Thoughts?
I'm not sure what to expect after last week. Will Q just shut the game down? Will we? Will the skill guys get excited (and sloppy) because of MSG? All will be revealed.
Whatever happens, I'm sure of one thing-am excellent meal in Koreatown.
I went into this season expecting us to be the favorite in pretty much every game. Instead, after how we've looked so far, I go into every game as thinking it's a coin-flip that we need to luck out to keep Pairwise hopes alive. A 3-0 or 2-0-1 finish to the first half of the season would restore some confidence. But I'm pessimistic. The team has been so sloppy and hasn't looked dominant at any point, even against weaker opposition. Tonight's game is pick 'em. A loss would be crushing.
I'm hoping that the Thanksgiving holiday gave them time to prepare their minds for this game.
I will be looking from a different perspective tonight-who is bringing the energy, who is bringing the drive, who's hungry for the win
Time will tell
Quote from: BearLoverBut I'm pessimistic.
24/7
Quote from: fastforwardI'm hoping that the Thanksgiving holiday gave them time to prepare their minds for this game.
I will be looking from a different perspective tonight-who is bringing the energy, who is bringing the drive, who's hungry for the win
Time will tell
I don't think energy has been the problem at all. It's just stupid decision making and lack of cohesion. It's mental lapses/coaching decisions, not physical effort.
Quote from: Al DeFlorioQuote from: BearLoverBut I'm pessimistic.
24/7
You too though. Which is okay.
Quote from: BearLoverQuote from: fastforwardI'm hoping that the Thanksgiving holiday gave them time to prepare their minds for this game.
I will be looking from a different perspective tonight-who is bringing the energy, who is bringing the drive, who's hungry for the win
Time will tell
I don't think energy has been the problem at all. It's just stupid decision making and lack of cohesion. It's mental lapses/coaching decisions, not physical effort.
Could be, but I sometimes think they tie together.
I was at the Ranger game in Philly last night and they seem to be going through a similar dynamic.
Is it the players or is it the coach?
I'll be at MSG for the Ranger game and Cornell game, cheering both teams on and hoping for a win in both.
Quote from: fastforwardQuote from: BearLoverQuote from: fastforwardI'm hoping that the Thanksgiving holiday gave them time to prepare their minds for this game.
I will be looking from a different perspective tonight-who is bringing the energy, who is bringing the drive, who's hungry for the win
Time will tell
I don't think energy has been the problem at all. It's just stupid decision making and lack of cohesion. It's mental lapses/coaching decisions, not physical effort.
Is it the players or is it the coach
Time for another ABC's of coaching essay from BL. Today's menu -
Turkey (Bear)
Liver infused.
It's neither effort nor coaching; it's injuries.
If we have 5 (formerly 7) guys out just imagine how many of the guys who skate are playing hurt.
We just need to survive, get the squad healthy, foster the esprit de corps, and stretch ourselves against each opponent. Enjoy the games and don't worry about the standings; success will come with us gelling as a team.
Quote from: TrotskyIt's neither effort nor coaching; it's injuries.
If we have 5 (formerly 7) guys out just imagine how many of the guys who skate are playing hurt.
We just need to survive, get the squad healthy, foster the esprit de corps, and stretch ourselves against each opponent. Enjoy the games and don't worry about the standings; success will come with us gelling as a team.
I get it about the injuries, I really do.
I've just always been of the mindset that no matter who's on the ice, they should be able to get the job done.
I'm young, I'll adjust eventually
Quote from: TrotskyIt's neither effort nor coaching; it's injuries.
If we have 5 (formerly 7) guys out just imagine how many of the guys who skate are playing hurt.
We just need to survive, get the squad healthy, foster the esprit de corps, and stretch ourselves against each opponent. Enjoy the games and don't worry about the standings; success will come with us gelling as a team.
Cornell lost Wolfenberg (injury) and Bancroft (game misconduct) vs Harvard, stretching the total to 7 for one game. But most of the season we've had 3-5 guys out, which is a lot, but not a great excuse when our opponents have also been dealing with injuries, including NoDak not being able to field a full lineup and Dartmouth's best player being out. Our entire first PP unit and our top returning scorers from last season have all been healthy the whole year. At this point, depending on whether Mack can play, we are short Devlin (who was on the fourth line last year), Wallace (in and out of the lineup), Wolfenberg (seventh D). Injuries will not be an excuse tonight unless there are more injuries of which we aren't aware yet. Devlin (and possibly Mack) is the only one currently hurt who would be a shoe-in to play tonight.
