For quite some time I've played a very rudimentary card game that generates hockey results. I will use this thread to play out the ECACs and the NCAAs on the days the games would occur. A game takes about 2 minutes.
I will list results here. If you're interested I welcome you to peruse.
ECAC QF will begin tomorrow night with the original 4 game slate.
Once the ECACs finish I will seed the NCAA field based on the final PWR, taking into consideration any dark horse ECAC champion.
If you are really, really interested I can actually play out the games in real time on slack, announcing goals as they happen. :-) I wish I could do it on social media but I am woefully undertalented.
Coming up on the 7pm start times. Tonight's games:
ECAC QF Game 1
#5 Harvard at #4 RPI
#7 Yale at #3 Quinnipiac
#8 Colgate at #2 Clarkson
#11 Princeton at #1 Cornell
Games will be broadcast on slack on the general game-chat thread. Results will be listed here.
Tonight's finals:
Harvard 3 RPI 0
Quinnipiac 5 Yale 3
Clarkson 3 Colgate 2
At Lynah:
[color=#FF0000]1 07 Cor 1-0 Donaldson 1
1 10 Cor 2-0 Green 1
1 11 Cor 3-0 Donaldson 2
2 14 Cor 4-0 Malott 1
3 13 Cor 5-0 Green 2[/color]
Quote from: TrotskyTonight's finals:
Harvard 3 RPI 0
Quinnipiac 5 Yale 3
Clarkson 3 Colgate 2
At Lynah:
1 07 Cor 1-0 Donaldson 1
1 10 Cor 2-0 Green 1
1 11 Cor 3-0 Donaldson 2
2 14 Cor 4-0 Malott 1
3 13 Cor 5-0 Green 2
No goals for Barron—3rd straight game
Quote from: TrotskyTonight's finals:
Harvard 3 RPI 0
A very Savory bit of fake news. IMO!
Are you simulating the other tournaments as well? We wouldn't need scores for those, just won/lost results so you could use KRACH if you don't already have an easy way to do it.
Cornell also won a simulation on USCHO as did the other three home teams. https://fanforum.uscho.com/showthread.php?136059-2020-NCAA-Hockey-Tournament-What-If-A-Simulation-of-the-2019-2020-Postseason&p=6923668&viewfull=1#post6923668
Princeton @ Cornell - Game 1:
The Big Red took it to the Tigers in the opening game of this Best-of-Three series. Cornell used two goals in the opening frame, from Cam Donaldson and Morgan Barron respectively, to take a 2-0 lead, and that would be all the Big Red's Junior Netminder Matthew Galajda would need. Galajda stymied Princeton throughout the night, posting a 26-save shutout. Cornell added to their lead midway through the second on a Matt Steinburg tip of an Alex Green blast that beat Princeton goalie Jeremie Forget to give the Big Red a 3-0 lead through two periods. Both sides skated to a scoreless third period, and Cornell walked out of the rink with a 1-0 series lead.
Quote from: ursusminorCornell also won a simulation on USCHO as did the other three home teams. https://fanforum.uscho.com/showthread.php?136059-2020-NCAA-Hockey-Tournament-What-If-A-Simulation-of-the-2019-2020-Postseason&p=6923668&viewfull=1#post6923668
Princeton @ Cornell - Game 1:
The Big Red took it to the Tigers in the opening game of this Best-of-Three series. Cornell used two goals in the opening frame, from Cam Donaldson and Morgan Barron respectively, to take a 2-0 lead, and that would be all the Big Red's Junior Netminder Matthew Galajda would need. Galajda stymied Princeton throughout the night, posting a 26-save shutout. Cornell added to their lead midway through the second on a Matt Steinburg tip of an Alex Green blast that beat Princeton goalie Jeremie Forget to give the Big Red a 3-0 lead through two periods. Both sides skated to a scoreless third period, and Cornell walked out of the rink with a 1-0 series lead.
Did they not feed the actual team rosters into the simulator?!
Quote from: BeeeejQuote from: ursusminorCornell also won a simulation on USCHO as did the other three home teams. https://fanforum.uscho.com/showthread.php?136059-2020-NCAA-Hockey-Tournament-What-If-A-Simulation-of-the-2019-2020-Postseason&p=6923668&viewfull=1#post6923668
Princeton @ Cornell - Game 1:
The Big Red took it to the Tigers in the opening game of this Best-of-Three series. Cornell used two goals in the opening frame, from Cam Donaldson and Morgan Barron respectively, to take a 2-0 lead, and that would be all the Big Red's Junior Netminder Matthew Galajda would need. Galajda stymied Princeton throughout the night, posting a 26-save shutout. Cornell added to their lead midway through the second on a Matt Steinburg tip of an Alex Green blast that beat Princeton goalie Jeremie Forget to give the Big Red a 3-0 lead through two periods. Both sides skated to a scoreless third period, and Cornell walked out of the rink with a 1-0 series lead.
Did they not feed the actual team rosters into the simulator?!
I had figured that it would take at least an hour before someone would comment on that spelling. :-)
Quote from: ursusminorQuote from: BeeeejQuote from: ursusminorCornell also won a simulation on USCHO as did the other three home teams. https://fanforum.uscho.com/showthread.php?136059-2020-NCAA-Hockey-Tournament-What-If-A-Simulation-of-the-2019-2020-Postseason&p=6923668&viewfull=1#post6923668
Princeton @ Cornell - Game 1:
The Big Red took it to the Tigers in the opening game of this Best-of-Three series. Cornell used two goals in the opening frame, from Cam Donaldson and Morgan Barron respectively, to take a 2-0 lead, and that would be all the Big Red's Junior Netminder Matthew Galajda would need. Galajda stymied Princeton throughout the night, posting a 26-save shutout. Cornell added to their lead midway through the second on a Matt Steinburg tip of an Alex Green blast that beat Princeton goalie Jeremie Forget to give the Big Red a 3-0 lead through two periods. Both sides skated to a scoreless third period, and Cornell walked out of the rink with a 1-0 series lead.
Did they not feed the actual team rosters into the simulator?!
I had figured that it would take at least an hour before someone would comment on that spelling. :-)
What can I say? The cat woke me up early.
Quote from: jtwcornell91Are you simulating the other tournaments as well? We wouldn't need scores for those, just won/lost results so you could use KRACH if you don't already have an easy way to do it.
I could do that if you were willing to recalculate PWR based on all results. :-)
Then we could have Adam seed the NCAA regionals. :-)
Of course we really need Arthur to announce the goals.
Game 1 results:
AHA QF:
5 Niagara @ 4 Army
6 Air Force @ 3 RIT
7 Robert Morris @ 2 Sacred Heart
8 Bentley @ 1 AIC
Hockey East QF:
5 Connecticut @ 4 Maine
6 BU @ 3 Lowell
7 Northeastern @ 2 Massachusetts
8 Providence @ 1 BC
NCHC QF:
5 St. Cloud State @ 4 Western Michigan
6 Nebraska Omaha @ 3 Denver
7 Miami @ 2 Minnesota-Duluth
8 Colorado College @ 1 North Dakota
WCHA SF:
5 Bowling Green @ 2 Bemidji
6 Michigan Tech @ 1 Mankato
Quote from: TrotskyGame 1 results:
AHA QF:
5 Niagara @ 4 Army
6 Air Force @ 3 RIT
7 Robert Morris @ 2 Sacred Heart
8 Bentley @ 1 AIC
took me a second to realize that these were seeds, not scores and you had not, in fact, suffered a TBI before applying boldface.
Dropping the puck in 5 minutes over at slack game-chat for game 2.
Tonight's game 2 finals:
Harvard 3 RPI 2
Quinnipiac 2 Yale 1
Clarkson 5 Colgate 3
At Lynah:
[color=#FF0000]1 03 Cor 1-0 Andreev 1
2 10 Cor 2-0 Berard 1[/color]
3 16 Prn 2-1
So all four series were decided in two nights. The SF will be held starting at 4pm Friday in Lake Placid.
Early game pits #5 Harvard against #1 Cornell. Late game will be #3 Quinnipiac vs #2 Clarkson.
Non-ECAC scores are a little harder to get but they will be reported later tonight.
I liked the result of the RPI-Harvard series on the USCHO forum a lot better. ::banana::
Here is the Cornell summary:
Princeton @ Cornell - Game 2:
The Big Red looked to put away the Tigers in game 2 of their quarterfinal series in the ECAC. Cornell got off to a great start, as Tristan Mullin put the Big Red in the lead on his snipe midway through the first period. Mullin then added a second goal on the powerplay towards the end of the period, and after twenty minutes, Cornell held a 2-0 advantage. Princeton got one goal back early in the second period, when Liam Grande's one-timer from the near circle deflected off Travis Mitchell and past Matthew Galajda's blocker. The score remained 2-1 entering the third. Galajda came up big early in the final stanza when Luke Keenan found himself all alone in the slot. While Keenan's wrister looked destined for the top shelf, Galajda flashed his glove to keep the Big Red in the lead. Galajda was unable to stop Keenan's next opportunity midway through the period, as Keenan's one-time from the far circle beat Galajda stick-side to knot the game at 2. After sixty minutes of play, the teams remained all-square, but Cornell struck early in overtime when Morgan Barron won a puck-battle in the near corner, dished the puck out to Yanni Kaldis, who lined up a slapper from the point, which beat Jeremie Forget, and gave Cornel the 3-2 victory, and a 2-0 series win.
QU-Yale is going to game three. And yes, I realize that Cornell has two L's. Also too many commas for my taste in that last sentence. :-)
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: jtwcornell91Are you simulating the other tournaments as well? We wouldn't need scores for those, just won/lost results so you could use KRACH if you don't already have an easy way to do it.
I could do that if you were willing to recalculate PWR based on all results. :-)
Then we could have Adam seed the NCAA regionals. :-)
That's easy enough to do. I used to have a DIY script where anyone could add any results, but I never got around to updating it with the 2014 RPI hack.
Quote from: ursusminorI liked the result of the RPI-Harvard series on the USCHO forum a lot better. ::banana::
Here is the Cornell summary:
Princeton @ Cornell - Game 2:
The Big Red looked to put away the Tigers in game 2 of their quarterfinal series in the ECAC. Cornell got off to a great start, as Tristan Mullin put the Big Red in the lead on his snipe midway through the first period. Mullin then added a second goal on the powerplay towards the end of the period, and after twenty minutes, Cornell held a 2-0 advantage. Princeton got one goal back early in the second period, when Liam Grande's one-timer from the near circle deflected off Travis Mitchell and past Matthew Galajda's blocker. The score remained 2-1 entering the third. Galajda came up big early in the final stanza when Luke Keenan found himself all alone in the slot. While Keenan's wrister looked destined for the top shelf, Galajda flashed his glove to keep the Big Red in the lead. Galajda was unable to stop Keenan's next opportunity midway through the period, as Keenan's one-time from the far circle beat Galajda stick-side to knot the game at 2. After sixty minutes of play, the teams remained all-square, but Cornell struck early in overtime when Morgan Barron won a puck-battle in the near corner, dished the puck out to Yanni Kaldis, who lined up a slapper from the point, which beat Jeremie Forget, and gave Cornel the 3-2 victory, and a 2-0 series win.
QU-Yale is going to game three. And yes, I realize that Cornell has two L's. Also too many commas for my taste in that last sentence. :-)
Wow... perfect weekend for the penalty kill.
Quote from: ursusminorI liked the result of the RPI-Harvard series on the USCHO forum a lot better.
Get your own thread.
