ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 06:32:10 PM

Title: Cornell 3 RPI 0
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 06:32:10 PM
1 00:37 Cor Greening 8 (unassisted)
2 11:59 Cor pp R. Nash 7 (Barlow 9, Gallagher 10)
3 12:58 Cor P. Kennedy 3 (Roeszler 6, M. Kennedy 3)
Title: Re: Cornell at RPI (pregame)
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 06:34:42 PM
Greening-Nash-Barlow
Roeszler-M. Kennedy-P.Kennedy
Collins-Gallagher-Devin
Mugford-Punches-Jillson

Ross-Seminoff
Nash-Devin
Davenport-Krueger

Punches and Jillson in for Scali and Nicholls
Title: Re: Cornell at RPI (pregame)
Post by: lynah80 on January 17, 2009, 06:51:47 PM
Good to see a few other guys getting ice time (assuming Scali and Nicholls are not sitting because they are hurt).  Maybe Mike should put in Garman or Troy Davenport if Cornell opens up a significant lead.
Title: No B2 link yet
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 06:55:33 PM
5 minutes before gametime and no active link at B2...what else is new?
Title: Re: No B2 link yet
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 06:57:10 PM
yea i am not happy about this.
Title: Link is up
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 06:58:16 PM
Link just went up
Title: Re: IE only - no safari or firefox
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 06:58:34 PM
B2 streaming technology is so 1990's
Title: Re: Cornell at RPI (pregame)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 07:02:47 PM
I hope the guy in the RPI jersey has his head in front of the camera for the whole game.
Title: Re: Cornell at RPI (pregame)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 07:07:09 PM
They'll sit down. They're not like us at Lynah.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 at RPI 0 (1st)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 07:10:41 PM
Goal 37 seconds in!
Title: Re: Cornell at RPI (pregame)
Post by: Cactus12 on January 17, 2009, 07:10:46 PM
GOAL!
Title: Re: Cornell 1 - RIP 0
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 07:10:56 PM
I knew RPI would be easysauce.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 - RIP 0
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 07:11:24 PM
Greening squeaks a softie between Lange's pads!
Title: Re: Cornell 1 - RIP 0
Post by: LaJollaRed on January 17, 2009, 07:11:32 PM
37 seconds in, on 2nd shot--Greening
Title: Re: Cornell 1 - RIP 0
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 07:13:40 PM
RPI short saved by Lange..
Title: Goal credit
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 07:14:51 PM
[quote Trotsky]1 00:37 Cor M. Kennedy 8 (Greening 8, Barlow 9)[/quote]

Trotsky, I believe it was Greening from P. Kennedy and Barlow
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 07:15:11 PM
So was that a Greening goal or M. Kennedy goal?
Title: Re: Goal credit
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 07:15:39 PM
[quote sah67][quote Trotsky]1 00:37 Cor M. Kennedy 8 (Greening 8, Barlow 9)[/quote]

Trotsky, I believe it was Greening from P. Kennedy and Barlow[/quote]I'm going by Jason's call.  I'll make it conditional.
Title: Re: Goal credit
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 07:16:40 PM
[quote Trotsky][quote sah67][quote Trotsky]1 00:37 Cor M. Kennedy 8 (Greening 8, Barlow 9)[/quote]

Trotsky, I believe it was Greening from P. Kennedy and Barlow[/quote]I'm going by Jason's call.  I'll make it conditional.[/quote]

Works for me...I trust Jason a bit more than these RPI guys ;)
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 07:18:20 PM
Wow! We are dominant. We look like #1 in the nation.

Now I believe!
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 07:19:10 PM
The RPI play-by-play guy announces like he's running an auction.

All I hear is: "babblebabblebabble"
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 07:20:22 PM
"You're never as good as you look when you win and you're never as bad as you look when you lose."
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 07:22:05 PM
5 min major (boarding) on RPI
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: TimV on January 17, 2009, 07:23:16 PM
TW3 announcers say "Guys don't know how to protect themselves anymore."

What? a hit from behind is the hittees Fault???::wtf::
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 07:23:29 PM
RPI is near the top of the country in PIM/GP.

I can't recall the last time we scored twice on a major.  It would be nice.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 07:26:35 PM
Powerplay looking sloppy.  If we can't score on a 5-min major against RPI, I won't be very encouraged.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 07:26:43 PM
There's something about the expression "John Kennedy blocked a shot..."
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 07:27:52 PM
We spread out and utilize the space well, but we're not cycling and moving the puck efficiently like we did last night.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Robb on January 17, 2009, 07:28:37 PM
There's not pressing too hard on a major, and then there's being lazy - we need to step it up here.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 07:29:37 PM
Houston crowd rocking after the kill.  That building can get very loud (although it happens rarely these days).
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 07:29:42 PM
There was one moment where there could have been another RPI penalty. Could have been a 5x3..
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: ursusminor on January 17, 2009, 07:30:34 PM
[quote Trotsky]There's something about the expression "John Kennedy blocked a shot..."[/quote]
His name is John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Jr., which means that his father was named for the President. It makes me feel very old.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 07:34:40 PM
Collins looking very good for the second night in a row.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: sen '08 on January 17, 2009, 07:35:37 PM
It would be nice if TW3 would turn down the brightness so you could see anything at all....
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 17, 2009, 07:37:29 PM
[quote sen '08]It would be nice if TW3 would turn down the brightness so you could see anything at all....[/quote]Thanks, I was wondering if it was just me. I get to see the crowd well.::smashfreak::
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 07:38:59 PM
Big save by Scrivens on a point-blank RPI one-timer
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: sen '08 on January 17, 2009, 07:39:14 PM
It's a little hard to watch hockey when you can't see the puck, sticks, lines on the ice and can just tell where the players' legs are. ::rolleyes::
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 07:42:02 PM
[quote sen '08]It's a little hard to watch hockey when you can't see the puck, sticks, lines on the ice and can just tell where the players' legs are. ::rolleyes::[/quote]Sure, now we sympathize with John Murphy.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: dragonfan on January 17, 2009, 07:46:13 PM
Definitely M.Kennedy goal.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: pfibiger on January 17, 2009, 07:49:42 PM
[quote dragonfan]Definitely M.Kennedy goal.[/quote]

Brandon Thomas wrote on his liveblog that the official scoring was changed, and it's Colin Greening unassisted.

http://www.theithacajournal.com/article/20090117/BLOGS05/90117007
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: TimV on January 17, 2009, 07:51:53 PM
[quote sen '08]It's a little hard to watch hockey when you can't see the puck, sticks, lines on the ice and can just tell where the players' legs are. ::rolleyes::[/quote]

I just called the pressbox to see if they could get word to the television truck.  The guy said they have no communication with the truck, and I asked that they at least inform the commentators that are sitting right next to them.  By my look during this interview it's not corrected yet.

