting in the 2nd Omaha goal was as bad as I've seen given there were plenty of options to move the puck.
Quote from: Iceberg on January 02, 2026, 07:37:22 PMShouldn't be within one. That Veilleux turnover resulting in the 2nd Omaha goal was as bad as I've seen given there were plenty of options to move the puck.
Shit happens. So does Walsh hitting iron on the shorthanded chance. Or Ryan or Hiscock or any of like five other guys not being able to put wood on pucks with open cages.
We are still up by one. Lock it down. Score a few more.
Tied. Scrum in front of Cournoyer.
Too fancy, my brothers in Schafe.
Textbook Interference
"Wong strong against Long."
Walsh is covering the ice like 2 guys tonight.
3-4 them. But my guy got an assist :)
Lost our shape entirely. It's now throw it in front and hope.
Walsh to the box for getting attacked. Loranger to the box for trying to kill captain.
Pitiful 4x3. This team is offensively challenged. So much passing into traffic, passing it to nowhere, playing catch the blue line for 15 seconds before taking a worse shot than the first one that was available.
Well that SUCKED. Stop that.
I mostly want to come back and win so we don't have to read the tedious screeds.
Quote from: BearLover on January 02, 2026, 08:30:55 PMQuote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 08:12:29 PM3-4 them. But my guy got an assist :)
congrats!
thank you <3 i'm quite happy i got to see him factor in on a goal! ideally it would be when we were up 5-0...
Quote from: Weder on January 02, 2026, 03:18:11 PMQuote from: chimpfood on January 02, 2026, 03:10:20 PMQuote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 02:57:55 PMBernie and I are hanging out at the basketball game... the topic of faceoff% came up. We ran the numbers manually because the Cornell site doesn't display them. Did y'all know Castagna is running a 63.9% on the dot this year? That's gotta be some sort of leader with a minimum fo%. Bernie's saying it could be a NCAA record if he keeps up the pace.
Walsh, btw, with a still-impressive 54.7%.
If I remember correctly, Walsh was our go to faceoff guy last year, even in empty net situations when they were both on the ice. Wonder if the FO% differences are just due to Walsh being a better defensive playing and so he's put in for more D zone and PK draws.
Also helps Castagna to be going against the other team's 2C
I didn't feel like doing the math, but at a glance looks like a few other players in the low 60s for FO%.
https://www.ncaa.com/stats/icehockey-men/d1/current/individual/1258
I took that link and sorted by FO Win %. Only 35 players have a better percentage than Walsh. Castagna bests them all.
The list includes players who have had at least 133 FO Wins.
Rank Name Team Class Ind Games FO Won FO Lost % FO Won
44 Noah Morneau Bowling Green Fr. 16 153 89 63.2%
33 Victor Czernec. Quinnipiac Sr. 18 167 99 62.8%
1 Tyson Gross St. Cloud St. Jr. 18 261 160 62.0%
72 Jaden Lipinski Maine Fr. 17 135 84 61.6%
70 Ellis Rickwood North Dakota Sr. 13 137 86 61.4%
36 Kyle Gaffney Minn. Duluth Sr. 20 165 104 61.3%
9 Owen Michaels Western Mich. Jr. 18 216 139 60.8%
15 Charlie Cerrato Penn St. So. 16 194 125 60.8%
17 Jack Stockfish Holy Cross Jr. 17 188 122 60.6%
4 Klavs Veinbergs Colorado Col. Jr. 18 221 146 60.2%
18 Nick Sajevic Air Force So. 18 187 125 59.9%
11 T.J. Hughes Michigan Sr. 20 210 148 58.7%
10 William Ahlrik Lake Sup. St. So. 20 215 153 58.4%
5 Gavin Morrissey Wisconsin So. 18 220 160 57.9%
61 Sean McGurn Arizona St. Jr. 18 141 103 57.8%
41 Hank Cleaves Dartmouth So. 14 157 117 57.3%
39 Tiernan Shoudy Michigan St. Sr. 18 164 123 57.1%
74 Jacob Mathieu Northeastern Fr. 16 133 101 56.8%
34 Markus Vidicek Quinnipiac Fr. 18 166 127 56.7%
30 Roger McQueen Providence Fr. 16 170 131 56.5%
61 Brayden Schuurm Colorado Col. Fr. 18 141 109 56.4%
52 Max Montes Ohio St. Jr. 16 146 113 56.4%
57 Jaden Dyke LIU Fr. 19 144 112 56.3%
20 Cy LeClerc New Hampshire Sr. 17 185 144 56.2%
51 Nolan Roed St. Cloud St. Fr. 18 147 115 56.1%
66 Cole McKinney Michigan Fr. 20 139 111 55.6%
25 Josh Zary Ferris St. Sr. 20 179 143 55.6%
23 Logan Morrell Arizona St. Jr. 20 180 144 55.6%
25 Lucas Buzziol Union (NY) So. 19 179 144 55.4%
54 Cole Reschny North Dakota Fr. 16 145 117 55.3%
60 Jaden Grant Bowling Green Sr. 15 142 115 55.3%
12 Max Scott Maine. Jr. 18 209 171 55.0%
36 Jacob Maillet Niagara So. 16 165 135 55.0%
36 Danny Nelson Notre Dame Jr. 16 165 136 54.8%
28 Grant Slukynsky Western Mich. Jr. 18 171 141 54.8%
IT'S NOT DELIVERY IT'S DIGIULIAN
Quote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 08:51:52 PMIT'S NOT DELIVERY IT'S DIGIULIAN
I can Dig it.
