ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: Trotsky on October 29, 2011, 06:35:54 PM

Title: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: Trotsky on October 29, 2011, 06:35:54 PM
If Livestats is to be trusted, here are the lines and pairings:

Esposito-Miller-Ferlin
Lowry-Collins-McCarron
Jillson-Bardreau-Mowrey
Craig-Axell-de Swardt

Birch-Ross
Gotovets-Whitney
D'Agostino-Ryan

Iles in net
Title: Re: Cornell vs Mercyhurst
Post by: RichH on October 29, 2011, 07:04:16 PM
I guess Mercyhurst didn't even bother to send a broadcast team, as their usual radio station for hockey games is just playing jazz music.
Title: Re: Cornell vs Mercyhurst
Post by: Al DeFlorio on October 29, 2011, 07:23:20 PM
An offensive zone penalty followed by a neutral zone penalty shift the momentum as well as the score.
Title: Re: Cornell vs Mercyhurst
Post by: Al DeFlorio on October 29, 2011, 07:35:10 PM
If livestats is accurate, one Cornell SOG in the last 12-13 minutes of that period.
Title: Re: Cornell vs Mercyhurst
Post by: ajh258 on October 29, 2011, 07:48:01 PM
Hurst leads 2-1 end of first. SOG is 9-6.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: ugarte on October 29, 2011, 09:14:10 PM
uh oh. let the rending of garments begin.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: ScrewBU on October 29, 2011, 09:17:26 PM
Big and slow is no way to go.  Cornell's slide into obscurity continues.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: Scersk '97 on October 29, 2011, 09:28:49 PM
Quote from: ScrewBUBig and slow is no way to go.  Cornell's slide into obscurity continues.

So you didn't watch the game?  Neat.

The D needs work, missing coverages all night long.  The O looks further along than they usually are at this point.

So, given that I am very sure that Schafer teams eventually lock down defensively, I'm not too worried.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: Ben on October 29, 2011, 09:34:48 PM
Collective response: ::panic::


It's a bad result, but at least we can score. There's enough talent in the team and quality in the coaching staff that we should be fine.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: scoop85 on October 29, 2011, 09:50:00 PM
Quote from: Scersk '97
Quote from: ScrewBUBig and slow is no way to go.  Cornell's slide into obscurity continues.

So you didn't watch the game?  Neat.

The D needs work, missing coverages all night long.  The O looks further along than they usually are at this point.

So, given that I am very sure that Schafer teams eventually lock down defensively, I'm not too worried.

I didn't see the game either, but I doubt team speed was the biggest issue tonight.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: ajh258 on October 29, 2011, 09:58:26 PM
Quote from: scoop85
Quote from: Scersk '97
Quote from: ScrewBUBig and slow is no way to go.  Cornell's slide into obscurity continues.

So you didn't watch the game?  Neat.

The D needs work, missing coverages all night long.  The O looks further along than they usually are at this point.

So, given that I am very sure that Schafer teams eventually lock down defensively, I'm not too worried.

I didn't see the game either, but I doubt team speed was the biggest issue tonight.
Ya speed wasn't the issue. D definitely needs work, especially on breaking up passes and possession. Otherwise, we were pretty good offensively compared to years past.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: ithacat on October 29, 2011, 10:11:59 PM
Quote from: ScrewBUBig and slow is no way to go.

It's a nice rhyme, but it's inaccurate this time.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: Trotsky on October 30, 2011, 11:04:18 AM
Quote from: ScrewBUBig and slow is no way to go.  Cornell's slide into obscurity continues.
I would found an institution where obvious troll is obvious.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: css228 on October 30, 2011, 01:13:49 PM
I think a lot of this game comes back to the fact that this was Mercyhurst's sixth real game whereas its our first. If we played them 2 weeks ago we'd probably have won.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: ScrewBU on October 31, 2011, 02:58:16 PM
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: ScrewBUBig and slow is no way to go.  Cornell's slide into obscurity continues.
I would found an institution where obvious troll is obvious.

They were in behind our defensemen the entire game.  How long did it take them score the tying goal---3 seconds after the faceoff?  The D looked like statues on that play.  I guess the party line this year is "Isles sucks."

Also, way to keep up with the times with a witty retort such as "obvious X is obvious."  The last time I saw that used Cornell's style of play was still relevant.  What's next, an "Oh, snap?"  Is this the mid-90's?  Do you post your messages using the Cello web browser?
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: ugarte on October 31, 2011, 03:58:14 PM
Quote from: ScrewBU
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: ScrewBUBig and slow is no way to go.  Cornell's slide into obscurity continues.
I would found an institution where obvious troll is obvious.