If it keeps up, we can harass the press box by calling (518) 276-2661.::uptosomething::
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 17, 2009, 07:55:06 PM
[quote TimV][quote sen '08]It's a little hard to watch hockey when you can't see the puck, sticks, lines on the ice and can just tell where the players' legs are. ::rolleyes::[/quote]

I just called the pressbox to see if they could get word to the television truck.  The guy said they have no communication with the truck, and I asked that they at least inform the commentators that are sitting right next to them.  By my look during this interview it's not corrected yet.

If it keeps up, we can harass the press box by calling (518) 276-2661.::uptosomething::[/quote]I went to online tech chat. He said I'd receive a response to my problem before 24-48 hours. They want to be sure they get it correct.

Customer service?::nut::::bang::::flipd::
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: sen '08 on January 17, 2009, 07:55:59 PM
It seems to be fixed at the start of the second.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: TimV on January 17, 2009, 07:56:54 PM
[quote sen '08]It seems to be fixed at the start of the second.[/quote]

OK.  Hassle mode off.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 07:56:57 PM
To my understanding, the "exposure" settings (as well as white balance, color intensity, etc etc) is done at the camera, not by a guy in a truck. Is this not true?
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 07:57:30 PM
I'd be amazed if these RPI announcers can remember each others' names.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: TimV on January 17, 2009, 08:01:07 PM
[quote Oat]To my understanding, the "exposure" settings (as well as white balance, color intensity, etc etc) is done at the camera, not by a guy in a truck. Is this not true?[/quote]

Maybe, but the truck still sees the output on their monitors and can communicate with the camera guy.

Don't care as long as they have fixed it.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 17, 2009, 08:03:12 PM
[quote TimV][quote Oat]To my understanding, the "exposure" settings (as well as white balance, color intensity, etc etc) is done at the camera, not by a guy in a truck. Is this not true?[/quote]

Maybe, but the truck still sees the output on their monitors and can communicate with the camera guy.

Don't care as long as they have fixed it.[/quote]Except it took forever.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: jy3 on January 17, 2009, 08:03:54 PM
no game on here in buffalo on twc. silly sabres! It is not on satellite either.
LGR!
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (1st period)
Post by: dragonfan on January 17, 2009, 08:06:23 PM
should go to Kennedy thats what it looked like
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 08:07:00 PM
SLUts scored 4 tonight (6 last night).
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 08:11:23 PM
RPI penalty...the first in nearly 11 minutes of the 2nd period.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: sen '08 on January 17, 2009, 08:12:38 PM
The TW3 commentators seem to think that Cornell embellishes every hit and RPI is a team of angels.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: Killer on January 17, 2009, 08:12:41 PM
Are they also in the 2nd period, or did that game start earlier?  USCHO shows it as a 7:00 start, so I assume there's still a ways to go.
Title: Re: Cornell 2!! RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 08:13:13 PM
thats how you do it
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 08:13:14 PM
Riley Nash PPG on a deflection!
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 17, 2009, 08:13:16 PM
What a great series on that PP.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: Cactus12 on January 17, 2009, 08:13:22 PM
Riley Nash on the deflection.
Title: Re: Cornell 1 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 08:16:48 PM
make up call.. ok, honestly i didn't see it.
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 08:17:47 PM
haha Scrivens rolling!
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 08:18:09 PM
"It seems that RPI just needs to get the puck around Scrivens and into the net."

Brilliance! Make him the coach.
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: pfibiger on January 17, 2009, 08:19:29 PM
strong forecheck by Sean Collins. He's played well the last two games.
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 08:20:56 PM
RPI going right back on the powerplay.

Game misconduct + 2 min minor for unsportsmanlike conduct on Gallagher.
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 08:21:12 PM
I didn't see the penalty again! And I blame it on the stupid camera man/woman. What did Gallagher do? Is this a makeup call?
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: dragonfan on January 17, 2009, 08:22:02 PM
crap call!!!
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: sen '08 on January 17, 2009, 08:22:41 PM
10 minute and game misconduct to Gallagher for unsportsmanlike.
Title: Gallagher penalty
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 08:24:30 PM
Actually, I believe it's a just 10-minute misconduct, not a game misconduct, so we can get Gallagher back after 10 minutes.
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 08:25:22 PM
RPI negates their powerplay and takes a penalty just as ours expires.
Title: Re: Gallagher penalty
Post by: lynah80 on January 17, 2009, 08:25:22 PM
yes, he should be able to come back
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 08:28:16 PM
[quote dragonfan]crap call!!![/quote]

You saw it? Please elaborate.
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: cbuckser on January 17, 2009, 08:29:32 PM
[quote Oat]I didn't see the penalty again! And I blame it on the stupid camera man/woman. What did Gallagher do? Is this a makeup call?[/quote]
Gallagher got penalized for shooting the puck on net after play was whistled dead for offsides.
Title: Minny - St. Cloud game
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 08:30:21 PM
Another strong defensive effort in the WCHA tonight:
Minny over SCSU by a score of 7-6 ::bugeye::

Much better than boring Cornell lockdown hockey ;)
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd period)
Post by: sen '08 on January 17, 2009, 08:30:39 PM
Gallagher shot the puck after the whistle was blown and and so Lange had relaxed. Since Lange had relaxed he could have been injured by a hard shot, hence the unsportsmanlike.
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd intermission)
Post by: sen '08 on January 17, 2009, 08:33:07 PM
Is it just me or do the TW3 guys keep saying "screh-vens"?
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd intermission)
Post by: ACM on January 17, 2009, 08:34:55 PM
[quote sen '08]Is it just me or do the TW3 guys keep saying "screh-vens"?[/quote]
It's not just you. Just one of the many little mistakes they keep on making. The play-by-play guy isn't awful, but he's not very good. Craig Darby is useless.
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd intermission)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 08:37:28 PM
[quote sen '08]Is it just me or do the TW3 guys keep saying "screh-vens"?[/quote]

It's gotta be better than the RPI announcers on B2 who can't even keep their own players straight (referring to Lange as Scrivens and vice-versa on multiple occasions, confusing RPI's Kennedy with our two) let alone the Cornell players.
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (2nd intermission)
Post by: sen '08 on January 17, 2009, 08:37:59 PM
Yeah I've yelled "It's Brendan not Brandon" at the TV several times tonight.
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 08:45:31 PM
RPI going on the powerplay at 2:00 of the 3rd.
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 08:45:37 PM
That was not a dive, but the RPI guy went down REALLY easily.
Title: Re: idiots
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 08:46:39 PM
idiots stood up in front of the camera and blocked everyone who paid for to watch this game live over the internet.

edit: it was during the heated moment in front of the cornell goal (RPI pp)
Title: Re: idiots
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 08:54:15 PM
[quote Oat]idiots stood up in front of the camera and blocked everyone who paid for to watch this game live over the internet.

edit: it was during the heated moment in front of the cornell goal (RPI pp)[/quote]

We are currently working to remedy the situation.  A customer service representative will contact you with a solution within 24 hours.