Quote from: BearLoverI went into this season expecting us to be the favorite in pretty much every game. Instead, after how we've looked so far, I go into every game as thinking it's a coin-flip that we need to luck out to keep Pairwise hopes alive. A 3-0 or 2-0-1 finish to the first half of the season would restore some confidence. But I'm pessimistic. The team has been so sloppy and hasn't looked dominant at any point, even against weaker opposition. Tonight's game is pick 'em. A loss would be crushing.
This is one of those things that's especially pointless to bicker about given that the situation will continue to evolve, but I think you're underestimating our Pairwise odds, mathematically speaking.
We're in alright shape. We're 4-2-2 against a slightly tougher than average schedule (CHN has it ad 25th hardest). Given how much hockey is left compared to how much has been played, the record isn't anything to be concerned about.
Carry on worrying about the performance of the team itself. I also think we're more or less fine there, but I can see why you might be concerned.
Is there any bar nearby thats showing the game? me and my buddy waited too long to get tickets
Quote from: nycredIs there any bar nearby thats showing the game? me and my buddy waited too long to get tickets
Not nearby, but The Canuck, 202 9th Avenue, owned by Denis Ladouceur, should be showing it for sure.
.
8 o'clock. Not close to full.
Quote from: arugula8 o'clock. Not close to full.
FWIW our first year not going since it started in 2007. Quinnipiac as the opponent just didn't tempt me.
Is that Mike's son? Great voice!
Edit: yes, that's John.
2:13 Gorgeous play!!!
We have jump. Winning battles, looking fired up. ::cheer::
This is more like the team I remember watching the past two seasons
Clearly it was all Penney's fault.
Gah, pp like 5 pylons.
Band looks like they are ALL there.
That was a thing of beauty.
Lovely, didn't overthink it, just found the pass and finished.
That's what we all expected. Lots of jump. Shooting. Pp is still static. Strong forecheck. I'm surrounded by Cornell fans who seem half asleep though. Kind of annoying. Crowd filled in. I guess around 14 thousand.
not watching because I'm a jinx HOW ARE WE FEELING? BANCROFT SHORTY???
I was thinking, "we never score on those!" ::banana::
I defy anybody to find fault with that period. OK, the pp sucked, but otherwise that was divine.
Also, admissions standards appear to have dropped. This is the prettiest group of Cornellians that has ever gathered in one place.
Quote from: arugulaThat's what we all expected. Lots of jump. Shooting. Pp is still static. Strong forecheck. I'm surrounded by Cornell fans who seem half asleep though. Kind of annoying. Crowd filled in. I guess around 14 thousand.
Wake them the fuck up!
That was an almost perfect period. Is the band coming across well live? They are great in the feed but I assume the mics are well placed.
Also, if you're single, perhaps you should
mingle a bit during intermission. Just sayin'.
Quote from: arugulaThat's what we all expected. Lots of jump. Shooting. Pp is still static. Strong forecheck. I'm surrounded by Cornell fans who seem half asleep though. Kind of annoying. Crowd filled in. I guess around 14 thousand.
You must not be in my section because a guy right behind me shrieks every time we fumble the puck or don't clear the zone
Quote from: stereaxnot watching because I'm a jinx HOW ARE WE FEELING? BANCROFT SHORTY???
Thank you for not watching if you are a jinx. Catch the replay later tonight; that whole thing was lovely.
Quote from: TrotskyI was thinking, "we never score on those!" ::banana::
I defy anybody to find fault with that period. OK, the pp sucked, but otherwise that was divine.
Also, admissions standards appear to have dropped. This is the prettiest group of Cornellians that has ever gathered in one place.
To be less chauvinistic, just consider how the ratio has changed. Even Engineering now enrolls more women than men, and it's still one of the top ten engineering schools in the country.