Around the rest of the league on Satuday:
Game 2 results:
AHA QF:
5 Niagara @ 4
Army (ot): 4 (Army wins series, 2-0)
6 Air Force @ 3
RIT (RIT wins series, 2-0)
7 Robert Morris @ 2
Sacred Heart (Series tied, 1-1)
8 Bentley @ 1
AIC (Series tied, 1-1)
Hockey East QF:
5
Connecticut @ 4 Maine (Connecticut wins series, 2-0)
6 BU @ 3
Lowell (Lowell wins series, 2-0)
7
Northeastern @ 2 Massachusetts (Northeastern wins series, 2-0)
8 Providence @ 1
BC (BC wins series, 2-0)
NCHC QF:
5 St. Cloud State @ 4
Western Michigan (Series tied, 1-1)
6 Nebraska Omaha @ 3
Denver (Series tied, 1-1)
7 Miami @ 2
Minnesota-Duluth (Minnesota-Duluth wins series, 2-0)
8 Colorado College @ 1
North Dakota (North Dakota wins series, 2-0)
WCHA SF:
5 Bowling Green @ 2
Bemidji (Series tied, 1-1)
6 Michigan Tech @ 1
Mankato (Mankato wins series, 2-0)
- - - - -
Single game elimination:
Big 10 SF
4 Minnesota at 1
Penn State (ot)
3
Michigan at 2 Ohio State
Quote from: ursusminorI liked the result of the RPI-Harvard series on the USCHO forum a lot better. ::banana::
Here is the Cornell summary:
Princeton @ Cornell - Game 2:
The Big Red looked to put away the Tigers in game 2 of their quarterfinal series in the ECAC. Cornell got off to a great start, as Tristan Mullin put the Big Red in the lead on his snipe midway through the first period. Mullin then added a second goal on the powerplay towards the end of the period, and after twenty minutes, Cornell held a 2-0 advantage. Princeton got one goal back early in the second period, when Liam Grande's one-timer from the near circle deflected off Travis Mitchell and past Matthew Galajda's blocker. The score remained 2-1 entering the third. Galajda came up big early in the final stanza when Luke Keenan found himself all alone in the slot. While Keenan's wrister looked destined for the top shelf, Galajda flashed his glove to keep the Big Red in the lead. Galajda was unable to stop Keenan's next opportunity midway through the period, as Keenan's one-time from the far circle beat Galajda stick-side to knot the game at 2. After sixty minutes of play, the teams remained all-square, but Cornell struck early in overtime when Morgan Barron won a puck-battle in the near corner, dished the puck out to Yanni Kaldis, who lined up a slapper from the point, which beat Jeremie Forget, and gave Cornel the 3-2 victory, and a 2-0 series win.
QU-Yale is going to game three. And yes, I realize that Cornell has two L's. Also too many commas for my taste in that last sentence. :-)
If you were good, you could render this game report in cornellbigred.com style.
Better late than never, Sunday's results:
Game 3:
AHA QF:
7 Robert Morris @ 2 Sacred Heart (Robert Morris wins series, 2-1)
8 Bentley @ 1 AIC (AIC wins series, 2-1)
NCHC QF:
5 St. Cloud State @ 4 Western Michigan (Western Michigan wins series, 2-1)
6 Nebraska Omaha @ 3 Denver (ot) (Denver wins series, 2-1)
WCHA SF:
5 Bowling Green @ 2 Bemidji (Bemidji wins series, 2-1)
Here is a recap of the first weekend:
Game 1 results:
ECAC QF:
5 Harvard @ 4 RPI
7 Yale @ 3 Quinnipiac
8 Colgate @ 2 Clarkson
11 Princeton @ 1 Cornell
AHA QF:
5 Niagara @ 4 Army
6 Air Force @ 3 RIT
7 Robert Morris @ 2 Sacred Heart
8 Bentley @ 1 AIC
Hockey East QF:
5 Connecticut @ 4 Maine
6 BU @ 3 Lowell
7 Northeastern @ 2 Massachusetts
8 Providence @ 1 BC
NCHC QF:
5 St. Cloud State @ 4 Western Michigan
6 Nebraska Omaha @ 3 Denver
7 Miami @ 2 Minnesota-Duluth
8 Colorado College @ 1 North Dakota
WCHA SF:
5 Bowling Green @ 2 Bemidji
6 Michigan Tech @ 1 Mankato
Game 2 results:
ECAC QF:
5 Harvard @ 4 RPI (Harvard wins series, 2-0)
7 Yale @ 3 Quinnipiac (Quinnipiac wins series, 2-0)
8 Colgate @ 2 Clarkson (Clarkson wins series, 2-0)
11 Princeton @ 1 Cornell (Cornell wins series, 2-0)
AHA QF:
5 Niagara @ 4 Army (ot): 4 (Army wins series, 2-0)
6 Air Force @ 3 RIT (RIT wins series, 2-0)
7 Robert Morris @ 2 Sacred Heart
8 Bentley @ 1 AIC
Hockey East QF:
5 Connecticut @ 4 Maine (Connecticut wins series, 2-0)
6 BU @ 3 Lowell (Lowell wins series, 2-0)
7 Northeastern @ 2 Massachusetts (Northeastern wins series, 2-0)
8 Providence @ 1 BC (BC wins series, 2-0)
NCHC QF:
5 St. Cloud State @ 4 Western Michigan
6 Nebraska Omaha @ 3 Denver
7 Miami @ 2 Minnesota-Duluth (Minnesota-Duluth wins series, 2-0)
8 Colorado College @ 1 North Dakota (North Dakota wins series, 2-0)
WCHA SF:
5 Bowling Green @ 2 Bemidji
6 Michigan Tech @ 1 Mankato (Mankato wins series, 2-0)
- - - - -
Single game elimination:
Big 10 SF
4 Minnesota @ 1 Penn State (ot)
3 Michigan @ 2 Ohio State
- - - - -
Game 3 results:
AHA QF:
7 Robert Morris @ 2 Sacred Heart (Robert Morris wins series, 2-1)
8 Bentley @ 1 AIC (AIC wins series, 2-1)
NCHC QF:
5 St. Cloud State @ 4 Western Michigan (Western Michigan wins series, 2-1)
6 Nebraska Omaha @ 3 Denver (ot) (Denver wins series, 2-1)
WCHA SF:
5 Bowling Green @ 2 Bemidji (Bemidji wins series, 2-1)
Next weekend's matchups:
ECAC SF (Lake Placid, NY):
5 Harvard vs 1 Cornell
3 Quinnipiac vs 2 Clarkson
AHA SF (Buffalo, NY):
7 Robert Morris vs 1 AIC
4 Army vs 3 RIT
Hockey East SF (Boston, MA):
7 Northeastern vs 1 BC
5 Connecticut vs 3 Lowell
NCHC SF (Saint Paul, MN):
4 Western Michigan vs 1 North Dakota
3 Denver vs 2 Minnesota-Duluth
Big 10 F:
3 Michigan at 1 Penn State
WCHA F:
2 Bemidji at 1 Mankato
Harvard decided to forfeit rather than get their whuppin'. ::smashfreak::
Pairwise including simulated games through March 15:
Rk Team PWR RPI Comparisons Won
1 North Dakota (nt) 59 .6102 Mk Cr BC MD DU PS Ck ML OS MA Mi NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
2 MSU-Mankato (wc) 58 .6021 Cr BC MD DU PS Ck ML OS MA Mi NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
3 Cornell (ec) 57 .5924 BC MD DU PS Ck ML OS MA Mi NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
4 Boston Coll (he) 55 .5794 MD PS Ck ML OS MA Mi NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
5 Minn-Duluth (nt) 55 .5779 DU PS Ck ML OS MA Mi NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
6 Denver U (nt) 55 .5629 BC PS Ck ML OS MA Mi NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
7 Penn State (bt) 53 .5579 Ck ML OS MA Mi NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
8 Clarkson (ec) 52 .5529 ML OS MA Mi NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
9 Mass-Lowell (he) 51 .5453 OS MA Mi NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
10 Ohio State (bt) 50 .5433 MA Mi NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
11 Mass-Amherst (he) 49 .5419 Mi NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
12 Michigan (bt) 48 .5411 NE AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
13 NorthEastern (he) 47 .5405 AS BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
14 Arizona State (in) 46 .5399 BS Qn Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
15 Bemidji State (wc) 44 .5383 Qn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
16 Quinnipiac (ec) 44 .5381 Mn WM Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
17 Minnesota (bt) 43 .5289 BS Me Nt BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
18 Western Mich (nt) 42 .5357 Mn Me Nt Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
19 Maine (he) 40 .5288 Nt BG Ha Pv SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
20 Notre Dame (he) 40 .5276 BG Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
21 Bowling Green (wc) 40 .5236 WM Ha Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
22 Harvard (ec) 38 .5226 Pv Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
23 Providence (he) 37 .5174 Ct SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
24 Connecticut (he) 37 .5170 Me SC AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
25 St Cloud (nt) 35 .5168 AI MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
26 American Intl (ah) 34 .5158 MT MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
27 Michigan Tech (wc) 33 .5147 MS NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
28 Mich State (bt) 32 .5127 NO SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
29 NE-Omaha (nt) 30 .5120 SH Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
30 Sacred Heart (ah) 30 .5113 Wi NH NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
31 Wisconsin (bt) 28 .5097 NM BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
32 New Hampshire (he) 27 .5108 Wi NM RT Ak RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
33 Northern Mich (wc) 27 .5067 BU RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
34 Boston Univ (he) 27 .5067 NH RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
35 RIT (ah) 25 .5064 Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
36 AK-Fairbanks (wc) 24 .4999 Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
37 Army (ah) 24 .4981 NH RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
38 RPI (ec) 22 .4935 Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
39 Yale (ec) 21 .4824 Da CC Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
40 Dartmouth (ec) 19 .4774 CC By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
41 CO College (nt) 19 .4764 Cg By LS Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
42 Colgate (ec) 17 .4742 Da By LS RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn AA AH SL Mh
43 Bentley (ah) 16 .4732 LS Mm Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
44 Lake Superior (wc) 16 .4714 Mm RM Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
45 Miami (nt) 16 .4661 NO Cg Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
46 Robert Morris (ah) 15 .4663 By Mm Mr Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
47 Merrimack (he) 13 .4660 AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
48 Air Force (ah) 13 .4523 RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
49 Niagara (ah) 11 .4587 Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
50 Canisius (ah) 10 .4462 HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
51 Holy Cross (ah) 9 .4497 Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
52 Vermont (he) 8 .4429 Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
53 Brown (ec) 7 .4405 Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
54 Union (ec) 6 .4341 Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
55 Princeton (ec) 5 .4311 FS AA AH SL Mh
56 Ferris State (wc) 5 .4287 Cg AA AH SL Mh
57 AK-Anchorage (wc) 3 .4217 AH SL Mh
58 AL-Huntsville (wc) 2 .4129 SL Mh
59 St Lawrence (ec) 1 .4067 Mh
60 Mercyhurst (ah) 0 .3941
Summary of ratings including KRACH. (Normally in a simulation you don't want to re-calculate the team strengths including partial simulated results, but since the simulation didn't include uncertainty about the strengths, re-calculating introduces some of that, since teams which were stronger than their estimates would have been more likely to win last weekend.)