::innocent::
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 08:57:48 PM
Scrivens stones one of the Angers-Goulets on a clean breakaway.
Title: Re: idiots
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 08:58:40 PM
[quote sah67][quote Oat]idiots stood up in front of the camera and blocked everyone who paid for to watch this game live over the internet.

edit: it was during the heated moment in front of the cornell goal (RPI pp)[/quote]

We are currently working to remedy the situation.  A customer service representative will contact you with a solution within 24 hours.

::innocent::[/quote]

Help me harass the press box with the number that Jim gave us above:
518-276-2661

They just did it again.. and again
Title: Re: idiots
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 08:59:49 PM
Cornell shots after 7 minutes of the first period: 7.
Cornell shots now: 16.
Title: Re: idiots
Post by: Cactus12 on January 17, 2009, 09:01:08 PM
but a lot of chances sent wide (esp. on the pp)
Title: Re: Cornell 2 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 09:01:19 PM
Michael Kennedy just shot after the whistle there too.. Why didn't he get a misconduct like Gallagher?
Title: Re: idiots
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 09:02:04 PM
The CD completes a sweep of Colgate.  The Raiders are a different team against us.
Title: Re: idiots
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 09:02:29 PM
[quote Oat][quote sah67][quote Oat]idiots stood up in front of the camera and blocked everyone who paid for to watch this game live over the internet.

edit: it was during the heated moment in front of the cornell goal (RPI pp)[/quote]

We are currently working to remedy the situation.  A customer service representative will contact you with a solution within 24 hours.

::innocent::[/quote]

Help me harass the press box with the number that Jim gave us above:
518-276-2661

They just did it again.. and again[/quote]

Sorry bud, you're on your own.  I don't think anyone in the RPI press box is interested in listening to complaints from a Cornell fan about RPI fans blocking the camera ;)
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 09:02:48 PM
Patrick Kennedy! Top-shelf!
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Killer on January 17, 2009, 09:02:59 PM
Patrick Kennedy!!!
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 09:06:59 PM
4 minutes left in New Haven, SLU tied with Yale.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 09:07:34 PM
That was not offsides. "rossler" waited for the puck.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 09:11:41 PM
Overtime in New Haven.  Yale may be headed for a 1-point home weekend.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Scersk '97 on January 17, 2009, 09:12:15 PM
Unfortunately, UNH 6 Dartmouth 4 with about 5 to go.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 09:12:17 PM
RPI player plows into Scrivens and we'll end the game on the powerplay.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: lynah80 on January 17, 2009, 09:13:46 PM
Scrivens now leads the nation with 5 shutouts.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 09:14:07 PM
A dirty hit on Davenport at the buzzer and a brawl ensues.

Real classy, RPI.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 09:14:27 PM
OH MY GOD! WHAT A DIRTY HIT AFTER THE WHISTLE
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0
Post by: Cactus12 on January 17, 2009, 09:16:08 PM
Game DQ
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: lynah80 on January 17, 2009, 09:16:17 PM
5 minute major and game misconduct on Burdoerfer.  He will miss RPI's next game because of that.

No handshake to end the game.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 09:17:36 PM
[quote sah67]A dirty hit on Davenport at the buzzer and a brawl ensues.

Real classy, RPI.[/quote]


RPI hockey is the most useless collegiate program in the nation. I hope they leave ECAC. We gotta get them back in Lynah.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0
Post by: sah67 on January 17, 2009, 09:19:14 PM
[quote Cactus12]Game DQ[/quote]


And on Burgdoerfer, who also got a Game DQ in our game at RPI last year.  Classy guy.
Title: Re: Rensselaer Institute for Idiots
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 09:22:09 PM
And RPI fans boo'd our team.. after their player cheap shot Davenport following the game-ending whistle.

What kind of background did these uneducated acne-faced morons come from?
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: TimV on January 17, 2009, 09:23:36 PM
[quote lynah80]5 minute major and game misconduct on Burdoerfer.  He will miss RPI's next game because of that.

No handshake to end the game.[/quote]

Burgdorfer was the guy who ran one of our guys (also from behind) at RPI 2 years ago and enraged Sawada on the bench.  I'd like to see a good ol' Charlestown Chiefs game at Lynah against these jerks.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: cbuckser on January 17, 2009, 09:24:34 PM
[quote lynah80]5 minute major and game misconduct on Burdoerfer.  He will miss RPI's next game because of that.

No handshake to end the game.[/quote]
Erik Burgdoerfer is the same guy who got DQ'd for blatantly hitting Joe Scali from behind in last year's game at RPI.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 09:26:22 PM
[quote cbuckser][quote lynah80]5 minute major and game misconduct on Burdoerfer.  He will miss RPI's next game because of that.

No handshake to end the game.[/quote]
Erik Burgdoerfer is the same guy who got DQ'd for blatantly hitting Joe Scali from behind in last year's game at RPI.[/quote]

it's hard to say who I would rather see get hit by a truck. Burgdoerfer or Nickerson.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: lynah80 on January 17, 2009, 09:27:36 PM
Burgdoefer received a 5 minute major plus a game misconduct for hitting Joe Scali from behind on January 11, 2008 at RPI.  I wouldn't want to be him at Lynah on Feb. 20. '09.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 09:33:15 PM
[quote lynah80]Burgdoefer received a 5 minute major plus a game misconduct for hitting Joe Scali from behind on January 11, 2008 at RPI.  I wouldn't want to be him at Lynah on Feb. 20. '09.[/quote]

No one is going to touch him though. everyone on our current team has too much talent to make the same selfless sacrifice that Paul Varteressian did when Nickerson came to town.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0
Post by: Chris 02 on January 17, 2009, 09:40:22 PM
And the winner of the 2009 TBRW Kevan Melrose-Matt Nickerson Award goes to...


Erik Burgdoerfer of RPI!
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0
Post by: Trotsky on January 17, 2009, 09:42:23 PM
Postgame thread (http://elf.elynah.com/read.php?1,137811) up.
Title: Re: Rensselaer Institute for Idiots
Post by: Johnny 5 on January 17, 2009, 09:52:43 PM
[quote Oat]And RPI fans boo'd our team.. after their player cheap shot Davenport following the game-ending whistle.

