Worked out well today so thought would start the next one LGR!
In '86, I had just moved from CT to Seattle, but came back for a friend's wedding in Burlington the weekend of the ECAC Finals. Fortunately the Saturday wedding was an early afternoon event, so I hightailed it to Boston with a buddy from CT who had gone to Clarkson. Clarkson had a history back then of finding interesting ways to lose in the ECAC Tournament; the whole way down to Boston, my friend was griping about "getting the monkey off his back". Needless to say, all I could do was smile when we met up after the game; couldn't give him too much of a hard time, as I needed a place to stay that night!
This will be the 6th time these two have faced off for the league title:
Clarkson won in: 1966 and 2019
Cornell won in: 1970 (duh), 1986, 1997.
Reminder since it's not obvious and keeps catching me off guard: the game is at FIVE eastern tomorrow.
1997 was so good. Soooooo good. Suck it, Todd White! (damn that guy had a much better nhl career than i realized)
Quote from: ugarte1997 was so good. Soooooo good. Suck it, Todd White! (damn that guy had a much better nhl career than i realized)
Yeah, we really had no business winning that game. That game at Lynah they dominated us. Absolutely dominated us.
But we won! Pretty much sheer will and guile.
Quote from: Scersk '97Quote from: ugarte1997 was so good. Soooooo good. Suck it, Todd White! (damn that guy had a much better nhl career than i realized)
Yeah, we really had no business winning that game. That game at Lynah they dominated us. Absolutely dominated us.
But we won! Pretty much sheer will and guile.
And an embarrassing amount of icing as the clock wound down in the 3rd. An embarrassing amount. Whatever it takes.
We were manically applauding every icing, because what else could we do? One JF Houle scored in the 3rd to make it a miserably tense time for everyone. Christ, what a game. Schafer knows how to get the most out of overmatched teams.
http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1997/box19970315.pdf
Didn't see this mentioned anywhere, so...
Near the end of the Clarkson win over Dartmouth, Clarkson scored an empty netter. In the celebration one of the Clarkson players got hurt and had to be helped off the ice. He wasn't putting weight on one leg. He was wearing an "A", and checking their roster it looks like they only have one assistant captain, in which case it was Kaelan Taylor.
oops wrong thread!
Quote from: andyw2100Didn't see this mentioned anywhere, so...
Near the end of the Clarkson win over Dartmouth, Clarkson scored an empty netter. In the celebration one of the Clarkson players got hurt and had to be helped off the ice. He wasn't putting weight on one leg. He was wearing an "A", and checking their roster it looks like they only have one assistant captain, in which case it was Kaelan Taylor.
It was Trey Taylor - who was ECAC Best Defensive Defenseman Award winner this year. Martino Edwin Diaz'ed him.
Quote from: adamwQuote from: andyw2100Didn't see this mentioned anywhere, so...
Near the end of the Clarkson win over Dartmouth, Clarkson scored an empty netter. In the celebration one of the Clarkson players got hurt and had to be helped off the ice. He wasn't putting weight on one leg. He was wearing an "A", and checking their roster it looks like they only have one assistant captain, in which case it was Kaelan Taylor.
It was Trey Taylor - who was ECAC Best Defensive Defenseman Award winner this year. Martino Edwin Diaz'ed him.
Thanks.
My wife thought it was number 4. Turns out she was right.
Here's a screenshot of how I came up with the wrong Taylor.
Quote from: RichHQuote from: Scersk '97Quote from: ugarte1997 was so good. Soooooo good. Suck it, Todd White! (damn that guy had a much better nhl career than i realized)
Yeah, we really had no business winning that game. That game at Lynah they dominated us. Absolutely dominated us.
But we won! Pretty much sheer will and guile.
And an embarrassing amount of icing as the clock wound down in the 3rd. An embarrassing amount. Whatever it takes.
We were manically applauding every icing, because what else could we do? One JF Houle scored in the 3rd to make it a miserably tense time for everyone. Christ, what a game. Schafer knows how to get the most out of overmatched teams.
http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1997/box19970315.pdf
In those days you could change after an icing, so less of a disadvantage than it is today.
Its crazy that Clarkson manages to win these games, 4 goals on 15 shots.
Quote from: scoop85Quote from: RichHQuote from: Scersk '97Quote from: ugarte1997 was so good. Soooooo good. Suck it, Todd White! (damn that guy had a much better nhl career than i realized)
Yeah, we really had no business winning that game. That game at Lynah they dominated us. Absolutely dominated us.
But we won! Pretty much sheer will and guile.
And an embarrassing amount of icing as the clock wound down in the 3rd. An embarrassing amount. Whatever it takes.
We were manically applauding every icing, because what else could we do? One JF Houle scored in the 3rd to make it a miserably tense time for everyone. Christ, what a game. Schafer knows how to get the most out of overmatched teams.
http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1997/box19970315.pdf
In those days you could change after an icing, so less of a disadvantage than it is today.
Yeah - I figure that game was what led to the rule change!
Quote from: upprdeckIts crazy that Clarkson manages to win these games, 4 goals on 15 shots.
They shut down in the 3rd. I figured J.F. was having them practice sitting on a lead. When it was "close," which it wasn't for long, Clarkson and Dartmouth were about tied in shot attempts and shots on goal.
Lord help anyone being sat upon by coach Houle.
