ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: Jim Hyla on September 18, 2013, 06:54:51 AM

Title: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on September 18, 2013, 06:54:51 AM
Preseason poll is on other thread, here's the preseason All-ECAC:


2013-2014 Preseason All-Conference Team -
G-Erica Howe, Clarkson
D-Erin Ambrose, Clarkson
D-Sarah Edney, Harvard
F-Jamie Lee Rattray, Clarkson
F-Kelly Babstock, Quinnipiac
F-Jillian Saulnier Cornell
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 07, 2013, 05:25:40 PM
Women's Hockey to Hold Annual Fundraiser for the United Way of Tompkins County. (http://www2.cornellbigred.com/news/2013/10/7/WICE_1007133530.aspx) It's a 2PM game, maybe I can get a hockey doubleheader?(doubtful) The way the Clarkson women (and men) are starting, it might be a tough year for us.

USCHO 10/7 Poll posted. We're still 4.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: RichH on October 07, 2013, 05:51:04 PM
I noticed that 2x defending champion Minnesota visited Colgate this past weekend to start the season. One would think they might have rather visited Ithaca for more of a marquee matchup, if it weren't for the lame Ivy rules regarding season start times/game limits.  The Lady Gophers are traveling East once more this season when they go to Yale.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 09, 2013, 07:01:44 AM
CornellBigRed report on the beginning of this season. (http://www2.cornellbigred.com/news/2013/10/8/WICE_1008133616.aspx)
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 14, 2013, 07:37:17 AM
Women's Hockey to Hold Annual Fundraiser for the United Way of Tompkins County (http://cornellbigred.com/news/2013/10/7/WICE_1007133530.aspx?path=whockey) with the Northeastern game this Sat. Make it a hockey doubleheader.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Weder on October 19, 2013, 04:28:19 PM
Pretty strong 6-2 win against Northeastern today. Cornell came out flying and weathered a bit of a lapse late first period/early second period.

I'm intrigued by the Campbell-Woods pairing on the PK and think it could work really well. (Did they do that last year? I can't remember.) Liked what I saw from Bunton and some of the other freshmen a lot.

Also, I forgot how cold Lynah is when it's not packed.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: dag14 on October 20, 2013, 04:15:42 PM
Women shut out NE on Sunday 3-0.  Slebodnick ties Mazz as all-time leader in wins.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 25, 2013, 12:59:25 PM
ECAC Radio features Iles and Saulnier. (http://www.ecachockey.com/men/2013-14/Weekly_Radio_Show_-_13-14/20132510_Weekly_Radio_Show)
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: dag14 on October 25, 2013, 05:15:57 PM
Women up on Clarkson 4-2 after two periods.  Highlights so far:  Clarkson with an "own goal" to open the scoring.  Jillian Saulnier has balanced her 2? goals with a 5 min major during which Clarkson scored one.  Continuing a pattern that started against Northeastern, we dominated play in the first and got sloppy for a lot of the second, although the penalty kill during the major was outstanding.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 25, 2013, 06:00:52 PM
Cornell 6-3, I only saw bits and pieces, but we looked better individually and Clarkson better as a team.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: RichH on October 25, 2013, 06:15:38 PM
Quote from: Jim HylaCornell 6-3, I only saw bits and pieces, but we looked better individually and Clarkson better as a team.

I only got to see the last 15 minutes, and we really did survive a great amount of Clarkson pressure and grade-A opportunities. Slobo earned the W (now CU's career Win leader), and we got a couple opportunistic goals near the end to seal it after Clarkson got into penalty trouble. Saulnier got her 100th career point on a great drop pass in transition to set up the 5th goal .

Big win against a team favored to win the league.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Weder on October 25, 2013, 06:26:55 PM
Quote from: RichH
Quote from: Jim HylaCornell 6-3, I only saw bits and pieces, but we looked better individually and Clarkson better as a team.

I only got to see the last 15 minutes, and we really did survive a great amount of Clarkson pressure and grade-A opportunities. Slobo earned the W (now CU's career Win leader), and we got a couple opportunistic goals near the end to seal it after Clarkson got into penalty trouble. Saulnier got her 100th career point on a great drop pass in transition to set up the 5th goal .

