Saturday, April 27th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Columbia going with small offensive line

Posted by Weder 
Columbia going with small offensive line
Posted by: Weder (---.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
Date: September 14, 2012 09:29PM

Former Cornell football coach Pete Mangurian thinks you can use smaller, more agile linemen in college football and doesn't want any fatties at Columbia. Interesting.

[www.culions.blogspot.com]
 
Re: Columbia going with small offensive line
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: September 15, 2012 10:26AM

He may be right in the Ivy League where attributes like speed, technical skill and brute strength are more interchangeable. His agile guys would probably get eaten alive in the SEC where you need all of those skills. There is a reason that the position evolved to fatties, and its that they got better at finding fatties who are also technically adept and fast.

 
 
Re: Columbia going with small offensive line
Posted by: Robb (---.ks.ok.cox.net)
Date: September 15, 2012 11:03AM

ugarte
He may be right in the Ivy League where attributes like speed, technical skill and brute strength are more interchangeable. His agile guys would probably get eaten alive in the SEC where you need all of those skills. There is a reason that the position evolved to fatties, and its that they got better at finding fatties who are also technically adept and fast.
Probably? My high school's current roster has 10 guys who are 230+. 227 isn't just small - it's tiny.
 
Re: Columbia going with small offensive line
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: September 16, 2012 11:49PM

Robb
ugarte
He may be right in the Ivy League where attributes like speed, technical skill and brute strength are more interchangeable. His agile guys would probably get eaten alive in the SEC where you need all of those skills. There is a reason that the position evolved to fatties, and its that they got better at finding fatties who are also technically adept and fast.
Probably? My high school's current roster has 10 guys who are 230+. 227 isn't just small - it's tiny.
That's a fair interpretation of what I typed but I didn't mean "the small guys who are Ivy League quality football players." I more meant "the strategy of sacrificing size/strength for speed/technique".

 
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login