ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: Johnny 5 on January 04, 2016, 08:25:12 AM

Title: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Johnny 5 on January 04, 2016, 08:25:12 AM
OK, so they don't suck.
Is that good news??

(http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t147/Coelacanth64/CUMonitorVSMerrimack2015_4forum.jpg) (http://s159.photobucket.com/user/Coelacanth64/media/CUMonitorVSMerrimack2015_4forum.jpg.html)

::cheer::
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 04, 2016, 09:36:20 AM
Quote from: Johnny 5OK, so they don't suck.
Is that good news??

(http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t147/Coelacanth64/CUMonitorVSMerrimack2015_4forum.jpg) (http://s159.photobucket.com/user/Coelacanth64/media/CUMonitorVSMerrimack2015_4forum.jpg.html)

::cheer::

+10 Keep it going, they're a lot of fun.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Johnny 5 on January 04, 2016, 10:50:28 AM
Thanks!
Something to do during the long, hard winter!!

::banana::
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Iceberg on January 04, 2016, 09:36:23 PM
Merrimack has had a rough schedule the last month or so. Then again, I'm not sure how much of it is them or their opponents. Heading to Ithaca certainly doesn't help.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 07, 2016, 06:47:49 AM
"The Mack Report" reports on Lynah Rink. (http://www.themackreport.com/news/inside-cornells-lynah-rink/)
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: RichH on January 07, 2016, 12:03:04 PM
Quote from: Jim Hyla"The Mack Report" reports on Lynah Rink. (http://www.themackreport.com/news/inside-cornells-lynah-rink/)

I should be lucky to visit Itacha someday soon so I can see the place where Cornell is 82-17-14 over the past seven years. Also, Cornell has a 82-17-14 home record over the past seven years.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: scoop85 on January 07, 2016, 04:07:31 PM
Quote from: RichH
Quote from: Jim Hyla"The Mack Report" reports on Lynah Rink. (http://www.themackreport.com/news/inside-cornells-lynah-rink/)

I should be lucky to visit Itacha someday soon so I can see the place where Cornell is 82-17-14 over the past seven years. Also, Cornell has a 82-17-14 home record over the past seven years.

That guy gets paid to write for a living? Seriously?
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Johnny 5 on January 07, 2016, 05:07:40 PM
Quote from: scoop85
Quote from: RichH
Quote from: Jim Hyla"The Mack Report" reports on Lynah Rink. (http://www.themackreport.com/news/inside-cornells-lynah-rink/)

I should be lucky to visit Itacha someday soon so I can see the place where Cornell is 82-17-14 over the past seven years. Also, Cornell has a 82-17-14 home record over the past seven years.

That guy gets paid to write for a living? Seriously?

I think Itacha is the old Wampanoag spelling!?

::help::
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Swampy on January 07, 2016, 08:29:41 PM
Quote from: scoop85
Quote from: RichH
Quote from: Jim Hyla"The Mack Report" reports on Lynah Rink. (http://www.themackreport.com/news/inside-cornells-lynah-rink/)

I should be lucky to visit Itacha someday soon so I can see the place where Cornell is 82-17-14 over the past seven years. Also, Cornell has a 82-17-14 home record over the past seven years.

That guy gets paid to write for a living? Seriously?

Sounds as if the guy got fired from his job as a reporter (http://www.themackreport.com/about/) and started this blog. The income must come from advertising, not Pulitzer Prizes.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 08, 2016, 09:32:50 AM
Quote from: Swampy
Quote from: scoop85
Quote from: RichH
Quote from: Jim Hyla"The Mack Report" reports on Lynah Rink. (http://www.themackreport.com/news/inside-cornells-lynah-rink/)

I should be lucky to visit Itacha someday soon so I can see the place where Cornell is 82-17-14 over the past seven years. Also, Cornell has a 82-17-14 home record over the past seven years.

That guy gets paid to write for a living? Seriously?

Sounds as if the guy got fired from his job as a reporter (http://www.themackreport.com/about/) and started this blog. The income must come from advertising, not Pulitzer Prizes.

Where do you get the idea that he was fired?

Here's the initial description about how the report got started.

QuoteThe Mack Report was founded in 2006 by Eagle Tribune Merrimack writer Mike McMahon as a blog, then titled Warrior Rink Rat, to provide coverage of the Warriors' Division I hockey program in conjunction with coverage provided in the newspaper.

Since then, it has evolved its own entity, and while still providing conjunction coverage with Mike's work in The Eagle Tribune, is a standalone news source covering Merrimack College athletics and Hockey East.