Quote from: scoop85Quote from: arugulaThat's what we all expected. Lots of jump. Shooting. Pp is still static. Strong forecheck. I'm surrounded by Cornell fans who seem half asleep though. Kind of annoying. Crowd filled in. I guess around 14 thousand.
You must not be in my section because a guy right behind me shrieks every time we fumble the puck or don't clear the zone
That's not section 224. I'm it.
Quote from: arugulaQuote from: scoop85Quote from: arugulaThat's what we all expected. Lots of jump. Shooting. Pp is still static. Strong forecheck. I'm surrounded by Cornell fans who seem half asleep though. Kind of annoying. Crowd filled in. I guess around 14 thousand.
You must not be in my section because a guy right behind me shrieks every time we fumble the puck or don't clear the zone
That's not section 224. I'm it.
No, 212
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: stereaxnot watching because I'm a jinx HOW ARE WE FEELING? BANCROFT SHORTY???
Thank you for not watching if you are a jinx. Catch the replay later tonight; that whole thing was lovely.
Both times I put the Big Red on when away, they lost, so I'm doing my part here! Haha. I'll definitely rewatch it later though, prolly tomorrow though as I've been on the move for the past... 21 hours?
Welp. At least they lose the pp.
Jesus this PK is killing me
Quote from: SwampyQuote from: TrotskyI was thinking, "we never score on those!" ::banana::
I defy anybody to find fault with that period. OK, the pp sucked, but otherwise that was divine.
Also, admissions standards appear to have dropped. This is the prettiest group of Cornellians that has ever gathered in one place.
To be less chauvinistic, just consider how the ratio has changed. Even Engineering now enrolls more women than men, and it's still one of the top ten engineering schools in the country.
If these are engineers, they're ORE.
Uh oh.
Quote from: TrotskyUh oh.
Oh god. For what this time...
Major hasn't been impressing me too much. I see the talent but it's a lot of giveaways and he isn't physical at all.
Quote from: stereaxQuote from: TrotskyQuote from: stereaxnot watching because I'm a jinx HOW ARE WE FEELING? BANCROFT SHORTY???
Thank you for not watching if you are a jinx. Catch the replay later tonight; that whole thing was lovely.
Both times I put the Big Red on when away, they lost, so I'm doing my part here! Haha. I'll definitely rewatch it later though, prolly tomorrow though as I've been on the move for the past... 21 hours?
If you're watching now, shut it off
This is so infuriating
Makes the comeback that much more fun.
Quote from: scoop85Quote from: stereaxQuote from: TrotskyQuote from: stereaxnot watching because I'm a jinx HOW ARE WE FEELING? BANCROFT SHORTY???
Thank you for not watching if you are a jinx. Catch the replay later tonight; that whole thing was lovely.
Both times I put the Big Red on when away, they lost, so I'm doing my part here! Haha. I'll definitely rewatch it later though, prolly tomorrow though as I've been on the move for the past... 21 hours?
If you're watching now, shut it off
I saw one or two of the goal animations on twitter... I fear I am thoroughly cursed :'(
Uninstall X. It's a good idea anyway.
Quote from: TrotskyUninstall X. It's a good idea anyway.
Probably is, but I need to keep my notifs on for Friedge, Dreger, Lebrun and co because - wait have I mentioned the NHL salary cap tracker I do data work on here yet?
Is this the same team that won a championship last year? Absolutely horrific performance on the ice by all positions tonight. A QU team who is less skilled, younger, and not expected to win anything this year is making us look foolish. Every game I watch this team I think "this will be the game we turn it around" and every game I'm proven wrong.
No idea what is going on
Quote from: TrotskyUninstall X. It's a good idea anyway.
I recentl did. Bluesky is developing into a nice replacement.
Madison Square Garden fan favorite Jack O'Leary.
Quote from: TrotskyMadison Square Garden fan favorite Jack O'Leary.
Please tell me they're chanting his name.
Mack has been electric, glad he's back
Great push there, keep it going into OT
3x3 derp or real overtime?
And now boringtime!
It's derp.
"Hockey for people who hate hockey."
Wow. That was hideous.
Can we pull Ian for 4x3?
O'Leary is way too reckless to be playing in OT. He turned over the puck to them and then didn't get to the bench when he had an easy chance to, ended up pulling out a blocked shot but still too risky.
