Scrivens v Pisellini
Scrivens' weekend: 68 saves on 68 shots in 125 minutes.
I've heard Jillson and Collins both mentioned. Who is sitting?
I guess Joe Devin and Dan Nicholls..
[quote pfibiger]I've heard Jillson and Collins both mentioned. Who is sitting?[/quote]
Punches in for Nichols?
I haven't heard Greening, Nicholls or Joe Scali yet.
Scali gets back in time to defeat a Q breakaway.
Dartmouth up at RPI, 1-0. Break up the Big Green.
[quote Trotsky]I haven't heard Greening, Nicholls or Joe Scali yet.[/quote]
I've heard both. I'm pretty sure it's Punches for Nicholls and Kennedy for Devin.
[quote pfibiger]I'm pretty sure it's Punches for Nicholls and Kennedy for Devin.[/quote]Makes sense.
Q blows their second pp with an even-up.
Anybody heard Berk yet? I've only got 5 D (Seminoff, B. Nash, Ross, M. Devin, Krueger).
[quote Trotsky][quote pfibiger]I'm pretty sure it's Punches for Nicholls and Kennedy for Devin.[/quote]Makes sense.
Q blows their second pp with an even-up.
Anybody heard Berk yet? I've only got 5 D (Seminoff, B. Nash, Ross, M. Devin, Krueger).[/quote]
Berk's playing
RPI ties up DC 1-1.
Video just showed Q-Pac has a cowbell guy (lower case.)
Announcers disagree on scoreboard shots showing q 11 to C 4.
Q power play will start 2nd period.
Shots 12-6 Q after 1. Cornell has now been outshot 55-25 through 4 periods, and has entered each of 3 intermissions shorthanded.
[quote Trotsky]Shots 12-6 Q after 1. Cornell has now been outshot 55-25 through 4 periods, and has entered each of 3 intermissions shorthanded.[/quote]
Announcers said 11-4 (skeptically) with 4 seconds on clock. I saw no shots thereafter, but somehow the between period graphic came up with three more shots to make it 12-6. Shot differential from last night also questioned, so I suspect it's really not that bad.
[quote Trotsky][quote pfibiger]I'm pretty sure it's Punches for Nicholls and Kennedy for Devin.[/quote]Makes sense.
Q blows their second pp with an even-up.
Anybody heard Berk yet? I've only got 5 D (Seminoff, B. Nash, Ross, M. Devin, Krueger).[/quote]Berk just plays very little, it seems - watching yesterday's game, I couldn't figure out who the sixth defenseman was and had to look it up after the game.
Penalty shot!
Barlow has a chance to make the first penalty shot since Nieuwendyk.... but it's not to be,
Aaaaaand, still waiting after 21 years...
1987 last score...
Damn...
Why do we even bother? :`-(
last nights breakaway should have warned us.. shot right into the goalies gut..
Lack of Finishers.
The gongshow continues... another pp chance for us.
8 straight misses (http://www.tbrw.info/weeklyUpdates/cornellPenaltyShots.html).
I would like Lemon's back.. great season and that would have capped it..
Try adding on to the end of the thread please.
Great shift by the first line.
And a nice kill on the Seminoff penalty, featuring a big Scrivens save. Scoreless through 2, again.
Per CU radio, shots are 18-13 Q, but I don't know which set of first period shots that includes.
Scrivens stops another shorty breakaway from Q. This after the Red started to sound like they were moving the puck pretty well on pp. 14:43 left in the third, 0-0.
Union 1 Harvard 1 in the third.
Cornell about to go on pp #8.
Some Frenchman to the sin bin for Q. Let's Go Red!
[quote Jordan 04]Some Frenchman to the sin bin for Q.[/quote]But now he gets free.
[quote Trotsky][quote Jordan 04]Some Frenchman to the sin bin for Q.[/quote]But now he gets free.[/quote]
Well, he is known as a Freedomman in the States.
Sounds like we're finally getting some good shots on goal.
I love how they say it is loud, when all you can hear is the canned music.
How much time left?
4:13
Does Jason understand how hockey works? Why on earth would it be 5x5 with matching minors.
Roeszler and Greening up front?
if the penalties are for the same thing at the same time, it can be offsetting penalties and the teams still skate 5 on 5.
[quote CowbellGuy]Does Jason understand how hockey works? Why on earth would it be 5x5 with matching minors.[/quote]
Happens that way under many sanctioning bodies, never heard of it in NCAA though.
Free hockey!
[quote Jordan 04]Free hockey![/quote]Free hat?
punch and pie
Frenchman off again. PP the rest of the way.
No time out?
Wong is scary.
0-0 tie.
3 Points on an away weekend? I'll take it!
Would have been nice to score, but I'm totally looking forward to the old super defensive teams that I grew up with while on the hill.
[quote Jordan 04]0-0 tie.[/quote]
3 point weekend. Good play tonight. We have to be happy.
can we start a pool on whether we get a penalty shot or power play goal first?
So...this makes Scrivens' GAA and SV% pretty easy to calculate so far this season, doesn't it?
[quote DisplacedCornellian]So...this makes Scrivens' GAA and SV% pretty easy to calculate so far this season, doesn't it?[/quote]
Not to mention win %.