They were in behind our defensemen the entire game.  How long did it take them score the tying goal---3 seconds after the faceoff?  The D looked like statues on that play.  I guess the party line this year is "Isles sucks."

Also, way to keep up with the times with a witty retort such as "obvious X is obvious."  The last time I saw that used Cornell's style of play was still relevant.  What's next, an "Oh, snap?"  Is this the mid-90's?  Do you post your messages using the Cello web browser?
Your comedy critique is less trenchant than your game analysis.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: css228 on October 31, 2011, 04:10:06 PM
Quote from: ugarte
Quote from: ScrewBU
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: ScrewBUBig and slow is no way to go.  Cornell's slide into obscurity continues.
I would found an institution where obvious troll is obvious.

They were in behind our defensemen the entire game.  How long did it take them score the tying goal---3 seconds after the faceoff?  The D looked like statues on that play.  I guess the party line this year is "Isles sucks."

Also, way to keep up with the times with a witty retort such as "obvious X is obvious."  The last time I saw that used Cornell's style of play was still relevant.  What's next, an "Oh, snap?"  Is this the mid-90's?  Do you post your messages using the Cello web browser?
Your comedy critique is less trenchant than your game analysis.
Probably best not to feed trolls.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: kaelistus on October 31, 2011, 05:11:13 PM
Not a great first game, but there's no reason to panic. We've lost our share of 'cupcake' games to start the season. (Holy Cross for example)
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: css228 on October 31, 2011, 05:31:47 PM
Quote from: kaelistusNot a great first game, but there's no reason to panic. We've lost our share of 'cupcake' games to start the season. (Holy Cross for example)
Still, Schafer was unhappy with the effort put forth and he makes a fair point. Two goals off faceoffs is a lot. If a pattern emerges then we ought to be concerned. The Journal's wrap up for those who haven't had a chance to read it yet. (http://www.theithacajournal.com/article/20111030/SPORTS/110300340/Cornell-red-faced-after-hockey-opener?odyssey=tab%7Ctopnews%7Ctext%7CSports)
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: The Rancor on November 02, 2011, 09:07:59 AM
I felt like the 2 problems in the loss were that Andy let in 2 soft goals (1 of which was off the faceoff) and the D wasn't picking up their man. Not using the body to the advantage (umm hey kid, you're 6-3 220, he's 5-9 175, take his candy!) was something they didn't do in pre-season either.
That said, they controlled play for long periods of time, passed well, and generally worked they cycle and the Schafer breakout reasonably well. This team has bought into the system, they just need to execute better. Good showing by the freshman, and erase a couple of soft goals, and we are slapping each other's backs.
Iles is a very good young goaltender. I'm sure hell be able to turn it around.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: ScrewBU on November 05, 2011, 09:18:15 PM
Quote from: ugarte
Quote from: ScrewBU
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: ScrewBUBig and slow is no way to go.  Cornell's slide into obscurity continues.
I would found an institution where obvious troll is obvious.

They were in behind our defensemen the entire game.  How long did it take them score the tying goal---3 seconds after the faceoff?  The D looked like statues on that play.  I guess the party line this year is "Isles sucks."

Also, way to keep up with the times with a witty retort such as "obvious X is obvious."  The last time I saw that used Cornell's style of play was still relevant.  What's next, an "Oh, snap?"  Is this the mid-90's?  Do you post your messages using the Cello web browser?
Your comedy critique is less trenchant than your game analysis.

Quoting SAT words might have been good enough to get you into Cornell, but in the real world it doesn't mean shit.
Title: Re: Mercyhurst 5 Cornell 4
Post by: ugarte on November 06, 2011, 01:03:35 PM
Quote from: ScrewBU
Quote from: ugarte
Quote from: ScrewBU
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: ScrewBUBig and slow is no way to go.  Cornell's slide into obscurity continues.
I would found an institution where obvious troll is obvious.

They were in behind our defensemen the entire game.  How long did it take them score the tying goal---3 seconds after the faceoff?  The D looked like statues on that play.  I guess the party line this year is "Isles sucks."

Also, way to keep up with the times with a witty retort such as "obvious X is obvious."  The last time I saw that used Cornell's style of play was still relevant.  What's next, an "Oh, snap?"  Is this the mid-90's?  Do you post your messages using the Cello web browser?
Your comedy critique is less trenchant than your game analysis.


Quoting SAT words might have been good enough to get you into Cornell, but in the real world it doesn't mean shit.
I don't think you know how the SAT works, much less the real world.