What kind of background did these uneducated acne-faced morons come from?[/quote]

What is even more amazing is that the b2 Network announcers (RPI feed) suggested that:

1.) It was Davenport's fault because he positioned himself badly for the hit
2.) It wasn't a big deal because Davenport actually managed to get off the ice

Unbelievable. But, I guess that's what you get for 7 bucks.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: lynah80 on January 17, 2009, 10:06:05 PM
Yes, the best way to pay them back will be to stuff Lange's net with pucks.
Title: Re: Rensselaer Institute for Idiots
Post by: Oat on January 17, 2009, 10:09:44 PM
[quote Johnny 5]What is even more amazing is that the b2 Network announcers (RPI feed) suggested that:

1.) It was Davenport's fault because he positioned himself badly for the hit
2.) It wasn't a big deal because Davenport actually managed to get off the ice

Unbelievable. But, I guess that's what you get for 7 bucks.[/quote]

Re: 1.) He said "Davenport shouldn't have positioned himsefl that way and left himself vulnerable like that. That's not a smart thing to do." And he later said something along the line of "Cornell is not going to shake hands with RPI, thus creating bad blood between the teams... when there really is no reason to have bad blood.. blah blah blah this is unnecessary.."
Title: Re: Rensselaer Institute for Idiots
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 17, 2009, 10:17:52 PM
[quote Oat][quote Johnny 5]What is even more amazing is that the b2 Network announcers (RPI feed) suggested that:

1.) It was Davenport's fault because he positioned himself badly for the hit
2.) It wasn't a big deal because Davenport actually managed to get off the ice

Unbelievable. But, I guess that's what you get for 7 bucks.[/quote]

Re: 1.) He said "Davenport shouldn't have positioned himsefl that way and left himself vulnerable like that. That's not a smart thing to do." And he later said something along the line of "Cornell is not going to shake hands with RPI, thus creating bad blood between the teams... when there really is no reason to have bad blood.. blah blah blah this is unnecessary.."[/quote]

Three penalties at the end of the game. None necessary, one with the possibility of serious injury, and bad blood because of no handshake?::screwy::
Title: Re: Rensselaer Institute for Idiots
Post by: garrynayl on January 17, 2009, 10:35:01 PM
Realizing that language is always an issue in hockey talk I think we should refrain from the use of "idiot" and "moron" on this thread. It's just wrong and subjects this forum to justified critical comments from the rest of the earth.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: daredevilcu on January 18, 2009, 11:26:36 AM
[quote Oat][quote lynah80]Burgdoefer received a 5 minute major plus a game misconduct for hitting Joe Scali from behind on January 11, 2008 at RPI.  I wouldn't want to be him at Lynah on Feb. 20. '09.[/quote]

No one is going to touch him though. everyone on our current team has too much talent to make the same selfless sacrifice that Paul Varteressian did when Nickerson came to town.[/quote]

How'd that work out for him again? ::crazy::
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: DisplacedCornellian on January 18, 2009, 05:45:25 PM
[quote daredevilcu][quote Oat][quote lynah80]Burgdoefer received a 5 minute major plus a game misconduct for hitting Joe Scali from behind on January 11, 2008 at RPI.  I wouldn't want to be him at Lynah on Feb. 20. '09.[/quote]

No one is going to touch him though. everyone on our current team has too much talent to make the same selfless sacrifice that Paul Varteressian did when Nickerson came to town.[/quote]

How'd that work out for him again? ::crazy::[/quote]

I think he caught syphilis...::deadhorse::
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0
Post by: dragonfan on January 19, 2009, 06:21:13 AM
1.00:37 M.Kennedy 8 (unassisted)
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: redliner on January 21, 2009, 01:17:31 AM
[quote lynah80]5 minute major and game misconduct on Burdoerfer.  He will miss RPI's next game because of that.

No handshake to end the game.[/quote]

Here's the video of the hit and the aftermath http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PnJ-KfBIkw&feature=channel_page
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: imafrshmn on January 21, 2009, 01:56:44 AM
[quote redliner][quote lynah80]5 minute major and game misconduct on Burdoerfer.  He will miss RPI's next game because of that.

No handshake to end the game.[/quote]

Here's the video of the hit and the aftermath http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PnJ-KfBIkw&feature=channel_page[/quote]

Lots of RPI fans on USCHO have said, as we should expect, that the hit was legal and that Davenport put on an acting job to sell it.  By the looks of the video, it was clearly (to me anyway) boarding.  It is also clear that Davenport took a very hard fall into the boards and was no doubt shaken up--why he would want to try to sell an injury (especially at the end of a game) is beyond logic.  I'm not so sure whether the situation warranted beyond-minor penalties, from the video, because I am not sure that Davenport couldn't help slamming the board head first.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: KeithK on January 21, 2009, 12:39:16 PM
[quote imafrshmn]Lots of RPI fans on USCHO have said, as we should expect, that the hit was legal and that Davenport put on an acting job to sell it.  By the looks of the video, it was clearly (to me anyway) boarding.  It is also clear that Davenport took a very hard fall into the boards and was no doubt shaken up--why he would want to try to sell an injury (especially at the end of a game) is beyond logic.  I'm not so sure whether the situation warranted beyond-minor penalties, from the video, because I am not sure that Davenport couldn't help slamming the board head first.[/quote]
In real time I was sure it was a penalty.  Then watching in slow motion I was momentarily unsure (Edit: I was fixated on the fact that he hit Davenport from the front) until I read the boarding rule:

Quote from: NCAA Hockey Rule BookSECTION 3. A player shall not body check, cross-check, elbow, charge or
trip an opponent from the front or side in such a manner that causes the
opponent to be thrown violently into the boards (see 6-23).
I don't see how you could argue that this wasn't the case here.  Davenport was thrown violently into the boards. One could argue that the hit was legal and that Davenport was off balance and should have done more to protect himself but none of that matters according to the rule description. Besides, Burgdoerfer was clearly trying to shove Davenport into the boards.  Notice the extension he gets at the end of the hit. This was a shove, not a check.
Title: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: cbuckser on January 21, 2009, 12:41:24 PM
The ECAC issued supplemental discipline today for repeat offender, Erik Burgdoerfer (http://www.ecachockey.com/men/2008-09/news/20092101_Burgdoefer_Suspension).  The two-game suspension is in addition to the one-game suspension Burgdoerfer earned with the game disqualification.  The suspension is in response to Burgdoerfer's hitting-from-behind major/game misconduct in Friday's game against Colgate, as well as the boarding major/game disqualification at the end of Saturday's game.

In this morning's paper, Brandon Thomas wrote about Cornell's reactions to the play (http://www.theithacajournal.com/article/20090121/SPORTS/901210323).

I don't buy the RPI argument that Burgdoerfer's hit was a clean shoulder-to-shoulder check.  It's true, but it misses the point.  Boarding is the appropriate penalty to call when a hit that would have been legal in open ice causes a player to fly violently into the boards.  Taylor Davenport was several feet from the boards and was off-balance and vulnerable when Burgdoerfer lit into him.  In NCAA hockey, boarding by definition is a hit from the front or the side; a check from behind must be called hitting from behind, not boarding.
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Trotsky on January 21, 2009, 12:53:12 PM
Burgdoerfer isn't going to win the Lady Byng any time soon, but this seemed more unfortunate than malicious.  It wasn't Melrose or Nickerson.