Team Record RPI KRACH PWR
Rk W-L-T Pct. Rk Rating Rk Rating RRWP Rk Rating
Cornell 1 25-2-4 .8710 3 .5924 3 584.1 .8200 3 57
MSU-Mankato 2 33-5-2 .8500 2 .6021 1 865.9 .8678 2 58
North Dakota 3 28-5-4 .8108 1 .6102 2 858.8 .8669 1 59
Boston Coll 4 26-8-2 .7500 4 .5794 6 374.6 .7538 4 55
Clarkson 5 25-8-3 .7361 8 .5529 12 247.0 .6809 8 52
Minn-Duluth 6 24-10-2 .6944 5 .5779 4 470.7 .7894 5 55
Denver U 7T 23-10-6 .6667 6 .5629 5 388.5 .7597 6 55
Quinnipiac 7T 23-11-2 .6667 16 .5381 21 166.0 .6039 16 44
Bemidji State 9 24-11-5 .6625 15 .5383 8 271.8 .6985 15 44
Penn State 10 21-10-4 .6571 7 .5579 7 310.2 .7219 7 53
Arizona State 11 22-11-3 .6528 14 .5399 16 191.4 .6321 14 46
Mass-Lowell 12 20-10-6 .6389 9 .5453 14 199.1 .6399 9 51
American Intl 13T 23-13-1 .6351 26 .5158 36 77.29 .4470 26 34
Sacred Heart 13T 22-12-3 .6351 30 .5113 35 79.97 .4540 30 30
Mass-Amherst 15 21-13-2 .6111 11 .5419 17 186.2 .6266 11 49
Ohio State 16 20-12-5 .6081 10 .5433 9 270.3 .6975 10 50
Harvard 17 17-10-6 .6061 22 .5226 29 124.3 .5450 22 38
RIT 18 21-13-4 .6053 35 .5064 40 69.61 .4258 35 25
Northeastern 19 20-13-3 .5972 13 .5405 23 161.5 .5983 13 47
Army 20T 19-13-3 .5857 37 .4981 43 60.05 .3963 37 24
Maine 20T 18-12-5 .5857 19 .5288 26 143.3 .5741 19 40
Bowling Green 22 22-15-4 .5854 21 .5236 19 173.6 .6128 21 40
Western Mich 23 20-14-5 .5769 17 .5357 10 258.3 .6891 18 42
Michigan 24 19-14-4 .5676 12 .5411 11 249.9 .6830 12 48
Michigan Tech 25 21-17-3 .5488 27 .5147 24 155.5 .5907 27 33
Connecticut 26 17-15-4 .5278 24 .5170 31 116.9 .5323 24 37
Northern Mich 27 18-16-4 .5263 33 .5067 27 137.1 .5651 33 27
Providence 28 15-14-6 .5143 23 .5174 30 117.6 .5336 23 37
AK-Fairbanks 29 16-15-5 .5139 36 .4999 28 129.8 .5538 36 24
Minnesota 30 16-15-7 .5132 18 .5289 13 226.8 .6649 17 43
Bentley 31T 18-18-3 .5000 43 .4732 46 38.38 .3113 43 16
New Hampshire 31T 15-15-4 .5000 31 .5108 33 105.5 .5111 32 27
Notre Dame 31T 15-15-7 .5000 20 .5276 15 198.0 .6387 20 40
RPI 31T 17-17-2 .5000 38 .4935 37 74.87 .4406 38 22
Dartmouth 35 13-14-4 .4839 40 .4774 42 60.28 .3970 40 19
Boston Univ 36 13-15-8 .4722 34 .5067 32 107.5 .5149 34 27
Yale 37 15-17-2 .4706 39 .4824 41 61.77 .4018 39 21
St Cloud 38 14-17-6 .4595 25 .5168 18 177.7 .6175 25 35
NE-Omaha 39 15-19-5 .4487 29 .5120 25 148.5 .5813 29 30
Mich State 40 15-19-2 .4444 28 .5127 20 166.5 .6045 28 32
Robert Morris 41 15-20-5 .4375 45 .4663 47 33.84 .2891 46 15
Colgate 42 12-18-8 .4211 42 .4742 44 55.46 .3806 42 17
Wisconsin 43 14-20-2 .4167 32 .5097 22 162.8 .6000 31 28
Air Force 44 12-20-6 .3947 49 .4523 51 28.40 .2594 48 13
Lake Superior 45 14-23-4 .3902 44 .4714 39 69.78 .4263 44 16
Niagara 46 12-20-4 .3889 48 .4587 50 30.14 .2693 49 11
Holy Cross 47 11-21-5 .3649 50 .4497 56 24.56 .2362 51 9
Canisius 48 10-20-6 .3611 51 .4462 54 25.23 .2405 50 10
CO College 49 11-22-3 .3472 41 .4764 34 88.57 .4750 41 19
Merrimack 50 9-22-3 .3088 47 .4660 45 52.11 .3685 47 13
Miami 51 8-23-5 .2917 46 .4661 38 73.40 .4365 45 16
Brown 52 8-21-2 .2903 53 .4405 52 27.67 .2552 53 7
Union 53 8-25-4 .2703 54 .4341 57 23.23 .2276 54 6
Princeton 54 6-22-5 .2576 55 .4311 55 24.63 .2367 55 5
Vermont 55 5-23-6 .2353 52 .4429 48 33.37 .2866 52 8
Ferris State 56 7-26-2 .2286 56 .4287 49 31.45 .2765 56 5
AK-Anchorage 57 4-25-7 .2083 57 .4217 53 27.18 .2523 57 3
St Lawrence 58 4-27-5 .1806 59 .4067 59 12.16 .1420 59 1
Mercyhurst 59 5-29-2 .1667 60 .3941 60 7.874 .0991 60 0
AL-Huntsville 60 2-26-6 .1471 58 .4129 58 19.14 .1993 58 2
Additional results in case I made a data entry mistake (all scores are listed as 2-0 because only the result matters). Of course, the modified W-L-T records above also include this.
20200313 Ha 2 RP 0 NC
20200313 Ya 0 Qn 2 NC
20200313 Cg 0 Ck 2 NC
20200313 Pn 0 Cr 2 NC
20200313 Ni 0 Ar 2 NC
20200313 AF 0 RT 2 NC
20200313 RM 2 SH 0 NC
20200313 By 2 AI 0 NC
20200313 Ct 2 Me 0 NC
20200313 BU 0 ML 2 NC
20200313 NE 2 MA 0 NC
20200313 Pv 0 BC 2 NC
20200313 SC 2 WM 0 NC
20200313 NO 2 DU 0 NC
20200313 Mm 0 MD 2 NC
20200313 CC 0 ND 2 NC
20200313 BG 2 BS 0 NC
20200313 MT 0 Mk 2 NC
20200314 Ha 2 RP 0 NC
20200314 Ya 0 Qn 2 NC
20200314 Cg 0 Ck 2 NC
20200314 Pn 0 Cr 2 NC
20200314 Ni 0 Ar 2 NC
20200314 AF 0 RT 2 NC
20200314 RM 0 SH 2 NC
20200314 By 0 AI 2 NC
20200314 Ct 2 Me 0 NC
20200314 BU 0 ML 2 NC
20200314 NE 2 MA 0 NC
20200314 Pv 0 BC 2 NC
20200314 SC 0 WM 2 NC
20200314 NO 0 DU 2 NC
20200314 Mm 0 MD 2 NC
20200314 CC 0 ND 2 NC
20200314 BG 0 BS 2 NC
20200314 MT 0 Mk 2 NC
20200314 Mn 0 PS 2 NC
20200314 Mi 2 OS 0 NC
20200315 RM 2 SH 0 NC
20200315 By 0 AI 2 NC
20200315 SC 0 WM 2 NC
20200315 NO 0 DU 2 NC
20200315 BG 0 BS 2 NC
This is why John is the best. :-)
Quote from: TrotskyThis is why John is the best. :-)
Old-school browser busting? :-D
Tonight's broadcast will be at 7 which isn't exactly right but when I get home from work:
ECAC SF (Lake Placid, NY):
5 Harvard vs 1 Cornell
3 Quinnipiac vs 2 Clarkson
AHA SF (Buffalo, NY):
7 Robert Morris vs 1 AIC
4 Army vs 3 RIT
Hockey East SF (Boston, MA):
7 Northeastern vs 1 BC
5 Connecticut vs 3 Lowell
NCHC SF (Saint Paul, MN):
4 Western Michigan vs 1 North Dakota
3 Denver vs 2 Minnesota-Duluth
Big 10 F:
3 Michigan at 1 Penn State
WCHA F:
2 Bemidji at 1 Mankato
Are the B1G and WCHA finals supposed to be today?
Quote from: ursusminorAre the B1G and WCHA finals supposed to be today?
We'll check with the central office. Obviously we can't announce the scores if they aren't played!
Tonight's finals from Lake Placid.
In the late game, Clarkson beat Quinnipiac 4-1.
In the early game, Harvard scores the only goal at 2 minutes of the second period to beat Cornell 1-0.
Clarkson will play Harvard as part of the regular slate of game tomorrow. The NCAA Selection Show will be held at Noon on Sunday by a special guest contributor if I can get him.
Complete results from today's SFs:
ECAC SF (Lake Placid, NY):
5 Harvard vs 1 Cornell
3 Quinnipiac vs 2 Clarkson
AHA SF (Buffalo, NY):
7 Robert Morris vs 1 AIC
4 Army vs 3 RIT
Hockey East SF (Boston, MA):
7 Northeastern vs 1 BC
5 Connecticut vs 3 Lowell
NCHC SF (Saint Paul, MN):
4 Western Michigan vs 1 North Dakota
3 Denver vs 2 Minnesota-Duluth
Tomorrow finals:
Big 10 F: 3 Michigan at 1 Penn State
WCHA F: 2 Bemidji at 1 Mankato
ECAC F (Lake Placid, NY): 2 Clarkson vs 5 Harvard
AHA SF (Buffalo, NY): 1 AIC vs 3 RIT
Hockey East SF (Boston, MA): 1 BC vs 3 Lowell
NCHC SF (Saint Paul, MN): 1 North Dakota vs 2 Minnesota-Duluth
Updated pairwise:
Rk Team PWR RPI Comparisons Won
1 North Dakota (nt) 59 .6125 Mk Cr MD DU BC PS Ck ML OS MA Mi AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
2 MSU-Mankato (wc) 58 .6027 Cr MD DU BC PS Ck ML OS MA Mi AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
3 Cornell (ec) 57 .5846 MD DU BC PS Ck ML OS MA Mi AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
4 Minn-Duluth (nt) 56 .5821 DU BC PS Ck ML OS MA Mi AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
5 Denver U (nt) 55 .5592 BC PS Ck ML OS MA Mi AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
6 Boston Coll (he) 54 .5818 PS Ck ML OS MA Mi AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
7 Penn State (bt) 53 .5578 Ck ML OS MA Mi AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
8 Clarkson (ec) 52 .5571 ML OS MA Mi AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
9 Mass-Lowell (he) 51 .5481 OS MA Mi AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
10 Ohio State (bt) 50 .5434 MA Mi AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
11 Mass-Amherst (he) 49 .5410 Mi AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
12 Michigan (bt) 48 .5408 AS BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
13 Arizona State (in) 47 .5403 BS NE Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
14 Bemidji State (wc) 45 .5381 NE Qn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
15 NorthEastern (he) 45 .5370 Qn Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
16 Quinnipiac (ec) 44 .5338 Mn WM Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
17 Minnesota (bt) 43 .5291 BS Ha Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
18 Western Mich (nt) 42 .5330 Mn Ha Me Nt AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
19 Harvard (ec) 41 .5286 Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
20 Maine (he) 39 .5280 Nt BG AI Pv SC MT MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
21 Notre Dame (he) 39 .5279 BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
22 Bowling Green (wc) 39 .5236 WM AI Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
23 American Intl (ah) 37 .5178 Pv SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
24 Providence (he) 36 .5174 SC MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
25 St Cloud (nt) 35 .5168 MT Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
26 Michigan Tech (wc) 34 .5148 Ct MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
27 Connecticut (he) 34 .5130 Me MS NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
28 Mich State (bt) 32 .5121 NO SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
