ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: Trotsky on February 08, 2020, 06:54:11 PM

Title: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: Trotsky on February 08, 2020, 06:54:11 PM
Once more into the breach.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell at Colgate
Post by: ugarte on February 08, 2020, 09:32:09 PM
Glad nobody got DQ'd for tomorrow but I have a feeling it's going to be chippy.

Dominant win over a team we should dominate.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: Trotsky on February 08, 2020, 09:37:25 PM
Colgate with 8 shots in the game.  Galajda with 0 saves in the first.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: Jeff Hopkins '82 on February 08, 2020, 09:39:02 PM
Quote from: TrotskyColgate with 8 shots in the game.  Galajda with 0 saves in the first.

According to CHN, 9 shots, but still impressive.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: ugarte on February 08, 2020, 09:42:11 PM
Quote from: TrotskyGalajda with 0 saves in the first.
that would be better if Colgate didn't score
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: upprdeck on February 08, 2020, 11:41:07 PM
there barely even carried the puck into the offensive end.. a few high lob passes and a couple times on the PP.. not much else.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: scoop85 on February 08, 2020, 11:48:06 PM
Quote from: upprdeckthere barely even carried the puck into the offensive end.. a few high lob passes and a couple times on the PP.. not much else.

Looked a lot like our women against Dartmouth today.

Certainly our best overall performance in weeks. If we play again tomorrow like that I'll feel like we've righted the ship which has been listing a bit.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: Trotsky on February 09, 2020, 05:06:22 AM
Quote from: ugarte
Quote from: TrotskyGalajda with 0 saves in the first.
that would be better if Colgate didn't score
Well, er, yes.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: Jim Hyla on February 09, 2020, 09:10:49 AM
CBR: Barron Strikes Twice in #2 Men's Hockey's Suffocating 4-1 Win at Colgate (https://cornellbigred.com/news/2020/2/8/mens-ice-hockey-at-colgate-recap.aspx)

               "The Big Red yields just nine shots on goal for the first time since 2009"

Sun: No. 2 Men's Hockey Smothers Colgate in 1st Game of Home-and-Home, Outscores Raiders 4-1 (https://cornellsun.com/2020/02/08/no-2-mens-hockey-smothers-colgate-in-1st-game-of-home-and-home/)

Colgate: Route 13 Rivalry Renewed (https://gocolgateraiders.com/news/2020/2/8/mens-ice-hockey-route-13-rivalry-renewed.aspx)

CHN: Roundup: Leonard Puts on a Show in UMass' Sweep UML Keeps Pace; Cornell, Clarkson Steady Atop ECAC (https://www.collegehockeynews.com/news/2020/02/09_Rounup-Leonard-Puts-on-a.php)
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: upprdeck on February 09, 2020, 10:53:54 AM
would love to see what angle the refs had to take away the goal in the 3rd with an offsides.. On the ESPN feed you cant see the puck when the cornell player crosses the line and the next time you see the puck its on the blue line and the player is a  ft or so over.. No idea if he went over and pulled it back to the blue line.

I cant believe that ESPN has an app in the browser mode with no slo mo or rewind functions.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: scoop85 on February 09, 2020, 12:09:49 PM
Quote from: upprdeckwould love to see what angle the refs had to take away the goal in the 3rd with an offsides.. On the ESPN feed you cant see the puck when the cornell player crosses the line and the next time you see the puck its on the blue line and the player is a  ft or so over.. No idea if he went over and pulled it back to the blue line.

I cant believe that ESPN has an app in the browser mode with no slo mo or rewind functions.

I replayed that play, and I thought (at full speed) it was likely offside.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: upprdeck on February 09, 2020, 01:01:29 PM
likely yup..  evidence no. slow it down and you still cant see the puck at the pt he crosses the line from the ESPN main feed.  They might have another feed from the other side but we never saw it

in the NHL, a couple weeks ago a goalie made a save, and the glove was on the line.. You could see he glove pocket move well behind the line but as the puck could not be seen it was ruled a save, where as logically you knew it went over the line.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: ice on February 09, 2020, 01:11:15 PM
Go here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZg5VeA-p80

Click on the settings icon in the lower right hand corner of the video window and lower the speed to 0.25.

It looked like a good goal to me.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: Scersk '97 on February 09, 2020, 02:08:34 PM
Quote from: iceGo here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZg5VeA-p80

Click on the settings icon in the lower right hand corner of the video window and lower the speed to 0.25.

It looked like a good goal to me.

I very much wanted Lee-hay's goal to count, but I'm going to guess that Barron was drawing the puck across his body within the width of the blue line. Thus, since the entire puck did not enter the zone before Bauld did, the play was offsides. We certainly can't see it from that camera angle; I hope the refs had something better than that with which to make their decision.

Still:

(1) Why is Barron making that move right on the blue line? Details!
(2) Bauld seems to be looking straight at the puck while he's moving into the zone. That makes me wonder. Once again, I hope the refs had a better angle.
(3) The non-goal yet illustrates, once again, my point that I think Leahy brings significant offense to the team when compared against Cairns. He seems to have a very good concept of the "possible" on shots instead of constantly going for the "ideal." I don't think I've seen him nail it into a block in any of his rare appearances this season.
Title: Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Post by: ice on February 09, 2020, 02:17:28 PM
Quote from: Scersk '97...since the entire puck did not enter the zone before Bauld did, the play was offsides...


Ok.  I misunderstood the rule book.  Thanks.