Quote from: chimpfoodO'Leary is way too reckless to be playing in OT. He turned over the puck to them and then didn't get to the bench when he had an easy chance to, ended up pulling out a blocked shot but still too risky.
I don't think I've seen a guy that gassed
I'll take a tie there, just have to win when we go to Hamden to even it out. If we can get at least four points out of next weekend we'll be in a good spot
Also to hate on 3x3 again, 4 OT games today, all four ending in ties.
Quote from: chimpfoodAlso to hate on 3x3 again, 4 OT games today, all four ending in ties.
Why did they change the OT? It was fine before. Now it is completely dumb.
3 x3 works better for the nhl because the skill level is off the charts. Here not so much. 4x4 may work better.
In any event I'll take the tie. First do no harm. Played very well for two periods.
3x3 sucks in the N, too.
They should go back to 5 minutes normal overtime and then a tie, full stop. It was perfect.
It wasn't pretty but both teams pulled it off at the Garden today
Rangers finally won and Cornell took the shootout win
Geez, they've got a lot of work to do before next weekend
Looked great 5x5 and special teams completely failed them again. What a shame—this team would be top 5 in the PWR if their PP and PK wasn't total shit. At least they've figured out how to limit turnovers.
BTW—losing Penney is a massive blow. Anybody know why/the severity?
Need to sweep Colgate next weekend. Need Penney back.
Quote from: BearLoverBTW—losing Penney is a massive blow. Anybody know why/the severity?
Schafer was very careful in the interview to say it was another freak injury and he wasn't putting any time table to it.
It could be one of those nagging things that are always week to week, and he just doesn't want to put any pressure on Penney to feel like he has to heal "on time."
Assuming we will not see him against Colgate he (and the rest of the MASH unit) have the full month of December to repair themselves.
Dumb question: Did I miss it or did Quinnipiac not change any of their players when they had all that offensive zone time at the end of overtime? Why wouldn't they be swapping out at at least one skater at a time against a totally gassed D?
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: BearLoverBTW—losing Penney is a massive blow. Anybody know why/the severity?
Schafer was very careful in the interview to say it was another freak injury and he wasn't putting any time table to it.
sounds ominous
Quote from: BearLoverLooked great 5x5 and special teams completely failed them again. What a shame—this team would be top 5 in the PWR if their PP and PK wasn't total shit. At least they've figured out how to limit turnovers.
Well, we did get a shorty
Quote from: WederDumb question: Did I miss it or did Quinnipiac not change any of their players when they had all that offensive zone time at the end of overtime? Why wouldn't they be swapping out at at least one skater at a time against a totally gassed D?
they did rotate it once at a time. you didn't notice because like everyone else you kept nodding off.
two excellent periods and one real dogshit one. tilted ice: all goals by both teams scored in the same cage, including the shootout (props to shane).
Quote from: Trotsky3x3 sucks in the N, too.
They should go back to 5 minutes normal overtime and then a tie, full stop. It was perfect.
Agree
Quote from: Trotsky3x3 sucks in the N, too.
They should go back to 5 minutes normal overtime and then a tie, full stop. It was perfect.
Tbh I don't mind 3x3 in the N. I like the concept of opening up the ice for talented offensive players to go ham. The problem is I can't remember one NCAA game where this worked, in my admittedly limited experience.
We come out with the win, two points, woot. On to the next one. Colgate home and away should be easy right?
Also, what happened to captain :'(
Quote from: stereaxQuote from: Trotsky3x3 sucks in the N, too.
They should go back to 5 minutes normal overtime and then a tie, full stop. It was perfect.
Tbh I don't mind 3x3 in the N. I like the concept of opening up the ice for talented offensive players to go ham. The problem is I can't remember one NCAA game where this worked, in my admittedly limited experience.
We come out with the win, two points, woot. On to the next one. Colgate home and away should be easy right?
Also, what happened to captain :'(
This was considered a NC game. It's a tie and zero conference points.
The shoot out was bread and circuses. It changed nothing in record, points, pairwise, or any stats.
It is an exhibition dingleberry clinging to the anus of 3x3.