29 NE-Omaha (nt) 30 .5119 SH Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
30 Sacred Heart (ah) 30 .5109 Wi NH RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
31 Wisconsin (bt) 28 .5099 RT NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
32 New Hampshire (he) 27 .5103 Wi RT NM Ak RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
33 RIT (ah) 27 .5095 NM BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
34 Northern Mich (wc) 26 .5062 BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
35 Boston Univ (he) 26 .5064 NH Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
36 AK-Fairbanks (wc) 24 .4998 Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
37 Army (ah) 24 .4944 NH RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
38 RPI (ec) 22 .4941 Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
39 Yale (ec) 21 .4825 Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
40 Dartmouth (ec) 19 .4771 CC By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
41 CO College (nt) 19 .4763 Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
42 Colgate (ec) 17 .4747 Da By LS Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn AA AH SL Mh
43 Bentley (ah) 16 .4729 LS Mm Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
44 Lake Superior (wc) 16 .4713 Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
45 Miami (nt) 16 .4660 NO Cg AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
46 Merrimack (he) 15 .4662 Mm AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
47 Air Force (ah) 13 .4526 RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
48 Robert Morris (ah) 13 .4639 By Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
49 Niagara (ah) 11 .4587 Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
50 Canisius (ah) 10 .4461 HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
51 Holy Cross (ah) 9 .4495 Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
52 Vermont (he) 8 .4423 Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
53 Brown (ec) 7 .4404 Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
54 Union (ec) 6 .4338 Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
55 Princeton (ec) 5 .4307 FS AA AH SL Mh
56 Ferris State (wc) 5 .4285 Cg AA AH SL Mh
57 AK-Anchorage (wc) 3 .4215 AH SL Mh
58 AL-Huntsville (wc) 2 .4129 SL Mh
59 St Lawrence (ec) 1 .4070 Mh
60 Mercyhurst (ah) 0 .3938
Updated KRACH etc
Team Record RPI KRACH PWR
Rk W-L-T Pct. Rk Rating Rk Rating RRWP Rk Rating
MSU-Mankato 1 33-5-2 .8500 2 .6027 2 875.9 .8692 2 58
Cornell 2 25-3-4 .8438 3 .5846 4 474.0 .7905 3 57
North Dakota 3 29-5-4 .8158 1 .6125 1 895.1 .8715 1 59
Boston Coll 4 27-8-2 .7568 5 .5818 5 393.1 .7616 6 54
Clarkson 5 26-8-3 .7432 8 .5571 10 261.6 .6915 8 52
Minn-Duluth 6 25-10-2 .7027 4 .5821 3 501.3 .7987 4 56
Bemidji State 7 24-11-5 .6625 14 .5381 8 272.7 .6991 14 45
Penn State 8 21-10-4 .6571 7 .5578 7 310.5 .7221 7 53
Arizona State 9 22-11-3 .6528 13 .5403 16 193.0 .6337 13 47
Denver U 10 23-11-6 .6500 6 .5592 6 372.6 .7529 5 55
Mass-Lowell 11T 21-10-6 .6486 9 .5481 14 209.6 .6497 9 51
Quinnipiac 11T 23-12-2 .6486 16 .5338 22 157.6 .5934 16 44
American Intl 13 24-13-1 .6447 23 .5178 36 79.14 .4519 23 37
Sacred Heart 14 22-12-3 .6351 30 .5109 35 79.25 .4522 30 30
Harvard 15 18-10-6 .6176 19 .5286 27 140.2 .5696 19 41
RIT 16 22-13-4 .6154 33 .5095 39 73.21 .4360 33 27
Mass-Amherst 17 21-13-2 .6111 11 .5410 17 185.2 .6257 11 49
Ohio State 18 20-12-5 .6081 10 .5434 9 269.2 .6967 10 50
Maine 19 18-12-5 .5857 20 .5280 26 142.4 .5727 20 39
Bowling Green 20 22-15-4 .5854 22 .5236 19 173.7 .6129 22 39
Northeastern 21 20-14-3 .5811 15 .5370 23 156.6 .5921 15 45
Army 22 19-14-3 .5694 37 .4944 43 56.48 .3842 37 24
Michigan 23 19-14-4 .5676 12 .5408 12 250.4 .6834 12 48
Western Mich 24 20-15-5 .5625 17 .5330 11 253.6 .6858 18 42
Michigan Tech 25 21-17-3 .5488 26 .5148 24 155.8 .5911 26 34
Northern Mich 26 18-16-4 .5263 35 .5062 28 136.0 .5634 34 26
Providence 27 15-14-6 .5143 24 .5174 30 117.5 .5333 24 36
AK-Fairbanks 28 16-15-5 .5139 36 .4998 29 129.6 .5535 36 24
Connecticut 29 17-16-4 .5135 27 .5130 31 112.1 .5237 27 34
Minnesota 30 16-15-7 .5132 18 .5291 13 227.9 .6658 17 43
Bentley 31T 18-18-3 .5000 43 .4729 46 38.01 .3097 43 16
New Hampshire 31T 15-15-4 .5000 31 .5103 33 105.5 .5110 32 27
Notre Dame 31T 15-15-7 .5000 21 .5279 15 198.4 .6391 21 39
RPI 31T 17-17-2 .5000 38 .4941 37 75.44 .4421 38 22
Dartmouth 35 13-14-4 .4839 40 .4771 42 60.38 .3974 40 19
Boston Univ 36 13-15-8 .4722 34 .5064 32 107.8 .5155 35 26
Yale 37 15-17-2 .4706 39 .4825 41 61.98 .4025 39 21
St Cloud 38 14-17-6 .4595 25 .5168 18 177.7 .6175 25 35
NE-Omaha 39 15-19-5 .4487 29 .5119 25 148.6 .5815 29 30
Mich State 40 15-19-2 .4444 28 .5121 20 165.3 .6030 28 32
Robert Morris 41 15-21-5 .4268 47 .4639 48 32.42 .2818 48 13
Colgate 42 12-18-8 .4211 42 .4747 44 55.99 .3825 42 17
Wisconsin 43 14-20-2 .4167 32 .5099 21 164.1 .6015 31 28
Air Force 44 12-20-6 .3947 49 .4526 51 28.35 .2593 47 13
Lake Superior 45 14-23-4 .3902 44 .4713 40 69.73 .4262 44 16
Niagara 46 12-20-4 .3889 48 .4587 50 29.90 .2681 49 11
Holy Cross 47 11-21-5 .3649 50 .4495 56 24.35 .2350 51 9
Canisius 48 10-20-6 .3611 51 .4461 54 25.04 .2394 50 10
CO College 49 11-22-3 .3472 41 .4763 34 88.68 .4752 41 19
Merrimack 50 9-22-3 .3088 45 .4662 45 52.29 .3692 46 15
Miami 51 8-23-5 .2917 46 .4660 38 73.30 .4363 45 16
Brown 52 8-21-2 .2903 53 .4404 52 27.82 .2562 53 7
Union 53 8-25-4 .2703 54 .4338 57 23.25 .2279 54 6
Princeton 54 6-22-5 .2576 55 .4307 55 24.70 .2373 55 5
Vermont 55 5-23-6 .2353 52 .4423 47 33.38 .2868 52 8
Ferris State 56 7-26-2 .2286 56 .4285 49 31.42 .2765 56 5
AK-Anchorage 57 4-25-7 .2083 57 .4215 53 27.19 .2525 57 3
St Lawrence 58 4-27-5 .1806 59 .4070 59 12.23 .1429 59 1
Mercyhurst 59 5-29-2 .1667 60 .3938 60 7.810 .0985 60 0
AL-Huntsville 60 2-26-6 .1471 58 .4129 58 19.18 .1997 58 2
Additional scores in the list
20200320 Ha 2 Cr 0 nc
20200320 Qn 0 Ck 2 nc
20200320 RM 0 AI 2 nc
20200320 Ar 0 RT 2 nc
20200320 NE 0 BC 2 nc
20200320 Ct 0 ML 2 nc
20200320 WM 0 ND 2 nc
20200320 DU 0 MD 2 nc
Quote from: TrotskyComplete results from today's SFs:
ECAC SF (Lake Placid, NY):
5 Harvard vs 1 Cornell
3 Quinnipiac vs 2 Clarkson
AHA SF (Buffalo, NY):
7 Robert Morris vs 1 AIC
4 Army vs 3 RIT
Hockey East SF (Boston, MA):
7 Northeastern vs 1 BC
5 Connecticut vs 3 Lowell
NCHC SF (Saint Paul, MN):
4 Western Michigan vs 1 North Dakota
3 Denver vs 2 Minnesota-Duluth
So in your game every favored team wins, except Cornell?::screwy::
:-}
Quote from: Jim HylaQuote from: TrotskyComplete results from today's SFs:
ECAC SF (Lake Placid, NY):
5 Harvard vs 1 Cornell
3 Quinnipiac vs 2 Clarkson
AHA SF (Buffalo, NY):
7 Robert Morris vs 1 AIC
4 Army vs 3 RIT
Hockey East SF (Boston, MA):
7 Northeastern vs 1 BC
5 Connecticut vs 3 Lowell
NCHC SF (Saint Paul, MN):
4 Western Michigan vs 1 North Dakota
3 Denver vs 2 Minnesota-Duluth
So in your game every favored team wins, except Cornell?::screwy::
:-}
I had to play them, you only needed to watch. :-(
I just read the computer-generated results of a hypothetical next round in the 2020 NCAA division I men's National Ice Hockey Championship at USCHO online. It was unconvincing and deadly boring. The only numbers were predicted final scores. However, if the results had included six or eight pages of computer-generated numbers which parsed statistics of previous games the pain of the short season would be greatly eased.
Quote from: osorojoI just read the computer-generated results of a hypothetical next round in the 2020 NCAA division I men's National Ice Hockey Championship at USCHO online. It was unconvincing and deadly boring. The only numbers were predicted final scores. However, if the results had included six or eight pages of computer-generated numbers which parsed statistics of previous games the pain of the short season would be greatly eased.
Aaaaaaaaannnnnddd he's back
In tonight's finals:
Big 10 F: 3 Michigan at 1 Penn State
WCHA F: 2 Bemidji at 1 Mankato
AHA SF (Buffalo, NY): 1 AIC vs 3 RIT
Hockey East SF (Boston, MA): 1 BC vs 3 Lowell
NCHC SF (Saint Paul, MN): 1 North Dakota vs 2 Minnesota-Duluth
Finally, in Lake Placid, Harvard scored early in the first period, then again right off the opening face off of the second period, and completed an improbable shutout weekend to defeat Clarkson 2-0 and win the ECAC Championship.
After the final PWR is posted the NCAA brackets will be chosen and announced on the Selection Show tomorrow, here on this thread.
Meanwhile over on USCHO we "beat" Clarkson 3-1 to win our first ECAC tournament title since 2010. Goals by Berard,Barron, and Green.
I like what Trotsky is doing. Letting us lose in the ECACs so it doesn't look like favoritism when we win the NCAAs. Well played, sir, well played.
Quote from: scoop85Meanwhile over on USCHO we "beat" Clarkson 3-1 to win our first ECAC tournament title since 2010. Goals by Berard,Barron, and Green.
Big thanks to Trotsky for running his simulation, though the uscho game summary sounded pretty convincing.
