Friday, April 26th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Snorgasm, 2010

Posted by Trotsky 
Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: Trotsky (---.raytheon.com)
Date: February 05, 2010 11:59AM

Be safe driving today, all. It's been snowing in the Mid-Atlantic for about an hour now, very wet, with expectations of 20-26 inches. The locals think it's the Rapture and they're not real good at driving even when it's dry, so be doubly careful.
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: judy (63.240.196.---)
Date: February 05, 2010 12:28PM

I have not yet heard "snorgasm" yet. I've heard "snowmageddon", "snowpocalypse", "snOMG", and my favorite was probably "Alexander Snow-vechkin's revenge".

It's not sticking in Arlington yet.

Trotsky, you still planning on going to Princeton? :D I'm playing it by ear.
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: February 05, 2010 03:35PM

I think snowgasm fits better. Both terms convey the orgasm meaning immediately, but Snorgasm kind of loses me on the "snow" part until I see context.

Yet another dep and meaningful topic brought to you by the eLynah Forum. :-D
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (Moderator)
Date: February 05, 2010 03:58PM

KeithK
I think snowgasm fits better. Both terms convey the orgasm meaning immediately, but Snorgasm kind of loses me on the "snow" part until I see context.

Yet another dep and meaningful topic brought to you by the eLynah Forum. :-D

Neither is as much fun as a porkgasm

 
___________________________
JTW

Enjoy the latest hockey geek tools at [www.elynah.com]
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: RichH (---.hsd1.ct.comcast.net)
Date: February 05, 2010 04:21PM

KeithK
I think snowgasm fits better. Both terms convey the orgasm meaning immediately, but Snorgasm kind of loses me on the "snow" part until I see context.

Yet another dep and meaningful topic brought to you by the eLynah Forum. :-D

Snowtorious B-I-G.
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: February 05, 2010 05:41PM

judy
Trotsky, you still planning on going to Princeton? :D I'm playing it by ear.

Not a chance. There was a time when I would risk my life for a regular season road game. That time has passed.
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: February 05, 2010 05:41PM

KeithK
I think snowgasm fits better. Both terms convey the orgasm meaning immediately, but Snorgasm kind of loses me on the "snow" part until I see context.

Yet another dep and meaningful topic brought to you by the eLynah Forum. :-D

"Snorgasm" is the twitter feed. I figured it was hip with you kids with your funny tubes.
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: Killer (---.c3-0.nat-ubr5.sbo-nat.ma.cable.rcn.com)
Date: February 05, 2010 06:28PM

Trotsky
KeithK
I think snowgasm fits better. Both terms convey the orgasm meaning immediately, but Snorgasm kind of loses me on the "snow" part until I see context.

Yet another dep and meaningful topic brought to you by the eLynah Forum. :-D

"Snorgasm" is the twitter feed. I figured it was hip with you kids with your funny tubes.

Still, would you really want your partner to have a snorgasm? It's like you got him or her plenty excited, but somehow couldn't keep them awake.
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: February 05, 2010 10:40PM

Killer
Still, would you really want your partner to have a snorgasm? It's like you got him or her plenty excited, but somehow couldn't keep them awake.
At this point, I take it as it comes.
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: CKinsland (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: February 06, 2010 10:45AM

Trotsky
Killer
Still, would you really want your partner to have a snorgasm? It's like you got him or her plenty excited, but somehow couldn't keep them awake.
At this point, I take it as it comes.

As long as she does....

CK
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: judy (---.washdc.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 06, 2010 04:03PM

Bringing this semi-back on topic.

If I try to shovel out my car, where the f do I put the snow???
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: RichH (---.hsd1.ct.comcast.net)
Date: February 06, 2010 05:35PM

judy
Bringing this semi-back on topic.

If I try to shovel out my car, where the f do I put the snow???

One great property of snow with a lot of moisture: it stacks vertically very nicely. Just make a pile somewhere where it won't fall on anyone and keep throwing more on there. Like this person:





Learn from the kings. Oswego.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/06/2010 05:38PM by RichH.

 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: judy (---.washdc.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 08, 2010 06:43PM

We're supposed to get more tomorrow. When I moved down here, this kind of snow was NOT part of the deal!
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: RichH (167.225.107.---)
Date: February 08, 2010 06:44PM

judy
We're supposed to get more tomorrow. When I moved down here, this kind of snow was NOT part of the deal!

Sounds like a pretty good fringe-benefit to me.
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: cth95 (---.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net)
Date: February 09, 2010 01:50AM

RichH

Learn from the kings. Oswego.

It wasn't quite this much, but I have a picture very similar to this I took right after the blizzard in March '93. I think it was on the top of the hill near the sheep farm. The snow had drifted about 10' high and a loader had broken a path through it.
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: Rita (---.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
Date: February 09, 2010 09:02PM

Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: RichH (12.189.157.---)
Date: February 10, 2010 02:23AM


Not an unusual performance for Jim Kosek. Slate did the following profile of him in 2008:



And he's not local to Baltimore, but national on Accuweather, as the video shows.
 
Re: Snorgasm, 2010
Posted by: Jeff Hopkins '82 (---.airproducts.com)
Date: February 11, 2010 06:02PM

For the record, I drove from Newark Airport to Princeton Saturday evening. The NJ turnpike was clear with one slushy spot. Rte. 1 was a little narrowed, but mostly fine with a couple slushy areas. The only real snow I encountered was where I turned off Rte. 1 to get to the rink. Washington St. was not plowed, but was driven on enough to be passable. The streets on the PU campus were slick but driveable.

Going home to Allentown, the roads on the PU campus were still sketchy, but once I hit Nassau Ave. and then got on Rte. 206 heading out of Princeton, all roads were clear (I-278, I-78, and US 206).
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/12/2010 04:30PM by Jeff Hopkins '82.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login