Thursday, April 18th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

MLB RPI

Posted by Trotsky 
MLB RPI
Posted by: Trotsky (---.raytheon.com)
Date: April 11, 2006 11:50AM

[sports.espn.go.com]

It would be a fairer way to choose the wildcard... uhoh
 
Re: MLB RPI
Posted by: Anne 85 (---.wholesystems.com)
Date: April 17, 2006 08:31PM

You're just saying that because the Mets are ranked second.
 
Re: MLB RPI
Posted by: Beeeej (38.136.58.---)
Date: April 18, 2006 09:23AM

The Mets wouldn't be ranked second if they weren't 10-2.

Beeeej

 
___________________________
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
 
Re: MLB RPI
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (---.loyno.edu)
Date: April 18, 2006 11:29AM

Bradley-Terry, anyone?

I know Ken has applied it to assorted European soccer leagues.

 
___________________________
JTW

Enjoy the latest hockey geek tools at [www.elynah.com]
 
Re: MLB RPI
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.raytheon.com)
Date: April 18, 2006 11:55AM

Ha, Mets 3rd. Yankees 3rd from last.

Yeah, yeah, I know, it won't last. That's why I gotta enjoy it while I can :-D
 
Re: MLB RPI
Posted by: Trotsky (---.raytheon.com)
Date: April 25, 2006 02:18PM

Anne 85
You're just saying that because the Mets are ranked second.
Actually, when I posted it, the Mets were 3 games ahead in their division but ranked something like 12th because they had played nobody but Washington and Florida.
 
Re: MLB RPI
Posted by: RichH (216.195.201.---)
Date: April 25, 2006 02:35PM

Trotsky
Anne 85
You're just saying that because the Mets are ranked second.
Actually, when I posted it, the Mets were 3 games ahead in their division but ranked something like 12th because they had played nobody but Washington and Florida.

You forgot Canisius.
 
Re: MLB RPI
Posted by: Beeeej (38.136.58.---)
Date: April 25, 2006 05:51PM

RichH
Trotsky
Anne 85
You're just saying that because the Mets are ranked second.
Actually, when I posted it, the Mets were 3 games ahead in their division but ranked something like 12th because they had played nobody but Washington and Florida.

You forgot Canisius.

You forgot Poland.

Beeeej

 
___________________________
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
 
Re: MLB RPI
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: April 28, 2006 06:20PM

Trotsky
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi

It would be a fairer way to choose the wildcard... uhoh
Fairest way to choose the wild card? Second place teams GO HOME!
 
Re: MLB RPI
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.mtholyoke.edu)
Date: April 28, 2006 11:22PM

KeithK
Trotsky
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi

It would be a fairer way to choose the wildcard... uhoh
Fairest way to choose the wild card? Second place teams GO HOME!

Broken record, Keith... Keith, broken record

There, now you've been introduced, so you can know what not to act like :-P
 
Re: MLB RPI
Posted by: Trotsky (---.raytheon.com)
Date: May 08, 2006 02:38PM

KeithK
Trotsky
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi

It would be a fairer way to choose the wildcard... uhoh
Fairest way to choose the wild card? Second place teams GO HOME!

No argument from me, man. I'm all for no divisions -- just two league champions play the WS as God and Barney Dreyfuss intended.

Conservativism in civil society; progressivism in politics -- the unbeatable combination.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/08/2006 02:39PM by Trotsky.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login