Final PWR:
Rk Team PWR RPI Comparisons Won
1 North Dakota (nt) 59 .6160 Mk BC Cr MD PS DU Ck ML BS OS MA AS Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
2 MSU-Mankato (wc) 58 .5972 BC Cr MD PS DU Ck ML BS OS MA AS Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
3 Boston Coll (he) 56 .5850 Cr MD PS Ck ML BS OS MA AS Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
4 Cornell (ec) 56 .5846 MD PS DU Ck ML BS OS MA AS Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
5 Minn-Duluth (nt) 55 .5775 PS DU Ck ML BS OS MA AS Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
6 Penn State (bt) 54 .5600 DU Ck ML BS OS MA AS Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
7 Denver U (nt) 54 .5588 BC Ck ML BS OS MA AS Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
8 Clarkson (ec) 52 .5521 ML BS OS MA AS Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
9 Mass-Lowell (he) 51 .5449 BS OS MA AS Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
10 Bemidji State (wc) 49 .5436 OS MA AS Mi NE Qn Ha WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
11 Ohio State (bt) 49 .5425 MA AS Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
12 Mass-Amherst (he) 48 .5411 AS Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
13 Arizona State (in) 47 .5396 Mi NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
14 Michigan (bt) 46 .5371 NE Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
15 NorthEastern (he) 45 .5367 Qn Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
16 Quinnipiac (ec) 44 .5338 Ha Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
17 Harvard (ec) 43 .5332 Mn WM Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
18 Minnesota (bt) 42 .5290 BS Me Nt BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
19 Western Mich (nt) 41 .5326 Mn Me Nt AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
20 Maine (he) 39 .5278 Nt BG AI Pv SC MT MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
21 Notre Dame (he) 39 .5272 BG AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
22 Bowling Green (wc) 39 .5237 WM AI Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
23 American Intl (ah) 37 .5210 Pv SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
24 Providence (he) 36 .5173 SC MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
25 St Cloud (nt) 35 .5170 MT Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
26 Michigan Tech (wc) 34 .5142 Ct MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
27 Connecticut (he) 34 .5127 Me MS SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
28 Mich State (bt) 32 .5113 SH NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
29 Sacred Heart (ah) 31 .5111 NO Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
30 NE-Omaha (nt) 29 .5110 Wi BU NH RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
31 Wisconsin (bt) 28 .5089 BU RT NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
32 Boston Univ (he) 27 .5065 NH RT Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
33 New Hampshire (he) 27 .5098 Wi RT NM Ak RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
34 RIT (ah) 26 .5060 NM Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
35 Northern Mich (wc) 26 .5057 BU Ak Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
36 AK-Fairbanks (wc) 24 .5004 Ar RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
37 Army (ah) 24 .4946 NH RP Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
38 RPI (ec) 22 .4945 Ya Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
39 Yale (ec) 21 .4828 Da CC Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
40 Dartmouth (ec) 19 .4770 CC By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
41 CO College (nt) 19 .4757 Cg By LS Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
42 Colgate (ec) 17 .4747 Da By LS Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn AA AH SL Mh
43 Bentley (ah) 16 .4732 LS Mm Mr AF Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
44 Lake Superior (wc) 16 .4721 Mm Mr AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
45 Miami (nt) 16 .4655 NO Cg AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
46 Merrimack (he) 15 .4660 Mm AF RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
47 Air Force (ah) 13 .4523 RM Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
48 Robert Morris (ah) 13 .4641 By Ni Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
49 Niagara (ah) 11 .4587 Ca HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
50 Canisius (ah) 10 .4466 HC Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
51 Holy Cross (ah) 9 .4494 Vt Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
52 Vermont (he) 8 .4422 Bn Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
53 Brown (ec) 7 .4403 Un Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
54 Union (ec) 6 .4338 Pn FS AA AH SL Mh
55 Princeton (ec) 5 .4306 FS AA AH SL Mh
56 Ferris State (wc) 5 .4286 Cg AA AH SL Mh
57 AK-Anchorage (wc) 3 .4211 AH SL Mh
58 AL-Huntsville (wc) 2 .4130 SL Mh
59 St Lawrence (ec) 1 .4071 Mh
60 Mercyhurst (ah) 0 .3938
Final ratings:
Team Record RPI KRACH PWR
Rk W-L-T Pct. Rk Rating Rk Rating RRWP Rk Rating
Cornell 1 25-3-4 .8438 4 .5846 3 475.2 .7913 4 56
MSU-Mankato 2 33-6-2 .8293 2 .5972 2 763.3 .8541 2 58
North Dakota 3 30-5-4 .8205 1 .6160 1 939.8 .8770 1 59
Boston Coll 4 28-8-2 .7632 3 .5850 5 415.2 .7706 3 56
Clarkson 5 26-9-3 .7237 8 .5521 11 237.6 .6739 8 52
Minn-Duluth 6 25-11-2 .6842 5 .5775 4 471.5 .7901 5 55
Bemidji State 7 25-11-5 .6707 10 .5436 8 298.1 .7153 10 49
Penn State 8 22-10-4 .6667 6 .5600 7 324.8 .7302 6 54
American Intl 9 25-13-1 .6538 23 .5210 35 83.97 .4640 23 37
Arizona State 10 22-11-3 .6528 13 .5396 16 190.7 .6315 13 47
Denver U 11 23-11-6 .6500 7 .5588 6 371.3 .7527 7 54
Quinnipiac 12 23-12-2 .6486 16 .5338 22 158.1 .5941 16 44
Sacred Heart 13 22-12-3 .6351 29 .5111 36 79.86 .4537 29 31
Mass-Lowell 14 21-11-6 .6316 9 .5449 14 200.7 .6416 9 51
Harvard 15 19-10-6 .6286 17 .5332 24 154.3 .5892 17 43
Mass-Amherst 16 21-13-2 .6111 12 .5411 17 186.3 .6269 12 48
Ohio State 17 20-12-5 .6081 11 .5425 9 267.0 .6955 11 49
RIT 18 22-14-4 .6000 34 .5060 40 69.33 .4249 34 26
Maine 19 18-12-5 .5857 20 .5278 27 142.8 .5734 20 39
Bowling Green 20 22-15-4 .5854 22 .5237 19 173.8 .6131 22 39
Northeastern 21 20-14-3 .5811 15 .5367 23 157.6 .5935 15 45
Army 22 19-14-3 .5694 37 .4946 43 56.72 .3849 37 24
Western Mich 23 20-15-5 .5625 18 .5326 10 251.7 .6847 19 41
Michigan 24 19-15-4 .5526 14 .5371 12 237.3 .6736 14 46
Michigan Tech 25 21-17-3 .5488 26 .5142 25 154.2 .5891 26 34
Northern Mich 26 18-16-4 .5263 35 .5057 28 135.3 .5624 35 26
Providence 27 15-14-6 .5143 24 .5173 30 117.7 .5337 24 36
AK-Fairbanks 28 16-15-5 .5139 36 .5004 29 130.4 .5548 36 24
Connecticut 29 17-16-4 .5135 27 .5127 31 112.1 .5236 27 34
Minnesota 30 16-15-7 .5132 19 .5290 13 227.3 .6655 18 42
Bentley 31T 18-18-3 .5000 43 .4732 46 38.27 .3107 43 16
New Hampshire 31T 15-15-4 .5000 31 .5098 33 105.5 .5110 33 27
Notre Dame 31T 15-15-7 .5000 21 .5272 15 197.9 .6388 21 39
RPI 31T 17-17-2 .5000 38 .4945 37 76.06 .4437 38 22
Dartmouth 35 13-14-4 .4839 40 .4770 42 60.67 .3982 40 19
Boston Univ 36 13-15-8 .4722 33 .5065 32 108.0 .5158 32 27
Yale 37 15-17-2 .4706 39 .4828 41 62.51 .4041 39 21
St Cloud 38 14-17-6 .4595 25 .5170 18 177.2 .6170 25 35
NE-Omaha 39 15-19-5 .4487 30 .5110 26 147.6 .5801 30 29
Mich State 40 15-19-2 .4444 28 .5113 20 163.9 .6014 28 32
Robert Morris 41 15-21-5 .4268 47 .4641 48 32.55 .2823 48 13
Colgate 42 12-18-8 .4211 42 .4747 44 55.84 .3819 42 17
Wisconsin 43 14-20-2 .4167 32 .5089 21 162.0 .5991 31 28
Air Force 44 12-20-6 .3947 49 .4523 51 28.23 .2585 47 13
Lake Superior 45 14-23-4 .3902 44 .4721 39 70.18 .4274 44 16
Niagara 46 12-20-4 .3889 48 .4587 50 29.89 .2679 49 11
Holy Cross 47 11-21-5 .3649 50 .4494 56 24.34 .2348 51 9
Canisius 48 10-20-6 .3611 51 .4466 54 25.13 .2398 50 10
CO College 49 11-22-3 .3472 41 .4757 34 88.14 .4739 41 19
Merrimack 50 9-22-3 .3088 45 .4660 45 52.19 .3687 46 15
Miami 51 8-23-5 .2917 46 .4655 38 72.92 .4351 45 16
Brown 52 8-21-2 .2903 53 .4403 52 27.95 .2568 53 7
Union 53 8-25-4 .2703 54 .4338 57 23.38 .2286 54 6
Princeton 54 6-22-5 .2576 55 .4306 55 24.85 .2380 55 5
Vermont 55 5-23-6 .2353 52 .4422 47 33.40 .2867 52 8
Ferris State 56 7-26-2 .2286 56 .4286 49 31.49 .2766 56 5
AK-Anchorage 57 4-25-7 .2083 57 .4211 53 27.14 .2520 57 3
St Lawrence 58 4-27-5 .1806 59 .4071 59 12.30 .1433 59 1
Mercyhurst 59 5-29-2 .1667 60 .3938 60 7.839 .0987 60 0
AL-Huntsville 60 2-26-6 .1471 58 .4130 58 19.18 .1996 58 2
Last set of scores included:
20200321 Mi 0 PS 2 nc
20200321 BS 2 Mk 0 nc
20200321 AI 2 RT 0 nc
20200321 BC 2 ML 0 nc
20200321 ND 2 MD 0 nc
20200321 Ha 2 Ck 0 nc
So before the Selection Show I will haltingly go through a bracket prediction.
First, the field (bold auto bids):
1 North Dakota, NCHC
2 Mankato, WCHA
3 BC, HE
4 Cornell, ECAC
5 Minnesota-Duluth, NCHC
6 Pedo State, B1G; Allentown host
7 Denver, NCHC; Loveland host
8 Clarkson, ECAC
9 Lowell HE
10 Bemidji, WCHA
11 Ohio State, B1G
12 Massachusetts, HE
13 Arizona State, Indy
14 Michigan, B1G
17 Harvard, ECAC
23 AIC, AHA
Initial placement:
The 1-seeds by propinquity gives us:
1 North Dakota, NCHC --> Loveland
2 Mankato, WCHA --> Albany
3 BC, HE --> Worcester
4 Cornell, ECAC --> Allentown
The 2-seeds have the two hosts fixed so we seed the other two by propinquity:
5 Minnesota-Duluth, NCHC--> Albany
6 Pedo State, B1G --> Allentown host
7 Denver, NCHC --> Loveland host
8 Clarkson, ECAC --> Worcester
The 3 and 4 seeds have to avoid conference matchups:
9 Lowell HE --> anywhere
10 Bemidji, WCHA --> anywhere
11 Ohio State, B1G --> anywhere but Pedo State
12 Massachusetts, HE --> anywhere
13 Arizona State, Indy --> anywhere
14 Michigan, B1G --> anywhere
17 Harvard, ECAC --> anywhere but Cornell
23 AIC, AHA --> anywhere
Let's try to preserve bracket integrity by seeding the 1R opponents as close as possible to 1/16, 2/15, ..., 8/9.
9 Lowell HE --> vs 8 --> Worcester
10 Bemidji, WCHA --> vs 7 --> Loveland
11 Ohio State, B1G --> anywhere but Pedo State --> vs 6 --> Allentown (nope, conflict!)
12 Massachusetts, HE --> vs 5 --> Albany
13 Arizona State, Indy --> vs 4 --> Allentown
14 Michigan, B1G --> vs 3 --> Worcester
17 Harvard, ECAC --> anywhere but Cornell --> vs 2 --> Albany
23 AIC, AHA --> vs 1 --> Loveland
The 3 seeds are messed up by the B1G Problem. Since Lowell and Bemidji are each good hits for their regional assignments, I judge the least disruptive change to be flipping Ohio State and Massachusetts. That gives us these final brackets:
1 North Dakota, NCHC --> Loveland
2 Mankato, WCHA --> Albany
3 BC, HE --> Worcester
4 Cornell, ECAC --> Allentown
5 Minnesota-Duluth, NCHC--> Albany
6 Pedo State, B1G --> Allentown host
7 Denver, NCHC --> Loveland host
8 Clarkson, ECAC --> Worcester
9 Lowell HE --> Worcester
10 Bemidji, WCHA --> Loveland
11 Ohio State, B1G --> Albany
12 Massachusetts, HE --> Allentown
13 Arizona State, Indy --> Allentown
14 Michigan, B1G --> Worcester
17 Harvard, ECAC --> Albany
23 AIC, AHA --> Loveland
Loveland
1 North Dakota, NCHC
7 Denver, NCHC
10 Bemidji, WCHA
23 AIC, AHA
Albany
2 Mankato, WCHA
5 Minnesota-Duluth, NCHC
11 Ohio State, B1G
17 Harvard, ECAC
Worcester
3 BC, HE
8 Clarkson, ECAC
9 Lowell HE
14 Michigan, B1G
Allentown
4 Cornell, ECAC
6 Pedo State, B1G
12 Massachusetts, HE
13 Arizona State, Indy
The Selection Show results will be posted at Noon, so the forum is open until then for other opinions. Hint, hint.
