ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: ACM on December 28, 2008, 07:09:59 PM

Title: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: ACM on December 28, 2008, 07:09:59 PM
Several lineup changes (per pre-game interview with Schafer):

Roeszler, Kary, TaDavenport in

Jillson, Nicholls, MDevin out.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: ACM on December 28, 2008, 07:20:43 PM
Unfortunately, Jason's broadcast sounds as awful as it did last night.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: TimV on December 28, 2008, 07:29:04 PM
Teams just entered on to the ice.  I'm not getting any audio on B2.  It's actually better thab the SCSU radio guys.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: Jacob '06 on December 28, 2008, 07:32:06 PM
Colgate free audio here:
Colgate Audio (http://www.teamline.cc/sportpage?teamcode=2007&eventcode=25)
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: RedAR on December 28, 2008, 07:35:11 PM
No video or audio from B2. Great!
Listening to Redcast for now.
Anyone getting the B2 feed yet?
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: andyw2100 on December 28, 2008, 07:36:27 PM
I'm getting the B2 feed, but terrible audio.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: Cactus12 on December 28, 2008, 07:36:52 PM
yeh the audio is not really working
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: Robb on December 28, 2008, 07:36:54 PM
I have B2 up, but the audio is verry, verry quiet.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: TimV on December 28, 2008, 07:37:00 PM
I got video only.  Redcast audio is about 1 min behind the video.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: Robb on December 28, 2008, 07:38:46 PM
Good save by Scrivens on a partial breakaway.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: andyw2100 on December 28, 2008, 07:41:23 PM
The audio problem got corrected, and almost blew out my eardrums.
Title: B2 Audio kicked in...
Post by: TimV on December 28, 2008, 07:42:05 PM
Not Jason - Colgate feed.
Title: Re: B2 Audio kicked in...
Post by: TimV on December 28, 2008, 07:44:07 PM
This guy at least learned the rosters.  Compred to last night's crew this guy should be on ESPN.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 1 (per 1)
Post by: Cactus12 on December 28, 2008, 07:48:17 PM
bad giveaway
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (per 1)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 07:48:31 PM
Terrible giveaway.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (per 1)
Post by: Oat on December 28, 2008, 07:55:06 PM
So did anyone catch who gave it away?
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (per 1)
Post by: ACM on December 28, 2008, 07:55:57 PM
[quote Oat]So did anyone catch who gave it away?[/quote]

If you believe Jason, it was Michael Kennedy.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 1)
Post by: Cactus12 on December 28, 2008, 07:57:50 PM
shg colgate

we're awful at the blueline on the pp
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: TShen on December 28, 2008, 07:57:54 PM
Grrr 2-0 Gate.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 1)
Post by: Oat on December 28, 2008, 07:58:14 PM
Shawty for Colgate :(
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (pre-game)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 07:58:21 PM
We're sleepwalking through this period.  Three shots on goal.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 1)
Post by: Omie on December 28, 2008, 07:58:26 PM
WOW! Two horrible turnovers.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 1)
Post by: Oat on December 28, 2008, 07:59:50 PM
almost 0-3. but Scrivens was godlike.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (per 1)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 08:01:51 PM
Schafer needs to push some buttons.  That was a dull effort.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 0 (per 1)
Post by: Omie on December 28, 2008, 08:03:56 PM
[quote Al DeFlorio]That was a dull effort.[/quote]

Rather it was no effort.
Title: Buttons...
Post by: TimV on December 28, 2008, 08:09:42 PM
Here's the button to push. (http://www.bombombombomwooooo.com/)::worry::
Title: Re: Buttons...
Post by: Jim Hyla on December 28, 2008, 08:12:51 PM
[quote TimV]Here's the button to push. (http://www.bombombombomwooooo.com/)::worry::[/quote]