Big win against a team favored to win the league.

Wonder how much of that can be attributed to this being Cornell's third game and Clarkson's eighth. Cornell is working in a lot of new players in new roles, so I think everything we've seen so far is very promising.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: imafrshmn on October 25, 2013, 10:36:04 PM
5th goal was a thing of beauty... Saulnier enters the zone 1 on 3, shields the puck, then drop passes to Campbell, who snapped off a laser
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 25, 2013, 11:09:57 PM
Quote from: imafrshmn5th goal was a thing of beauty... Saulnier enters the zone 1 on 3, shields the puck, then drop passes to Campbell, who snapped off a laser

Agree, I saw that one.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: ScrewBUHarvardtoo on October 26, 2013, 02:06:48 AM
Was at the whole game with the band. Besides a bit of sloppy play late in the second period and early in the third, you really cannot ask for a better game against a team of Clarkson's caliber, especially with the number of players we lost last year. That own goal to start the game was the funniest thing I have ever witnessed though. If that ever happened in a men's game the fans would never let the goalie ever live it down. Seriously those kind of own goals aren't even seen in pee-wees
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 26, 2013, 10:02:55 AM
This is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. (http://cornellbigred.com/boxscore.aspx?id=13949&path=whockey) Will the men do the same?
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: marty on October 26, 2013, 11:02:58 AM
Quote from: Jim HylaThis is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. (http://cornellbigred.com/boxscore.aspx?id=13949&path=whockey) Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Trotsky on October 26, 2013, 11:49:30 AM
Quote from: marty
Quote from: Jim HylaThis is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. (http://cornellbigred.com/boxscore.aspx?id=13949&path=whockey) Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.
He means will we have great box scores (exhaustive, clean, useful) for the men, too.  He's right -- that box score is excellent.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 26, 2013, 12:21:19 PM
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: marty
Quote from: Jim HylaThis is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. (http://cornellbigred.com/boxscore.aspx?id=13949&path=whockey) Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.
He means will we have great box scores (exhaustive, clean, useful) for the men, too.  He's right -- that box score is excellent.

You got it!
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Weder on October 26, 2013, 12:48:33 PM
Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: marty
Quote from: Jim HylaThis is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. (http://cornellbigred.com/boxscore.aspx?id=13949&path=whockey) Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.
He means will we have great box scores (exhaustive, clean, useful) for the men, too.  He's right -- that box score is excellent.

You got it!

Are you supposed to credit assists on an own goal? I can't find anything that prohibits it in the NCAA scoring rules, but I thought that no assists were to be listed in that case.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 26, 2013, 05:09:43 PM
Women win 6-4
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: David Harding on October 26, 2013, 05:36:50 PM
Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: marty
Quote from: Jim HylaThis is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. (http://cornellbigred.com/boxscore.aspx?id=13949&path=whockey) Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.
He means will we have great box scores (exhaustive, clean, useful) for the men, too.  He's right -- that box score is excellent.

You got it!
The format is a little different and it's a black, white, and grey PDF file instead of a web page, but the men's box score from last night seems to me to have pretty close to the same information content which I claim makes it useful.  
http://cornellbigred.com/documents/2013/10/25/102513_uno_box_1.pdf?id=5587
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 26, 2013, 06:15:27 PM
Quote from: David Harding
Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: marty
Quote from: Jim HylaThis is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. (http://cornellbigred.com/boxscore.aspx?id=13949&path=whockey) Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.
He means will we have great box scores (exhaustive, clean, useful) for the men, too.  He's right -- that box score is excellent.

You got it!
The format is a little different and it's a black, white, and grey PDF file instead of a web page, but the men's box score from last night seems to me to have pretty close to the same information content which I claim makes it useful.  
http://cornellbigred.com/documents/2013/10/25/102513_uno_box_1.pdf?id=5587

I wouldn't, and I didn't, claim that the usual box score isn't useful. The difference is that the women's page has beauty and ease of reading. The men's page is strictly utilitarian, the info is there but it doesn't capture your interest to stay and look, like the women's does. The new format looks more like a page that Jobs would design, as opposed to the Gates men's site. And you can't find a Play-by-Play on the men's.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Trotsky on October 26, 2013, 06:38:30 PM
Quote from: Jim HylaI wouldn't, and I didn't, claim that the usual box score isn't useful. The difference is that the women's page has beauty and ease of reading. The men's page is strictly utilitarian, the info is there but it doesn't capture your interest to stay and look, like the women's does. The new format looks more like a page that Jobs would design, as opposed to the Gates men's site. And you can't find a Play-by-Play on the men's.

