ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: Trotsky on March 02, 2018, 11:20:42 AM

Title: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: Trotsky on March 02, 2018, 11:20:42 AM
Game Notes (http://cornellbigred.com/news/2018/2/28/womens-ice-hockey-no-6-womens-hockey-set-for-no-4-colgate-in-ecac-hockey-semifinals.aspx).
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: Jeff Hopkins '82 on March 02, 2018, 11:42:00 AM
Does nobody proofread anymore?  The headline refers to the #6 women, and the first words of the article call them the #5 women.  Good lord!

Yes I know...Get off my lawn!
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: jkahn on March 02, 2018, 11:49:57 AM
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82Does nobody proofread anymore?  The headline refers to the #6 women, and the first words of the article call them the #5 women.  Good lord!

Yes I know...Get off my lawn!
and reading further the article states
QuoteKristin O'Neill, Erin O'Connor, Lenka Serdar, Paige Lewis and Maddie Mills are four of 75 players in the country who have recorded a short-handed goal this season
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: Trotsky on March 03, 2018, 05:10:30 PM
Colgate up 4-1 in the 2nd.
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: Beeeej on March 03, 2018, 06:09:51 PM
Quote from: TrotskyColgate up 4-1 in the 2nd.

Two quick Cornell goals, and it's 4-3 with under 4 minutes left.

EDIT: Sorry, 4:25 left in the 3rd.
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: Beeeej on March 03, 2018, 06:12:28 PM
Cornell ties it up, 4-4! 3:20 left in the 3rd.
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: Beeeej on March 03, 2018, 06:19:58 PM
Colgate scores on the PP with one second left in regulation for the 5-4 lead. :-(

EDIT: 5-4 final, obvs.
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: Jim Hyla on March 03, 2018, 06:42:23 PM
Quote from: BeeeejColgate scores on the PP with one second left in regulation for the 5-4 lead. :-(

EDIT: 5-4 final, obvs.

I wish I could have seen the penalty. The announcers didn't see it and said it was behind the play, an interference call. Hopefully it was a blatant offense, to call a penalty that didn't look like it had anything to do with the play, with less than 1 minute to go in a 4-4 game, wow.
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: cbuckser on March 03, 2018, 07:58:57 PM
Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: BeeeejColgate scores on the PP with one second left in regulation for the 5-4 lead. :-(

EDIT: 5-4 final, obvs.

I wish I could have seen the penalty. The announcers didn't see it and said it was behind the play, an interference call. Hopefully it was a blatant offense, to call a penalty that didn't look like it had anything to do with the play, with less than 1 minute to go in a 4-4 game, wow.
The infraction occurred on camera. Jaime Bourbonnais cleared out Breanne Wilson-Bennett a few feet from the Cornell net to ensure Wilson-Bennett couldn't score on a deflection or a rebound. There was no deflection (I think the contact came too late to have prevented one), and Marlène Boissonnault sent the rebound to the opposite side. So, Bourbonnais's penalty didn't save a goal.

It was the sort of contact near the net that the NHL consistently tolerated fifteen years ago. But, by either the rulebook or today's standards of officiating, it was interference.
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: Tom Pasniewski 98 on March 04, 2018, 12:06:04 PM
Exciting finish to the game. I thought the Clarkson announcer left a bit to be desired, but Clarkson didn't have to televise that game so thanks to them.

With Cornell's loss, but more importantly Minnesota's win in the WCHA semifinals last night, Cornell fell from 6th to 7th in the pairwise if you exclude Saint Anselm from the rankings. With Mercyhurst from outside the top eight getting the CHA Auto bid and then Boston College not getting the Hockey East auto bid, that takes out Cornell from the NCAA Tournament. Unless, Minnesota loses the WCHA championship game and Cornell moves up one spot in the pairwise, I think Cornell is on the outside looking in.

Even if Cornell does jump Minnesota, the issue of division II Saint Anselm being eligible, versus being qualified, for the division 1 tournament this year, which seems thoroughly ridiculous after having read the reasons behind their eligibility this year, could loom large if Cornell does jump Minnesota.

Bottom line is that two out of three of Minnesota, Cornell and St Anselm are going to miss the tournament when it's announced tonight.
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: Trotsky on March 04, 2018, 05:15:20 PM
Thanks, Tom.  That's very interesting.
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: Tom Pasniewski 98 on March 04, 2018, 09:19:07 PM
With Minnesota, Northeastern and Mercyhurst winning auto bids, Cornell women left out of the NCAA tournament.
Title: Re: Women: Cornell vs Colgate, ECAC SF, Sat 4 pm
Post by: scoop85 on March 04, 2018, 10:17:23 PM
Quote from: Tom Pasniewski 98With Minnesota, Northeastern and Mercyhurst winning auto bids, Cornell women left out of the NCAA tournament.

Didn't see that coming, as women's hockey typically follows chalk