He should send Davenport a get well soon, though.  That was a scary fall.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Trotsky on January 21, 2009, 12:57:16 PM
[quote imafrshmn]Lots of RPI fans on USCHO have said, as we should expect[/quote]"Expect" in the sense that people are going to see through partisan glasses, but in our experience here and on USCHO, the vast majority of RPI's fans are pretty exemplary in sportsmanship and maturity.
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: KeithK on January 21, 2009, 01:03:40 PM
[quote Trotsky]Burgdoerfer isn't going to win the Lady Byng any time soon, but this seemed more unfortunate than malicious.  It wasn't Melrose or Nickerson.[/quote]Maybe so.  But the kid has a history of dangerous hits.  If it's not malicious then he simply gets so frustrated that he stops caring. I'm not optimistic that another suspension will be enough to make him start thinking out there but the league has to penalize him severely for it.
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Trotsky on January 21, 2009, 01:09:48 PM
[quote KeithK]Maybe so.  But the kid has a history of dangerous hits.  If it's not malicious then he simply gets so frustrated that he stops caring. I'm not optimistic that another suspension will be enough to make him start thinking out there but the league has to penalize him severely for it.[/quote]Hey, granted.  Context matters.
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: ugarte on January 21, 2009, 01:23:31 PM
[quote Trotsky][quote KeithK]Maybe so.  But the kid has a history of dangerous hits.  If it's not malicious then he simply gets so frustrated that he stops caring. I'm not optimistic that another suspension will be enough to make him start thinking out there but the league has to penalize him severely for it.[/quote]Hey, granted.  Context matters.[/quote]
And the context here includes "down 3-0 with one second left in the game."
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: imafrshmn on January 21, 2009, 01:25:27 PM
[quote imafrshmn]Lots of RPI fans on USCHO have said, as we should expect
[quote Trotsky]"Expect" in the sense that people are going to see through partisan glasses,[/quote][/quote]
Yes, that is what I meant, not implying anything about RPI fans in particular.

[quote Trotsky]but in our experience here and on USCHO, the vast majority of RPI's fans are pretty exemplary in sportsmanship and maturity.[/quote]
Thanks for this bit of experience.  I have never met RPI fans in person or been to their rink.  It does bother me though that lots of online ECAC hockey fans "hate" Cornell fans for being "classless" or "snobs" or whatever.  Admittedly, I am only a student and don't personally know the Cornell fan community very well.  However, from my 3+ years of going to games, I believe that our fans, while being intense and provocative, almost always know where to draw the line in serious matters of sportsmanship (like when opposing players are hurt at Lynah).
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 21, 2009, 01:27:35 PM
[quote ugarte][quote Trotsky][quote KeithK]Maybe so.  But the kid has a history of dangerous hits.  If it's not malicious then he simply gets so frustrated that he stops caring. I'm not optimistic that another suspension will be enough to make him start thinking out there but the league has to penalize him severely for it.[/quote]Hey, granted.  Context matters.[/quote]
And the context here includes "down 3-0 with one second left in the game."[/quote]EXACTLY!The game is over, let it go.
Title: Davenport possibly out for this weekend
Post by: sah67 on January 21, 2009, 02:45:58 PM
From the IJ article about the Burgdoerfer hit:

[quote Ithaca Journal] As for Davenport's condition, the outlook for this weekend's games at Lynah isn't good.

"He's not better yet," Schafer said Tuesday. "We hope to get him back for maybe one game this week. We'll find out. He might not be back for either.

"Each day hopefully is a better one for him, which they have been so far," he added. "He hasn't practiced yet this week, so we'll see what (today) brings." [/quote]
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Josh '99 on January 21, 2009, 02:47:07 PM
[quote Trotsky][quote imafrshmn]Lots of RPI fans on USCHO have said, as we should expect[/quote]"Expect" in the sense that people are going to see through partisan glasses, but in our experience here and on USCHO, the vast majority of RPI's fans are pretty exemplary in sportsmanship and maturity.[/quote]I think that was just a florid way of saying that Ralph is old.  :-D
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Dpperk29 on January 21, 2009, 03:19:52 PM
[quote ugarte][quote Trotsky][quote KeithK]Maybe so.  But the kid has a history of dangerous hits.  If it's not malicious then he simply gets so frustrated that he stops caring. I'm not optimistic that another suspension will be enough to make him start thinking out there but the league has to penalize him severely for it.[/quote]Hey, granted.  Context matters.[/quote]
And the context here includes "down 3-0 with one second left in the game."[/quote]

I am by no means excusing Burgdoefer's hit, but why was Taylor Davenport even going towards the net with such little time left in a already decided game? why not just dump it in and let the clock expire? Perhaps Mr. Burgdoefer thought Davenport was being a show boat...
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Robb on January 21, 2009, 03:22:50 PM
[quote Dpperk29][quote ugarte][quote Trotsky][quote KeithK]Maybe so.  But the kid has a history of dangerous hits.  If it's not malicious then he simply gets so frustrated that he stops caring. I'm not optimistic that another suspension will be enough to make him start thinking out there but the league has to penalize him severely for it.[/quote]Hey, granted.  Context matters.[/quote]
And the context here includes "down 3-0 with one second left in the game."[/quote]

I am by no means excusing Burgdoefer's hit, but why was Taylor Davenport even going towards the net with such little time left in a already decided game? why not just dump it in and let the clock expire? Perhaps Mr. Burgdoefer thought Davenport was being a show boat...[/quote]
From the Ithaca Journal article, it sounded like Schafer, et al, took exception to the run RPI took at Scrivens with just over a minute to go, so they kept playing full speed.  Very unfortunate - if either team had taken the high road, this entire situation could have been avoided.  :-/
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: redliner on January 21, 2009, 03:32:19 PM
[quote Robb][quote Dpperk29][quote ugarte][quote Trotsky][quote KeithK]Maybe so.  But the kid has a history of dangerous hits.  If it's not malicious then he simply gets so frustrated that he stops caring. I'm not optimistic that another suspension will be enough to make him start thinking out there but the league has to penalize him severely for it.[/quote]Hey, granted.  Context matters.[/quote]
And the context here includes "down 3-0 with one second left in the game."[/quote]

I am by no means excusing Burgdoefer's hit, but why was Taylor Davenport even going towards the net with such little time left in a already decided game? why not just dump it in and let the clock expire? Perhaps Mr. Burgdoefer thought Davenport was being a show boat...[/quote]
From the Ithaca Journal article, it sounded like Schafer, et al, took exception to the run RPI took at Scrivens with just over a minute to go, so they kept playing full speed.  Very unfortunate - if either team had taken the high road, this entire situation could have been avoided.  :-/[/quote]

Within the same IJ article, here's Schafer's response, "Our guys will have a long memory when they come back to Lynah"
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Rosey on January 21, 2009, 03:54:24 PM
[quote redliner]Within the same IJ article, here's Schafer's response, "Our guys will have a long memory when they come back to Lynah"[/quote]
If Appert knows what's good for his team, he'll bench Burgdoefer for that game.
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: KeithK on January 21, 2009, 04:16:48 PM
[quote Jim Hyla][quote ugarte][quote Trotsky][quote KeithK]Maybe so.  But the kid has a history of dangerous hits.  If it's not malicious then he simply gets so frustrated that he stops caring. I'm not optimistic that another suspension will be enough to make him start thinking out there but the league has to penalize him severely for it.[/quote]Hey, granted.  Context matters.[/quote]
And the context here includes "down 3-0 with one second left in the game."[/quote]EXACTLY!The game is over, let it go.[/quote]
In fairness, there have been a couple times in my slow pitch softball league that I have gotten worked up enough that I could imagine at least wanting to do what Burgdoefer did.  So I can't condemn the kid too much.