Which bubble teams did not make it?
Putting us in Allentown when there's no tourney? You would, you SOB.
Quote from: KenPWhich bubble teams did not make it?
Northeastern and Quinnipiac.
Quote from: KenPWhich bubble teams did not make it?
From jtw's post, 15-Northeastern and 16-QU were replaced by the two auto bids.
Edit: A bit late.
Quote from: TrotskyThe Selection Show results will be posted at Noon, so the forum is open until then for other opinions. Hint, hint.
I'd flip Cornell and ASU to Albany with Mankato and Harvard in Allentown.
That way if the high seeds won the second round in those two venues are 4 vs 5 and 2 vs 6.
Your second round is 4 vs 6 and 2 vs 5.
Quote from: martyQuote from: TrotskyThe Selection Show results will be posted at Noon, so the forum is open until then for other opinions. Hint, hint.
I'd flip Cornell and ASU to Albany with Mankato and Harvard in Allentown.
That way if the high seeds won the second round in those two venues are 4 vs 5 and 2 vs 6.
Your second round is 4 vs 6 and 2 vs 5.
Agree, plus it actually brings some fans to Albany. Before the flip, the closest school is Harvard and we know how many fans they'll bring.
With the flip it doesn't effect Mankato as they have to fly. It might actually make it easier, as I suspect they could easily fly to Philly, rent a car and drive.
It makes it easier for (T)OSU fans to drive, 7 vs. 9 hours.
ASU has same issues as Mankato.
Quote from: martyQuote from: TrotskyThe Selection Show results will be posted at Noon, so the forum is open until then for other opinions. Hint, hint.
I'd flip Cornell and ASU to Albany with Mankato and Harvard in Allentown.
That way if the high seeds won the second round in those two venues are 4 vs 5 and 2 vs 6.
Your second round is 4 vs 6 and 2 vs 5.
That's a good point.
The only pure seeding integrity conference conflict is 6 Pedo State / 11 Ohio State.
So, we can start from the 2-seeds because they have less freedom (#hostssuck):
5 Minnesota-Duluth, NCHC--> Albany or Worcester
6 Pedo State, B1G --> Allentown host
7 Denver, NCHC --> Loveland host
8 Clarkson, ECAC --> Albany or Worcester
then we backtrack to the 1-seeds to max out second round integrity:
1 North Dakota, NCHC --> vs 8 Clarkson in Albany or Worcester
2 Mankato, WCHA --> vs 7 in Loveland
3 BC, HE --> vs 6 Pedo State in Allentown
4 Cornell, ECAC --> vs 5 Minnesota-Duluth in Albany or Worcester
Give North Dakota Albany on propinquity.
OK, trying again.
Start with pure integrity plus North Dakota --> Albany
Loveland
2 Mankato, WCHA
7 Denver, NCHC
10 Bemidji, WCHA
15 Harvard, ECAC
Albany
1 North Dakota, NCHC
8 Clarkson, ECAC
9 Lowell HE
16 AIC, AHA
Worcester
4 Cornell, ECAC
5 Minnesota-Duluth, NCHC
12 Massachusetts, HE
13 Arizona State, Indy
Allentown
3 BC, HE
6 Pedo State, B1G
11 Ohio State, B1G
14 Michigan, B1G
Ohio State must move. Bemidji makes sense in Loveland. Lowell gets the propinquity preference over Massachusetts. Therefore,
Loveland
2 Mankato, WCHA
7 Denver, NCHC
10 Bemidji, WCHA
15 Harvard, ECAC
Albany
1 North Dakota, NCHC
8 Clarkson, ECAC
9 Lowell HE
16 AIC, AHA
Worcester
4 Cornell, ECAC
5 Minnesota-Duluth, NCHC
11 Ohio State, B1G
13 Arizona State, Indy
Allentown
3 BC, HE
6 Pedo State, B1G
12 Massachusetts, HE
14 Michigan, B1G
The wages of Cornell's loss to Harvard and drop to #4 is repeat national champion UMD.
20 more minutes to comment before the Selection Show.
Quote from: TrotskyOK, trying again.
Start with pure integrity plus North Dakota --> Albany
Loveland
2 Mankato, WCHA
7 Denver, NCHC
10 Bemidji, WCHA
15 Harvard, ECAC
Albany
1 North Dakota, NCHC
8 Clarkson, ECAC
9 Lowell HE
16 AIC, AHA
Worcester
4 Cornell, ECAC
5 Minnesota-Duluth, NCHC
12 Massachusetts, HE
13 Arizona State, Indy
Allentown
3 BC, HE
6 Pedo State, B1G
11 Ohio State, B1G
14 Michigan, B1G
Ohio State must move. Bemidji makes sense in Loveland. Lowell gets the propinquity preference over Massachusetts. Therefore,
Loveland
2 Mankato, WCHA
7 Denver, NCHC
10 Bemidji, WCHA
15 Harvard, ECAC
Albany
1 North Dakota, NCHC
8 Clarkson, ECAC
9 Lowell HE
16 AIC, AHA
Worcester
4 Cornell, ECAC
5 Minnesota-Duluth, NCHC
11 Ohio State, B1G
13 Arizona State, Indy
Allentown
3 BC, HE
6 Pedo State, B1G
12 Massachusetts, HE
14 Michigan, B1G
The wages of Cornell's loss to Harvard and drop to #4 is repeat national champion UMD.
There is no egging way that any NCAA committee puts BC a millimeter further from home. Ergo BC in Wuhsta.
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82Putting us in Allentown when there's no tourney? You would, you SOB.
+1 was thinking the same thing.
The 2020 NCAA Selection:
Albany
1 North Dakota, NCHC
8 Clarkson, ECAC
9 Lowell HE
16 AIC, AHA
Loveland
2 Mankato, WCHA
7 Denver, NCHC
10 Bemidji, WCHA
15 Harvard, ECAC
Worcester
3 BC, HE
5 Minnesota-Duluth, NCHC
11 Ohio State, B1G
14 Michigan, B1G
Allentown
4 Cornell, ECAC
6 Pedo State, B1G
12 Massachusetts, HE
13 Arizona State, Indy
So, it looks like you were right, Marty. They put BC in Worcester for attendance and also moved their 1R partner Michigan there. Cornell and the host will get people to Allentown. Clarkson should have a good crowd in Albany and the Sioux travel well. And Loveland will have no trouble at all.
See you all Friday for the first games.
The regionals will begin this weekend though I'm not quite sure what the schedule is (it has been removed in several places for reasons not relevant to OTL). As soon as I have them I will post the schedule of results.
Friday: 4 1R from early regionals
Saturday: 4 1R from late regionals and 2 QF from early regionals
Sunday: 2 QF from late regionals
I think this is right:
Loveland is 3/27-28 (early)
Worcester is 3/27-28 (early)
Allentown is 3/28-29 (late)
Albany is 3/28-29 (late)
If that is correct then this is the schedule:
Friday
Worcester 1-4: 3 BC vs 14 Michigan
Loveland 1-4: 2 Mankato vs 15 Harvard
Worcester 2-3: 5 Minnesota-Duluth vs 11 Ohio State
Loveland 2-3: 7 Denver vs 10 Bemidji
Saturday
Albany 1-4: 1 North Dakota vs 16 AIC
Allentown 1-4: 4 Cornell vs 13 Arizona State
Worcester QF
Albany 2-3: 8 Clarkson vs 9 Lowell
Allentown 2-3: 6 Pedo State vs 12 Massachusetts
Loveland QF
Sunday
Albany QF
Allentown QF
Quote from: TrotskyI think this is right:
Loveland is 3/27-28 (early)
Worcester is 3/27-28 (early)
Allentown is 3/28-29 (late)
Albany is 3/28-29 (late)
My notes had it the same as you do here.
Friday's NCAA games:
Worcester 1-4: 3 BC defeats 14 Michigan
Worcester 2-3: 5 Minnesota-Duluth vs 11 Ohio State
Loveland 2-3: 7 Denver vs 10 Bemidji
Loveland 1-4: 2 Mankato upset by 15 Harvard:
Man 0 1 0 - 1
Hvd 0 1 2 - 3
2 08 M 1-0
2 09 H 1-1
3 15 H 2-1
3 18 H 3-1 en
Saturday's Cornell game will be broadcast at noon:
Albany 1-4: 1 North Dakota vs 16 AIC
Allentown 1-4: 4 Cornell vs 13 Arizona State
Albany 2-3: 8 Clarkson vs 9 Lowell
Allentown 2-3: 6 Pedo State vs 12 Massachusetts
Worcester QF: 3 BC vs 5 Minnesota-Duluth
Loveland QF: 7 Denver vs 15 Harvard
Quote from: TrotskyFriday's NCAA games:
Worcester 1-4: 3 BC defeats 14 Michigan
Worcester 2-3: 5 Minnesota-Duluth vs 11 Ohio State
Loveland 2-3: 7 Denver vs 10 Bemidji
Loveland 1-4: 2 Mankato upset by 15 Harvard:
Man 0 1 0 - 1
Hvd 0 1 2 - 3
2 08 M 1-0
2 09 H 1-1
3 15 H 2-1
3 18 H 3-1 en
Harvard winning an NCAA game? Clearly this is a fantasy league...
Quote from: KenPQuote from: TrotskyFriday's NCAA games:
Worcester 1-4: 3 BC defeats 14 Michigan
Worcester 2-3: 5 Minnesota-Duluth vs 11 Ohio State
Loveland 2-3: 7 Denver vs 10 Bemidji
Loveland 1-4: 2 Mankato upset by 15 Harvard:
Man 0 1 0 - 1
Hvd 0 1 2 - 3
2 08 M 1-0
2 09 H 1-1
3 15 H 2-1
3 18 H 3-1 en
Harvard winning an NCAA game? Clearly this is a fantasy league...
If you can't see what he's doing...
Quote from: RichHIf you can't see what he's doing...
It's the cards, baby. I don't write this, I just read it.
Cornell game on Slack in 5.
Saturday's First Round results:
Albany 1-4: 1 North Dakota defeated 16 AIC
Allentown 2-3: 6 Pedo State defeated 12 Massachusetts
Albany 2-3: 8 Clarkson upset by 9 Lowell
Low 0 3 0 - 3
Clk 0 1 1 - 2
2 10 K 1-0
2 11 L 1-1
2 18 L 1-2
2 19 L 1-3
3 03 K 2-3
Allentown 1-4: 4 Cornell defeated 13 Arizona State
ASU 0 0 1 - 1
Cor 1 3 1 - 5
1 01 C 1-0 Donaldson 3
2 00 C 2-0 Green 3
2 13 C 3-0 Motley 1
2 16 C 4-0 Stienburg 1
3 07 C 5-0 Betts 1
3 16 A 5-1
Today's Regional Finals will be announced as results come in later in the afternoon:
Worcester QF: 3 BC vs 5 Minnesota-Duluth
Loveland QF: 7 Denver vs 15 Harvard
Regional Finals: (winners advance to the Frozen Four in Detroit)
Worcester: 3 BC upset by 5 Minnesota-Duluth
Loveland: 7 Denver defeated 15 Harvard
Hvd 1 0 1 - 2
Den 0 3 1 - 4
1 09 H 1-0
2 00 D 1-1
2 03 D 1-2
2 13 D 1-3
3 11 H 2-3
3 16 D 2-4
So we have half the Frozen Four field: #5 Minnesota-Duluth, the two-time defending national champion, and #7 Denver. Each team was its regional's 2-seed.
