ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: min \'97 on April 04, 2003, 09:58:48 PM

Title: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: min \'97 on April 04, 2003, 09:58:48 PM
not sure if anyone has seen this, but here's the link:

http://www.michigandaily.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2003/04/04/3e8d0da432a9d

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: RedAR on April 05, 2003, 12:20:10 AM
hmmm....

We really need some creative cheers against Gartman for the Michigan/Minnesota game.
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: Greg Berge on April 05, 2003, 12:25:26 AM
Good goalie, bad goalie, cut goalie.
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: RedAR on April 05, 2003, 12:47:16 AM
Hey Gartman,
Your coach called.
He said...

YOU'RE CUT

or

Hey Gartman,
OUR coach called.
He said...

YOU SUCK!!



Post Edited (04-05-03 00:51)
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: RedAR on April 05, 2003, 01:31:34 AM
Sieve.

3rd string sieve.
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: Ben Doyle 03 on April 05, 2003, 02:08:22 AM
Or maybe: Still a back-up, Clap-clap Clap-Clap-clap, Still a back-up, Clap-clap Clap-Clap-clap, Still a back-up, Clap-clap Clap-Clap-clap. . .!!!:-|

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: jtwcornell91 on April 05, 2003, 08:42:19 AM
QuoteRedAR wrote:
We really need some creative cheers against Gartman for the Michigan/Minnesota game.
Do we?  We normally cheer former Cornellians who've ended up with other teams (e.g., Casey Jones), and I know in Bern the only opposing players who got cheers were former SCB guys.  I realize a guy transferring in the middle of college is unusual, but this seems like a pretty benign situation (as opposed to that Yale guy who went back to UNH), and I don't see why we should treat someone who was once one of our own with hostility.

OTOH, I think "We Want Gartman" either in the Minnesota-Michigan game or if we light up Montoya (please please please), would be great.

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: kaelistus on April 05, 2003, 09:03:17 AM
Yeah.. I was wondering that too.. As a faithful, I just can't get myself to cheer against a former Big Red. Even if there was a rift.

Felix

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: marty on April 05, 2003, 09:09:41 AM
I agree.  Why the heck would we taunt him?

There are more important people to harass.

We want the Big Red Bear to beat up on Wildcats and Gophers or Wolverines.  And speaking of the Bear.  Do you think the Skating Bear will bring his female partner?  It is the end of the season, after all and a short trip to Buffalo.
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: Tom Hamill \'85 on April 05, 2003, 09:25:36 AM
We want Gartman!  That's definitely the one to use....
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: Al DeFlorio on April 05, 2003, 10:35:44 AM
QuoteMarty'74 wrote:
Do you think the Skating Bear will bring his female partner?  It is the end of the season, after all and a short trip to Buffalo.
Yeah, and it's still cold in Buffalo dens. :-P

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: melissa on April 05, 2003, 11:03:31 AM
I dunno. Maybe I'm in the minority but I think a lot of the possibilities posted here were clever and funny and I would have no problem hearing them and cheering along. Maybe I'm just a jerk but I kinda see Gartman as a traitor. There are a handful of guys that have been riding the bench for years and still talk about supporting the team. Are they disaapointed they aren't playing? Sure, but they have stuck it out and still adhere to the team philosophy. I know Gartman isn't a horrible person and I understand why he left. I even feel bad that things haven't faired any better for him with Michigan. All that said tho, he ultimately made the decision to leave and must have known that he risked the chance of coming against the Lynah faithful. Thus, in my personal persepctive everything is fair game.
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: RedAR on April 05, 2003, 11:12:05 AM
Well, the way I see it, Gartman seems to view beating Cornell as something extra special.

If he is out for vengeance, then I don't see why we shouldn't show him the wrath of the faithful.

Of course, this is just my opinion.

I do think that the "We Want Gartman" cheer can be used either to taunt or support Chris, so maybe that is the default cheer.
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: kingpin248 on April 05, 2003, 11:42:18 AM
It may be a short trip to Buffalo, but according to the championships handbook, the NCAA limits teams to one mascot - at least, one mascot to be admitted under credentials. Theoretically, a team might be able to bring another if (s)he were to pay his/her way in, but I can't see Cornell sanctioning that.
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: jtwcornell91 on April 05, 2003, 11:58:02 AM
The NCAA regs also allow for cheerleaders.  How about one cheerleader with a bearskin cheerleading uniform?

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: Section A on April 05, 2003, 01:31:56 PM
Hey Gartman, Underhill called, HE SAID....YOU SUCK!

Hey Gartman, Coach Schafer called, HE SAID...YOU SUCK!

Hey Gartman, Coach Berenson called, HE SAID...YOU STILL SUCK! YOU STILL SUCK!

:-P
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: gtsully on April 05, 2003, 02:42:01 PM
After seeing the cheerleaders (male and female) from Ohio State, I hope Cornell NEVER sends cheerleaders to a hockey game.  ::yark::

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: Chad on April 06, 2003, 12:07:05 AM
I recall Age loved the Ohio State cheerleaders.     ;-)

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: CowbellGuy on April 07, 2003, 09:08:10 AM
QuoteChad wrote:
I recall Age loved the Ohio State cheerleaders.     ;-)

I thought they were rather silly, but had nothing in particular against them. Their walking browneye, on the other hand...

As for Gartman, I was in the "give him crap" camp before this article. Now I'm definitely out for blood.

Grea-sy mul-let (clap, clap, clap-clap-clap)

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: Mike on April 07, 2003, 04:35:41 PM
Hmmmm... After reading this whole thread, I'm wondering if I need to get a new jersey, since I've got one of Gartman's old ones!!!
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: CowbellGuy on April 07, 2003, 04:39:05 PM
You could just change "Gartman" to "Marr" :-D

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: Mike on April 07, 2003, 04:42:01 PM
Well, there's no name on the back, so technically I could put "Elliott" on it, since Jason wore #30 as well...

I've been warned, however, that putting somebody's name on somebody else'e jersey is an evil thing to do, so I think I'll just let it remain nameless for now...
Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: Adam on April 07, 2003, 04:52:37 PM
"Hey Gartman, the Plaza called, they need a new doorman!"

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: jtwcornell91 on April 07, 2003, 10:51:55 PM
QuoteMike wrote:
I've been warned, however, that putting somebody's name on somebody else'e jersey is an evil thing to do, so I think I'll just let it remain nameless for now...
Sort of like re-christening a ship?  I've not heard of a superstition along these lines, but I'd be in favor of it.  My Oates jersey really was Oates's.

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: CowbellGuy on April 08, 2003, 09:56:57 AM
In general, I'm completely all for authenticity. But if the guy's an ass who would probably ride the pine in pickup hockey, I could let it slide. :-D

Title: Re: Michigan Daily's feature on C. Gartman
Post by: jbeaber1998 on April 08, 2003, 09:57:56 AM
hmmmm, think another player made Age's sh*t list?  Remind me never to aggravate you, Age.

-J