Note: I have never sent seriously injured anyone in my softball games, intentionally or otherwise.  Well, I have sent a teammate to the hospital for stitches but that was an accident.
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Josh '99 on January 21, 2009, 04:42:45 PM
[quote Kyle Rose][quote redliner]Within the same IJ article, here's Schafer's response, "Our guys will have a long memory when they come back to Lynah"[/quote]
If Appert knows what's good for his team, he'll bench Burgdoefer for that game.[/quote]If suspensions could be structured intelligently, he would be suspended for that game rather than an undifferentiated next two games.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: DeltaOne81 on January 21, 2009, 07:00:19 PM
After seeing it for the first time, here's my thoughts:

The aftermath was bad, but the hit wasn't as bad as I expected. It was exacerbated by the fact that Davenport lost an edge and hit hard, but it wasn't a slam from behind directly into the boards.

However, neither was it so innocent. Davenport did not lose his edge afte the hit. He lost it just before or during, and he still went through with it and, furthermore, finished it off with a nice extra shove.

It was stupid, it was dangerous, and it was deserving of repercussions. It just wasn't the most blatant or dangerous there's ever been.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Josh '99 on January 21, 2009, 07:22:39 PM
[quote DeltaOne81]After seeing it for the first time, here's my thoughts:

The aftermath was bad, but the hit wasn't as bad as I expected. It was exacerbated by the fact that Davenport lost an edge and hit hard, but it wasn't a slam from behind directly into the boards.

However, neither was it so innocent. Davenport did not lose his edge afte the hit. He lost it just before or during, and he still went through with it and, furthermore, finished it off with a nice extra shove.

It was stupid, it was dangerous, and it was deserving of repercussions. It just wasn't the most blatant or dangerous there's ever been.[/quote]That sums my thoughts up fairly well.  From reading about the aftermath and suspension before seeing that video, I expected it to have looked a lot worse.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: ursusminor on January 21, 2009, 10:10:05 PM
[quote Josh '99][quote Trotsky][quote imafrshmn]Lots of RPI fans on USCHO have said, as we should expect[/quote]"Expect" in the sense that people are going to see through partisan glasses, but in our experience here and on USCHO, the vast majority of RPI's fans are pretty exemplary in sportsmanship and maturity.[/quote]I think that was just a florid way of saying that Ralph is old.  :-D[/quote]:-}
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Oat on January 22, 2009, 12:16:01 AM
[quote imafrshmn]It does bother me though that lots of online ECAC hockey fans "hate" Cornell fans for being "classless" or "snobs" or whatever.  Admittedly, I am only a student and don't personally know the Cornell fan community very well.  However, from my 3+ years of going to games, I believe that our fans, while being intense and provocative, almost always know where to draw the line in serious matters of sportsmanship (like when opposing players are hurt at Lynah).[/quote]


Most people who don't like Cornell fans are the other upstate New York fans (Colgate, Clarkson, Union, and RPI). It isn't anything that we do in particular.

So many people in America hate the Yankees. You can find so many Yankees haters in every town, every state (not just in Boston). When seriously asked why, their answer is "we just do. Yankees suck. we just hate'em."

People tend to hate the elite / the strong.
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: lynah80 on January 22, 2009, 01:06:34 AM
[quote Kyle Rose]
If Appert knows what's good for his team, he'll bench Burgdoefer for that game.[/quote]

I agree.  If the Big Red goes after him, the ensuing penalties could cost them the game.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: nyc94 on January 22, 2009, 11:16:46 AM
[quote Oat]People tend to hate the elite / the strong.[/quote]

True but there are plenty of reasons to hate the Yankees.  I get tired of the Minnesota fans on USCHO saying that everyone is jealous of their team's success, especially as measured by NCAA titles.  By that logic I should hate Michigan or Denver more - but I don't.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Josh '99 on January 22, 2009, 11:20:28 AM
[quote nyc94][quote Oat]People tend to hate the elite / the strong.[/quote]

True but there are plenty of reasons to hate the Yankees.  I get tired of the Minnesota fans on USCHO saying that everyone is jealous of their team's success, especially as measured by NCAA titles.  By that logic I should hate Michigan or Denver more - but I don't.[/quote]Maybe everyone is jealous of their success as measured by...  mascot head-spinning?
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: ben03 on January 22, 2009, 12:44:00 PM
[quote Josh '99][quote nyc94][quote Oat]People tend to hate the elite / the strong.[/quote]

True but there are plenty of reasons to hate the Yankees.  I get tired of the Minnesota fans on USCHO saying that everyone is jealous of their team's success, especially as measured by NCAA titles.  By that logic I should hate Michigan or Denver more - but I don't.[/quote]Maybe everyone is jealous of their success as measured by...  mascot head-spinning?[/quote]

or maybe their ability to spell en masse ...
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Josh '99 on January 22, 2009, 12:58:27 PM
[quote ben03][quote Josh '99][quote nyc94][quote Oat]People tend to hate the elite / the strong.[/quote]

True but there are plenty of reasons to hate the Yankees.  I get tired of the Minnesota fans on USCHO saying that everyone is jealous of their team's success, especially as measured by NCAA titles.  By that logic I should hate Michigan or Denver more - but I don't.[/quote]Maybe everyone is jealous of their success as measured by...  mascot head-spinning?[/quote]

or maybe their ability to spell en masse ...[/quote]That cheer is so annoying that I think I'd rather listen to the Michigan band play their fight song over and over and over and over and over and over and over.
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: daredevilcu on January 22, 2009, 01:37:29 PM
[quote lynah80][quote Kyle Rose]
If Appert knows what's good for his team, he'll bench Burgdoefer for that game.[/quote]

I agree.  If the Big Red goes after him, the ensuing penalties could cost them the game.[/quote]

If that is a concern of yours, that speaks to the discipline and character of the team and Schafer.  Watching it the first few times, I didn't see much of a call, then the extended arms were pointed out and the rule was quoted.  Having that information, it's definitely a penalty, possibly a major, definitely not more than that if there is any time left on the clock.  The DQ would have been sufficient penalty for the events of the weekend, imho.  The league didn't need to slap three extra games on there -- had there not been a DQ, a one or two game suspension might have been warranted.