Quote from: RobbQuote from: scoop85Quote from: RichHQuote from: Scersk '97Quote from: ugarte1997 was so good. Soooooo good. Suck it, Todd White! (damn that guy had a much better nhl career than i realized)
Yeah, we really had no business winning that game. That game at Lynah they dominated us. Absolutely dominated us.
But we won! Pretty much sheer will and guile.
And an embarrassing amount of icing as the clock wound down in the 3rd. An embarrassing amount. Whatever it takes.
We were manically applauding every icing, because what else could we do? One JF Houle scored in the 3rd to make it a miserably tense time for everyone. Christ, what a game. Schafer knows how to get the most out of overmatched teams.
http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1997/box19970315.pdf
In those days you could change after an icing, so less of a disadvantage than it is today.
Yeah - I figure that game was what led to the rule change!
I'm so old I forgot the rule changed. ::cuss::
Quote from: imafrshmnLord help anyone being sat upon by coach Houle.
Makes Mike look svelte.
Clarkson's 5 starters are their top 5 scorers. They'll probably be double shifting their top line and we need to shut them down. We have much more scoring depth so hopefully that comes through for us and allows us to play more defensive against their first line.
Quote from: adamwQuote from: andyw2100Didn't see this mentioned anywhere, so...
Near the end of the Clarkson win over Dartmouth, Clarkson scored an empty netter. In the celebration one of the Clarkson players got hurt and had to be helped off the ice. He wasn't putting weight on one leg. He was wearing an "A", and checking their roster it looks like they only have one assistant captain, in which case it was Kaelan Taylor.
It was Trey Taylor - who was ECAC Best Defensive Defenseman Award winner this year. Martino Edwin Diaz'ed him.
Trey Taylor is dressed for warmups.
Same lines (https://x.com/JaneMcNally_/status/1903535805299322943/photo/1) as last night.
Got my sandwich, let's go Red!
PSENICKA!!!
YES!!!!
MY BOY MY STAR
Already! Some good play so far. Working the boards.
Keep pushing, this won't be a 1-0 win
TWO NOTHING
Nope -- 2 on 1, DeSantis!
DeSantis!!!! let's goooooo
LETS GO, TEXTBOOK 2 on 1
What a tournament for Kovich!
Keep it up.
Chatted with a Section B'er while the CTB people were getting the game up, finally.
Highlights:
Him: "This team is finally playing like the number 6 ranked team preseason - OH WAIT..."
Him: "They're like me with assignments, do it at the last possible minute."
Me [after we were trying to figure out if Quinnipiac was in or out]: "I think quantum physics is slightly LESS confusing than the pairwise..."
Him: "I'm a comm major, I wouldn't know!"
Great start, please limit the penalties the rest of the way.
Quote from: chimpfoodGreat start, please limit the penalties the rest of the way.
Shhhh!!!
Well goddamn I should shut up
Quote from: chimpfoodGreat start, please limit the penalties the rest of the way.
They didn't hear you. Louder.
IAN. GET YOUR ASS IN THE NET.
Kind of a weak call. It's not like anyone's stick went "15 feet in the air."
Quote from: sah67Kind of a weak call. It's not like anyone's stick went "15 feet in the air."
Hat tip to a friend of mine who started a "Take the fall! Act hurt! Get indignant!" chant at a game 20 years ago.
Was that Kovich who had the SH chance? Screen's a little too far for me to read numbers well.
Wow Clarkson looks rattled. As they should.
GBR!
So close, Sully!
Quote from: stereaxWas that Kovich who had the SH chance? Screen's a little too far for me to read numbers well.
Mack.
Quote from: sah67Quote from: stereaxWas that Kovich who had the SH chance? Screen's a little too far for me to read numbers well.
Mack.
Copy! Would have been devastating (for Clarkson, of course) if he buried it.
These annnouncers are saying the exact same stuff as yesterday, do they not think that the same people from yesterday are watching this one?
Looks like their 27 is in pain after that one. He any good?
End 1st. Good guys up 2-0. Fuck yeah.
Great save by Ian in last seconds of the first period.
Shane coming up with a big left leg stop just before the buzzer. Great period, let's keep it going boys!
Can't be missing those breakaways, those chances cost you
Incredible start. Cornell was moving the puck, moving their feet, and supporting exceedingly well.
Clarkson looked sluggish the first 10 minutes but it seemed like they got it together, last half of the period looked much more even. I suspect the next two periods will be tight but I love the way Cornell is executing right now.
Who on earth was that cuddly grandpa they interviewed and what have they done with hardass Mark Morris?!?!?
Every word of this:
Quote from: Tom LentoIncredible start. Cornell was moving the puck, moving their feet, and supporting exceedingly well.
CTB's playing Take Me Out by Franz Ferdinand...
Pierre McGuire always sounds like he's a couple shots of whiskey deep
Quote from: stereaxCTB's playing Take Me Out by Franz Ferdinand...
Uprising. Muse. Much better.
Quote from: imafrshmnPierre McGuire always sounds like he's a couple shots of whiskey deep
Yes. Such a buffoon.
We've been on our heels this period
I would pay to hear what Schaf is yelling at the D right now.
This PBP guy is straight up making up information
SEE YA, ASSHOLE! boooooooooooo.
Quote from: IcebergThis PBP guy is straight up making up information
He's probably getting his banter generated by ChatGPT.
