This may just be an exercise in fertility.
You know, that's where we get screwed; again.
But, since we all bleed Big Red blood...in the words of that renowned philosopher, statesman and visionary, Ragnar Lothbruk, "Puck 'em and feed 'em fish heads"!!
(http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t147/Coelacanth64/HahvahdHockeyToon2016_4ELF.jpg) (http://s159.photobucket.com/user/Coelacanth64/media/HahvahdHockeyToon2016_4ELF.jpg.html)
::banana:: LGR!!!
The game will be televised on NESN+.
http://nesn.com/nesnplus-schedule/
Quote from: jkahnThe game will be televised on NESN+.
http://nesn.com/nesnplus-schedule/
Does anyone know of a public viewing spot in Ithaca??
Would anyone record it and make me a DVD?
Yes, I'm with Jim, there is no NESN on Time Warner.
Tim, Al?
Anyone?
Quote from: martyYes, I'm with Jim, there is no NESN on Time Warner.
Tim, Al?
Anyone?
You need a bar that has the Directv Sports Pack.
Quote from: jkahnQuote from: martyYes, I'm with Jim, there is no NESN on Time Warner.
Tim, Al?
Anyone?
You need a bar that has the Directv Sports Pack.
Does anyone which bar that might be, in Ithaca?
I didn't realize that TWC Does not even offer NESN. Shame on TWC...::asshole::
Quote from: jkahnQuote from: martyYes, I'm with Jim, there is no NESN on Time Warner.
Tim, Al?
Anyone?
You need a bar that has the Directv Sports Pack.
What Jim and I need is someone with a DVR who will make a copy for us. I'll be watching RIP attempt to exterminate the Deerticks in the Morgue © . I'm betting Jim will be at Lynah East tomorrow night.
Quote from: rediceQuote from: jkahnQuote from: martyYes, I'm with Jim, there is no NESN on Time Warner.
Tim, Al?
Anyone?
You need a bar that has the Directv Sports Pack.
Does anyone which bar that might be, in Ithaca?
I didn't realize that TWC Does not even offer NESN. Shame on TWC...::asshole::
I found Captain Morgan's in Corning, NY... The bartender, who will also be working tomorrow night promised me a TV for the Cornell-Harvard game... Life is good!!:-)
Anyone know if there is an internet feed for NESN Plus? I checked their website, but it was difficult to tell.
Assuming there isn't one, is the ILDN likely to use the NESN Plus video production, so at least the production quality should be better than usual, even if the transmission is not?
Quote from: rediceQuote from: jkahnQuote from: martyYes, I'm with Jim, there is no NESN on Time Warner.
Tim, Al?
Anyone?
You need a bar that has the Directv Sports Pack.
Does anyone which bar that might be, in Ithaca?
I didn't realize that TWC Does not even offer NESN. Shame on TWC...::asshole::
I'd call the Fall Creek House or Uncle Joe's if I were you.
WHCU currently in loading limbo, so either we're all hitting the server simultaneously or all the derp finally clogged their pipes.
ILDN up and showing the Harvard logo. Unknown whether they will use the NESN feed.
Edit: NESN feed up.
Knisley sitting for what could be his last Harvard game.
no whcu feed for me and I can't seem to chromecast either. hmmmm. LGR!
How does a ref blow the whistle on a puck that sitting clearly behind the goalie and has his hands in a position that he could never cover the puck even if he wanted too.
a team that struggles to score and now has had 1 cleared by the D from the goal line and one taken away by a blind ref..
this team used all its brakes up pre christmas it seems.
Quote from: upprdeckHow does a ref blow the whistle on a puck that sitting clearly behind the goalie and has his hands in a position that he could never cover the puck even if he wanted too.
Yeah, that was a horrible whistle. Horrible.
Quote from: Scersk '97Quote from: upprdeckHow does a ref blow the whistle on a puck that sitting clearly behind the goalie and has his hands in a position that he could never cover the puck even if he wanted too.
Yeah, that was a horrible whistle. Horrible.
Really? From the replay I saw (and perhaps I can go back and watch it again and if I do perhaps I'll feel differently) it looked like the puck was under the goalie and Hilbrich poked it in from underneath him.