No, I want a button that does something.::cuss::
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: HeafDog on December 28, 2008, 08:17:53 PM
IRC information is irc.warped.net, #lynah, right? I didn't see anyone in there. Do I have the wrong server?
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Omie on December 28, 2008, 08:21:49 PM
Five or more blatant giveaways so far with two of them resulting in goals. What in the world is going on? ::help::
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Trotsky on December 28, 2008, 08:25:12 PM
On the bright side, the REDcast feed has taken an encouraging turn for the so-so.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: ryeguy on December 28, 2008, 08:25:17 PM
very sloppy pp.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Omie on December 28, 2008, 08:25:27 PM
5x3. Let's hope we get something going. LGR!
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Cactus12 on December 28, 2008, 08:26:47 PM
pp goal gallagher
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: ryeguy on December 28, 2008, 08:27:05 PM
nice goal. gallagher
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: ACM on December 28, 2008, 08:27:19 PM
6:48 gallagher's first goal of the season
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Omie on December 28, 2008, 08:27:21 PM
SCORE!!!! Gallagher!
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Cactus12 on December 28, 2008, 08:27:49 PM
and right back on the pp
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 08:28:09 PM
[quote Omie]Five or more blatant giveaways so far with two of them resulting in goals. What in the world is going on? ::help::[/quote]
I think one reason for that is that Colgate is going after our D-men and they're not handling it well.
Title: Re: Buttons...
Post by: andyw2100 on December 28, 2008, 08:30:50 PM
Anyone watching the B2 feed actually --see-- the goal? We apparently missed perhaps 10-20 seconds of the broadcast somehow, going from about 10 seconds left in the 5-3 to about 10-15 seconds after the goal, as the line that was out on the ice when the goal was scored was skating by the Cornell bench.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Oat on December 28, 2008, 08:31:32 PM
Our PP is weak
Title: Re: Buttons...
Post by: Robb on December 28, 2008, 08:31:44 PM
I saw it on B2.

Nice goal.
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 08:31:44 PM
I saw the goal here.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 08:33:16 PM
[quote Oat]Our PP is weak[/quote]
I wish they'd put more shots on net while on PP.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Cactus12 on December 28, 2008, 08:35:03 PM
or in net for that matter
Title: Re: Cornell 0, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: andyw2100 on December 28, 2008, 08:35:51 PM
Thanks. Must have been some weird internet lag catching up at an inopportune time.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: ryeguy on December 28, 2008, 08:35:52 PM
Whitney looked like a pylon.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 08:37:14 PM
Looks we've started skating after the three quick Colgate penalties.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Robb on December 28, 2008, 08:37:17 PM
Scrivens is definitely saving our bacon again - great save followed by knocking the puck into the corner out of the air with his stick while getting knocked on his butt.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Cactus12 on December 28, 2008, 08:39:00 PM
nice pass
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: ACM on December 28, 2008, 08:39:32 PM
about all i can tell from jason's broadcast is that somebody scored for cornell
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Oat on December 28, 2008, 08:39:53 PM
Dammit I WAS TYPING for 2 seconds and I missed the goal.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: ACM on December 28, 2008, 08:40:20 PM
michael kennedy from whitney and roeszler
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Aro23r on December 28, 2008, 08:40:53 PM
We should keep a tally of how many ways opposing teams announcers pronounce Roeszler. I've counted 3 different this game alone.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: ryeguy on December 28, 2008, 08:41:47 PM
I was doing the same. It didn't sound too fancy. I guess it bounced off a defender and went between the goalies legs.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Trotsky on December 28, 2008, 08:41:56 PM
[quote Aro23r]We should keep a tally of how many ways opposing teams announcers pronounce Roeszler. I've counted 3 different this game alone.[/quote]It's ok, Jason just mispronounced it, too. :-}
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: ACM on December 28, 2008, 08:42:18 PM
ress-ler. ross-ler. rose-ler. i'm not sure what it is myself, and i've known tyler's father since 1981.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: ryeguy on December 28, 2008, 08:43:36 PM
[quote ACM]ress-ler. ross-ler. rose-ler. i'm not sure what it is myself, and i've known tyler's father since 1981.[/quote]
Add russ-ler to the list.
Title: Re: Cornell 1, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 08:46:19 PM
Someone on USCHO reported Harvard lost to Huntsville in the consy game.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: ACM on December 28, 2008, 08:47:19 PM
cornell pronunciation guide says it's roz-ler. guess that's what i'll call him.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Trotsky on December 28, 2008, 08:54:21 PM
[quote ACM]cornell pronunciation guide says it's roz-ler. guess that's what i'll call him.[/quote]Jason has been alternating between "Rezler" and "Wrestler."
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: dragonfan on December 28, 2008, 08:56:12 PM
B.Nash needs to be benched,Colgates just taking the puck right from him and skating circles around him not to mention his bad passes.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Oat on December 28, 2008, 09:00:58 PM
I like this Colgate radio guy
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Cactus12 on December 28, 2008, 09:04:39 PM
yeh i think he's pretty competent
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: TimV on December 28, 2008, 09:06:07 PM
Damn.  All alone in the slot and our guy fires high and wide.  Why can't we finish?
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Cactus12 on December 28, 2008, 09:06:07 PM
back on the pp
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 09:06:30 PM
Lots of good chances.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Trotsky on December 28, 2008, 09:07:02 PM
[quote Cactus12]back on the pp[/quote]Opposite of last night: always on the advantage (and a shorty given up).
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Oat on December 28, 2008, 09:07:32 PM
doesn't matter. to me, cornell pp = pee break. our special team needs to be much much better.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: ryeguy on December 28, 2008, 09:10:02 PM
[quote Oat]doesn't matter. to me, cornell pp = pee break. our special team needs to be much much better.[/quote]
It would become a little better if we hit the net.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: HeafDog on December 28, 2008, 09:11:20 PM
[quote Oat]I like this Colgate radio guy[/quote]