Quote from: IcebergThis PBP guy is straight up making up information
Silver lining that CTB's got the game on mute, then?
got back from Philly, turned on the game and goddamn it is nice to see that score.
can't believe that Clarkson would play with fire letting this power play unit on the ice!
Quote from: IcebergThis PBP guy is straight up making up information
Yes, like "Both teams have Harvard transfers?"
WTF
Quote from: IcebergThis PBP guy is straight up making up information
Pierre McGuire is well known to NHL fans as pretty useless.
Quote from: SnowballQuote from: IcebergThis PBP guy is straight up making up information
Yes, like "Both teams have Harvard transfers?"
WTF
Is that a good thing?
Quote from: SnowballQuote from: IcebergThis PBP guy is straight up making up information
Yes, like "Both teams have Harvard transfers?"
WTF
Wat.
Bancroft took a real stinger. Hope he's okay.
Fuck.
Ooof, that replay on Bancroft's stinger hurts me.
And Clarkson finally cashes in. Cornell's been scrambling too much the last 10 minutes or so.
Clarkson got the kind of the goal they wanted. They've been trying to force something from the crease and it worked
This is not good. Bad feeling about this
I hate one goal games. Get another one, boys.
Hope we're not tiring.
Quote from: Al DeFlorioHope we're not tiring.
Yesterday, Jack O'Brien got some third period shifts and it was good to have fresh legs. I wonder if we see the same today.
Cornell looking much better the last couple of shifts but next goal is anybody's.
That's such a flop
PK again.
Stupid pen to take there... gotta kill this period off
Weak call, though.
Exhale. Skin of our teeth hockey
I don't know if I'm mad at Stanley for taking that penalty or the refs for calling it. But I know that I'm mad.
Up 1 going into the third is good. The way we played that period was not. Hopefully yesterday's OT isn't catching up to us. We can not play that period again and expect to win this game. Get the next goal or make sure there isn't a next one.
I am imagining Jimmy Rayhill is airdropping this to the entire team during intermission.
If we somehow win this I'll admit everything wrong I did to Bearlover
Shane was huge the last 10+ minutes of that period. Cornell needs to regroup, Clarkson smells blood.
Quote from: chimpfoodUp 1 going into the third is good. The way we played that period was not. Hopefully yesterday's OT isn't catching up to us. We can not play that period again and expect to win this game. Get the next goal or make sure there isn't a next one.
Yep. We have like 20 seconds of PK, then figure it the hell out.
20 minutes. We play 20 minutes, we win. That's it.
Quote from: DafatoneI don't know if I'm mad at Stanley for taking that penalty or the refs for calling it. But I know that I'm mad.
Didn't seem like much of a call.
whew on that post. shane coming up big on the shots that are actually on net and has had great instincts on the ones that are bound for the post.
Shane and a little bit of good luck has us holding onto the narrow margin. We weren't completely impotent going forward there either--CLK's goalie has also come up with some good/fortuitous stops... a great game for the neutral... Cornell's gotta try to control the tempo a bit more.
Small contingent of watchers here at CTB. A few Clarkson fans with Cornell partners. Had to explain to someone that you can't ice the puck while on the PK...
The next twenty minutes might kill me. Let's see how it goes.
I'm liking this flurry of shots off the faceoff rn.
Power play time. C'mon, boys.
Quote from: stereaxPower play time. C'mon, boys.
Do you hear yourself? ::rolleyes::;-)
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82Quote from: stereaxPower play time. C'mon, boys.
Do you hear yourself? ::rolleyes::;-)
I know better than to expect anything on the snooze play. But it is two minutes we should be in their o-zone.
Quote from: stereaxQuote from: Jeff Hopkins '82Quote from: stereaxPower play time. C'mon, boys.
Do you hear yourself? ::rolleyes::;-)
I know better than to expect anything on the snooze play. But it is two minutes we should be in their o-zone.
Sadly, that's how I've come to think of it, too.
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82Quote from: stereaxQuote from: Jeff Hopkins '82Quote from: stereaxPower play time. C'mon, boys.
Do you hear yourself? ::rolleyes::;-)
I know better than to expect anything on the snooze play. But it is two minutes we should be in their o-zone.
Sadly, that's how I've come to think of it, too.
Well, that was a good two minutes of nap time... now 12ish of pure stress.
thank god for ian shane
Quote from: stereaxthank god for ian shane
+1
That 2 on 1 was the same indecision we see in the pp.
Suddenly gettting odd man rushes. They're pushing forward.
Under 5 to go. Someone hold me.
Quote from: arugulaSuddenly gettting odd man rushes. They're pushing forward.
They've only got a few more shifts left. Empty the tank.
SHOOT THE PUCK BEFORE YOU LOSE IT
Clarkson edited the FACEOFF'S WON stat bug
Clarkson looked very inept in that last bit. No way that was icing
OUTSTANDING!
Goooooaaaaaal!
Not sure why that wasn't icing. No complaints, though.
YESSSSSS no idea why icing was waved off but I love it!
Looked like the linesman never had his hand up. Maybe he thought it bounced off someone at mid ice.
I thought the Cornell player was well ahead in the skating race to negate the icing regardless of any deflection
Quote from: IcebergI thought the Cornell player was well ahead in the skating race to negate the icing regardless of any deflection
He lost the race by a mile (iirc) but i see what you mean - our guy pulled up when he saw it was waved off.