Quote from: TrotskyThe shoot out was bread and circuses. It changed nothing in record, points, pairwise, or any stats.
It is an exhibition dingleberry clinging to the anus of 3x3.
yeah but it was cool a hell when shane went 3 for 3
Quote from: ugarteQuote from: TrotskyThe shoot out was bread and circuses. It changed nothing in record, points, pairwise, or any stats.
It is an exhibition dingleberry clinging to the anus of 3x3.
yeah but it was cool a hell when shane went 3 for 3
Was it though?
Attendance was 16,593 according to CHN
Quote from: JohnF81Attendance was 16,593 according to CHN
Sounded like 16,500 were Cornell fans.
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: ugarteQuote from: TrotskyThe shoot out was bread and circuses. It changed nothing in record, points, pairwise, or any stats.
It is an exhibition dingleberry clinging to the anus of 3x3.
yeah but it was cool a hell when shane went 3 for 3
Was it though?
Yes. The entire crowd was standing and going nuts during the shootout, same as it's been for every shootout I've seen in person. Fans love the shootout. Fans also hate ties. That's why neither the shootout nor 3x3 OT is going anywhere. The NHL threw a bone to the casual fan, and it worked, and the NCAA followed. No use complaining about it.
Personally I like 3x3 in the NHL, less so in college, don't mind the shootout because it doesn't count towards the PWR anyway. But I don't think the purists in this chat have any idea how much the casual fan despises ties. To most fans, it feels like a loss for both teams.
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: JohnF81Attendance was 16,593 according to CHN
Sounded like 16,500 were Cornell fans.
You must've forgotten your hearing aids. While Cornell fans were in the majority, QU brought a nice fan contingent (much better than Penn State, UCONN, and UNH) that was plenty loud when QU did good things.
Quote from: scoop85Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: JohnF81Attendance was 16,593 according to CHN
Sounded like 16,500 were Cornell fans.
You must've forgotten your hearing aids. While Cornell fans were in the majority, QU brought a nice fan contingent (much better than Penn State, UCONN, and UNH) that was plenty loud when QU did good things.
Mic placement. The only time I heard any Q fans over the broadcast was during the 3x3 when they booed when we ragged the puck.
Quote from: BearLoverNo use complaining about it.
Here I stand. I can do no other.
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: BearLoverNo use complaining about it.
Here I stand. I can do no other.
Fuckin' windmills.
Quote from: Give My RegardsQuote from: TrotskyQuote from: BearLoverNo use complaining about it.
Here I stand. I can do no other.
Fuckin' windmills.
Sometimes there are villains so big they blot the sun out (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nse8jE_Mb8I&ab_channel=ShootSchedule).
Quote from: SwampyQuote from: TrotskyI was thinking, "we never score on those!" ::banana::
I defy anybody to find fault with that period. OK, the pp sucked, but otherwise that was divine.
Also, admissions standards appear to have dropped. This is the prettiest group of Cornellians that has ever gathered in one place.
To be less chauvinistic, just consider how the ratio has changed. Even Engineering now enrolls more women than men, and it's still one of the top ten engineering schools in the country.
What was chauvinistic? He included ALL the Cornellians. ::crazy::
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: scoop85Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: JohnF81Attendance was 16,593 according to CHN
Sounded like 16,500 were Cornell fans.
You must've forgotten your hearing aids. While Cornell fans were in the majority, QU brought a nice fan contingent (much better than Penn State, UCONN, and UNH) that was plenty loud when QU did good things.
Mic placement. The only time I heard any Q fans over the broadcast was during the 3x3 when they booed when we ragged the puck.
In person it was the opposite. Cornell fans booed Q when they stalled. There was a decent Q fan turnout in the northeast corner of the building.
Was there any tribute for Schaefer's last MSG game?
Quote from: underskillWas there any tribute for Schaefer's last MSG game?
Other than his son John singing the anthem (quite well) wearing a 1986 Schafer jersey, no.
Much less Cornelliana than in past years. No introduction of Athletic Department or other university administration except for head of Board of Trustees. Only Cornell celebrity intro was Niuwendyk. Odd.
Quote from: arugulaQuote from: underskillWas there any tribute for Schaefer's last MSG game?