And then there's this bio of Mike.

QuoteMike McMahon – Managing Editor – Mike has been covering college hockey since the 2005-06 season, and has been covering Merrimack College for The Eagle Tribune since the 2006-07 season. Along with working for The Eagle Tribune, Mike is a senior writer at College Hockey News and has also covered the UFC for many print and online outlets.

The article had its journalistic problems, but let's not smear the guy.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Swampy on January 08, 2016, 01:10:13 PM
Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: Swampy
Quote from: scoop85
Quote from: RichH
Quote from: Jim Hyla"The Mack Report" reports on Lynah Rink. (http://www.themackreport.com/news/inside-cornells-lynah-rink/)

I should be lucky to visit Itacha someday soon so I can see the place where Cornell is 82-17-14 over the past seven years. Also, Cornell has a 82-17-14 home record over the past seven years.

That guy gets paid to write for a living? Seriously?

Sounds as if the guy got fired from his job as a reporter (http://www.themackreport.com/about/) and started this blog. The income must come from advertising, not Pulitzer Prizes.

Where do you get the idea that he was fired?

Here's the initial description about how the report got started.

QuoteThe Mack Report was founded in 2006 by Eagle Tribune Merrimack writer Mike McMahon as a blog, then titled Warrior Rink Rat, to provide coverage of the Warriors' Division I hockey program in conjunction with coverage provided in the newspaper.

Since then, it has evolved its own entity, and while still providing conjunction coverage with Mike's work in The Eagle Tribune, is a standalone news source covering Merrimack College athletics and Hockey East.

And then there's this bio of Mike.

QuoteMike McMahon – Managing Editor – Mike has been covering college hockey since the 2005-06 season, and has been covering Merrimack College for The Eagle Tribune since the 2006-07 season. Along with working for The Eagle Tribune, Mike is a senior writer at College Hockey News and has also covered the UFC for many print and online outlets.

The article had its journalistic problems, but let's not smear the guy.

I stand corrected.

I read the first paragraph you quote and mistakenly interpreted it as saying he went from being a reporter to writing a blog only. Had I taken the time to read on I would have learned he continues working as a reporter, as you point out.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Trotsky on January 08, 2016, 01:17:33 PM
Back on topic, CU preview (http://www.cornellbigred.com/news/2016/1/6/MICE_0106162323.aspx) of the series.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: RichH on January 08, 2016, 03:00:41 PM
Quote from: TrotskyBack on topic, CU preview (http://www.cornellbigred.com/news/2016/1/6/MICE_0106162323.aspx) of the series.

Mitch Vanderlaan's mustache on the accompanying photo is something else.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Trotsky on January 08, 2016, 03:52:45 PM
Quote from: RichH
Quote from: TrotskyBack on topic, CU preview (http://www.cornellbigred.com/news/2016/1/6/MICE_0106162323.aspx) of the series.

Mitch Vanderlaan's mustache on the accompanying photo is something else.

Mentor (http://www.vh1.com/news/wp-content/uploads/blog.vh1.com/2013/07/86088-great-mustaches-of-cinema-white-goodman-ben-stiller.jpg)?
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Trotsky on January 08, 2016, 06:22:23 PM
Gillam in tonight.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Trotsky on January 08, 2016, 06:47:11 PM
Lineup tonight:


1 9 - Christian Hilbrich 7 - Jake Weidner 21 - Dwyer Tschantz
2 14 - Mitch Vanderlaan 26 - Jeff Kubiak 17 - Anthony Angello
3 4 - Alex Rauter 12 - John Knisley 16 - Matt Buckles
4 18 - Jared Fiegl 11 - Eric Freschi 19 - Teemu Tiitinen

1 27 - Patrick McCarron 29 - Alec McCrea
2 24 - Ryan Bliss         3 - Reece Willcox
3 20 - Dan Wedman        23 - Trent Shore