WALSH ENG WE WIN 3-1 LGR LGR LGR
ONE LAST TRIP TO THE BIG SHOW FOR THE BIG GUY
CHAMPIONS AGAIN
MORE THAN THAT!!!
WE DO IT FOR SCHAFER.
[size=xl]ONE MORE WEEKEND[/size]
Quote from: DafatoneNot sure why that wasn't icing. No complaints, though.
It wasn't icing bc the ref at center for waived it off, which is why the cornell player totally let up despite having the lead in the race to the puck
"DO YOU BELIEVE IN MIRACLES? YES!!!"
—BearLover
Quote from: BearLover"DO YOU BELIEVE IN MIRACLES? YES!!!"
—BearLover
+1
Quote from: ugarteONE LAST TRIP TO THE BIG SHOW FOR THE BIG GUY
FOUR MORE WINS! FOUR MORE WINS!
Hey, a guy can dream, and this looks a lot more like the team we thought we'd get pre-season. Anything can happen.
Quote from: Tom LentoQuote from: ugarteONE LAST TRIP TO THE BIG SHOW FOR THE BIG GUY
FOUR MORE WINS! FOUR MORE WINS!
Hey, a guy can dream, and this looks a lot more like the team we thought we'd get pre-season. Anything can happen.
House money, baby
Let's stay in the moment, tremendous win!!!!
Never in doubt eh folks?
How fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
I'm a big fan of honoring history, and imma let him finish, but can we please re-name the tournament trophy the Mike Schafer Cup, please?
Quote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
I'm a big fan of honoring history, and imma let him finish, but can we please re-name the tournament trophy the Mike Schafer Cup, please?
The icing thing was a total nothingburg. Bancroft had a huge lead on the puck, linesman waived off the icing, and Bancroft totally let up. That's the only reason Taylor of (Clarkson) got there first.
And they never even scored a second goal
Quote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
I'm a big fan of honoring history, and imma let him finish, but can we please re-name the tournament trophy the Mike Schafer Cup, please?
Totally. It's been such a pleasure following his teams over the years.
Quote from: Tom LentoQuote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
I'm a big fan of honoring history, and imma let him finish, but can we please re-name the tournament trophy the Mike Schafer Cup, please?
Totally. It's been such a pleasure following his teams over the years.
I'm a little upset they got rid of the consolation game, because they could make a trophy for winning it and call it the Pecknold.
Quote from: DafatoneQuote from: Tom LentoQuote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
I'm a big fan of honoring history, and imma let him finish, but can we please re-name the tournament trophy the Mike Schafer Cup, please?
Totally. It's been such a pleasure following his teams over the years.
I'm a little upset they got rid of the consolation game, because they could make a trophy for winning it and call it the Pecknold.
BOOM!!!! ::cheer::
Coach another weekend, Mike! Coach another weekend!
Quote from: DafatoneQuote from: Tom LentoQuote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
I'm a big fan of honoring history, and imma let him finish, but can we please re-name the tournament trophy the Mike Schafer Cup, please?
Totally. It's been such a pleasure following his teams over the years.
I'm a little upset they got rid of the consolation game, because they could make a trophy for winning it and call it the Pecknold.
Given Q's SF record are you sure that trophy should be for the consolation winner?
Quote from: Tom LentoQuote from: DafatoneQuote from: Tom LentoQuote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
I'm a big fan of honoring history, and imma let him finish, but can we please re-name the tournament trophy the Mike Schafer Cup, please?
Totally. It's been such a pleasure following his teams over the years.
I'm a little upset they got rid of the consolation game, because they could make a trophy for winning it and call it the Pecknold.
Given Q's SF record are you sure that trophy should be for the consolation winner?
I was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
Quote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
It really looked like icing to me, but I'm sure as hell not going to ask Doug Christiansen about it :-)
Quote from: Give My RegardsQuote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
It really looked like icing to me, but I'm sure as hell not going to ask Doug Christiansen about it :-)
Because Bancroft was clearly ahead of the Clarkson Dman at center ice, I think it was a proper call.
Quote from: scoop85Quote from: Give My RegardsQuote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
It really looked like icing to me, but I'm sure as hell not going to ask Doug Christiansen about it :-)
Because Bancroft was clearly ahead of the Clarkson Dman at center ice, I think it was a proper call.
It's not about who's ahead at center ice, it's about who's ahead at the dot. But it definitely looked like Bancroft majorly let up once the linesman waived it off.
Quote from: Big DingusIf we somehow win this I'll admit everything wrong I did to Bearlover
Time to pay the piper
Quote from: scoop85Quote from: Give My RegardsQuote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
It really looked like icing to me, but I'm sure as hell not going to ask Doug Christiansen about it :-)
Because Bancroft was clearly ahead of the Clarkson Dman at center ice, I think it was a proper call.
Oh, I agree with you - hence, an "icing" that wasn't. Also can't forget that Clarkson handily won the race to that puck, but couldn't keep possession. They had every opportunity to get that back out of the zone, but didn't.
Quote from: arugulaNever in doubt eh folks?
I spent the last 30 minutes of the game praying to god and ian shane
Quote from: BearLoverQuote from: scoop85Quote from: Give My RegardsQuote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
It really looked like icing to me, but I'm sure as hell not going to ask Doug Christiansen about it :-)
Because Bancroft was clearly ahead of the Clarkson Dman at center ice, I think it was a proper call.
