ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: Josh '99 on January 16, 2003, 12:13:06 PM

Title: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Josh '99 on January 16, 2003, 12:13:06 PM
Big Red's Big Swede (http://uscollegehockey.com/news/2003/01/16_005881.php)

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Mo Kelly on January 16, 2003, 12:39:53 PM
Alright Age - say whatever the hell you got to say.  Get back to your Murray bashing.

I'm just glad you don't write for USCHO.com.

Mo
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: melissa\'01 on January 16, 2003, 12:47:56 PM
Mo, don't be such a schmuck. Do you try to be a shit disturber, or does it just come naturally?
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Alan on January 16, 2003, 12:51:14 PM
All things aside, I think it is a great article. I like the point made that he hasn't really received overwhelming national recognition. He is a huge factor for the Big Red. I know we keep talking about intangibles, but what would our defense be without the intimidation factor that he brings?
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: CowbellGuy on January 16, 2003, 01:02:04 PM
Maybe not, but they're my photos.

I think we can all be glad that you don't write for them either.

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Mo Kelly on January 16, 2003, 02:39:28 PM
melissa,

Sometimes you got to "disturb shit" or else you're gonna end up constipated like Age.

Mo
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: littleredfan on January 16, 2003, 02:39:36 PM
Alan: how do you figure? He was an All-American first team last year, Hobey finalist, has been written up on uscho a fair amount, and seems to get a lot of attention from other teams.  Though he's not on ESPN, I think he is known in the college hockey world (maybe less so in the West). There prob is an intimidation factor, but there probably is also the point that teams have a target to go after, a player to key in on to shut down (doing so is another story).  Yes, he's a big hitter and I'd be afraid of him on the ice...but he is prone to defensive lapses and isn't the best skating defenseman on the team.
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: CowbellGuy on January 16, 2003, 02:42:39 PM
At least I don't soil myself at the mention of Doug's name like you.

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Mo Kelly on January 16, 2003, 02:45:00 PM
What can I say - I eat, sleep, and shit Cornell Hockey.

Mo
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Ogletorp on January 16, 2003, 03:27:47 PM
Melissa,

It's not about being a schmuck, it's about sticking up for the Cornell team and not bashing them.  Personally I think Dougie is holding up for himself this year.  Dougie had a great year last year and Age (and a small group of others) can't get that out of their one-sided mind.  I can guarantee if you ask any player on the team if they think Dougie isn't doing well this year, they will give you a look like you have four heads.   Everyone knows, except the "Murray basher" how valuable the Big Swede is to our team.  He leads our team and will be a HUGE loss next year.  

Best,
Ogie
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Ogletorp on January 16, 2003, 03:34:49 PM
Age,

It just seems like you are proud that you can rip into one of our best players.  Does that make you feel good?  Hell, I could criticize Wayne Gretzky for never playing physical hockey, but he is still the greatest hockey player of all time (and no I'm not comparing).  Sure Dougie makes a few mistakes, but in the end he makes the best plays, hits, shots, and opportunities for the team than any of our other defenseman.  Are you still going to bash him when we are at the Frozen Four this year?

Best,
Ogie
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Mo Kelly on January 16, 2003, 03:53:21 PM
There is constant criticism that some of our bigger guys are not "strong skaters."  I never understand this argument.  I mean I'm sure Brian Boitano is a stronger skater than Dougie but would you want him playin the point for the Big Red?  Please - I don't care how the job gets done - and Dougie gets the job done.   Brain Boitano can go skate for Harvard.


Mo
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: crodger1 on January 16, 2003, 04:08:14 PM
Looks a lot like the article "Number 6" in Faceoff -- but I don't see that credited as a source.
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Josh '99 on January 16, 2003, 04:09:38 PM
Ogletorp wrote:
QuoteAre you still going to bash him when we are at the Frozen Four this year?
Chickens...  hatching...  counting...  Something along those lines.

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Mo Kelly on January 16, 2003, 04:14:21 PM
Josh Herman '99 wrote

Chickens... hatching... counting... Something along those lines.


Optimistic....glass half full....confident....Something along those lines.


Seriously if we don't believe it who will???  This is our year!!!

Mo
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Josh '99 on January 16, 2003, 04:40:01 PM
Being confident is fine.  But there are a lot of other good teams out there.  The line between thinking the team will be playing in Buffalo and ASSUMING the team will be playing in Buffalo is the line between confidence and overconfidence.