Other than his son John singing the anthem (quite well) wearing a 1986 Schafer jersey, no.
Much less Cornelliana than in past years. No introduction of Athletic Department or other university administration except for head of Board of Trustees. Only Cornell celebrity intro was Niuwendyk. Odd.
They do less pomp in the off-years. The BU game gets more hype in terms of alumni and university introduction.
The Q crowd wasn't large but they were surprisingly loud when things went right. Pretty sedate during the typical run of play but they got up for the goals and the good saves.
As for the game itself, I thought we had more raw skill but a more stagnant offensive setup. Q had a lot more movement in the offensive zone - especially on the PP - and more willingness to make interesting passes to skaters looking for space rather than trying to win one-on-one with the puck or making safe perimeter passes. I would love to see our PP try to emulate theirs.
Quote from: ugarteAs for the game itself, I thought we had more raw skill but a more stagnant offensive setup. Q had a lot more movement in the offensive zone - especially on the PP - and more willingness to make interesting passes to skaters looking for space rather than trying to win one-on-one with the puck or making safe perimeter passes. I would love to see our PP try to emulate theirs.
That's how I saw it too. A week or two ago Schafer noted we weren't "connected," and while I think we're improved in that area, Q does seem better connected, especially on the PP. We still stand around too much passing around the perimeter.
Quote from: arugulaQuote from: underskillWas there any tribute for Schaefer's last MSG game?
Other than his son John singing the anthem (quite well) wearing a 1986 Schafer jersey, no.
Much less Cornelliana than in past years. No introduction of Athletic Department or other university administration except for head of Board of Trustees. Only Cornell celebrity intro was Niuwendyk. Odd.
IIRC, he (Nieuwendyk) has a daughter attending Q. One of the broadcasts last season or maybe the one before mentioned it, so no surprise he'd be at the game
Quote from: IcebergQuote from: arugulaQuote from: underskillWas there any tribute for Schaefer's last MSG game?
Other than his son John singing the anthem (quite well) wearing a 1986 Schafer jersey, no.
Much less Cornelliana than in past years. No introduction of Athletic Department or other university administration except for head of Board of Trustees. Only Cornell celebrity intro was Niuwendyk. Odd.
IIRC, he (Nieuwendyk) has a daughter attending Q. One of the broadcasts last season or maybe the one before mentioned it, so no surprise he'd be at the game
At a very nice pre-game reception, Nieuwendyk gave a nice speech and mentioned his daughter (who was at the reception wearing a Quinnipiac hat) was a recent QU grad.
There was a small pre-game reception to honor Coach Schafer to which donors to the Athletics Dept/Hockey team were invited. Director of Athletics Moore, Assistant/incoming Coach Jones, Nieuwendyk, and Schafer spoke. All very nice speeches, Schafer spoke about how much Cornell has meant to him, very touching and heartfelt.
Quote from: IcebergQuote from: arugulaQuote from: underskillWas there any tribute for Schaefer's last MSG game?
Other than his son John singing the anthem (quite well) wearing a 1986 Schafer jersey, no.
Much less Cornelliana than in past years. No introduction of Athletic Department or other university administration except for head of Board of Trustees. Only Cornell celebrity intro was Niuwendyk. Odd.
IIRC, he (Nieuwendyk) has a daughter attending Q. One of the broadcasts last season or maybe the one before mentioned it, so no surprise he'd be at the game
Nieuwy was at the NoDak games too.
Quote from: ugarteQuote from: arugulaQuote from: underskillWas there any tribute for Schaefer's last MSG game?
Other than his son John singing the anthem (quite well) wearing a 1986 Schafer jersey, no.
Much less Cornelliana than in past years. No introduction of Athletic Department or other university administration except for head of Board of Trustees. Only Cornell celebrity intro was Niuwendyk. Odd.
As for the game itself, I thought we had more raw skill but a more stagnant offensive setup. Q had a lot more movement in the offensive zone - especially on the PP - and more willingness to make interesting passes to skaters looking for space rather than trying to win one-on-one with the puck or making safe perimeter passes. I would love to see our PP try to emulate theirs.