He was overdue.
Princeton tied with Dartmouth in the 3rd.
WHOSE COCK???
(https://media.gettyimages.com/id/3151671/photo/south-carolina-v-lsu.webp?s=2048x2048&w=gi&k=20&c=BghMOAE4oJPD8UKx_0AytfvINydARO0xWInDPEliaJ8=)
Another bad turnover by Veilleux: X gonna give it to them?
Quote from: Trotsky on January 02, 2026, 09:01:10 PMPrinceton tied with Dartmouth in the 3rd.
And Q is bitch-slapping Sucks, 8-1.
And make it 9-1.
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on January 02, 2026, 09:13:12 PMQuote from: Trotsky on January 02, 2026, 09:01:10 PMPrinceton tied with Dartmouth in the 3rd.
And Q is bitch-slapping Sucks, 8-1.
And make it 9-1.
Make that 9 hard boiled eggs.
LONG HITS THE EMPTY NET
Whew
UNO 4
Cornell 3
Walshy 3
Nice job sticking with it in the third.
Quote from: BearLover on January 02, 2026, 08:29:48 PMPitiful 4x3. This team is offensively challenged. So much passing into traffic, passing it to nowhere, playing catch the blue line for 15 seconds before taking a worse shot than the first one that was available.
Some on eLynah are - too be politically correct - challenged too.
Quote from: marty on January 02, 2026, 09:28:27 PMQuote from: BearLover on January 02, 2026, 08:29:48 PMPitiful 4x3. This team is offensively challenged. So much passing into traffic, passing it to nowhere, playing catch the blue line for 15 seconds before taking a worse shot than the first one that was available.
Some on eLynah are - too be politically correct - challenged too.
To*
WALSH WALSH WALSH
[/quote]
Not bothered by jet lag...
Good job by the team to come back. It was always clear that there would be offensive opportunities throughout but things definitely need to be tighter tomorrow, as Omaha will probably continue to play gutsy
Quote from: Snowball on January 02, 2026, 09:30:05 PMWALSH WALSH WALSH
Not bothered by jet lag...
[/quote]
What the hell, might be worth sending him across an ocean before every game :)
As a disciple of the Schafer school of hockey philosophy, i wanted to shoot a goose when we let up goals 3 and 4 from U-NO-who. But ok, glad to see things settle down in the end against a very slippery opponent.
Can't be choking a three goal lead but it's good that we untucked our balls and got the win.
Happy that Fegaras and Long got the monkeys off their backs (Fegaras' celly was him taking the monkey off his back which was hilarious).
Got a lot of dirty looks in section B and A from first time fans that got the ticket deals and probably didn't know it was the student section.
It was also cold as hell in Lynah today but if that's the price to pay for good ice I'll take it.
Weird thing to say when we scored six goals, but I thought UNO's goalie played very well. We could have had eight or nine pretty easily.
Lordy we lucked out!
Definitely need to tighten up the nuts and bolts - too many bad passes in my opinion but happy they managed to pull things together in the 3rd
Quote from: Dafatone on January 02, 2026, 09:46:44 PMWeird thing to say when we scored six goals, but I thought UNO's goalie played very well. We could have had eight or nine pretty easily.
