We haven't had many (http://www.tbrw.info/?/games/cornell_Playoff_Games.html), and we've been damn good (7-4) (8-4!) ::cheer:: in those we have had.
(series record in parens)
{RS point difference in squigglies}[size=large]1965 QF L (0-1-0) {6} 5 at 4 Brown
1976 QF W (1-0-0) {6} 5 at 4 Clarkson
1980 QF W (1-0-0) {15} 8 at 1 BC
1989 QF W (1-0-1) {2} 5 at 4 Clarkson
1992 QF W (1-0-0) {5} 5 at 4 Yale
1994 QF L (0-2-0) {17} 8 at 1 Harvard
1995 Pr W (1-0-0) {0} 9 at 8 SLU
1995 QF L (0-2-0) {11} 9 at 1 Clarkson
1998 1R W (2-1-0) {7} 8 at 3 RPI
1999 1R L (0-1-1) {1} 7 at 4 Princeton
2008 QF W (2-0-0) {0} 5 at 4 Union
2013 1R W (2-0-0) {1} 9 at 8 Princeton
2013 QF {18} 9 at 1 Quinnipiac
[/size]
Of course, the one trip to Princeton is not a happy memory. In a "first team to 3 points" series, after coming from 4-1 down to tie the opener, Cornell led midway through the decisive second game 4-1. Then, this (http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1999/box19990313.pdf).
Quote from: TrotskyOf course, the one trip to Princeton is not a happy memory. In a "first team to 3 points" series, after coming from 4-1 down to tie the opener, Cornell led midway through the decisive second game 4-1. Then, this (http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1999/box19990313.pdf).
That was rendered more stupefying for me by the fact that I was listening to the game at 4am in my office in Bern.
Quote from: jtwcornell91Quote from: TrotskyOf course, the one trip to Princeton is not a happy memory. In a "first team to 3 points" series, after coming from 4-1 down to tie the opener, Cornell led midway through the decisive second game 4-1. Then, this (http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1999/box19990313.pdf).
That was rendered more stupefying for me by the fact that I was listening to the game at 4am in my office in Bern.
I'm pretty sure I was chatting with you in my office in Redondo Beach, CA. Did we have Asia covered?
Quote from: TrotskyOf course, the one trip to Princeton is not a happy memory. In a "first team to 3 points" series, after coming from 4-1 down to tie the opener, Cornell led midway through the decisive second game 4-1. Then, this (http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1999/box19990313.pdf).
Wow. While I certainly remember the loss, I had no recollection of that 3rd period.
Quote from: Jordan 04Quote from: TrotskyOf course, the one trip to Princeton is not a happy memory. In a "first team to 3 points" series, after coming from 4-1 down to tie the opener, Cornell led midway through the decisive second game 4-1. Then, this (http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1999/box19990313.pdf).
Wow. While I certainly remember the loss, I had no recollection of that 3rd period.
Then you did the post-season mind-wiping process correctly.
Quote from: RichHQuote from: jtwcornell91Quote from: TrotskyOf course, the one trip to Princeton is not a happy memory. In a "first team to 3 points" series, after coming from 4-1 down to tie the opener, Cornell led midway through the decisive second game 4-1. Then, this (http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1999/box19990313.pdf).
That was rendered more stupefying for me by the fact that I was listening to the game at 4am in my office in Bern.
I'm pretty sure I was chatting with you in my office in Redondo Beach, CA. Did we have Asia covered?
If you consider the Middle East to be Asia, then yes.
Quote from: RichHQuote from: Jordan 04Quote from: TrotskyOf course, the one trip to Princeton is not a happy memory. In a "first team to 3 points" series, after coming from 4-1 down to tie the opener, Cornell led midway through the decisive second game 4-1. Then, this (http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1999/box19990313.pdf).
Wow. While I certainly remember the loss, I had no recollection of that 3rd period.
Then you did the post-season mind-wiping process correctly.
Oh, THAT explains why I drove to Buffalo 10 years ago. Thanks!
Quote from: Greenberg '97Quote from: RichHQuote from: Jordan 04Quote from: TrotskyOf course, the one trip to Princeton is not a happy memory. In a "first team to 3 points" series, after coming from 4-1 down to tie the opener, Cornell led midway through the decisive second game 4-1. Then, this (http://www.tbrw.info/seasons/1999/box19990313.pdf).
Wow. While I certainly remember the loss, I had no recollection of that 3rd period.
Then you did the post-season mind-wiping process correctly.
Oh, THAT explains why I drove to Buffalo 10 years ago. Thanks!
(http://cdn-media.hollywood.com/images/l/mib.jpg)
Oddly enough, Agent K sits in Section L.
OP updated! :)
Cornell's second-round opponent, Quinnipiac if Harvard loses Sunday, RPI if Harvard wins, are both on spring break next week. In case you were worried about tickets being available.
Quote from: billhowardCornell's second-round opponent, Quinnipiac if Harvard loses Sunday, RPI if Harvard wins, are both on spring break next week. In case you were worried about tickets being available.
Thanks
Quote from: TrotskyOP updated! :)
The last line should read "2013," no?
Quote from: RichHQuote from: TrotskyOP updated! :)
The last line should read "2013," no?
I think it refers to the season, as in 2012-13.
Quote from: RichHQuote from: TrotskyOP updated! :)
The last line should read "2013," no?
Yes, fixed
Since the ECAC has had its current format, how many times has the No. 1 seed lost a quarterfinal series ?
I know in 2008, 2010, and 2011 the #1 seed lost in the QF. So, it has not been uncommon in recent memory.
Quote from: snert1288I know in 2008, 2010, and 2011 the #1 seed lost in the QF. So, it has not been uncommon in recent memory.
Those are the only three occasions. The #2 seed, on the other hand, is 9-1, with the sole loss coming in 2004 (us, to Clarkson). ::cuss::
Overall, teams with a bye through the first round are 31-9 in their quarterfinal series under the current format.
Of all the wonderful statistics amassed by Cornell hockey over the years, the road playoff record continues to amaze me. Now 12-6-2 against "better" teams in their own barns when the season is on the line - truly remarkable.
To be fair, 6 of the series advances were against teams one place ahead in the standings, with only 1980 and 1998 showing up as major upsets. May we add another one next weekend at #9 over #1/#2!
Quote from: RobbOf all the wonderful statistics amassed by Cornell hockey over the years, the road playoff record continues to amaze me. Now 12-6-2 against "better" teams in their own barns when the season is on the line - truly remarkable.
To be fair, 6 of the series advances were against teams one place ahead in the standings, with only 1980 and 1998 showing up as major upsets. May we add another one next weekend at #9 over #1/#2!
I have edited the OP to include RS points difference. Three of the 5 at 4 cases were actually fairly big gaps (5+ points).
If Cornell plays at RPI, it will be an 8-point gap. If at Quinnipiac, it will be the largest {18} RS point deficit Cornell has faced in ECAC playoff history.