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cornell                             |  Overall - 13 GP  ( 9- 2- 2  .769)  | Conf Only -  8 GP  ( 6- 1- 1  .812) |      Career    
------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|----------------
## Player                    POS YR | GP   G   A PTS PEN/MIN  PP SH GW GT | GP   G   A PTS PEN/MIN  PP SH GW GT |  GP   G   A PTS
26 Jeff Kubiak                 F JR | 13   4   8  12           1  0  2  0 |  8   1   6   7           0  0  1  0 |  70   6  23  29
17 Anthony Angello (PIT)       F FR | 13   6   4  10   5/ 10   1  0  2  0 |  8   4   1   5   4/  8   0  0  2  0 |  13   6   4  10
 7 Jake Weidner                F JR | 13   2   6   8   2/  4   1  0  1  0 |  8   2   5   7   2/  4   1  0  1  0 |  66   6  23  29
29 Alec McCrea                 D FR | 13   1   7   8           0  0  0  0 |  8   1   5   6           0  0  0  0 |  13   1   7   8
14 Mitch Vanderlaan            F FR | 13   4   3   7           0  0  1  0 |  8   3   2   5           0  0  0  0 |  13   4   3   7
15 Trevor Yates                F SO | 13   3   4   7   3/  6   0  0  2  0 |  8   2   3   5   2/  4   0  0  2  0 |  33   4   7  11
27 Patrick McCarron            D JR | 13   2   4   6   3/  6   0  0  0  0 |  8   2   2   4   2/  4   0  0  0  0 |  67   6  13  19
 3 Reece Willcox (PHI)         D SR | 13   1   5   6           1  0  0  0 |  8   1   4   5           1  0  0  0 | 100   4  18  22
24 Ryan Bliss                  D SO | 13   0   6   6   1/  2   0  0  0  0 |  8   0   3   3   1/  2   0  0  0  0 |  44   2  12  14
 9 Christian Hilbrich          F SR | 12   3   2   5   5/ 10   0  0  1  0 |  7   2   2   4   2/  4   0  0  0  0 |  91  24  15  39
16 Matt Buckles (FLA)          F JR | 13   3   2   5   1/  2   2  0  0  0 |  8   3   2   5   1/  2   2  0  0  0 |  71  15   5  20
 6 Holden Anderson             D JR | 11   2   2   4   6/ 12   0  0  0  0 |  8   0   1   1   3/  6   0  0  0  0 |  34   3   5   8
11 Eric Freschi                F JR | 12   1   3   4   7/ 14   0  0  0  0 |  7   0   2   2   6/ 12   0  0  0  0 |  71   6   6  12
19 Teemu Tiitinen              F SR | 13   1   2   3   7/ 14   0  0  0  0 |  8   1   0   1   4/  8   0  0  0  0 |  60   2   5   7
18 Jared Fiegl (ARI)           F SO | 11   1   1   2   4/  8   0  0  0  0 |  6   0   0   0   3/  6   0  0  0  0 |  37   2   1   3
 4 Alex Rauter                 F SO | 11   0   2   2   4/  8   0  0  0  0 |  8   0   1   1   3/  6   0  0  0  0 |  16   0   4   4
12 John Knisley                F SR |  5   1   0   1   4/  8   0  0  0  0 |  2   1   0   1   2/  4   0  0  0  0 |  84   9   4  13
10 Beau Starrett (CHI)         F FR |  5   1   0   1           0  0  0  0 |  4   1   0   1           0  0  0  0 |   5   1   0   1
20 Dan Wedman                  D SO | 11   0   1   1   3/  6   0  0  0  0 |  6   0   1   1   2/  4   0  0  0  0 |  42   0   1   1
31 Hayden Stewart              G SO |  1   0   0   0           0  0  0  0 |                                     |  12   0   0   0
 8 Gavin Stoick                F JR |  1   0   0   0   1/  2   0  0  0  0 |  1   0   0   0   1/  2   0  0  0  0 |  10   0   1   1
21 Dwyer Tschantz (STL)        F SO |  2   0   0   0           0  0  0  0 |                                     |  21   2   3   5
 5 Matthew Nuttle              D FR |  2   0   0   0           0  0  0  0 |  2   0   0   0           0  0  0  0 |   2   0   0   0
 2 Brendan Smith               D FR |  3   0   0   0           0  0  0  0 |  1   0   0   0           0  0  0  0 |   3   0   0   0
23 Trent Shore                 D FR |  5   0   0   0           0  0  0  0 |  4   0   0   0           0  0  0  0 |   5   0   0   0
32 Mitch Gillam                G JR | 13   0   0   0           0  0  0  0 |  8   0   0   0           0  0  0  0 |  42   1   2   3
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Trotsky on January 08, 2016, 06:50:11 PM
It's break, but with 10 minutes to go the rink is less than 5% filled.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: dag14 on January 08, 2016, 09:44:40 PM
It's break so I am in Florida not Ithaca.  Watching the broadcast, clearly the townies showed up in force.  We never got a good look at the student side of the rink, however. Did it remain only 5% occupied?
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: upprdeck on January 08, 2016, 10:07:14 PM
A had the 7 in the band and maybe 10 more, B was maybe 20%.  some people moved around since there was noone to complain.  I know some from section O went over to A and sat
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Jeff Hopkins '82 on January 08, 2016, 10:24:27 PM
Section B was full by the end of the game, and C was nearly so.  D&E were 50-75%.  A was empty: <10 band members showed,

As for the game, I was impressed with this team.  They can actually pass and stickhandle!  And they shoot from the point!  Whoohoo!  