CHN's box score has our expected goals at 4.6 and UNO's at 1.7. (I have no idea how reliable CHN's xG metric is.) We dominated this game, even accounting for the 5-to-2 PP disparity.
Quote from: BearLover on January 02, 2026, 09:51:45 PMQuote from: Dafatone on January 02, 2026, 09:46:44 PMWeird thing to say when we scored six goals, but I thought UNO's goalie played very well. We could have had eight or nine pretty easily.
CHN's box score has our expected goals at 4.6 and UNO's at 1.7. (I have no idea how reliable CHN's xG metric is.) We dominated this game, even accounting for the 5-to-2 PP disparity.
I'm not sure I want to say Cournoyer had a bad game, exactly, because he was really hung out to dry on some of those goals. But we could have used a robbery or two.
Still, they're all line drives in the scorebook. On to tomorrow.
Quote from: Trotsky on January 02, 2026, 09:25:06 PMUNO 4
Cornell 3
Walshy 3
That's our captain.
As I predicted - UNO is a gutsy ass team that's probably a little better than its record suggests. Can't be doing the cardiac let-in-four-goals experience again. Good win, very glad we stuck it out. Now lock it down before tomorrow.
I guess UNO started to look better? Maybe? good guys won but yeesh.
Quote from: BearLover on January 02, 2026, 09:51:45 PMQuote from: Dafatone on January 02, 2026, 09:46:44 PMWeird thing to say when we scored six goals, but I thought UNO's goalie played very well. We could have had eight or nine pretty easily.
CHN's box score has our expected goals at 4.6 and UNO's at 1.7. (I have no idea how reliable CHN's xG metric is.) We dominated this game, even accounting for the 5-to-2 PP disparity.
I think their xG is just based on where the shot comes from. So probably not very telling.
Latkoczy warmed up for UNO but was not on the bench. Wouldn't be shocked to see him tomorrow, they probably wouldn't like to put Cowan back out there after giving up 6 even though he didn't look terrible.
Also, I'm not sold on Stanley on the power play. He's like the modern day Travis Mitchell, just seems to slow everything down. I would prefer that we go 4 forwards on the top unit and just have Veilleux stay along the blue line a little more. Though, maybe today showed that he's too turnover prone to be trusted as the lone defenseman on the PP.
I thought Cowan looked fine, we generated a TON of great chances. As somebody mentioned a few pages back we had empty nets at least 4 times and something happened -- a whiff, a roll onto the puck edge, a mystifying extra pass, a post.
We could have won this one 10-5.
I'm a bit worried about Cournoyer. That was a bad performance. He wasn't tracking the puck well. UNO took his eyes but there were also times when they blasted unscreened and they just flat out missed, he didn't even react. I really like him and I guess goalies can go stale and need playing time to spin back up, but I thought in period 2 he looked lost.
Walsh is better every game. The Frosh already look experienced. We have the ability to score. This team could do something in March.
Quote from: chimpfood on January 02, 2026, 10:56:31 PMAlso, I'm not sold on Stanley on the power play. He's like the modern day Travis Mitchell, just seems to slow everything down. I would prefer that we go 4 forwards on the top unit and just have Veilleux stay along the blue line a little more. Though, maybe today showed that he's too turnover prone to be trusted as the lone defenseman on the PP.
I was going to make the same comment earlier, but I felt like I didn't really have any clue what I was talking about (I have a high threshold for posting only when I feel confident in what I'm saying).
Great one to be at last night. Really enjoyed sitting over in section B for a change.
One thing that has to be said that nobody has mentioned is that Gio DeGulian had a huge impact last night. After ringing one off the post in the second, just a wicked snipe to tie it at 4 on the PP. Then assisted on the winner off a turnover he created on a great forecheck. It's two plays but it's a kid whose speed and skill stood out all night and those were not 2 plays that just anyone could have made. We have long needed players with speed and skill who can make plays like that and win us games. The UNO goalie played well but we failed to finish on 3 breakaways and numerous golden opportunities. Digiulian scored when we desperately needed one.
What a roller coaster of emotion.
When we went up 3-0 in the first 10, I thought to myself how strong of a team this is, and how college hockey has evolved in the last few years, indeed in the 40 years I've been watching.