It's not about who's ahead at center ice, it's about who's ahead at the dot. But it definitely looked like Bancroft majorly let up once the linesman waived it off.
Yes, I should have added that fact. Bancroft was ahead of Taylor when the linesman waived it off and Bancroft then clearly let up. The fact that Taylor then "beat" Bancroft to the goaline was then irrelevant, since the linesman had already made his call. It could be argued the linesman made his call prematurely, but once made the race to the goal line was rendered moot.
Quote from: scoop85Quote from: BearLoverQuote from: scoop85Quote from: Give My RegardsQuote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
It really looked like icing to me, but I'm sure as hell not going to ask Doug Christiansen about it :-)
Because Bancroft was clearly ahead of the Clarkson Dman at center ice, I think it was a proper call.
It's not about who's ahead at center ice, it's about who's ahead at the dot. But it definitely looked like Bancroft majorly let up once the linesman waived it off.
Yes, I should have added that fact. Bancroft was ahead of Taylor when the linesman waived it off and Bancroft then clearly let up. The fact that Taylor then "beat" Bancroft to the goaline was then irrelevant, since the linesman had already made his call. It could be argued the linesman made his call prematurely, but once made the race to the goal line was rendered moot.
And the more I think about it, I'm a little bit in awe of what a smart play that was - put in the effort to beat the icing, but then don't overplay it. Cede the possession of the puck in lieu of maintaining defensive shape. That was a seriously veteran move by a well-coached player.
Quote from: scoop85Quote from: BearLoverQuote from: scoop85Quote from: Give My RegardsQuote from: RobbHow fitting to beat Clarkson, once again...on an icing that wasn't.
It really looked like icing to me, but I'm sure as hell not going to ask Doug Christiansen about it :-)
Because Bancroft was clearly ahead of the Clarkson Dman at center ice, I think it was a proper call.
It's not about who's ahead at center ice, it's about who's ahead at the dot. But it definitely looked like Bancroft majorly let up once the linesman waived it off.
Yes, I should have added that fact. Bancroft was ahead of Taylor when the linesman waived it off and Bancroft then clearly let up. The fact that Taylor then "beat" Bancroft to the goaline was then irrelevant, since the linesman had already made his call. It could be argued the linesman made his call prematurely, but once made the race to the goal line was rendered moot.
But the linesman can't waive it off because Bancroft was ahead at center ice, he can only waive it off because it was went off a Clarkson stick or was playable by Clarkson, right? The way I saw it was that the waive-off was incorrect, but immaterial because Bancroft would have won the race anyway.
why cant the icing be waived off early? If the dude thinks cornell was clearly going to win the race to dot he doesnt have to wait for the dot to make the decision,
Quote from: upprdeckwhy cant the icing be waived off early? If the dude thinks cornell was clearly going to win the race to dot he doesnt have to wait for the dot to make the decision,
Maybe I have the rule wrong then? I thought icing cannot be waived off for that reason.
Quote from: BearLoverQuote from: upprdeckwhy cant the icing be waived off early? If the dude thinks cornell was clearly going to win the race to dot he doesnt have to wait for the dot to make the decision,
Maybe I have the rule wrong then? I thought icing cannot be waived off for that reason.
I haven't checked the rule, but I believe the linesman has broad discretion as to when he can waive off the icing if he believes the offensive player is sufficiently ahead of the defender
Unlike last night's game where Cornell clearly had the better of the play, today's was a coin flip. I feel fortunately things broke out way.
Quote from: stereaxQuote from: arugulaNever in doubt eh folks?
I spent the last 30 minutes of the game praying to god and ian shane
Pulling what's left of my hair out.
Quote from: scoop85Quote from: BearLoverQuote from: upprdeckwhy cant the icing be waived off early? If the dude thinks cornell was clearly going to win the race to dot he doesnt have to wait for the dot to make the decision,
Maybe I have the rule wrong then? I thought icing cannot be waived off for that reason.
I haven't checked the rule, but I believe the linesman has broad discretion as to when he can waive off the icing if he believes the offensive player is sufficiently ahead of the defender
Quote from: NCAA rulebook on icingFor the purpose of interpretation of this rule, icing is completed the instant the puck crosses the goal line, unless an attacking player, who is onside at the blue line and with no opponent between that player and the goal line and is clearly in position to be the first player to touch the puck. Icing shall not be called in this situation. This decision by the official shall be made no later than the first player reaching the end zone faceoff dots. If the puck enters the goal in this situation, icing shall not be called and a goal shall be awarded.
So, the ref called it at the right time for college. Maybe in the NHL it's a touch-up rule but they're a little more careful in the NCAA.
Quote from: BearLoverUnlike last night's game where Cornell clearly had the better of the play, today's was a coin flip. I feel fortunately things broke out way.
Clarkson gave us so much room in the first, and we cashed in. I still feel Mack wants that breakaway back that could have pushed it to 3-0 - his roofed shot had Langenegger beat.
Had Clarkson played like they did in the 2nd, things are different.
Quote from: BearLoverUnlike last night's game where Cornell clearly had the better of the play, today's was a coin flip. I feel fortunately things broke out way.
Agreed. Cornell absolutely dominated the first 10 minutes or so, and Clarkson dominated for about 10 minutes of the second, but the rest felt like they were trading a few strong shifts at a time, and both goaltenders played well.
