Harvard has put its Cornell Flex Pass (https://gocrimson.evenue.net/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/SEAddPackage?linkID=harvard-athletics&cartNum=1740507&ticketNum=1135146&caller=PKReturn&shopperContext=) tickets on sale. To get a ticket for Cornell game in this pass, you also have to purchase tickets to at least two other games.
Since four of us want to attend, I priced a package just out of curiosity, picking the Stonehill game since I figured that would be the cheapest, and the Colgate game. It would cost me $366 for the four tickets to the three games. Since the Cornell game is the only game I'll be going to, and I doubt they'll be much resale value to the other two games, that comes out to approximately $90 apiece for the Cornell tickets, almost as pricey as MSG! I'll wait and take my chances on the secondary market.
I suppose I could buy tickets to the games against BU and Michigan and figure there will be a resale market for those. But that's too much trouble.
The irony is making the tickets more expensive results in more people from Cornell going since Harvard fans are not a thing.
Nope, I'll wait. Eventually they will sell over-priced tickets for just the Cornell game. I'm fine with standing room if needed (although it galls me to pay the high price and not even get a seat).
Winning is a coupon that redeems everything.
This should actually not be allowed, should be ECAC or NCAA guidelines about how tickets to all games should be priced fairly and enforced...
This is a downside to all the tickets being available online. When they were physical tickets sitting in a box office, a visitors' allotment would be set to Cornell. It wouldn't be enough for demand, but there would be some tickets available to visiting fans for just that game.
Quote from: 617BigRedThis should actually not be allowed, should be ECAC or NCAA guidelines about how tickets to all games should be priced fairly and enforced...
Pfft. "Rules" are such a 20th Century idea (shakes head).