I thought Cornell really outplayed Q 5x5. I couldn't tell how many lines Q was rolling but it seemed like Cornell dominated possession unless Quinnipiac's very top guys were on the ice. The second period was a string of Cornell penalties, many of which were stupid. That plus the bad PK cost Cornell the game. If the entire game had been played 5x5 Cornell would have won by multiple goals. It was another huge special teams let down. I really think that if special teams merely matched their opponent each game this season then Cornell would be undefeated. Instead, we lose the special teams battle every game, which turns wins into ties and ties into losses.
It's that simple: figure out special teams and get healthy, and this team will be great. Otherwise, the mediocrity will continue.
Q's pp whipped the puck around and had lots of man motion. At the moment we do neither
Quote from: arugulaQ's pp whipped the puck around and had lots of man motion. At the moment we do neither
Correct. Three possibilities:
1. Q PP unit is much more skilled than Cornell's
2. Cornell's PP unit doesn't understand how to follow coaches' orders
3. Coaching issue
Quote from: ERQuote from: stereaxQuote from: Trotsky3x3 sucks in the N, too.
They should go back to 5 minutes normal overtime and then a tie, full stop. It was perfect.
Tbh I don't mind 3x3 in the N. I like the concept of opening up the ice for talented offensive players to go ham. The problem is I can't remember one NCAA game where this worked, in my admittedly limited experience.
We come out with the win, two points, woot. On to the next one. Colgate home and away should be easy right?
Also, what happened to captain :'(
This was considered a NC game. It's a tie and zero conference points.
Really? Ugh.
Quote from: BearLoverQuote from: arugulaQ's pp whipped the puck around and had lots of man motion. At the moment we do neither
Correct. Three possibilities:
1. Q PP unit is much more skilled than Cornell's
2. Cornell's PP unit doesn't understand how to follow coaches' orders
3. Coaching issue
The big thing that sticks out to me is the lack of body movement. Cornell has the skilled guys to do better on the PP. If you look at Dartmouth, they have less skill up front and overall team speed but they move the puck and their bodies around, which opens up more opportunities down low and for their offensively-skilled D from the point.
Quote from: arugulahad lots of man motion. At the moment we do neither
This is the one thing about the team that makes me say unpleasant words to the cat. We don't move with the puck on pp, we push passes back and forth while standing utterly still. It really helps the penalty kill not to have to make those adjustments.
Typically you do that when your guys are low skill but come on, just look at this roster!
Yes. If you're not going to use your skill, you should crowd the net and bomb away from the point. We dont do that either. Bancroft used to shoot. Not anymore.
I saw some things in that game that I believe they could build off of. It's just that after playing one of their best periods of the season in the first, it might be unfair to expect them to apply those lessons to next weekend when they weren't able to carry anything over into the second. When things were going good they were attacking the zone and putting pucks to the net from a variety of angles. I thought they met the moment of the stage they were playing on. After nearly letting the game get away from them they rallied quite nicely with a solid third. They even were the team in control at the end trying to win it in regulation where typically I think of them as having to hunker down and hang on to force OT. It was a different team than the previous Friday in many good ways. I'm looking forward to next weekend but first they'll need to figure out how to make it through a week of practices intact.
Quote from: chimpfoodAlso to hate on 3x3 again,
I wish that once you enter the zone in OT you weren't allowed to bring it back out voluntarily. If they want to continue to allow those resets I wish that they would put in a shot clock. It's not real hockey anyway
I would not call O'Leary reckless. He may be a scrapper and he likes to stir things up, but not reckless. He is an excellent leader and the other boys love him. He garners respect from his teammates. He brings energy to the ice for sure.
Quote from: VIEWfromKQuote from: chimpfoodAlso to hate on 3x3 again,
I wish that once you enter the zone in OT you weren't allowed to bring it back out voluntarily. If they want to continue to allow those resets I wish that they would put in a shot clock. It's not real hockey anyway
The "shot clock" for entering the offensive zone or a "back court" type violation for re-entering your own zone with the puck were some of the changes the NHL was considering for 3x3 OT, but they didn't make much progress and fell back on the tired old "well we don't want anything that creates more stoppages and faceoffs!"
Quote from: CJI would not call O'Leary reckless. He may be a scrapper and he likes to stir things up, but not reckless. He is an excellent leader and the other boys love him. He garners respect from his teammates. He brings energy to the ice for sure.