That gorgeous 2 on 1 in the first and Clarkson just barely missing on that late 2nd period PP when Cornell was scrambling was the difference.
Quote from: RichHQuote from: BearLoverUnlike last night's game where Cornell clearly had the better of the play, today's was a coin flip. I feel fortunately things broke out way.
Clarkson gave us so much room in the first, and we cashed in. I still feel Mack wants that breakaway back that could have pushed it to 3-0 - his roofed shot had Langenegger beat.
Had Clarkson played like they did in the 2nd, things are different.
going to watch the highlights but i may need to watch the first seven minutes in real time just for the vibes of what i missed on the road.
Castagna was a beast this weekend.
Quote from: Tom LentoQuote from: BearLoverUnlike last night's game where Cornell clearly had the better of the play, today's was a coin flip. I feel fortunately things broke out way.
Agreed. Cornell absolutely dominated the first 10 minutes or so, and Clarkson dominated for about 10 minutes of the second, but the rest felt like they were trading a few strong shifts at a time, and both goaltenders played well.
That gorgeous 2 on 1 in the first and Clarkson just barely missing on that late 2nd period PP when Cornell was scrambling was the difference.
I thought that Cornell coming up with the puck off the board scrums was outstanding. Clarkson created chaos and controlled play right before they scored and things could have turned then but Cornell didn't roll over.
Watching it in real time was so impressive that I couldn't say it out loud to the two fans I was with. I finally let it out after time expired in the third.
How the hell they almost never let Clarkson grab the puck of those board scrums isn't something I can understand. The team this weekend found high gear and very rarely let its foot off the gas.
Hats off to the team and the coaching staff.
Quote from: BearLoverCastagna was a beast this weekend.
Yes. That's the Castagna I want to see. Just great. Wonder if he was playing hurt.
Shoutout to Jane McNally for her superb coverage of our games, doing double duty for both the Sun and College Hockey News. And Josh Seguin had an excellent piece in CHN on Kovich's improbable SHG against QU. Thanks to Adam for providing about the only quality source of college hockey news anywhere.
And for those who aren't aware, Adam is BU PxP man Bernie Corbett's guest every Sunday at 9 a.m. ET on the NHL network's college hockey radio show on Sirius/XM where they discuss the latest developments in college hockey. And yesterday morning after Adam's segment Corbett interviewed Schafer about his pending retirement and Schafer's coaching career. The interview was recorded before the QU game, so that tale had yet to be told.
Quote from: ugarteQuote from: scoop85Quote from: BearLoverQuote from: upprdeckwhy cant the icing be waived off early? If the dude thinks cornell was clearly going to win the race to dot he doesnt have to wait for the dot to make the decision,
Maybe I have the rule wrong then? I thought icing cannot be waived off for that reason.
I haven't checked the rule, but I believe the linesman has broad discretion as to when he can waive off the icing if he believes the offensive player is sufficiently ahead of the defender
Quote from: NCAA rulebook on icingFor the purpose of interpretation of this rule, icing is completed the instant the puck crosses the goal line, unless an attacking player, who is onside at the blue line and with no opponent between that player and the goal line and is clearly in position to be the first player to touch the puck. Icing shall not be called in this situation. This decision by the official shall be made no later than the first player reaching the end zone faceoff dots. If the puck enters the goal in this situation, icing shall not be called and a goal shall be awarded.
So, the ref called it at the right time for college. Maybe in the NHL it's a touch-up rule but they're a little more careful in the NCAA.
After Max Andreev was injured crashing into the end wall while racing for an icing call, Schafer criticized the ref for being too late with the whistle.
Quote from: SwampyQuote from: ugarteQuote from: scoop85Quote from: BearLoverQuote from: upprdeckwhy cant the icing be waived off early? If the dude thinks cornell was clearly going to win the race to dot he doesnt have to wait for the dot to make the decision,
Maybe I have the rule wrong then? I thought icing cannot be waived off for that reason.
I haven't checked the rule, but I believe the linesman has broad discretion as to when he can waive off the icing if he believes the offensive player is sufficiently ahead of the defender
Quote from: NCAA rulebook on icingFor the purpose of interpretation of this rule, icing is completed the instant the puck crosses the goal line, unless an attacking player, who is onside at the blue line and with no opponent between that player and the goal line and is clearly in position to be the first player to touch the puck. Icing shall not be called in this situation. This decision by the official shall be made no later than the first player reaching the end zone faceoff dots. If the puck enters the goal in this situation, icing shall not be called and a goal shall be awarded.
So, the ref called it at the right time for college. Maybe in the NHL it's a touch-up rule but they're a little more careful in the NCAA.
After Max Andreev was injured crashing into the end wall while racing for an icing call, Schafer criticized the ref for being too late with the whistle.
Cody Haiskanen, right?
Quote from: scoop85Shoutout to Jane McNally for her superb coverage of our games, doing double duty for both the Sun and College Hockey News. And Josh Seguin had an excellent piece in CHN on Kovich's improbable SHG against QU. Thanks to Adam for providing about the only quality source of college hockey news anywhere.
And for those who aren't aware, Adam is BU PxP man Bernie Corbett's guest every Sunday at 9 a.m. ET on the NHL network's college hockey radio show on Sirius/XM where they discuss the latest developments in college hockey. And yesterday morning after Adam's segment Corbett interviewed Schafer about his pending retirement and Schafer's coaching career. The interview was recorded before the QU game, so that tale had yet to be told.