I'm with you on that. He said the Cornell Pep Band is the best in the conference. Gotta respect a guy who says something like that about another school!
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Jim Hyla on December 28, 2008, 09:14:13 PM
[quote HeafDog][quote Oat]I like this Colgate radio guy[/quote]

I'm with you on that. He said the Cornell Pep Band is the best in the conference. Gotta respect a guy who says something like that about another school![/quote]
Well, he was only telling the truth.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Cactus12 on December 28, 2008, 09:15:50 PM
another horrible giveaway
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 2)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 09:22:47 PM
Some sloppy puck-handling there for a bit.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Aro23r on December 28, 2008, 09:25:21 PM
I'm becoming a bigger and bigger fan of J. Devin. After long shifts that ended in icing, he will intentionally get bounced from the faceoff circle to buy some extra time for the tired line to recover.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Robb on December 28, 2008, 09:26:45 PM
pretty good intensity building here - hope we can use it and not get sloppy.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: mnagowski on December 28, 2008, 09:27:21 PM
OT.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: ryeguy on December 28, 2008, 09:28:49 PM
Please tell me this will not go to a shootout after one OT.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 09:29:34 PM
[quote ryeguy]Please tell me this will not go to a shootout after one OT.[/quote]
Well, that's the second best outcome.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Oat on December 28, 2008, 09:32:34 PM
Was that the right penalty call?
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 09:32:52 PM
Argh.  I don't think it was intentional.  Colgate announcer is sympathetic.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: ugarte on December 28, 2008, 09:36:32 PM
TO in OT. 40 seconds left.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: ugarte on December 28, 2008, 09:39:09 PM
TO Colgate. Two seconds left in OT, faceoff in the Cornell zone.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 09:39:42 PM
Whatever happened to those face-off-in-the-offensive-zone plays Cornell pulled off in the Vesce/Murray/McRae era?
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: mnagowski on December 28, 2008, 09:39:45 PM
Two seconds left. Faceoff outside of Cornell's net. Colgate has pulled their goalie.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 09:40:24 PM
Can we somehow trick our guys into thinking these are not penalty shots?
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: mnagowski on December 28, 2008, 09:40:45 PM
And yet another two goal Colgate lead that has resulted in a two-two tie.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (OT)
Post by: Omie on December 28, 2008, 09:40:58 PM
Frankly after that first period we were lucky to end up with a tie.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Trotsky on December 28, 2008, 09:42:13 PM
[quote Al DeFlorio]Can we somehow trick our guys into thinking these are not penalty shots?[/quote]Put a Raider defenseman out there?
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Oat on December 28, 2008, 09:42:29 PM
a tie against colgate? that's not good
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (OT)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 09:42:52 PM
[quote Omie]Frankly after that first period we were lucky to end up with a tie.[/quote]
Agree.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: ugarte on December 28, 2008, 09:47:29 PM
Shootout:

Cornell           Colgate
Roeszler: Save    Smith: Save
Gallagher: Goal   ?: Save
R. Nash: Save     McIntyre: Whiff
Seminoff: Goal    Riley: Save


Cornell takes the shootout 2-0.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: mnagowski on December 28, 2008, 09:47:33 PM
Cornell with a win.*

*Not really.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 09:47:39 PM
Fitting the Harkness Trophy comes to Ithaca the year of his passing.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 09:49:05 PM
That's a Cornell football fight song.  The real one, not the goofy one Knowles uses.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: polar on December 28, 2008, 09:51:26 PM
lord knows where they dug up audio of "the big red team" from
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Omie on December 28, 2008, 09:52:10 PM
Scrivens is the MVP, well deserved.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: mnagowski on December 28, 2008, 09:53:14 PM
QuoteThat's a Cornell football fight song. The real one, not the goofy one Knowles uses.

Cornell victorious?
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 09:54:03 PM
Tie knocks Cornell to third in pairwise.  Ho hum.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot) 2 man forecheck
Post by: lynah80 on December 28, 2008, 10:09:02 PM
Colgate seems to have figured out that the Cornell defense is uncomfortable with a 2 man fore-check.  They were quite good at forcing turnovers.  Mike needs to come up with a new approach before everyone else in the country watches the game film.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 (per 3)
Post by: Trotsky on December 28, 2008, 10:21:37 PM
[quote ugarte]Shootout:

Cornell           Colgate
Roeszler: Save    Smith: Save
Gallagher: Goal   ?: Save
R. Nash: Save     McIntyre: Whiff
Seminoff: Goal    Riley: Save


Cornell takes the shootout 2-0.[/quote]

The second Colgate shot was taken by Day.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 10:33:36 PM
[quote mnagowski]
QuoteThat's a Cornell football fight song. The real one, not the goofy one Knowles uses.

Cornell victorious?[/quote]
I think it's "Fight for Cornell."

"Make all advances strong and sure today; take all the chances fate throws in the way; fight for the glory that is earned so well; victory makes history so fight for Cornell."

Actually, it may have been a medley of Cornell songs, including the one above.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Jeff Hopkins '82 on December 28, 2008, 10:58:36 PM
Whatever it was, they played it after every goal and every time we came out onto the ice for each period.  Someone who's been to the tourney several times before said they've never had any of the appropriate songs (Davy, My Old Cornell, etc.), just this obscure one.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Ben Rocky '04 on December 28, 2008, 11:00:42 PM
Long deserved the all-tourney team goalie slot.  He kept 'Gate in the game in the third period.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 28, 2008, 11:17:11 PM
[quote Jeff Hopkins '82]Whatever it was, they played it after every goal and every time we came out onto the ice for each period.  Someone who's been to the tourney several times before said they've never had any of the appropriate songs (Davy, My Old Cornell, etc.), just this obscure one.[/quote]
Well, I think everyone would agree "Davy" would be the right choice.  But I wouldn't say "Fight for Cornell" is any more "obscure" or any less "appropriate" than "My Old Cornell" or "Cornell Victorious" or several other traditional Cornell songs.  Just because you don't know it...;-)

And maybe Craig Brush just likes it.::crazy::
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: RichH on December 28, 2008, 11:24:51 PM
[quote Al DeFlorio][quote Jeff Hopkins '82]Whatever it was, they played it after every goal and every time we came out onto the ice for each period.  Someone who's been to the tourney several times before said they've never had any of the appropriate songs (Davy, My Old Cornell, etc.), just this obscure one.[/quote]
Well, I think everyone would agree "Davy" would be the right choice.  But I wouldn't say "Fight for Cornell" is any more "obscure" or any less "appropriate" than "My Old Cornell" or "Cornell Victorious" or several other traditional Cornell songs.  Just because you don't know it...;-)

And maybe Craig Brush just likes it.::crazy::[/quote]

From what I remember of the early years of this tournament, they used the "New Cornell Fight Song" after goals.  Now if I were the arena DJ guy and got handed a CU band CD for the first tournament...that's probably what I would pick to play after goals.  However, I seem to recall that JTW et al. made a stink and a legitimate attempt to let it be known that "Davy" be played.