He also turns the puck over a lot.
Quote from: sah67Quote from: VIEWfromKQuote from: chimpfoodAlso to hate on 3x3 again,
I wish that once you enter the zone in OT you weren't allowed to bring it back out voluntarily. If they want to continue to allow those resets I wish that they would put in a shot clock. It's not real hockey anyway
The "shot clock" for entering the offensive zone or a "back court" type violation for re-entering your own zone with the puck were some of the changes the NHL was considering for 3x3 OT, but they didn't make much progress and fell back on the tired old "well we don't want anything that creates more stoppages and faceoffs!"
There shouldn't be faceoffs after one of these violations. You should have to abandon the puck and play could continue. More chances should be the goal and not a team holding onto it for five minutes looking for that one golden opportunity at the end
Quote from: VIEWfromKQuote from: sah67Quote from: VIEWfromKQuote from: chimpfoodAlso to hate on 3x3 again,
I wish that once you enter the zone in OT you weren't allowed to bring it back out voluntarily. If they want to continue to allow those resets I wish that they would put in a shot clock. It's not real hockey anyway
The "shot clock" for entering the offensive zone or a "back court" type violation for re-entering your own zone with the puck were some of the changes the NHL was considering for 3x3 OT, but they didn't make much progress and fell back on the tired old "well we don't want anything that creates more stoppages and faceoffs!"
There shouldn't be faceoffs after one of these violations. You should have to abandon the puck and play could continue. More chances should be the goal and not a team holding onto it for five minutes looking for that one golden opportunity at the end
If you institute a rule that a team has to shoot the puck within a minute of entering the zone i'm not sure if we'd ever score in OT.
Quote from: VIEWfromKQuote from: sah67Quote from: VIEWfromKQuote from: chimpfoodAlso to hate on 3x3 again,
I wish that once you enter the zone in OT you weren't allowed to bring it back out voluntarily. If they want to continue to allow those resets I wish that they would put in a shot clock. It's not real hockey anyway
The "shot clock" for entering the offensive zone or a "back court" type violation for re-entering your own zone with the puck were some of the changes the NHL was considering for 3x3 OT, but they didn't make much progress and fell back on the tired old "well we don't want anything that creates more stoppages and faceoffs!"
There shouldn't be faceoffs after one of these violations. You should have to abandon the puck and play could continue. More chances should be the goal and not a team holding onto it for five minutes looking for that one golden opportunity at the end
Like sudden death OT in lacrosse before the shot clock. Team that won the faceoff held the ball for three-plus minutes before looking for a shot.
The energy in the 3rd was pretty good. We had the puck inside 10ft scoring area a ton of times just couldnt get one to go in. We need more of that.
Quote from: JohnF81Attendance was 16,593 according to CHN
16,593 of 18,006 ice hockey seats is 92% of capacity. FWIW, Cornell-BU Red Hot Hockey 2023 drew worse, 15,289.
I worried that with Cornell and Q having played 8 days earlier, the Garden would have been lucky to see attendance of 12,000. It got to 92% full because:
* Students love their parents but by Saturday they want to get the hell out of the house for the afternoon and evening.
* Metro NYC alumni don't go to many hockey games in Ithaca, so a game in the Garden is something special, and this is a chance to reconnect with Cornell and not get asked for money. Other than from Ticketmaster.
* Quinnipiac has a decent sized student body (about 7,000 undergrads plus grad students), at least 70,000 living alumni (they don't say living alumni but "alumni network"), and some of them turned out, but it was clearly a Cornell majority crowd.
Still hope someone, anyone other than Q, anyone other than an ECAC opponent, is on tap for 2026 and 2028.
Quote from: George64Quote from: nycredIs there any bar nearby thats showing the game? me and my buddy waited too long to get tickets
Not nearby, but The Canuck, 202 9th Avenue, owned by Denis Ladouceur, should be showing it for sure.
.
Great story in Cornellians (https://alumni.cornell.edu/cornellians/ladouceur-hockey-bar/?utm_source=sfmc&utm_medium=email&user_id=1588308&utm_campaign=bigredthread&program=&segment=×tamp=)