I got a little nervous when Merrimack came out fast with a hard forecheck but eventually we figured it out.  The latter part of the first we started to get some chances. Altho I was surprised Merrimack had only 8 shots in the period.  

Second period was more wide open.  Kubiak's goal was sweet.  Some of the freshmen had some nice moves, too.  And we had 13 SOG!  Wow.

By the third period, we pretty much had them under control.  While Merrimack had a lot of the possession in the 3rd, it was in their own zone. They seemed to skating backward a lot, and they got frustrated, They tried a lot of dump and chase, and we beat them to the puck.  It burned the clock really well, although I would have liked just a little more attack in the 3rd.  

Hopefully tomorrow is more of the same.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: upprdeck on January 09, 2016, 09:12:57 AM
we ended up with zero shots in the 3rd.  didnt feel like we were being dominated but i guess not of the shots got the goalie.  it was pretty helter skelter though

merrimack is not very good.. most of their chances came on the power play or just really sloppy play by cornell.. several times we just lost the puck and causing our own grief.

the game really turned on them hitting the bar on apretty  open shot and a couple nice saves since cornell never could really put home its own open shots in the first period. should have been a 2 goal lead after one instead of a 0-0 game
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 09, 2016, 09:49:49 AM
Quote from: upprdeckwe ended up with zero shots in the 3rd.  didnt feel like we were being dominated but i guess not of the shots got the goalie.  it was pretty helter skelter though

merrimack is not very good.. most of their chances came on the power play or just really sloppy play by cornell.. several times we just lost the puck and causing our own grief.

the game really turned on them hitting the bar on apretty  open shot and a couple nice saves since cornell never could really put home its own open shots in the first period. should have been a 2 goal lead after one instead of a 0-0 game

Not quite correct. They ended up with zero saves, we had one shot.::banana::
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Trotsky on January 09, 2016, 09:59:28 AM
That early forecheck by Merrimack was very scary and effective.  They lost pace on it later (or we figured it out) but they managed to keep it on the kill.  It was similar to Union's aggressive forecheck from 2-3 years ago.  I found myself wishing Mike would try to apply it -- I think we have good personnel for it, and it really forces a lot of opportunities and is exhausting for the opposing defense.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: upprdeck on January 09, 2016, 11:36:08 AM
of course it was also the empty net shot so no one to make a save anyway.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 09, 2016, 02:14:49 PM
Quote from: upprdeckof course it was also the empty net shot so no one to make a save anyway.

True, that was my point.:-)
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Jeff Hopkins '82 on January 09, 2016, 03:09:49 PM
Quote from: TrotskyThat early forecheck by Merrimack was very scary and effective.  They lost pace on it later (or we figured it out) but they managed to keep it on the kill.  It was similar to Union's aggressive forecheck from 2-3 years ago.  I found myself wishing Mike would try to apply it -- I think we have good personnel for it, and it really forces a lot of opportunities and is exhausting for the opposing defense.

What I noticed was we kept more men back for the clear and passed it along the end boards away from the forechecker.
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Trotsky on January 09, 2016, 09:29:25 PM
Solid sweep, outscoring Merrimack 8-2 over 120 minutes.  And we even put 4 on net in the third period on Saturday! ::cheer::
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: ACM on January 09, 2016, 09:44:22 PM
Delia's gone. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNPp2IBO-T0)
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Trotsky on January 09, 2016, 10:11:09 PM
Anthony Angello is now 4th in career goal scoring on this team:
 
 [b]G GP Player[/b]
24 93 Hilbrich
15 73 Buckles
 9 86 Knisley
 8 15 Angello
 8 72 Kubiak
 6 68 Weidner
 6 69 McCarron
 6 73 Freschi
[/size]
Title: Re: CU vs Merrimack 01/08-09/16
Post by: Jeff Hopkins '82 on January 09, 2016, 10:43:41 PM
Quote from: TrotskySolid sweep, outscoring Merrimack 8-2 over 120 minutes.  And we even put 4 on net in the third period on Saturday! ::cheer::

I looked at the scoreboard after two, saw we had 24 SOG, and thought "That's more than we usually have in a whole game."

I'm still a little concerned about some of the inconsistency on D, but I'm thrilled with the offense.