I'm going to have to go see if I can take a look at it again.
the goalie has his hands by his sides and the puck roles down around behind his head. how can you rule any control in that situation? if it was under his feet would you rule it the same way. far different from a goalie laying on the puck
Quote from: upprdeckthe goalie has his hands by his sides and the puck roles down around behind his head. how can you rule any control in that situation? if it was under his feet would you rule it the same way. far different from a goalie laying on the puck
I watched the replay. The goalie was, in fact, laying on the puck.
As much as I'd like to say "We were robbed!", I think that was a pretty standard call. It would have taken a really slow whistle for that goal to have been allowed.
so now a harvard guy in the crease wacks the goalie and thats not interefernce?
Quote from: upprdeckso now a harvard guy in the crease wacks the goalie and thats not interefernce?
He even played the puck!
Playing angry for once!
its like they focus on the shot and ignore the other 10 things that happened.. much like the first replay that went harvards way on the clear by the D,, did they watch the replay and notice this missed the clear boarding cross check?
best effort in awhile and no reward. helped teams above them lost though
where did you see the goalie laying on the puck? he was laying on his back and the puck rolled under his head? is that now control? they dont always rule control when a goalie has his glove over a puck
Quote from: upprdeckwhere did you see the goalie laying on the puck? he was laying on his back and the puck rolled under his head? is that now control? they dont always rule control when a goalie has his glove over a puck
Are we watching the same play? To me it looked like the puck was at least below the goalie's shoulders--not under his head--and Hilbrich poked it in from under him.
a puck sliding under a prone player does not always warrant control? now if the ref says it he lost sight there is not much you can do, it didnt take much of an effort to put it in and it could easily be under the goalie and with the helmet not even touching the puck. If am a ref I want to make the player at least be in some position to be controlling the puck not just laying there hoping if slides under me. far different when a play is trying to squeeze it under legs or arms and actually control it.
really though the harvard goal is the one thats really a questionable call. how do you review that and not call something with a player in the crease hitting the goalie and no puck within reach?
Quote from: upprdecka puck sliding under a prone player does not always warrant control? now if the ref says it he lost sight there is not much you can do, it didnt take much of an effort to put it in and it could easily be under the goalie and with the helmet not even touching the puck. If am a ref I want to make the player at least be in some position to be controlling the puck not just laying there hoping if slides under me. far different when a play is trying to squeeze it under legs or arms and actually control it.
I think the ref must have whistled the play dead because he lost sight of the puck. I took some screen shots that actually show the ref whistling the play dead while the puck was still out in plain view. (The first image.) So it may have been a quick whistle, but on the other hand he may have lost sight of the puck before then.
http://postimg.org/image/m0843qns7/
In the second image, the ref has already stopped blowing the whistle, the puck is now under the goalie's shoulders, and Hilbrich has not yet started to reach under the goalie with his stick.
http://postimg.org/image/ydgcwwo2v/
In the third image, the ref has clearly stopped the play, the puck is still under the goalie's shoulders, and Hilbrich's stick is also under the goalie's shoulders, reaching for the puck.
http://postimg.org/image/yc6f3hm93/
In the fourth image Hilbrich is just about to sweep the puck from under the goalie into the net.
http://postimg.org/image/oitt4f9if/
It seemed to me blowing the whistle made more sense on the 2nd Harvard goal than on the Cornell no-goal.
Good effort, though. It'd have been one of the best games I've seen in-person had Cornell pulled out a win.
Quote from: BearLoverIt seemed to me blowing the whistle made more sense on the 2nd Harvard goal than on the Cornell no-goal.
Interestingly (or not) there were different refs behind the net on each of those goals. Lynch had the quick whistle on the Hilbrich no-goal. Whittemore never whistled the play dead on the Harvard goal that went in off of Fiegl's skate.
One thing I never understood is if it's a quick whistle, what are they doing reviewing the play? If he said the whistle blew,what could they see on review to change anything?
Quote from: Jim HylaOne thing I never understood is if it's a quick whistle, what are they doing reviewing the play? If he said the whistle blew,what could they see on review to change anything?