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Mo Kelly on January 16, 2003, 04:45:44 PM
All I knows is I already booked my flight to Buffalo and have my tickets lined up.  If that's overconfident then I'm guilty as charged.

Way too much negative energy flyin around eLynah these days.  What are you guys all Red Sox fans too???

Mo
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: cquinn on January 16, 2003, 05:07:51 PM
What are you guys all Red Sox fans too???

Some of us, yes.   ::help::
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: jtwcornell91 on January 16, 2003, 05:18:20 PM
Ogletorp wrote:
QuoteIt's not about being a schmuck, it's about sticking up for the Cornell team and not bashing them.
Who was bashing?  Age hadn't even opened his mouth on this thread when Mo started in on him.  And in fact, Age hasn't said anything bad about Murray on this thread.  So both of you stop trying to pick a fight, which is what Melissa called Mo out for,

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: gtsully on January 16, 2003, 05:28:36 PM
Not all of us Red Sox fans are negative all the time.  Just 99%... ::worry::

By the way, Cornell :: Harvard as Red Sox :: Yankees  :-P

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: atb9 on January 16, 2003, 05:33:40 PM
I think that when everyone gets over the euphoria of having a really good team people try to find the things that would make the team take the next step to being truly great.  I wouldn't call it negativity.

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Ogletorp on January 16, 2003, 06:20:06 PM
I know he didn't open his mouth on this thread but he has over on USCHO.  I was referring to that, not sure about Mo.

If Murray was having such a bad year like some people say, why would Schaffer keep playing him?  To me, Schaffer and all the guys on the team know a lot more about hockey than any of us and they all realize how good he is.  Obviously Age can have his own opinion, but I would just think that a fan who is as loyal as he is, would not attack players on his favorite team.  Just my $.02

Best,
Ogie
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Ben Doyle 03 on January 16, 2003, 06:39:43 PM
[Q] Mo Kelly' wrote
Way too much negative energy flyin around eLynah these days. [/Q]

"These days". . .Mo, let's open our eyes to reality here bud. . .you've been "around" eLynah for at best a few weeks and in that period logged a massive 20 posts. Fact is, since you started posting here you've instigated nothing but trouble. I realize your intentions are genuine but you method SUCKS! This is not a forum where people start sh#t like your 12:39 post. If you want to contribute to this board by all means, all are welcome (whether you agree with their view or not). Again, just in case you missed that. . .ALL OPINIONS ARE WELCOME! Leave the third grade crap at home and act you age.

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: ugarte on January 16, 2003, 07:19:28 PM
I don't think you have been paying attention to recent history.

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Al DeFlorio on January 16, 2003, 10:13:30 PM
Speaking of "the enforcer," anybody know what the outlook is for Hornby? ::help::

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Greg Berge on January 16, 2003, 10:15:44 PM
> By the way, Cornell :: Harvard as Red Sox :: Yankees

Actually, it's  Cornell :: Harvard as Yankees::Red Sox.  The teams on the left win, the fans of the teams on the right are tiresome whiners.  (Note: I actually dislike the Yankees.  I just hate Red Sox fans even more.)

To return this thread to its ostensible topic, does anybody know who the Harvard player is that Doug is dry-humping in that picture?
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 16, 2003, 10:19:19 PM
Sully said:[Q]By the way, Cornell :: Harvard as Red Sox :: Yankees [/Q] Let's see the Yankees are the team that "always" wins, and others love to hate. The Red Sox are the also-rans. So which one is Cornell, and which is Harvard?

Beat me again, Greg.

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Steve R 02 on January 16, 2003, 11:01:17 PM
Yeah, but this is gonna be the year!  You heard it here!

LGR(Sox)!
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: DeltaOne81 on January 16, 2003, 11:03:30 PM
I dunno, Hahvahd really is the team that others love to hate... and, on an all-sports perspective, is the team that "always" wins. So I have to go w/ Sully on this one.
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Jim Hyla on January 17, 2003, 12:21:39 AM
Yeah, but we're talking hockey.:-)

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: DeltaOne81 on January 17, 2003, 12:28:39 AM
Did we not have a discussion on the root of Hahvahd hatred back around the Hahvahd game time? And was the not consensus generally that we hate them because they win too much and bc they had like a 10 year winning streak against us?
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Greg Berge on January 17, 2003, 12:34:28 AM
Well, the ten year drought didn't help any... :-(
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: rhovorka on January 17, 2003, 02:13:51 AM
Look...the Red Sox-Yankees thing doesn't work, because those two teams both have very passionate fans.  Harvard does not.    And each team has beat the other in the playoffs recently.  (Although 2002 was the first time HU got over on CU in the postseason since 1994, while CU knocked out HU in 2001, 2000, 1997, and 1996.)   Anyway, it's a poor analogy.  BU-UNH is probably a better comparison to NYY-BOS.  Or Minnesota-North Dakota.
Title: Top 5 Reasons Cornell hates Harvard
Post by: jeh25 on January 17, 2003, 08:05:52 AM
5. Bill Cleary.