Personally, I prefer this (http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/2014/box20131025.pdf) style.  ;-)

Less is usually more.  The women's box score linked above is very clean and manages to display a lot of information without feeling cluttered or moving the eye around too much.  This guy (http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/books_vdqi) would approve.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: ACM on October 26, 2013, 07:23:35 PM
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: Jim HylaI wouldn't, and I didn't, claim that the usual box score isn't useful. The difference is that the women's page has beauty and ease of reading. The men's page is strictly utilitarian, the info is there but it doesn't capture your interest to stay and look, like the women's does. The new format looks more like a page that Jobs would design, as opposed to the Gates men's site. And you can't find a Play-by-Play on the men's.

Personally, I prefer this (http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/2014/box20131025.pdf) style.  ;-)

Less is usually more.  The women's box score linked above is very clean and manages to display a lot of information without feeling cluttered or moving the eye around too much.  This guy (http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/books_vdqi) would approve.

Box scores that don't include individual penalty information are useless.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Trotsky on October 26, 2013, 07:36:01 PM
Quote from: ACMBox scores that don't include individual penalty information are useless.
Yes, who can forget the PIM totals that determined the outcomes of our national championship games?
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: ACM on October 26, 2013, 07:41:18 PM
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: ACMBox scores that don't include individual penalty information are useless.
Yes, who can forget the PIM totals that determined the outcomes of our national championship games?

Adequate for your purposes, perhaps. Not mine.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Trotsky on October 26, 2013, 07:44:10 PM
Quote from: ACM
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: ACMBox scores that don't include individual penalty information are useless.
Yes, who can forget the PIM totals that determined the outcomes of our national championship games?

Adequate for your purposes, perhaps. Not mine.
Ah, but your purposes also require the winning raffle number...
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: imafrshmn on October 26, 2013, 08:07:16 PM
Will you geezers lay off each other? We've got a hockey game about to begin! ;)
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 29, 2013, 12:57:13 PM
Emily Fulton is ECAC POTW. (http://www.ecachockey.com/women/2013-14/Weekly_Awards/20132910_W_Weekly_Awards)
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on October 31, 2013, 07:04:47 AM
USCHO article titled Campbell and Fulton are becoming more recognizable at Cornell. (http://www.uscho.com/2013/10/30/campbell-and-fulton-are-becoming-more-recognizable-at-cornell/)
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on November 01, 2013, 07:37:31 AM
Fulton is ECAC POTM. (http://www.ecachockey.com/women/2013-14/Monthly_Awards/20133110_W_Monthly_Awards)
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: dag14 on November 01, 2013, 07:35:53 PM
Women are hammering Princeton.  5-0 after 1 period.  Not sure of the scoring since we got 3 in the last 2 minutes but Saulnier has at least one and Taylor Woods 2 goals.

Second period Princeton did the hammering...4 unanswered goals to make it 5-4 at the start of the 3rd.  Don't ask me to explain how that happened because I am not sure I can.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Josh '99 on November 03, 2013, 01:02:10 PM
Quote from: dag14Women are hammering Princeton.  5-0 after 1 period.  Not sure of the scoring since we got 3 in the last 2 minutes but Saulnier has at least one and Taylor Woods 2 goals.

Second period Princeton did the hammering...4 unanswered goals to make it 5-4 at the start of the 3rd.  Don't ask me to explain how that happened because I am not sure I can.
In case anyone else was wondering how this cliffhanger turned out, the game ended 5-4.  The women tied Quinnipiac 1-1 yesterday.
Title: Re: Women 2013-14
Post by: Jim Hyla on November 13, 2013, 07:25:52 AM
The women pick up some ECAC awards. (http://www.ecachockey.com/men/2013-14/Weekly_Awards/20131211_W_Weekly_Awards)