My other thought was, again, we were playing a team with 15 new players, like ourselves. Seems this is true for nearly every team we've faced this season and across D1. Wild shakeups to team chemistry.
Then... 4 unanswered. Disaster.
Followed by me literally jumping off the couch in the 3rd with the tying and winning goals. I'm proud of the team for not giving up and battling out of a psychological hole. LGR!!!
Quote from: The Rancor on January 03, 2026, 08:32:08 AMWhat a roller coaster of emotion.
When we went up 3-0 in the first 10, I thought to myself how strong of a team this is, and how college hockey has evolved in the last few years, indeed in the 40 years I've been watching.
My other thought was, again, we were playing a team with 15 new players, like ourselves. Seems this is true for nearly every team we've faced this season and across D1. Wild shakeups to team chemistry.
Then... 4 unanswered. Disaster.
Followed by me literally jumping off the couch in the 3rd with the tying and winning goals. I'm proud of the team for not giving up and battling out of a psychological hole. LGR!!!
...and even the empty netter was a blast to watch.
Finished your post.
Quote from: marty on January 03, 2026, 08:36:48 AMQuote from: The Rancor on January 03, 2026, 08:32:08 AMWhat a roller coaster of emotion.
When we went up 3-0 in the first 10, I thought to myself how strong of a team this is, and how college hockey has evolved in the last few years, indeed in the 40 years I've been watching.
My other thought was, again, we were playing a team with 15 new players, like ourselves. Seems this is true for nearly every team we've faced this season and across D1. Wild shakeups to team chemistry.
Then... 4 unanswered. Disaster.
Followed by me literally jumping off the couch in the 3rd with the tying and winning goals. I'm proud of the team for not giving up and battling out of a psychological hole. LGR!!!
...and even the empty netter was a blast to watch.
Finished your post.
A thing of beauty.
Quote from: chimpfood on January 02, 2026, 10:56:31 PMAlso, I'm not sold on Stanley on the power play. He's like the modern day Travis Mitchell, just seems to slow everything down. I would prefer that we go 4 forwards on the top unit and just have Veilleux stay along the blue line a little more. Though, maybe today showed that he's too turnover prone to be trusted as the lone defenseman on the PP.
Yeah, I mentioned this to the kiddo I ended up next to. 3F2D on PP1 is certainly a choice, especially when it felt like Stanley spent all night
not keeping pucks in the zone. But I also seem to remember Veilleux's goal coming with him deep in the crease, so maybe they want him to be able to activate into the cycle like a forward?
Quote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 02:57:55 PMBernie and I are hanging out at the basketball game... the topic of faceoff% came up. We ran the numbers manually because the Cornell site doesn't display them. Did y'all know Castagna is running a 63.9% on the dot this year? That's gotta be some sort of leader with a minimum fo%. Bernie's saying it could be a NCAA record if he keeps up the pace.
Walsh, btw, with a still-impressive 54.7%.
Faceoff stats are here - https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/overall.php ... also on team pages, and other places.
Quote from: adamw on January 03, 2026, 08:21:32 PMQuote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 02:57:55 PMBernie and I are hanging out at the basketball game... the topic of faceoff% came up. We ran the numbers manually because the Cornell site doesn't display them. Did y'all know Castagna is running a 63.9% on the dot this year? That's gotta be some sort of leader with a minimum fo%. Bernie's saying it could be a NCAA record if he keeps up the pace.
Walsh, btw, with a still-impressive 54.7%.
Faceoff stats are here - https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/overall.php ... also on team pages, and other places.
Yeah... except that shows all the 1 win guys first lmao, and I can't see a way to filter it without signing up for an account, and the account signup wasn't working yesterday when I tried it. :')
Quote from: adamw on January 03, 2026, 08:21:32 PMQuote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 02:57:55 PMBernie and I are hanging out at the basketball game... the topic of faceoff% came up. We ran the numbers manually because the Cornell site doesn't display them. Did y'all know Castagna is running a 63.9% on the dot this year? That's gotta be some sort of leader with a minimum fo%. Bernie's saying it could be a NCAA record if he keeps up the pace.
Walsh, btw, with a still-impressive 54.7%.
Faceoff stats are here - https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/overall.php ... also on team pages, and other places.