I hope Davenport is OK, I wouldn't want the Big Red to be less than full strength when they lose in Cheel in two weeks when I'm up there (woof woof) :-D
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: lynah80 on January 22, 2009, 01:43:00 PM
[quote daredevilcu][quote lynah80][quote Kyle Rose]
If Appert knows what's good for his team, he'll bench Burgdoefer for that game.[/quote]

I agree.  If the Big Red goes after him, the ensuing penalties could cost them the game.[/quote]

If that is a concern of yours, that speaks to the discipline and character of the team and Schafer.  Watching it the first few times, I didn't see much of a call, then the extended arms were pointed out and the rule was quoted.  Having that information, it's definitely a penalty, possibly a major, definitely not more than that if there is any time left on the clock.  The DQ would have been sufficient penalty for the events of the weekend, imho.  The league didn't need to slap three extra games on there -- had there not been a DQ, a one or two game suspension might have been warranted.

I hope Davenport is OK, I wouldn't want the Big Red to be less than full strength when they lose in Cheel in two weeks when I'm up there (woof woof) :-D[/quote]

Please ask the Cheel maintenance crew to change the bulbs in the goal lamps before the Cornell game.  The Big Red will be using them a lot.
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Rosey on January 22, 2009, 02:17:16 PM
[quote lynah80][quote daredevilcu]I hope Davenport is OK, I wouldn't want the Big Red to be less than full strength when they lose in Cheel in two weeks when I'm up there (woof woof) :-D[/quote]

Please ask the Cheel maintenance crew to change the bulbs in the goal lamps before the Cornell game.  The Big Red will be using them a lot.[/quote]

OMG, won't somebody please stop the woofing?!!
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Robb on January 22, 2009, 02:29:03 PM
[quote lynah80][quote daredevilcu][quote lynah80][quote Kyle Rose]
If Appert knows what's good for his team, he'll bench Burgdoefer for that game.[/quote]

I agree.  If the Big Red goes after him, the ensuing penalties could cost them the game.[/quote]

If that is a concern of yours, that speaks to the discipline and character of the team and Schafer.  Watching it the first few times, I didn't see much of a call, then the extended arms were pointed out and the rule was quoted.  Having that information, it's definitely a penalty, possibly a major, definitely not more than that if there is any time left on the clock.  The DQ would have been sufficient penalty for the events of the weekend, imho.  The league didn't need to slap three extra games on there -- had there not been a DQ, a one or two game suspension might have been warranted.

I hope Davenport is OK, I wouldn't want the Big Red to be less than full strength when they lose in Cheel in two weeks when I'm up there (woof woof) :-D[/quote]

Please ask the Cheel maintenance crew to change the bulbs in the goal lamps before the Cornell game.  The Big Red will be using them a lot.[/quote]
It would have been a lot more believable if you'd said "tell them not to bother changing Cornell's goal light, since Clarkson won't be scoring at all."
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Give My Regards on January 22, 2009, 03:34:41 PM
[quote Robb]It would have been a lot more believable if you'd said "tell them not to bother changing Cornell's goal light, since Clarkson won't be scoring at all."[/quote]

But the teams switch ends at intermission, so... oh, never mind.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: marty on January 22, 2009, 05:44:28 PM
[quote Josh '99][quote ben03][quote Josh '99][quote nyc94][quote Oat]People tend to hate the elite / the strong.[/quote]

True but there are plenty of reasons to hate the Yankees.  I get tired of the Minnesota fans on USCHO saying that everyone is jealous of their team's success, especially as measured by NCAA titles.  By that logic I should hate Michigan or Denver more - but I don't.[/quote]Maybe everyone is jealous of their success as measured by...  mascot head-spinning?[/quote]

or maybe their ability to spell en masse ...[/quote]That cheer is so annoying that I think I'd rather listen to the Michigan band play their fight song over and over and over and over and over and over and over.[/quote]

Oh yeah? (http://www.davidmburrow.com/michigan.mid)
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Josh '99 on January 22, 2009, 05:48:30 PM
[quote Give My Regards][quote Robb]It would have been a lot more believable if you'd said "tell them not to bother changing Cornell's goal light, since Clarkson won't be scoring at all."[/quote]

But the teams switch ends at intermission, so... oh, never mind.[/quote]So they should be sure to have one good light bulb and one burnt out one on hand and switch them between periods, clearly.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: nr53 on January 22, 2009, 06:55:57 PM
[quote marty][quote Josh '99][quote ben03][quote Josh '99][quote nyc94][quote Oat]People tend to hate the elite / the strong.[/quote]

True but there are plenty of reasons to hate the Yankees.  I get tired of the Minnesota fans on USCHO saying that everyone is jealous of their team's success, especially as measured by NCAA titles.  By that logic I should hate Michigan or Denver more - but I don't.[/quote]Maybe everyone is jealous of their success as measured by...  mascot head-spinning?[/quote]

or maybe their ability to spell en masse ...[/quote]That cheer is so annoying that I think I'd rather listen to the Michigan band play their fight song over and over and over and over and over and over and over.[/quote]

Oh yeah? (http://www.davidmburrow.com/michigan.mid)[/quote]

[quote From a friend who used to be in the Illinois marching band]
Hail to the Mother ****ers,
Hail to the Big **** ****ers,
Hail Hail to Michigan the cesspoll of the West,
Hail to the Fornicators,
Hail to the Masterbaters
Hail Hail to Michigan the cesspoll of the West...
[/quote]

I have a lot of friends at work who went to Michigan so it's always fun to bust this out :-p
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: marty on January 22, 2009, 07:28:17 PM
[quote Josh '99][quote Give My Regards][quote Robb]It would have been a lot more believable if you'd said "tell them not to bother changing Cornell's goal light, since Clarkson won't be scoring at all."[/quote]

But the teams switch ends at intermission, so... oh, never mind.[/quote]So they should be sure to have one good light bulb and one burnt out one on hand and switch them between periods, clearly.[/quote]

Which begs the question, how many CCT technicians does it take to change two light bulbs?(http://www.cpfmarketplace.com/mp/images/smilies/au.gif)
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: daredevilcu on January 22, 2009, 08:45:40 PM
[quote marty][quote Josh '99][quote Give My Regards][quote Robb]It would have been a lot more believable if you'd said "tell them not to bother changing Cornell's goal light, since Clarkson won't be scoring at all."[/quote]

But the teams switch ends at intermission, so... oh, never mind.[/quote]So they should be sure to have one good light bulb and one burnt out one on hand and switch them between periods, clearly.[/quote]

Which begs the question, how many CCT technicians does it take to change two light bulbs?(http://www.cpfmarketplace.com/mp/images/smilies/au.gif)[/quote]

I don't know about technicians, but it takes about 700 students.  1 to screw in the bulb, and 699 to go crazy when it turns on!  ::rock::
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: marty on January 23, 2009, 06:23:44 AM
[quote daredevilcu][quote marty][quote Josh '99][quote Give My Regards][quote Robb]It would have been a lot more believable if you'd said "tell them not to bother changing Cornell's goal light, since Clarkson won't be scoring at all."[/quote]

But the teams switch ends at intermission, so... oh, never mind.[/quote]So they should be sure to have one good light bulb and one burnt out one on hand and switch them between periods, clearly.[/quote]