[quote Al DeFlorio]No time out?[/quote]
Cornell used their time out with ~ 6 minutes left in the 3rd.
Nice defensive effort this weekend and I'm certainly not going to complain about taking 3 points on the road and not giving up a goal all weekend. :-)
I think we can guess what they will be working on in practice this week. 0/8 (0/10?? with the 2 penalties in OT?). Ouch.
I thought the puck movement vs Princ was pretty good on the PP. did it get worse tonight? but hey in the era of green everything we saved a lot of ink in the paper and game programs by needing only 1 line for goal scoring for the team.
Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?
[quote TimV]Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?[/quote]
No. Best since the 12-team league: 1 GA in 2002.
[quote TimV]Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?[/quote]
Have we ever scored one goal in two games and come away with three points?
Starting off the season with two shutouts appears to be a first from what I can tell in looking at the archives. The closest Cornell has ever come was back in the 1967-68 season:
11/25/67 7-0 over Loyola-Montreal (All non-conference games counted back then!)
11/29/67 8-1 over RPI
12/02/67 4-0 over Guelph
BTW, note the date when the season actually started. Back then...hockey couldn't start till after the last football game. Fortunately that practice ended around 1983.
[quote scoop85][quote TimV]Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?[/quote]
Have we ever scored one goal in two games and come away with three points?[/quote]
No. However, in consecutive games in 2005 they beat SLU and Colgate 1-0.
They have only scored 1 goal over consecutive league games 8 times (6 times under Schafer). Fun fact: in consecutive games in 1973 they lost 9-0 to BU and 10-1 to UNH.
[quote Larry72]Starting off the season with two shutouts appears to be a first from what I can tell in looking at the archives.[/quote]
In 1908 Cornell shut out their opponents in all 4 games. **]
In 1940, after two games they had given up 33 goals (9 to Colgate, 24 to BC).
Quote from: NCAA Rule book, Rule 4, Section 2-e (2006)When penalties are not in effect and not visible on the clock and one minor penalty is assessed to one player of each team at the same stoppage of play, these penalties shall be served without substitution.
When penalties are not in effect and not visible on the clock and one minor penalty is assessed to one player of each team, with an additional penalty or penalties (minor or major) assessed at the same stoppage of play, immediate substitutions on ice shall be made for an equal number of coincidental minor penalties (penalties assessed during the same stoppage of play) to each team so penalized. The penalized players substituted for shall take their places on the penalty bench and shall not leave the penalty bench until the first stoppage of play after the expiration of their respective penalties. Penalties of the players for which substitutions have been made shall not be taken into account for the purpose of the delayed penalty rule (see 4-8-a).
When penalties are in effect and visible on the clock and coincidental minor penalties are imposed against players of both teams, immediate substitutions on ice shall be made for an equal number of coincidental minor penalties to each team so penalized. The penalized players substituted for shall take their places on the penalty bench and shall not leave the penalty bench until the first stoppage of play after the expiration of their respective penalties. Penalties of the players for which substitutions have been made shall not be taken into account for the purpose of the delayed penalty rule (see 4-8-a).
Any other penalties assessed at the same stoppage of play as minor penalties covered in this rule shall be served in the manner prescribed elsewhere in these rules and shall not affect the application of this rule.
Let me try to translate into English the section of the rule book that David Harding posted ...
There is one, and only one, situation in which coincidental penalties affect on-ice manpower, and that is when both of the following conditions are in effect:
- no penalties on the clock at the time the coincidental penalties are called (i.e., both teams at full and equal strength)
- one, and only one, minor penalty called on each team.
In all other situations, the on-ice manpower is not affected by coincidental penalties.
[quote Trotsky][quote scoop85][quote TimV]Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?[/quote]
Have we ever scored one goal in two games and come away with three points?[/quote]
No. However, in consecutive games in 2005 they beat SLU and Colgate 1-0.
They have only scored 1 goal over consecutive league games 8 times (6 times under Schafer). Fun fact: in consecutive games in 1973 they lost 9-0 to beat BU 1-0 and lost 10-1 to UNH.[/quote]
I fixed the titanic error in your post.
[quote Killer][quote Trotsky][quote scoop85][quote TimV]Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?[/quote]
Have we ever scored one goal in two games and come away with three points?[/quote]
No. However, in consecutive games in 2005 they beat SLU and Colgate 1-0.
They have only scored 1 goal over consecutive league games 8 times (6 times under Schafer). Fun fact: in consecutive games in 1973 they lost 9-0 to beat BU 1-0 and lost 10-1 to UNH.[/quote]
I fixed the titanic error in your post.[/quote]
Wasn't that a decloe error?
**][quote ursusminor][quote Killer][quote Trotsky][quote scoop85][quote TimV]Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?[/quote]
Have we ever scored one goal in two games and come away with three points?[/quote]
No. However, in consecutive games in 2005 they beat SLU and Colgate 1-0.
They have only scored 1 goal over consecutive league games 8 times (6 times under Schafer). Fun fact: in consecutive games in 1973 they lost 9-0 to beat BU 1-0 and lost 10-1 to UNH.[/quote]
I fixed the titanic error in your post.[/quote]
Wasn't that a decloe error?[/quote]
Absolutely, but even when I tried it in French, it didn't translate to anything that made sense, so...