McNally is amazing, how is she able to produce two separate non-redundant articles within a couple of hours after the game ends?
Is the Adam/Schafer interview available online anywhere?
Quote from: BearLoverQuote from: scoop85Shoutout to Jane McNally for her superb coverage of our games, doing double duty for both the Sun and College Hockey News. And Josh Seguin had an excellent piece in CHN on Kovich's improbable SHG against QU. Thanks to Adam for providing about the only quality source of college hockey news anywhere.
And for those who aren't aware, Adam is BU PxP man Bernie Corbett's guest every Sunday at 9 a.m. ET on the NHL network's college hockey radio show on Sirius/XM where they discuss the latest developments in college hockey. And yesterday morning after Adam's segment Corbett interviewed Schafer about his pending retirement and Schafer's coaching career. The interview was recorded before the QU game, so that tale had yet to be told.
McNally is amazing, how is she able to produce two separate non-redundant articles within a couple of hours after the game ends?
Is the Adam/Schafer interview available online anywhere?
Our podcast page
https://www.collegehockeynews.com/ontheair/
has archives of both our own, and Bernie's show (at the bottom). Though it looks like his producer didn't upload this weekend's one to our site yet.
Quote from: 617BigRedWorked out well today so thought would start the next one LGR!
I think you are hired permanently.
Quote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is
so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Excellent photo selection
Quote from: RichHQuote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Excellent photo selection
I was trying to capture the spirit of the thing.
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Hang on hang on.... QU was the 1 seed and lost in the last SIX actually-played playoffs in row?
That's.... remarkable.
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
+5
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
i'm honored!
I've known it's true, but seeing Rand's name there in black-and-white so many times in a row is just almost unbelievable.
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
For 2020 you should put a covid molecule
Quote from: pjd8Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
+6
I laughed out loud. There is something special about seeing it all in print, bravo.
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
I love this and I love you. Lmfao. Holy fuck Pecknold sucks at his job. It should not be possible to blow it that many times in a row. And Yet.
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
This is the hilarious! Thank you!
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Wow, that was fast! Well, done, sir. Well done.
Did Cornell give up an single odd-man rush the entire weekend?
Quote from: BearLoverDid Cornell give up an single odd-man rush the entire weekend?
They must have, but I can't think of one. They played incredibly disciplined hockey.
Quote from: Tom LentoQuote from: BearLoverDid Cornell give up an single odd-man rush the entire weekend?
They must have, but I can't think of one. They played incredibly disciplined hockey.
I think they won 90+ % of the "Who gets the puck after the wall scrum?" battles. I noticed this on Saturday and yet when looking at the replay of Friday's game there was the same strategy. Pin the puck to the boards, fight like hell and grab the puck as it comes out of the mess.
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Thanks for posting this list. It got me to watch again one of the most non-representative two minutes of a game which I have ever seen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUEHAUJsKDE This is from the 1974 UNH (#1) vs RPI (#8) ECAC playoff game. It was won by RPI 7-6 in OT on a goal by freshman Rick Smith, his second of the game and second of the season.
I wrote years ago to the poster, and he claimed not to have a video of the rest of the game. Granted, RPI would never have taken an early lead if UNH goalie Cap Raeder was not playing injured or sick. (I have forgotten which.) And these 2 minutes would not have happened as it did if RPI could have skated 3 on 3.
Quote from: ursusminorThanks for posting this list. It got me to watch again one of the most non-representative two minutes of a game which I have ever seen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUEHAUJsKDE This is from the 1974 UNH (#1) vs RPI (#8) ECAC playoff game. It was won by RPI 7-6 in OT on a goal by freshman Rick Smith, his second of the game and second of the season.
I wrote years ago to the poster, and he claimed not to have a video of the rest of the game. Granted, RPI would never have taken an early lead if UNH goalie Cap Raeder was not playing injured or sick. (I have forgotten which.) And these 2 minutes would not have happened as it did if RPI could have skated 3 on 3.
Enough glorious lettuce for a salad bar.
Quote from: ursusminorQuote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Thanks for posting this list. It got me to watch again one of the most non-representative two minutes of a game which I have ever seen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUEHAUJsKDE This is from the 1974 UNH (#1) vs RPI (#8) ECAC playoff game. It was won by RPI 7-6 in OT on a goal by freshman Rick Smith, his second of the game and second of the season.
I wrote years ago to the poster, and he claimed not to have a video of the rest of the game. Granted, RPI would never have taken an early lead if UNH goalie Cap Raeder was not playing injured or sick. (I have forgotten which.) And these 2 minutes would not have happened as it did if RPI could have skated 3 on 3.
Injured? Sick? Ian Shane apologized for his voice on Saturday because he was fighting a sinus infection.
Quote from: martyQuote from: ursusminorQuote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Thanks for posting this list. It got me to watch again one of the most non-representative two minutes of a game which I have ever seen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUEHAUJsKDE This is from the 1974 UNH (#1) vs RPI (#8) ECAC playoff game. It was won by RPI 7-6 in OT on a goal by freshman Rick Smith, his second of the game and second of the season.
I wrote years ago to the poster, and he claimed not to have a video of the rest of the game. Granted, RPI would never have taken an early lead if UNH goalie Cap Raeder was not playing injured or sick. (I have forgotten which.) And these 2 minutes would not have happened as it did if RPI could have skated 3 on 3.