I'm not exactly sure whether these teams play each other in the SF.
Quote from: TrotskySaturday's First Round results:
Albany 1-4: 1 North Dakota defeated 16 AIC
Allentown 2-3: 6 Pedo State defeated 12 Massachusetts
Albany 2-3: 8 Clarkson upset by 9 Lowell
Low 0 3 0 - 3
Clk 0 1 1 - 2
2 10 K 1-0
2 11 L 1-1
2 18 L 1-2
2 19 L 1-3
3 03 K 2-3
Allentown 1-4: 4 Cornell defeated 13 Arizona State
ASU 0 0 1 - 1
Cor 1 3 1 - 5
1 01 C 1-0 Donaldson 3
2 00 C 2-0 Green 3
2 13 C 3-0 Motley 1
2 16 C 4-0 Stienburg 1
3 07 C 5-0 Betts 1
3 16 A 5-1
Today's Regional Finals will be announced as results come in later in the afternoon:
Worcester QF: 3 BC vs 5 Minnesota-Duluth
Loveland QF: 7 Denver vs 15 Harvard
Interesting that Motley was "in the lineup" given he hadn't played much in the second half of the season.
Quote from: scoop85Quote from: TrotskySaturday's First Round results:
Albany 1-4: 1 North Dakota defeated 16 AIC
Allentown 2-3: 6 Pedo State defeated 12 Massachusetts
Albany 2-3: 8 Clarkson upset by 9 Lowell
Low 0 3 0 - 3
Clk 0 1 1 - 2
2 10 K 1-0
2 11 L 1-1
2 18 L 1-2
2 19 L 1-3
3 03 K 2-3
Allentown 1-4: 4 Cornell defeated 13 Arizona State
ASU 0 0 1 - 1
Cor 1 3 1 - 5
1 01 C 1-0 Donaldson 3
2 00 C 2-0 Green 3
2 13 C 3-0 Motley 1
2 16 C 4-0 Stienburg 1
3 07 C 5-0 Betts 1
3 16 A 5-1
Today's Regional Finals will be announced as results come in later in the afternoon:
Worcester QF: 3 BC vs 5 Minnesota-Duluth
Loveland QF: 7 Denver vs 15 Harvard
Interesting that Motley was "in the lineup" given he hadn't played much in the second half of the season.
If you scored a goal during the regular season you have a non-zero chance of being in the lineup and thus scoring. Clearly there was some combination of circumstances where Mike elected to play him and, presto, he was right!
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: scoop85Interesting that Motley was "in the lineup" given he hadn't played much in the second half of the season.
If you scored a goal during the regular season you have a non-zero chance of being in the lineup and thus scoring. Clearly there was some combination of circumstances where Mike elected to play him and, presto, he was right!
honestly the goals to minutes played for the tupkers and motley and leahy felt like a coach who was just VIBING with the guys who were feeling it that day. i'm not going to check this.
things we dont know.. who is working hard in practice and who is getting slightly dinged up.. Baron at 80% is gonna play the 3-4th liners not so much
Quote from: TrotskyRegional Finals: (winners advance to the Frozen Four in Detroit)
Worcester: 3 BC upset by 5 Minnesota-Duluth
Loveland: 7 Denver defeated 15 Harvard
Hvd 1 0 1 - 2
Den 0 3 1 - 4
1 09 H 1-0
2 00 D 1-1
2 03 D 1-2
2 13 D 1-3
3 11 H 2-3
3 16 D 2-4
So we have half the Frozen Four field: #5 Minnesota-Duluth, the two-time defending national champion, and #7 Denver. Each team was its regional's 2-seed.
I'm not exactly sure whether these teams play each other in the SF.
The brackets with the #1 and #4 overall seeds meet in one semi, and the brackets with #2 and #3 overall meet in the other. So Denver would play UMD,
Quote from: jkahnQuote from: TrotskyRegional Finals: (winners advance to the Frozen Four in Detroit)
Worcester: 3 BC upset by 5 Minnesota-Duluth
Loveland: 7 Denver defeated 15 Harvard
Hvd 1 0 1 - 2
Den 0 3 1 - 4
1 09 H 1-0
2 00 D 1-1
2 03 D 1-2
2 13 D 1-3
3 11 H 2-3
3 16 D 2-4
So we have half the Frozen Four field: #5 Minnesota-Duluth, the two-time defending national champion, and #7 Denver. Each team was its regional's 2-seed.
I'm not exactly sure whether these teams play each other in the SF.
The brackets with the #1 and #4 overall seeds meet in one semi, and the brackets with #2 and #3 overall meet in the other. So Denver would play UMD,
Excellent. Thank you.
Are we saying 1-4/2-3 because thats how it worked out or because that the way it was set up? I didnt think they reseeded ?
Quote from: upprdeckAre we saying 1-4/2-3 because thats how it worked out or because that the way it was set up? I didnt think they reseeded ?
I don't think they reseed. It is based on the 1-4 bracket of 16 at the start of the regionals.
It's definitely fixed brackets. It is logical that the 1 and 4 brackets are matched. I should have remembered.
What is the proper pronunciation? (Asking for a friend)
* Peddo State?
* PEEdough State?
* Depends if you're American or British?
Quote from: billhoward* Depends if you're American or British?
In the UK it is PEE-dough State. In the US it is PED-oh State.
Today at noon on slack, the livestream of #4 Cornell playing #6 Pedo State. The winner advances to the Frozen Four in Detroit.
#5 Minnesota-Duluth (the two-time defending national champion) and #7 Denver have each advanced from their regions. In Albany, #1 North Dakota is currently underway against #9 Lowell and we should have the result prior to the start of our game.
The USCHO virtual simulation of the imaginary quarter-finals shows B.C.men defeating Cornell men. This is SO wrong. Somebody ought to publish a rebuttal, with at least five pages of statistics and arithmatec carried out to the 4th decimal place!
Today's Regional championship games:
Albany: 1 North Dakota defeated 9 Lowell
Allentown: 4 Cornell was upset by 6 Pedo State in overtime
PSU 1 0 0 1 - 2
Cor 0 1 0 0 - 1
1 19 P 0-1
2 16 C 1-1 Green 4
4 03 P 1-2
Final statistics for Cornell in the post-season:
Scoring:
4 Alex Green
3 Cam Donaldson
1 Max Andreev
1 Ben Berard
1 Kyle Betts
1 Jeff Malott
1 Liam Motley
1 Max Stienberg
Goaltending:
GP W - L Mins GA SO GAA
Matt Galajda 5 3 - 2 302 5 1 0.99
Game Results:
3/13 ECAC QF.1 5 - Princeton .......... 0
3/14 ECAC QF.2 2 - Princeton .......... 1
3/20 ECAC SF 0 - vs Harvard ......... 1
3/27 NCAA 1R 5 - vs Arizona State ... 1
3/28 NCAA QF 1 - vs Pedo State ...... 2 (ot)
Aggregate box score:
Opponents 1 1 2 1 - 5
Cornell 5 3 2 0 - 13
2020 Frozen Four
April 9:
#5 Minnesota-Duluth vs #7 Denver
#1 North Dakota vs #6 Pedo State
Ah, the bitter taste of integrity.
Quote from: TrotskyToday's Regional championship games:
Albany: 1 North Dakota defeated 9 Lowell
Allentown: 4 Cornell was upset by 6 Pedo State in overtime
PSU 1 0 0 1 - 2
Cor 0 1 0 0 - 1
1 19 P 0-1
2 16 C 1-1 Green 4
4 03 P 1-2
Cornell: where even our fantasy simulations are painful.
happens every goddamn time we get stuck in someone else's regional
Our last hope is the CHN simulation.
Quote from: scoop85Our last hope is the CHN simulation.
Yes. That one's not being run by a crank that threw us to the Lions.
Quote from: ugartehappens every goddamn time we get stuck in someone else's regional
#endhosts
Well, now I'm actually liking real life better.
Quote from: Give My RegardsWell, now I'm actually liking real life better.
Yeah, and there goes the CHN tourney. Our record in the regional finals is as bad virtually as it has been in reality.
Quote from: scoop85Quote from: Give My RegardsWell, now I'm actually liking real life better.
Yeah, and there goes the CHN tourney. Our record in the regional finals is as bad virtually as it has been in reality.
Nice comment on the CHN game thread.
Quote from: William WardCornell averaged about 10 penalty minutes per game through this season....one of the lowest averages in all of Division 1. They also had the fewest game misconducts. Whatever your calculation is for game misconducts, it clearly is not based on season stats per team. Maybe it's based on a Division 1 average. So you penalized Cornell with an unrealistic simulation. The #1 ranked team in the nation would never have committed a game misconduct in a game for the final four. Your simulation is flawed and needs to be corrected and replayed before you continue to disparage great teams. Cornell would have wiped the ice with BC in a game in Albany.
If the simulation were to be replayed, we probably would've had a 2 goal first period, followed by a BC goal off a high stick in the second. Then we'd have battled back to get a disallowed goal, three crossbars, and a whiff on an empty net. BC pots an easy one on a cherry picked breakaway, then we go to two overtimes and BC still would have taken it all on a puck bounced in off a skate that was reviewed and deemed good.
Quote from: Jim HylaQuote from: scoop85Quote from: Give My RegardsWell, now I'm actually liking real life better.
Yeah, and there goes the CHN tourney. Our record in the regional finals is as bad virtually as it has been in reality.
Nice comment on the CHN game thread.
Quote from: William WardCornell averaged about 10 penalty minutes per game through this season....one of the lowest averages in all of Division 1. They also had the fewest game misconducts. Whatever your calculation is for game misconducts, it clearly is not based on season stats per team. Maybe it's based on a Division 1 average. So you penalized Cornell with an unrealistic simulation. The #1 ranked team in the nation would never have committed a game misconduct in a game for the final four. Your simulation is flawed and needs to be corrected and replayed before you continue to disparage great teams. Cornell would have wiped the ice with BC in a game in Albany.
Sounds like somebody needs to get a sense of perspective. And possibly also a lesson on Poisson statistics.
It's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Quote from: ursusminorIt's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Ralph, could you please give us a link? I can't find it on YouTube nor RPITV.org.
Quote from: martyQuote from: ursusminorIt's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Ralph, could you please give us a link? I can't find it on YouTube nor RPITV.org.
Sorry. Pickett is a BU fan. Most of his videos thus pertain to BU, but I am sure you remember that the ECAC still used the Boston Garden for several years after the great divorce. The thread is here (https://fanforum.uscho.com/showthread.php?136069-Finding-old-games-to-watch). The direct link to his uploaded files is here (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1eTkkKsrWu9fxhoGLfHGj_in1UusUhzIA). There is a second Cornell game from a year later, also a loss. Both videos are near the beginning.
Quote from: ursusminorQuote from: martyQuote from: ursusminorIt's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Ralph, could you please give us a link? I can't find it on YouTube nor RPITV.org.
Sorry. Pickett is a BU fan. Most of his videos thus pertain to BU, but I am sure you remember that the ECAC still used the Boston Garden for several years after the great divorce. The thread is here (https://fanforum.uscho.com/showthread.php?136069-Finding-old-games-to-watch). The direct link to his uploaded files is here (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1eTkkKsrWu9fxhoGLfHGj_in1UusUhzIA). There is a second Cornell game from a year later, also a loss. Both videos are near the beginning.
Thanks! In 1996 and 1997 I went to Walmart and changed the station on the feed to their display TVs to see the ECAC tournament. But I don't think that option was available in 1990.
Quote from: ursusminorIt's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Those of us who were there in person remember that game not just for having lost in a season we had more than the usual firepower, but for Ross Lemon being awarded - and missing - a penalty shot
on his birthday that would have been a late-game tying goal.
Quote from: BeeeejQuote from: ursusminorIt's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Those of us who were there in person remember that game not just for having lost in a season we had more than the usual firepower, but for Ross Lemon being awarded - and missing - a penalty shot on his birthday that would have been a late-game tying goal.