4. The Beer Can Incident

3. The Damn Chicken Thing

2.  10 year losing streak and going home with stinky fish

1.  2002 ECAC Tourney

Title: Re: Top 5 Reasons Cornell hates Harvard
Post by: Al DeFlorio on January 17, 2003, 08:42:05 AM
Um...check the year on the last one, John.

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: CowbellGuy on January 17, 2003, 09:12:32 AM
Greg wrote:
QuoteTo return this thread to its ostensible topic, does anybody know who the Harvard player is that Doug is dry-humping in that picture?

Aaron Kim

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Al DeFlorio on January 17, 2003, 09:37:42 AM
CowbellGuy wrote:
QuoteGreg wrote:
QuoteTo return this thread to its ostensible topic, does anybody know who the Harvard player is that Doug is dry-humping in that picture?
Aaron Kim
Couldn't have picked a more appropriate victim.

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Mo Kelly on January 17, 2003, 10:21:08 AM
"These days". . .Mo, let's open our eyes to reality here bud. . .you've been "around" eLynah for at best a few weeks and in that period logged a massive 20 posts. Fact is, since you started posting here you've instigated nothing but trouble. I realize your intentions are genuine but you method SUCKS! This is not a forum where people start sh#t like your 12:39 post. If you want to contribute to this board by all means, all are welcome (whether you agree with their view or not). Again, just in case you missed that. . .ALL OPINIONS ARE WELCOME! Leave the third grade crap at home and act you age.  

Actually Ben the funny thing is I am only in second grade, so I guess I'm acting more than my age.  I have been told I'm mature for my age before though.  And in full disclosure- I've been around eLynah for more than a few weeks.  I posted when I was in first grade and kindergarten under the name Mo Kelly (w/out the ') but forgot what my password was this year.

I do believe my intentions are genuine - I just tend to get a little upset when people rip on our players or bash my unbridled enthusiasm for the Big Red.  Yes maybe I wear rose colored glasses but its better than having a 2 by 4 stuck up my a$$.  (sorry couldn't resist)

I hope we can agree that we are all fans, and that's the common bond that should supercede all.  

See you at the Frozen Four-
I remain,
Mo
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: jtwcornell91 on January 17, 2003, 10:22:58 AM
Maybe the lessons on the dangers of angering the Woofing Gods come later in the semester...

Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: Ogletorp on January 17, 2003, 11:02:35 AM
It may seem that I agree with Mo a lot and yet disagree sometimes but I notice his sarcasm and see his intentions.  I do remember Mo from last year posting about Steve Baby and his glowlights (not really sure what the meaning of that is) and Undy's potential, so Ben you don't have a justification there.  Mo seems to be in it for the team while others think he is just trying to cause trouble.  You probably need to look past his attitude (or imatureness as people have said) and try to understand that he is a true believer.
As for you Mo, I also will see you at the Frozen Four!

Best,
Ogie

p.s. I on the other hand have just started posting this year after reading for several years.  Just am so excited about this year that thought it was the time to give my thoughts.
Title: Re: USCHO Front Page Article on Murray
Post by: DeltaOne81 on January 17, 2003, 01:13:01 PM
Honestly Mo, your intentions may be good, but your persistence and choice of words have lead to more negitivity on eLynah than I've seen in a long time. Keep in mind that sarcasm doesn't carry very well on the internet - there's no "tone of voice" - so a jokingly sarcastic sentence can just as easily be read seriously.

Just please be more careful, and maybe consider using ;-), :-P,  ::nut:: , when you're kidding around.

Also, it's one thing to say to Age, et al... "I think you're being overcritical for these reasons..."

It's another thing to pick a fight on a thread where Age hasn't said a damn thing.

I think we're all willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, but please be careful and cool it just a tad.

-Fred