Injured? Sick? Ian Shane apologized for his voice on Saturday because he was fighting a sinus infection.
Are you martytoo who commented on the video? It will probably be deleted whenever ClarkHislopCox (Mike Lowry) looks at it again as many other RPI comments have been deleted over the years.
Quote from: ursusminorQuote from: martyQuote from: ursusminorQuote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Thanks for posting this list. It got me to watch again one of the most non-representative two minutes of a game which I have ever seen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUEHAUJsKDE This is from the 1974 UNH (#1) vs RPI (#8) ECAC playoff game. It was won by RPI 7-6 in OT on a goal by freshman Rick Smith, his second of the game and second of the season.
I wrote years ago to the poster, and he claimed not to have a video of the rest of the game. Granted, RPI would never have taken an early lead if UNH goalie Cap Raeder was not playing injured or sick. (I have forgotten which.) And these 2 minutes would not have happened as it did if RPI could have skated 3 on 3.
Injured? Sick? Ian Shane apologized for his voice on Saturday because he was fighting a sinus infection.
Are you martytoo who commented on the video? It will probably be deleted whenever ClarkHislopCox (Mike Lowry) looks at it again as many other RPI comments have been deleted over the years.
That's me! And so is this! (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEcHVVbcTSg&t=1262s)
would love to see a better replay as to how Quin got caught with so many guys in deep off the faceoff when you just want to protect the lead .
Quote from: upprdeckwould love to see a better replay as to how Quin got caught with so many guys in deep off the faceoff when you just want to protect the lead .
Schafer talked about making sure our guys knew that we needed to make a play, (and not just clear the puck out of our end.) He made a point of changing the standard penalty-kill mindset. Guessing Pecknold failed to do the equivalent mind-set change behind his bench.
Quote from: upprdeckwould love to see a better replay as to how Quin got caught with so many guys in deep off the faceoff when you just want to protect the lead .
you and everyone else!
Quote from: ursusminorQuote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Thanks for posting this list. It got me to watch again one of the most non-representative two minutes of a game which I have ever seen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUEHAUJsKDE This is from the 1974 UNH (#1) vs RPI (#8) ECAC playoff game. It was won by RPI 7-6 in OT on a goal by freshman Rick Smith, his second of the game and second of the season.
I wrote years ago to the poster, and he claimed not to have a video of the rest of the game. Granted, RPI would never have taken an early lead if UNH goalie Cap Raeder was not playing injured or sick. (I have forgotten which.) And these 2 minutes would not have happened as it did if RPI could have skated 3 on 3.
For those who missed it, here is Ian talking about playing with an infection. (https://youtu.be/dCp81tZPH30?t=181)
Quote from: martyQuote from: ursusminorQuote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Thanks for posting this list. It got me to watch again one of the most non-representative two minutes of a game which I have ever seen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUEHAUJsKDE This is from the 1974 UNH (#1) vs RPI (#8) ECAC playoff game. It was won by RPI 7-6 in OT on a goal by freshman Rick Smith, his second of the game and second of the season.
I wrote years ago to the poster, and he claimed not to have a video of the rest of the game. Granted, RPI would never have taken an early lead if UNH goalie Cap Raeder was not playing injured or sick. (I have forgotten which.) And these 2 minutes would not have happened as it did if RPI could have skated 3 on 3.
For those who missed it, here is Ian talking about playing with an infection. (https://youtu.be/dCp81tZPH30?t=181)
Christ. Sending him all the antibiotics in Ithaca. Need that man at 100%.
Also. That is a butchering of Psenicka's last name if I've ever heard one. (Rolled the tape all the way back.)
Also also. Does DeSantis just sound like that or is he also sick?
Quote from: martyQuote from: ursusminorQuote from: martyQuote from: ursusminorQuote from: TrotskyQuote from: RobbI was thinking the Pecknold cup should go to whichever team knocks off the #1 seed.
OMG this is so going to be a TBRW page! ::deadhorse::
Edit: http://www.tbrw.info/?/ecac_History/ecac_Pecknold_Cup.html
Thanks for posting this list. It got me to watch again one of the most non-representative two minutes of a game which I have ever seen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUEHAUJsKDE This is from the 1974 UNH (#1) vs RPI (#8) ECAC playoff game. It was won by RPI 7-6 in OT on a goal by freshman Rick Smith, his second of the game and second of the season.
I wrote years ago to the poster, and he claimed not to have a video of the rest of the game. Granted, RPI would never have taken an early lead if UNH goalie Cap Raeder was not playing injured or sick. (I have forgotten which.) And these 2 minutes would not have happened as it did if RPI could have skated 3 on 3.
Injured? Sick? Ian Shane apologized for his voice on Saturday because he was fighting a sinus infection.
Are you martytoo who commented on the video? It will probably be deleted whenever ClarkHislopCox (Mike Lowry) looks at it again as many other RPI comments have been deleted over the years.
That's me! And so is this! (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEcHVVbcTSg&t=1262s)
I just read through The Poly (RPI's weekly newspaper) https://digitalassets.archives.rpi.edu/do/dc7cf9e1-8051-417a-9ad8-c8b4daa0afa3#page/14/mode/2up Raeder was "injury plagued". Also thanks to Cornell for beating Penn, allowing RPI to sneak into the playoffs.