Still wrong after all these years...9 years in, I guess it's tradition now.  ::doh::
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: mnagowski on December 28, 2008, 11:36:38 PM
It definitely wasn't up tempo enough to be TNCFS (which I believe is the one that Knowles uses?). And I think Al's right in that it was 'Fight For Cornell'.

Both 'Fight For Cornell' and 'Cornell Victorious' are great songs, and should be played more often at the games, but the 'fight' song they are not.

Edit: And yes, I realize that 'fight' is in the title of the former.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Josh '99 on December 29, 2008, 11:00:59 AM
[quote mnagowski]It definitely wasn't up tempo enough to be TNCFS (which I believe is the one that Knowles uses?). And I think Al's right in that it was 'Fight For Cornell'.

Both 'Fight For Cornell' and 'Cornell Victorious' are great songs, and should be played more often at the games, but the 'fight' song they are not.

Edit: And yes, I realize that 'fight' is in the title of the former.[/quote]#3 should be played exactly zero or one time at a game, ideally once.

(It's #3, right?  It's been a while since I had that sheet in front of me.)
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: mnagowski on December 29, 2008, 11:46:02 AM
Quote(It's #3, right? It's been a while since I had that sheet in front of me.)

I have no idea. I wasn't in the band.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: ugarte on December 29, 2008, 12:47:20 PM
[quote mnagowski]
Quote(It's #3, right? It's been a while since I had that sheet in front of me.)

I have no idea. I wasn't in the band.[/quote]
Then you might not be the best person to answer the question.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Chris '03 on December 29, 2008, 01:21:41 PM
[quote Josh '99][quote mnagowski]It definitely wasn't up tempo enough to be TNCFS (which I believe is the one that Knowles uses?). And I think Al's right in that it was 'Fight For Cornell'.

Both 'Fight For Cornell' and 'Cornell Victorious' are great songs, and should be played more often at the games, but the 'fight' song they are not.

Edit: And yes, I realize that 'fight' is in the title of the former.[/quote]#3 should be played exactly zero or one time at a game, ideally once.

(It's #3, right?  It's been a while since I had that sheet in front of me.)[/quote]

Yes. It's #3 and it's nonsense that Knowles took it away, both by policy and lack of success. He's effectively killed NCFS and #3.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Josh '99 on December 29, 2008, 06:51:21 PM
[quote mnagowski]
Quote(It's #3, right? It's been a while since I had that sheet in front of me.)

I have no idea. I wasn't in the band.[/quote]I didn't assume so; my question was directed at other readers of the board who were.  Sorry for any confusion.  :-)
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: mnagowski on December 30, 2008, 01:29:09 AM
QuoteSorry for any confusion.

No worries. I'm still confused as to what song #3 is though. Is it Cornell Victorious or the Fight for Cornell?
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Al DeFlorio on December 30, 2008, 08:57:46 AM
[quote Al DeFlorio]Tie knocks Cornell to third in pairwise.  Ho hum.[/quote]
Princeton's win over Mankato last night puts them atop both pairwise and KRACH.::wow::
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Chris '03 on December 30, 2008, 09:17:30 AM
[quote mnagowski]
QuoteSorry for any confusion.

No worries. I'm still confused as to what song #3 is though. Is it Cornell Victorious or the Fight for Cornell?[/quote]

It's not Fight for Cornell.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: Josh '99 on December 30, 2008, 11:35:10 AM
[quote Chris '03][quote mnagowski]
QuoteSorry for any confusion.

No worries. I'm still confused as to what song #3 is though. Is it Cornell Victorious or the Fight for Cornell?[/quote]

It's not Fight for Cornell.[/quote]mnagowski, if you search through some older threads on this topic (maybe in the Other Sports forum in a football discussion), you'll find a good post (I think from RichH or Lowell '99) explaining the superstition about #3 that leads Chris and me to be so obtuse about it.
Title: Re: Cornell 2, Colgate 2 tie (ot)
Post by: mnagowski on December 30, 2008, 11:53:05 AM
Quoteexplaining the superstition about #3 that leads Chris and me to be so obtuse about it.

Got it. Thanks.