I remember feeling like the only person in the building who heard the quick whistle before Trent Andison put back a loose rebound.
Quote from: BeeeejQuote from: ursusminorIt's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Those of us who were there in person remember that game not just for having lost in a season we had more than the usual firepower, but for Ross Lemon being awarded - and missing - a penalty shot on his birthday that would have been a late-game tying goal.
Lemon had also been on a tear that season scoring a goal in something like 10 or 11 straight games.
Quote from: BeeeejQuote from: ursusminorIt's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Those of us who were there in person remember that game not just for having lost in a season we had more than the usual firepower, but for Ross Lemon being awarded - and missing - a penalty shot on his birthday that would have been a late-game tying goal.
If I recall correctly, had Ross scored, it was going to be some weird numerical anomaly where it would have been his 23rd goal, his 23rd birthday, and on the 23rd of March... I'm not sure if I have all of that right...(The 23rd of March doesn't sound right for the ECAC tourney).
Quote from: rediceQuote from: BeeeejQuote from: ursusminorIt's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Those of us who were there in person remember that game not just for having lost in a season we had more than the usual firepower, but for Ross Lemon being awarded - and missing - a penalty shot on his birthday that would have been a late-game tying goal.
If I recall correctly, had Ross scored, it was going to be some weird numerical anomaly where it would have been his 23rd goal, his 23rd birthday, and on the 23rd of March... I'm not sure if I have all of that right...(The 23rd of March doesn't sound right for the ECAC tourney).
It was March 10. No idea what the other stuff was about.
Quote from: jtwcornell91Quote from: Jim HylaQuote from: scoop85Quote from: Give My RegardsWell, now I'm actually liking real life better.
Yeah, and there goes the CHN tourney. Our record in the regional finals is as bad virtually as it has been in reality.
Nice comment on the CHN game thread.
Quote from: William WardCornell averaged about 10 penalty minutes per game through this season....one of the lowest averages in all of Division 1. They also had the fewest game misconducts. Whatever your calculation is for game misconducts, it clearly is not based on season stats per team. Maybe it's based on a Division 1 average. So you penalized Cornell with an unrealistic simulation. The #1 ranked team in the nation would never have committed a game misconduct in a game for the final four. Your simulation is flawed and needs to be corrected and replayed before you continue to disparage great teams. Cornell would have wiped the ice with BC in a game in Albany.
Sounds like somebody needs to get a sense of perspective. And possibly also a lesson on Poisson statistics.
Here's some positive perspective. We are 6-0 in all-time postseason games vs. BC, excluding a 1-1 record in NCAA consolation games. Of the 6-0 games, the only one I did not see live was the '66 ECAC, the spring before my freshmen year. The two most recent games are the 2003 NCAA regional final (2-1 in 2o't. at Providence) and the 1980 ECAC quarterfinal at BC (5-1). All the others were between 1966 and 1973.
Quote from: rediceQuote from: BeeeejQuote from: ursusminorIt's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Those of us who were there in person remember that game not just for having lost in a season we had more than the usual firepower, but for Ross Lemon being awarded - and missing - a penalty shot on his birthday that would have been a late-game tying goal.
If I recall correctly, had Ross scored, it was going to be some weird numerical anomaly where it would have been his 23rd goal, his 23rd birthday, and on the 23rd of March... I'm not sure if I have all of that right...(The 23rd of March doesn't sound right for the ECAC tourney).
his secretary was named lincoln
Quote from: jkahnQuote from: jtwcornell91Quote from: Jim HylaQuote from: scoop85Quote from: Give My RegardsWell, now I'm actually liking real life better.
Yeah, and there goes the CHN tourney. Our record in the regional finals is as bad virtually as it has been in reality.
Nice comment on the CHN game thread.
Quote from: William WardCornell averaged about 10 penalty minutes per game through this season....one of the lowest averages in all of Division 1. They also had the fewest game misconducts. Whatever your calculation is for game misconducts, it clearly is not based on season stats per team. Maybe it's based on a Division 1 average. So you penalized Cornell with an unrealistic simulation. The #1 ranked team in the nation would never have committed a game misconduct in a game for the final four. Your simulation is flawed and needs to be corrected and replayed before you continue to disparage great teams. Cornell would have wiped the ice with BC in a game in Albany.
Sounds like somebody needs to get a sense of perspective. And possibly also a lesson on Poisson statistics.
Here's some positive perspective. We are 6-0 in all-time postseason games vs. BC, excluding a 1-1 record in NCAA consolation games. Of the 6-0 games, the only one I did not see live was the '66 ECAC, the spring before my freshmen year. The two most recent games are the 2003 NCAA regional final (2-1 in 2o't. at Providence) and the 1980 ECAC quarterfinal at BC (5-1). All the others were between 1966 and 1973.
Oh, you wouldn't have liked the '66 game. We blew them out, 9-0 at Lynah. Hardly any excitement at all. **]
Quote from: SwampyQuote from: jkahnQuote from: jtwcornell91Quote from: Jim HylaQuote from: scoop85Quote from: Give My RegardsWell, now I'm actually liking real life better.
Yeah, and there goes the CHN tourney. Our record in the regional finals is as bad virtually as it has been in reality.
Nice comment on the CHN game thread.
Quote from: William WardCornell averaged about 10 penalty minutes per game through this season....one of the lowest averages in all of Division 1. They also had the fewest game misconducts. Whatever your calculation is for game misconducts, it clearly is not based on season stats per team. Maybe it's based on a Division 1 average. So you penalized Cornell with an unrealistic simulation. The #1 ranked team in the nation would never have committed a game misconduct in a game for the final four. Your simulation is flawed and needs to be corrected and replayed before you continue to disparage great teams. Cornell would have wiped the ice with BC in a game in Albany.
Sounds like somebody needs to get a sense of perspective. And possibly also a lesson on Poisson statistics.
Here's some positive perspective. We are 6-0 in all-time postseason games vs. BC, excluding a 1-1 record in NCAA consolation games. Of the 6-0 games, the only one I did not see live was the '66 ECAC, the spring before my freshmen year. The two most recent games are the 2003 NCAA regional final (2-1 in 2o't. at Providence) and the 1980 ECAC quarterfinal at BC (5-1). All the others were between 1966 and 1973.
Oh, you wouldn't have liked the '66 game. We blew them out, 9-0 at Lynah. Hardly any excitement at all. **]
Fantastic game. First post-season Cornell win. Lynah packed an hour before game time. A Doug goal on the opening rush. Then a first period Doug hat trick. Three years later my apartment was down the hall from Pat Murphy's, the BC starting goalie that night. Nice guy. Beautiful wife.
Getting back to the title of this thread.... can you do another version of your simulation that includes 1..n mulligans? USCHO and CHN and ELF is too much for me.
Even if it's fake^2 I could use some fun Big Red news.
Quote from: jkahnQuote from: jtwcornell91Quote from: Jim HylaQuote from: scoop85Quote from: Give My RegardsWell, now I'm actually liking real life better.
Yeah, and there goes the CHN tourney. Our record in the regional finals is as bad virtually as it has been in reality.
Nice comment on the CHN game thread.
Quote from: William WardCornell averaged about 10 penalty minutes per game through this season....one of the lowest averages in all of Division 1. They also had the fewest game misconducts. Whatever your calculation is for game misconducts, it clearly is not based on season stats per team. Maybe it's based on a Division 1 average. So you penalized Cornell with an unrealistic simulation. The #1 ranked team in the nation would never have committed a game misconduct in a game for the final four. Your simulation is flawed and needs to be corrected and replayed before you continue to disparage great teams. Cornell would have wiped the ice with BC in a game in Albany.
Sounds like somebody needs to get a sense of perspective. And possibly also a lesson on Poisson statistics.
Here's some positive perspective. We are 6-0 in all-time postseason games vs. BC, excluding a 1-1 record in NCAA consolation games. Of the 6-0 games, the only one I did not see live was the '66 ECAC, the spring before my freshmen year. The two most recent games are the 2003 NCAA regional final (2-1 in 2o't. at Providence) and the 1980 ECAC quarterfinal at BC (5-1). All the others were between 1966 and 1973.
It would be fun to document how many times Cornell beat Jerry York as a player vs as a coach in these playoff games.
https://twitter.com/SimulatinSports/status/1245022425181347840
:`-(
Quote from: ursusminorhttps://twitter.com/SimulatinSports/status/1245022425181347840
:`-(
+1
Quote from: ursusminorhttps://twitter.com/SimulatinSports/status/1245022425181347840
:`-(
silver lining is that is an incredible run for RPI
Quote from: martyIt would be fun to document how many times Cornell beat Jerry York as a player vs as a coach in these playoff games.
Season numbers are for end year (i.e., "65" = 1964-65)
[b]PS All[/b]
2-0-0 5-0-0 Player at BC, 65-67
0-0-0 3-0-0 Assistant coach at BC, 69-70
0-1-0 0-3-0 Assistant coach at Clarkson, 71-72
3-0-0 8-4-0 Head coach at Clarkson, 73-79
0-0-0 0-3-0 Head coach at Bowling Green, 80-94
1-0-0 1-2-0 Head coach at BC, 95-20
6-1-0 in playoffs
17-12-0 in all games
Quote from: ursusminorQuote from: martyQuote from: ursusminorIt's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Ralph, could you please give us a link? I can't find it on YouTube nor RPITV.org.
Sorry. Pickett is a BU fan. Most of his videos thus pertain to BU, but I am sure you remember that the ECAC still used the Boston Garden for several years after the great divorce. The thread is here (https://fanforum.uscho.com/showthread.php?136069-Finding-old-games-to-watch). The direct link to his uploaded files is here (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1eTkkKsrWu9fxhoGLfHGj_in1UusUhzIA). There is a second Cornell game from a year later, also a loss. Both videos are near the beginning.
He has added two more games with Cornell, both losses, the 1989 semifinal and consolation games. Same link as above.
2020 Frozen Four
Results from April 9:
#5 Minnesota-Duluth upset by #7 Denver
#1 North Dakota defeated #6 Pedo State
Championship Game, April 11
#1 North Dakota vs #7 Denver
Championship Game, April 11
#1 North Dakota defeats #7 Denver
Quote from: ursusminorQuote from: martyQuote from: ursusminorIt's not clear to me how this affects simulations, but Cornell suffers from having to play mediocre competition in the ECAC. Clarkson isn't bad, but after that -- blah!
It has nothing to do with this, but yesterday I enjoyed watching the 1990 RPI-Cornell ECAC semifinal which Sean Pickett uploaded recently. It made me realize again one of the reasons why I used to despise Cornell. :-) I did not watch that game in 1990 because I don't get NESN.
Ralph, could you please give us a link? I can't find it on YouTube nor RPITV.org.
Sorry. Pickett is a BU fan. Most of his videos thus pertain to BU, but I am sure you remember that the ECAC still used the Boston Garden for several years after the great divorce. The thread is here (https://fanforum.uscho.com/showthread.php?136069-Finding-old-games-to-watch). The direct link to his uploaded files is here (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1eTkkKsrWu9fxhoGLfHGj_in1UusUhzIA). There is a second Cornell game from a year later, also a loss. Both videos are near the beginning.
Pickett uploaded recently the 11/25/01 Cornell at BU game which was a Cornell win. The same links should work.
He has also posted that he is running out of room and will probably delete games not involving BU as well as BU losses.
https://twitter.com/SimulatinSports/status/1249166347415760899
A sim that thinks we give up 5 goals in a game like this?
Quote from: upprdeckA sim that thinks we give up 5 goals in a game like this?
At least they had us in Detroit.
Quote from: upprdeckA sim that thinks we give up 5 goals in a game like this?
this.
Quote from: upprdeckA sim that thinks we give up 5 goals in a game like this?
Maybe there were two ENGs.
Quote from: ursusminorQuote from: upprdeckA sim that thinks we give up 5 goals in a game like this?
Maybe there were two ENGs.
What I was thinking