They didn't review the Hilbrich no-goal. The ref skated right over to Schafer and apparently was telling him that he had whistled the play dead. (Couldn't you hear him? You were sitting right there! :) )
Sorry guys- I didn't read the thread until just now.
We still had trouble getting the puck out of our zone, and we do this annoying thing on offense, especially on the power play, where we hold on to the puck at the point, think about shooting, and then finally fire a shot into the defender's ankles. I'm not one to yell "shoot" constantly, but we need to be pulling the trigger more quickly or passing up the shot altogether.
But we looked competent, which is nice. Kind of an underwhelming game to watch a replay of until 3:30am, but I did catch a friend of mine in a shot of the stands, so there's that.
As a recent alum I had a great time at the game. I almost felt like I was back at Lynah. Unfortunate that some calls didn't go our way, the Red really had every opportunity to win that game. Since it was on NESN+, will there be a way to watch a full replay of the game? I'm not sure if ILDN can host a full archive of the game if they didn't broadcast it exclusively. I'd really like rewatch certain parts with commentary.
Here's a link to some highlights if anyone's interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQObxFvYnwY
Quote from: LynahFaithful2015As a recent alum I had a great time at the game. I almost felt like I was back at Lynah. Unfortunate that some calls didn't go our way, the Red really had every opportunity to win that game. Since it was on NESN+, will there be a way to watch a full replay of the game? I'm not sure if ILDN can host a full archive of the game if they didn't broadcast it exclusively. I'd really like rewatch certain parts with commentary.
It's currently available on ILDN, at least for now:
http://www.ivyleaguedigitalnetwork.com/cornell/game/cornell-at-harvard-on-02192016-ihm
Harvard has set up a hockey fan survey (https://harvard.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_5bU5X753lDzfTox).
You know what to do.
Pornspam?
Quote from: RobbPornspam?
I just answered "How can we improve the hockey experience?" with "Replace the head coach."
Quote from: BeeeejI just answered "How can we improve the hockey experience?" with "Replace the head coach."
Wait, how does that improve the Harvard hockey experience for us? (OK, I'm still not convinced that Harvard's better seasons of late are because of Teddy, rather than in spite of him)
Quote from: BeeeejQuote from: RobbPornspam?
I just answered "How can we improve the hockey experience?" with "Replace the head coach."
My suggestion was "Bring back Mark Mazzoleni."
Quote from: BeeeejQuote from: RobbPornspam?
I just answered "How can we improve the hockey experience?" with "Replace the head coach."
I suggested that they serve Suicide Sandwiches in the concession areas and that the lighting be improved over the players' bench. Reason for the lighting improvement was to better appreciate the shine reflected off Ted's head.
Quote from: DisplacedCornellianQuote from: BeeeejQuote from: RobbPornspam?
I just answered "How can we improve the hockey experience?" with "Replace the head coach."
My suggestion was "Bring back Mark Mazzoleni."
Ugh. Harvard was more successful under Mazz the Rat. Teddy Rogaine's talent-squandering record suits me just fine. It's like Mike Gilligan's DNA moved to Allston.
I can't submit the form because my answer to the first question isn't there.
Quote from: RichHI can't submit the form because my answer to the first question isn't there.
I give you permission to lie and say you went to all of them. They'll take you more seriously anyway.
Quote from: TrotskyQuote from: RichHI can't submit the form because my answer to the first question isn't there.
I give you permission to lie and say you went to all of them. They'll take you more seriously anyway.
Careful, pretending that you went to Harvard can get you into trouble.[img]http://www.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/2016027/rs_1024x759-160127153217-1024-patrick-j-adams-suits.jpg
Quote from: DisplacedCornellianQuote from: BeeeejQuote from: RobbPornspam?
I just answered "How can we improve the hockey experience?" with "Replace the head coach."
My suggestion was "Bring back Mark Mazzoleni."
I went with play Cornell more often.
http://www.theplayerstribune.com/jimmy-vesey-harvard-hockey/
Good read. Interesting to note that he calls Yale their biggest rival.