But if you sort that page by FO%, you either see nothing but players at 100% or 0%, depending on the sort order. And the stats page for the team doesn't have FO%. Maybe it's someplace I haven't found yet.
The problem with offering lots of option is that eventually something gets buried.
Quote from: pjd8 on January 03, 2026, 08:36:52 PMQuote from: adamw on January 03, 2026, 08:21:32 PMQuote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 02:57:55 PMBernie and I are hanging out at the basketball game... the topic of faceoff% came up. We ran the numbers manually because the Cornell site doesn't display them. Did y'all know Castagna is running a 63.9% on the dot this year? That's gotta be some sort of leader with a minimum fo%. Bernie's saying it could be a NCAA record if he keeps up the pace.
Walsh, btw, with a still-impressive 54.7%.
Faceoff stats are here - https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/overall.php ... also on team pages, and other places.
But if you sort that page by FO%, you either see nothing but players at 100% or 0%, depending on the sort order. And the stats page for the team doesn't have FO%. Maybe it's someplace I haven't found yet.
The problem with offering lots of option is that eventually something gets buried.
That's true - I do need to set some sort of minimum there on the national page. Team Stats page is here:
https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/team/Cornell/18/advanced,20252026
The basic team stats page has a dropdown menu to all sorts of other stats - including "in conference only" and the "advanced" page I linked above, among other things.
Quote from: adamw on January 03, 2026, 10:15:45 PMQuote from: pjd8 on January 03, 2026, 08:36:52 PMQuote from: adamw on January 03, 2026, 08:21:32 PMQuote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 02:57:55 PMBernie and I are hanging out at the basketball game... the topic of faceoff% came up. We ran the numbers manually because the Cornell site doesn't display them. Did y'all know Castagna is running a 63.9% on the dot this year? That's gotta be some sort of leader with a minimum fo%. Bernie's saying it could be a NCAA record if he keeps up the pace.
Walsh, btw, with a still-impressive 54.7%.
Faceoff stats are here - https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/overall.php ... also on team pages, and other places.
But if you sort that page by FO%, you either see nothing but players at 100% or 0%, depending on the sort order. And the stats page for the team doesn't have FO%. Maybe it's someplace I haven't found yet.
The problem with offering lots of option is that eventually something gets buried.
That's true - I do need to set some sort of minimum there on the national page. Team Stats page is here:
https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/team/Cornell/18/advanced,20252026
The basic team stats page has a dropdown menu to all sorts of other stats - including "in conference only" and the "advanced" page I linked above, among other things.
Thanks! I didn't go down all the options on that menu.
Quote from: adamw on January 03, 2026, 10:15:45 PMQuote from: pjd8 on January 03, 2026, 08:36:52 PMQuote from: adamw on January 03, 2026, 08:21:32 PMQuote from: stereax on January 02, 2026, 02:57:55 PMBernie and I are hanging out at the basketball game... the topic of faceoff% came up. We ran the numbers manually because the Cornell site doesn't display them. Did y'all know Castagna is running a 63.9% on the dot this year? That's gotta be some sort of leader with a minimum fo%. Bernie's saying it could be a NCAA record if he keeps up the pace.
Walsh, btw, with a still-impressive 54.7%.
Faceoff stats are here - https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/overall.php ... also on team pages, and other places.
But if you sort that page by FO%, you either see nothing but players at 100% or 0%, depending on the sort order. And the stats page for the team doesn't have FO%. Maybe it's someplace I haven't found yet.
The problem with offering lots of option is that eventually something gets buried.
That's true - I do need to set some sort of minimum there on the national page. Team Stats page is here:
https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/team/Cornell/18/advanced,20252026
The basic team stats page has a dropdown menu to all sorts of other stats - including "in conference only" and the "advanced" page I linked above, among other things.
Ooh! Thanks!!!
Speaking of Walsh, just did a scroll on Jane McNally's Twitter and it turns out he only got to Ithaca around midday the day of (https://x.com/JaneMcNally_/status/2007191317357764635?t=p-FGPfihoL4ZDtLGToU7jQ&s=19) the game. And I thought my travel plans were bad.
Rest up, Walsh. That's how many games, 5? Since Christmas?
Aiden Long (https://x.com/CornellMHockey/status/2008227635093004709?t=bBmBTdfnn_wvdH-aQuhiBQ&s=19) is the ECAC rookie of the week with 3G1A.