Which begs the question, how many CCT technicians does it take to change two light bulbs?(http://www.cpfmarketplace.com/mp/images/smilies/au.gif)[/quote]

I don't know about technicians, but it takes about 700 students.  1 to screw in the bulb, and 699 to go crazy when it turns on!  ::rock::[/quote]


Well since don't consider yourselves technicians are you at least junior techs?
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: ithacat on January 23, 2009, 07:54:59 AM
[quote Kyle Rose][quote lynah80][quote daredevilcu]I hope Davenport is OK, I wouldn't want the Big Red to be less than full strength when they lose in Cheel in two weeks when I'm up there (woof woof) :-D[/quote]

Please ask the Cheel maintenance crew to change the bulbs in the goal lamps before the Cornell game.  The Big Red will be using them a lot.[/quote]

OMG, won't somebody please stop the woofing?!![/quote]

Thank you...
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Jeff Hopkins '82 on January 23, 2009, 08:13:31 AM
[quote nr53][quote marty][quote Josh '99][quote ben03][quote Josh '99][quote nyc94][quote Oat]People tend to hate the elite / the strong.[/quote]

True but there are plenty of reasons to hate the Yankees.  I get tired of the Minnesota fans on USCHO saying that everyone is jealous of their team's success, especially as measured by NCAA titles.  By that logic I should hate Michigan or Denver more - but I don't.[/quote]Maybe everyone is jealous of their success as measured by...  mascot head-spinning?[/quote]

or maybe their ability to spell en masse ...[/quote]That cheer is so annoying that I think I'd rather listen to the Michigan band play their fight song over and over and over and over and over and over and over.[/quote]

Oh yeah? (http://www.davidmburrow.com/michigan.mid)[/quote]

[quote From a friend who used to be in the Illinois marching band]
Hail to the Mother ****ers,
Hail to the Big **** ****ers,
Hail Hail to Michigan the cesspoll of the West,
Hail to the Fornicators,
Hail to the Masterbaters
Hail Hail to Michigan the cesspoll of the West...
[/quote]

I have a lot of friends at work who went to Michigan so it's always fun to bust this out :-p[/quote]

I had a friend at Cornell who was a transfer from Purdue.  He knew the same version, except I think he sang "cesspool of the world."

Edit:  Oh and thank you.  Now I have that fucking song stuck in my head.  ::flipc::
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Josh '99 on January 23, 2009, 11:10:05 AM
[quote Jeff Hopkins '82][quote nr53][quote marty][quote Josh '99][quote ben03][quote Josh '99][quote nyc94][quote Oat]People tend to hate the elite / the strong.[/quote]

True but there are plenty of reasons to hate the Yankees.  I get tired of the Minnesota fans on USCHO saying that everyone is jealous of their team's success, especially as measured by NCAA titles.  By that logic I should hate Michigan or Denver more - but I don't.[/quote]Maybe everyone is jealous of their success as measured by...  mascot head-spinning?[/quote]

or maybe their ability to spell en masse ...[/quote]That cheer is so annoying that I think I'd rather listen to the Michigan band play their fight song over and over and over and over and over and over and over.[/quote]

Oh yeah? (http://www.davidmburrow.com/michigan.mid)[/quote]

[quote From a friend who used to be in the Illinois marching band]
Hail to the Mother ****ers,
Hail to the Big **** ****ers,
Hail Hail to Michigan the cesspoll of the West,
Hail to the Fornicators,
Hail to the Masterbaters
Hail Hail to Michigan the cesspoll of the West...
[/quote]

I have a lot of friends at work who went to Michigan so it's always fun to bust this out :-p[/quote]

I had a friend at Cornell who was a transfer from Purdue.  He knew the same version, except I think he sang "cesspool of the world."

Edit:  Oh and thank you.  Now I have that fucking song stuck in my head.  ::flipc::[/quote]I think it works better with "To hell with" than "Hail to".
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: daredevilcu on January 23, 2009, 01:26:09 PM
I'm a business student, don't ask me what the engineers want to be called these days.  They're all nuts no matter what school you go to anyway.
Title: Re: ECAC Suspends Erik Burgdoerfer for Two Games
Post by: Trotsky on January 23, 2009, 02:02:54 PM
[quote daredevilcu]I'm a business student, don't ask me what the engineers want to be called these days.[/quote]"Employed."
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: ugarte on January 23, 2009, 03:57:11 PM
I'll take Songs the Cornell Pep Band Can't Play at Lynah for 800, Alex.

[quote From a friend who used to be in the Illinois marching band]
Hail to the Mother ****ers,
Hail to the Big **** ****ers,
Hail Hail to Michigan the cesspoll of the West,
Hail to the Fornicators,
Hail to the Masterbaters
Hail Hail to Michigan the cesspoll of the West...
[/quote]

What is Hail to the Victors?
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0 (3rd period)
Post by: Scersk '97 on January 23, 2009, 06:34:05 PM
[quote marty][quote Josh '99]That cheer is so annoying that I think I'd rather listen to the Michigan band play their fight song over and over and over and over and over and over and over.[/quote]

Oh yeah? (http://www.davidmburrow.com/michigan.mid)[/quote]

Given how pathetic midi files are in the first place, what's more pathetic is that our toolish friend here has (1) substituted the bridge for the intro, (2) screwed up the bridge, and (3) generally messed up the harmonies.

Go BLUE!!!  I love Michigan, yea!!!111
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 24, 2009, 01:31:58 PM
Guess who leads the league in penalties-in-minutes? No, you don't get 3 guesses. He has 72 with next closest 58 in overall games.  If there were more minutes for ECAC imposed penalties, then it would be astronomical.

He already has more ECAC PIM this year than every player last year and 25 more than the next closest in ECAC play this year. Yeah, I know that the 10 min ones add up quickly, but that's the point.

I guess it's clear the pattern of his career, rather than the hit on Davenport, is what lead to the ECAC penalty.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0
Post by: cbuckser on January 24, 2009, 02:18:08 PM
[quote Jim Hyla]I guess it's clear the pattern of his career, rather than the hit on Davenport, is what lead to the ECAC penalty.[/quote]

Can anybody think of another occasion in which a player left one game with a game misconduct and followed it up in the ensuing game with a game disqualification?  I can't.
Title: Re: Cornell 3 RPI 0
Post by: lynah80 on January 26, 2009, 12:02:10 AM
He also had a 10-min misconduct against Quinnipiac on 11/15/08 for slashing the goalie after the whistle.

Should this guy be allowed on the ice with a stick?
Title: RPI: 3rd in the nation in PIM/game
Post by: lynah80 on January 26, 2009, 12:18:04 AM
2008-2009

Rank Team Penalties-for-PIM   PIM/gm

1   Ferris State   234-for-592   22.77
2   Mercyhurst   205-for-523   20.92
3   Rensselaer   200-for-517   20.68
4   Wisconsin   237-for-531   20.42
5   Michigan   211-for-515   19.81

It's part of their team culture.