ELynah Forum

General Category => Other Sports => Topic started by: Al DeFlorio on March 02, 2012, 04:54:21 PM

Title: Lax vs. Army
Post by: Al DeFlorio on March 02, 2012, 04:54:21 PM
1pm Saturday at Schoellkopf. Inside Lacrosse staff unanimously picks Cornell, but Army looked very tough against Syracuse.

http://insidelacrosse.com/news/2012/03/02/inside-lacrosse-staff-pics-week-3
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: billhoward on March 02, 2012, 10:41:32 PM
Army has a 130-yard-long indoor practice field. That has to help a NYS team get ready in January-February. Army was certainly ready to play a year ago up there.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: scoop85 on March 03, 2012, 03:14:06 PM
18-7 Big Red rout.  Mock and Donovan were the big scorers.  There's some concern, though, because Pannell went down untouched at the end of the 3rd with an apparent leg injury.  He limped off the field and did stay on the sideline for the duration of the game.  Hopefully he's ok.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: sjact on March 03, 2012, 03:50:55 PM
Inside Lacrosse in-game blog:

QuoteIt looks like Pannell is OK on the sidelines. He's taking a knee and cheering on his team. I'm assuming he isn't coming back in because the Big Red are up by so much.
[/size]
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: Jim Hyla on March 03, 2012, 03:51:26 PM
Quote from: Al DeFlorio1pm Saturday at Schoellkopf. Inside Lacrosse staff unanimously picks Cornell, but Army looked very tough against Syracuse.

http://insidelacrosse.com/news/2012/03/02/inside-lacrosse-staff-pics-week-3

I think today's game may say more about SU this early in the season, than about Army being good.
(Lousy sentence, but you get the drift, I hope.)
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: Al DeFlorio on March 03, 2012, 09:48:12 PM
UNC beaten by Lehigh today, 9-8.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: Jim Hyla on March 04, 2012, 09:01:25 AM
The Syracuse Post-Standard (http://blog.syracuse.com/sports/2012/03/cornell_mens_lacrosse_rolls_to.html) story on Army/CU.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: dbilmes on March 04, 2012, 01:24:37 PM
We have to hope Pannell's injury isn't serious, especially with UVA next weekend.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: TimV on March 04, 2012, 04:10:36 PM
::doh::;-)
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: Al DeFlorio on March 04, 2012, 04:29:53 PM
Quote from: TimV::doh::;-)
Bad cop;-)
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: ithacat on March 04, 2012, 06:02:57 PM
Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: Al DeFlorio1pm Saturday at Schoellkopf. Inside Lacrosse staff unanimously picks Cornell, but Army looked very tough against Syracuse.

http://insidelacrosse.com/news/2012/03/02/inside-lacrosse-staff-pics-week-3

I think today's game may say more about SU this early in the season, than about Army being good.
(Lousy sentence, but you get the drift, I hope.)

SU has blown a 6-3 lead and now trails UVA 7-10. Lerman can't stop anything at his feet.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: Al DeFlorio on March 04, 2012, 06:24:53 PM
10-8 after three, UVA.  I think I just heard faceoffs were 17-4 UVA.  Big advantage.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: Jeff Hopkins '82 on March 04, 2012, 06:26:33 PM
Quote from: ithacat
Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: Al DeFlorio1pm Saturday at Schoellkopf. Inside Lacrosse staff unanimously picks Cornell, but Army looked very tough against Syracuse.

http://insidelacrosse.com/news/2012/03/02/inside-lacrosse-staff-pics-week-3

I think today's game may say more about SU this early in the season, than about Army being good.
(Lousy sentence, but you get the drift, I hope.)

SU has blown a 6-3 lead and now trails UVA 7-10. Lerman can't stop anything at his feet.

UVa has dominated on faceoffs.  And their outside shooters are something else.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: Jeff Hopkins '82 on March 04, 2012, 06:27:47 PM
Quote from: Al DeFlorio10-8 after three, UVA.  I think I just heard faceoffs were 17-4 UVA.  Big advantage.

It was 14-7, but still, that's huge.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: Al DeFlorio on March 04, 2012, 06:30:20 PM
UVA showing a lot of zone D.  Need to prepare for that next weekend.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: Al DeFlorio on March 04, 2012, 06:33:16 PM
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82
Quote from: Al DeFlorio10-8 after three, UVA.  I think I just heard faceoffs were 17-4 UVA.  Big advantage.

It was 14-7, but still, that's huge.
It's now 18-6.;-)
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: Jeff Hopkins '82 on March 04, 2012, 06:34:42 PM
Quote from: Al DeFlorio
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82
Quote from: Al DeFlorio10-8 after three, UVA.  I think I just heard faceoffs were 17-4 UVA.  Big advantage.

It was 14-7, but still, that's huge.
It's now 18-6.;-)

I stand corrected.  Maybe my brain couldn't wrap around that kind of dominance.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: TimV on March 04, 2012, 08:35:34 PM
::banana::::banana::::banana::
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: TimV on March 04, 2012, 08:53:20 PM
If UVA gets a 2+ goal lead they'll go into that packed in zone and eat clock.

We don't have a big outside cannon to break that up.  With the inside finishers we have, I'd attack that with a 1-4-1 setup with  Mock, Bremner, English, and Lang up somewhat, maybe 12 yards from the crease and widely spaced.  Then pop those guys into the gaps on the move to get quick feeds from Donovan/Pannell and high percentage dunks.  It might be interesting to make the two middle guys Stenrud (6'5) and Lang (6'4) and drop some high feeds down on UVA goaltender Fortunato, 6'1" in the program but doesn't look that tall standing in the cage.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: ugarte on March 04, 2012, 11:50:14 PM
Quote from: TimVIf UVA gets a 2+ goal lead they'll go into that packed in zone and eat clock.

We don't have a big outside cannon to break that up.  With the inside finishers we have, I'd attack that with a 1-4-1 setup with  Mock, Bremner, English, and Lang up somewhat, maybe 12 yards from the crease and widely spaced.  Then pop those guys into the gaps on the move to get quick feeds from Donovan/Pannell and high percentage dunks.  It might be interesting to make the two middle guys Stenrud (6'5) and Lang (6'4) and drop some high feeds down on UVA goaltender Fortunato, 6'1" in the program but doesn't look that tall standing in the cage.
My suggestion is don't let them get a two goal lead.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army - Top-3 results
Post by: billhoward on March 05, 2012, 12:09:01 AM
1. @Virginia 14-10 over Syracuse
2. Johns Hopkins 10-8 over @Princeton
3. @Cornell 18-7 over Army

The top 3 teams appear pretty close esp. knowing what we did to the Cadets after losing by just 1 at Syracuse the week before.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: TimV on March 05, 2012, 11:45:16 AM
Two questions for ya:

1. Did you see the UVA-Syracuse game?
2. Which of our goaltenders do you think we can rely on to prevent UVA from getting a 2 goal lead at any point?
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: ithacat on March 05, 2012, 12:34:57 PM
Quote from: ugarteMy suggestion is don't let them get a two goal lead.

That didn't work too well for SU. Of course, maybe if they had held their own at the X the result would have been different.
Title: Re: Lax vs. Army
Post by: scoop85 on March 05, 2012, 01:18:11 PM
Quote from: ithacat
Quote from: ugarteMy suggestion is don't let them get a two goal lead.

That didn't work too well for SU. Of course, maybe if they had held their own at the X the result would have been different.

If Tesoriero can continue doing well at X and keep giving us a huge advantage with time of possession, that will go a long way on Saturday.