ELynah Forum

General Category => John Spencer Is Dead => Topic started by: Trotsky on May 19, 2024, 10:13:35 AM

Title: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on May 19, 2024, 10:13:35 AM
I figure there have to be fellow sufferers here, demographically-speaking.

I have love-hated this team for 54 seasons, now.  LFGM.

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/7b/New_York_Mets.svg/1200px-New_York_Mets.svg.png)
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Beeeej on May 22, 2024, 10:25:31 PM
Yup. One of the few things I inherited from my Dad's Mom Gussie, who was a Mets fan from Day 1 in 1962 because the Brooklyn Dodgers had broken her heart. 1986 feels like a loooooooooong time ago now.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on May 23, 2024, 08:28:02 AM
I've had a lot of happiness since 1986.  Mostly because while I have been a fan since 1971, the late 70s permanently froze my Mets thermometer so I absolutely expect to lose every game.

"A Yankee fan has 60 disappointments a season, a Mets fan has 60 thrills." -- Jimmy Breslin, 1962
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Chris H82 on May 23, 2024, 03:01:38 PM
I can top your pain.  I'm a Mariners fan....
At least you all have 5 World Series appearances, as recent as 2015, to look back on, and 2 WS titles.  The M's have 0 WS appearances.  Yup, 0.  And our most recent playoff appearance came after a 21 year drought.

Sigh.....
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Beeeej on May 24, 2024, 01:02:26 PM
Quote from: Chris H82I can top your pain.  I'm a Mariners fan....
At least you all have 5 World Series appearances, as recent as 2015, to look back on, and 2 WS titles.  The M's have 0 WS appearances.  Yup, 0.  And our most recent playoff appearance came after a 21 year drought.

Frasier: So you're not in Seattle because of the Mariners?
Sam Malone: Believe me, no ballplayer is in Seattle because of the Mariners.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: jtwcornell91 on May 25, 2024, 09:43:38 AM
Quote from: Chris H82I can top your pain.  I'm a Mariners fan....
At least you all have 5 World Series appearances, as recent as 2015, to look back on, and 2 WS titles.  The M's have 0 WS appearances.  Yup, 0.  And our most recent playoff appearance came after a 21 year drought.

Sigh.....

I'm old enough to consider the Mariners an expansion team (but young enough not to consider the Mets one).  So by definition they can't have a chanpionship drought.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on May 25, 2024, 01:13:27 PM
Quote from: Chris H82I can top your pain.  I'm a Mariners fan....
At least you all have 5 World Series appearances, as recent as 2015, to look back on, and 2 WS titles.  The M's have 0 WS appearances.  Yup, 0.  And our most recent playoff appearance came after a 21 year drought.

Sigh.....
If we're playing Topper, my AL team has been the Mariners since expansion.

But shut your whore mouth; we're in first despite hitting even worse than the Mets.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on May 25, 2024, 01:15:03 PM
Quote from: jtwcornell91
Quote from: Chris H82I can top your pain.  I'm a Mariners fan....
At least you all have 5 World Series appearances, as recent as 2015, to look back on, and 2 WS titles.  The M's have 0 WS appearances.  Yup, 0.  And our most recent playoff appearance came after a 21 year drought.

Sigh.....

I'm old enough to consider the Mariners an expansion team (but young enough not to consider the Mets one).  So by definition they can't have a chanpionship drought.
This is the correct answer.

Mets, Padres, Nats, Rangers, Brewers -- not expansion.

Mariners, Blue Jays -- expansion.

Dbacks, Rockies, all of Florida -- fake.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on June 03, 2024, 05:59:46 AM
This is actually a more painful season than most, despite the callouses of age.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: scoop85 on June 03, 2024, 08:33:20 AM
Quote from: TrotskyThis is actually a more painful season than most, despite the callouses of age.

6 losses when leading after 8 innings. No other team has more than 2.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: ugarte on June 03, 2024, 11:45:44 AM
Quote from: scoop85
Quote from: TrotskyThis is actually a more painful season than most, despite the callouses of age.

6 losses when leading after 8 innings. No other team has more than 2.
The Pirates tend to blow their leads in the 7th and 8th.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: scoop85 on June 03, 2024, 01:23:15 PM
Quote from: ugarte
Quote from: scoop85
Quote from: TrotskyThis is actually a more painful season than most, despite the callouses of age.

6 losses when leading after 8 innings. No other team has more than 2.
The Pirates tend to blow their leads in the 7th and 8th.

That's marginally less painful
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: ugarte on June 03, 2024, 07:03:33 PM
Quote from: scoop85
Quote from: ugarte
Quote from: scoop85
Quote from: TrotskyThis is actually a more painful season than most, despite the callouses of age.

6 losses when leading after 8 innings. No other team has more than 2.
The Pirates tend to blow their leads in the 7th and 8th.

That's marginally less painful
we make it up in volume
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on June 08, 2024, 12:49:32 PM
Mets have a chance to lose on our third continent today!
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on March 27, 2025, 04:43:42 PM
If anyone is being driven crazy by MLBTV on Chrome with a circle of Sisyphus, it came right up for me on Edge (Sucks, but not this time).
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on March 27, 2025, 04:45:20 PM
Clay Holmes will not have a 0.00 ERA this season.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on March 27, 2025, 04:53:40 PM
Juan Soto OBP currently 1.000.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on March 27, 2025, 05:12:32 PM
Clay Holmes will likely not have a < 1.00 ERA this season.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on March 30, 2025, 03:31:58 PM
Well, the pitching held through the first series, anyway.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on April 01, 2025, 06:33:01 PM
Manaea gone until mid-May now, because of course.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: upprdeck on April 01, 2025, 06:39:40 PM
i think pitching will be fine.

 hitting who knows
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on April 01, 2025, 06:48:59 PM
Suboptimal start for Kodai.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on April 04, 2025, 03:09:34 PM
Love the BJs logo, hate their font.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on April 04, 2025, 05:22:10 PM
The Mets continue to play their 7th inning stretch song about an insatiable 19th century Italian girl who can't stop fucking every man in town.

It's a choice.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on April 05, 2025, 08:19:18 AM
Tylor Megill: three emergency spot starts in openers, 16 IP, 3 wins, 0 runs allowed.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on April 05, 2025, 07:39:57 PM
We're the Colorado Yankees tonight.  ::rolleyes::

Most wins in MLB since 2021: Zach Wheeler.  May the Wilpons burn in hell forever.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Jeff Hopkins '82 on April 05, 2025, 08:04:47 PM
Quote from: TrotskyWe're the Colorado Yankees tonight.  ::rolleyes::

Most wins in MLB since 2021: Zach Wheeler.  May the Wilpons burn in hell forever.

Nah.  I like them. (Go Phils!)
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: billhoward on April 07, 2025, 01:41:36 PM
You risk some of us writing more on the miracles of this century by the Sox.

We believe two possibly confusing MLB team names are best put as the Sox and the White Sox.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: RichH on April 07, 2025, 02:33:52 PM
Quote from: billhowardYou risk some of us writing more on the miracles of this century by the Sox.

We believe two possibly confusing MLB team names are best put as the Sox and the White Sox.

The Chicago team had the name first. My reflex is to think of them whenever anyone says "Sox."

Leave it to Red Sox fans to make everything about them.

Please continue with your non-sensical Mets therapy blather, Trotsky.
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on April 07, 2025, 07:54:15 PM
(https://i.makeagif.com/media/8-08-2018/LWymA7.gif)
Title: Re: Mets
Post by: Trotsky on September 13, 2025, 07:10:21 AM
In response to the season cratering, we are hosting ChatGPT Night.