If you go to the Free Netcasts link you can listen to the first round of the beanpot on Harvard's link. The game has just begun.
-J
That's if you can't watch it on NESN....
I'll ask the obligatory question:
Normally, we'd be looking for an ECAC victory. But we also played BU twice. Which result aids us more with the statistical rankings?
scoreless after 1 period. i feel weird routing for Harvard, but oh well.
http://www.whrb.org/
Click the regular link NOT the internet sports-only link
Scoreless after 1 period, Harvard generated just 3 shots in the first period.
[Q]Normally, we'd be looking for an ECAC victory. But we also played BU twice. Which result aids us more with the statistical rankings?[/Q]
for just this instant, a BU win might help us more, but by the end of the season will have played 2 games vs. Hahvahd too... plus a Hahvahd win raises their win % which raises the RPIs of every ECAC team and feeds back into itself to help an extra amount.
So, when it's a NC game, always the ECAC team, unless perhaps we played some other team 3 times or something.
We also might play Hahvahd 3 times before the season is over...
Turning into a great goaltender's duel (still 0-0)
harvard scores first 1-0
Spoke slightly too soon. 1-0 Crimson, off a face-off.
BU sleeps through one quick drop too many; Kenny Smith right off the draw on a shot that fooled Fields.
1-1
BU gets the tying goal with 1 second remaining on a pp, and now the ice has tilted and it's all BU -- Harvard takes another penalty to take pressure off.
Period ends. Harvard has spent way too much time in the box.
Will someone please tell Norton Harvard beat us 4-3 in the ECAC championship game, not the other way around? ::rolleyes::
Freddy Meyer helps BU take the lead. . . 2-1 late in the 3rd
Screw BU:-( !
Hahvahd, too!!!
Another "moral victory" for the ECAC. Blech.
And Harvard drops it. . .
Freddy Meyer is a hack. :`(
Harvard broadcasters reachin' for that rainbow:
"Sooner or later, they're gonna win."