ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: Neil Shapiro \'83 on July 01, 2003, 12:44:21 PM

Title: MAAC RIP
Post by: Neil Shapiro \'83 on July 01, 2003, 12:44:21 PM
Division I hockey fans won't have the MAAC to kick around anymore.  

Instead, we can diss Atlantic Hockey.

http://goerie.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20030701/HOCKEY03/107010383

Title: Re: MAAC RIP
Post by: rhovorka on July 01, 2003, 01:07:10 PM
This leaves the ECAC as the lone NCAA conference governed by a multi-sport organization.  I still think the ECAC schools should do the exact thing that the MAAC hockey schools just did.

Adam outlined this belief back in February about as well as anyone has:
http://www.uscho.com/news/2003/02/18_006220.php



Post Edited (07-01-03 13:11)
Title: Re: MAAC RIP
Post by: Greg Berge on July 01, 2003, 10:52:17 PM
Even as the resident arch-conservative (hockey-wise), I have to agree.  It would be best if we could stay nominally within the ECAC for the sake of tradition while having a completely separate, autonomous hockey structure, but short of that we should do precisely what Atlantic hockey did.
Title: ECAC
Post by: jtwcornell91 on July 02, 2003, 03:36:26 AM
Would we get to take the Whitelaw Trophy with us?  (There is some precedent, as the McNaughton Cup has followed Michigan Tech from the WCHA to the CCHA and back again.)

Title: Re: MAAC RIP
Post by: jtwcornell91 on July 02, 2003, 03:38:34 AM
QuoteNeil Shapiro '83 wrote:
Atlantic Hockey.
Man, this totally screws up my one-letter conference abbreviations.  The CHA was already 'A' and if I give that to the AH (tee hee), every one of the letters will be taken (C by the CCHA, H by HE and A by some AH).  Maybe the AH should be 'T' (the second letter in "Atlantic").

Title: Re: MAAC RIP
Post by: Jeff Hopkins \'82 on July 02, 2003, 08:23:37 AM
Hmmm...let me be the first to suggest that we call them:   AH-soles!  :-P

JH