Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by KeithK
Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
Date: February 05, 2008 10:51PM
Had to be done....
IMO, he always sounded like a crazy uncle when the topics switched to anything resembling foreign policy. As much as some would like it, we can't just pull back behind walls and disengage from the world.
Regarding Kyles' reference to the founders, it's a lot easier to be non-interventionist when 1) the rest of the world is months away by sea and 2) you have a whole continent to explore. Even then we intervened when it suited our interests (e.g. Barbary pirates).
On domestic policy issues I respect Paul's ideas a great deal. But that's not enough when you're running for president. (I'd say that I hope his presence moved the other candidates toward the libertarian position on domestic issues, but I know it hasn't.)
IMO, he always sounded like a crazy uncle when the topics switched to anything resembling foreign policy. As much as some would like it, we can't just pull back behind walls and disengage from the world.
Regarding Kyles' reference to the founders, it's a lot easier to be non-interventionist when 1) the rest of the world is months away by sea and 2) you have a whole continent to explore. Even then we intervened when it suited our interests (e.g. Barbary pirates).
On domestic policy issues I respect Paul's ideas a great deal. But that's not enough when you're running for president. (I'd say that I hope his presence moved the other candidates toward the libertarian position on domestic issues, but I know it hasn't.)
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
Date: February 06, 2008 11:14AM
For the record Kyle, I wasn't trying to tick you off with the subject. I was simply attempting to move the discussion to JSID. But the helpful moderators did that for us.
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: RichH (216.195.201.---)
Date: February 06, 2008 11:18AM
KeithK
I was simply attempting to move the discussion to JSID.
A noble effort, Keith.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/06/2008 11:24AM by RichH.
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
Date: February 06, 2008 11:22AM
Something that we will no doubt not have to worry about for another ten years.RichH
At the very least, this wipes a record of a Harvard [Beanpot] victory off the face of the hockey forum.
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.cmbrmaks.akamai.com)
Date: February 06, 2008 12:54PM
I tried to write "But they could still beat BC!" with a straight face, but I simply couldn't do it.KeithKSomething that we will no doubt not have to worry about for another ten years.RichH
At the very least, this wipes a record of a Harvard [Beanpot] victory off the face of the hockey forum.
Kyle
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.cmbrmaks.akamai.com)
Date: February 06, 2008 01:06PM
He's arguing for trading in peace without barriers. He's not an isolationist, although the establishment media sure likes to portray him as one.KeithK
Had to be done....
IMO, he always sounded like a crazy uncle when the topics switched to anything resembling foreign policy. As much as some would like it, we can't just pull back behind walls and disengage from the world.
And I reject the implied assertion that 'everything's changed.' The principles on which this country was founded are still solid principles, yet for the last 150 years, we've slowly but surely thrown them all out for the mercantilism of old England. Most countries in the world get by just fine without stationing hundreds of thousands of their own military in 150 other countries. Why do we feel a need to? What makes us different?
When you answer these questions, you'll begin to understand the foundation of the American empire, and why it is unsustainable in the long term.
FTR, I'm not a Paulite: he does hold some positions I disagree with. Nonetheless, he's the closest we've gotten in one hundred years and probably the closest we'll get for another hundred.
I don't think anyone would argue against using retaliatory force against those who initiate force. I certainly wouldn't. Your homework assignment is to distinguish the Barbary pirates from Iraq (easy) and from all the other countries in which we have troops stationed (even easier).
Regarding Kyles' reference to the founders, it's a lot easier to be non-interventionist when 1) the rest of the world is months away by sea and 2) you have a whole continent to explore. Even then we intervened when it suited our interests (e.g. Barbary pirates).
And you'd be right. The GOP will have to suffer a crushing, coalition-rending defeat to even have the opportunity to embrace the core principles of small government, federalism, non-interventionism, free markets, and liberty that would allow it to win once again. Hopefully that will happen sooner rather than later.
(I'd say that I hope his presence moved the other candidates toward the libertarian position on domestic issues, but I know it hasn't.)
Kyle
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Killer (---.fidelity.com)
Date: February 06, 2008 01:47PM
kroseI tried to write "But they could still beat BC!" with a straight face, but I simply couldn't do it.KeithKSomething that we will no doubt not have to worry about for another ten years.RichH
At the very least, this wipes a record of a Harvard [Beanpot] victory off the face of the hockey forum.
Kyle
Besides, then this thread would start taking on a "Men's Hockey" flavor and someone would have to move it to the other forum.
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Annoying name here (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 23, 2008 09:54PM
Yes. QED.
___________________________
I WEAR A NORTH FACE JACKET TOO FYI.
I WEAR A NORTH FACE JACKET TOO FYI.
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: April 01, 2008 01:18PM
Removing annoying name from the front page (last post field).
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Rita (---.agry.purdue.edu)
Date: April 29, 2008 01:53PM
Ron Paul and his fellow libertarians are starting their own community.
Yes, it is in Texas.
You do not have to pay for the utilities if you don't want to have electricity and the like in your home.
Yes, it is in Texas.
You do not have to pay for the utilities if you don't want to have electricity and the like in your home.
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.net)
Date: April 29, 2008 03:03PM
Isn't that the same as it is everywhere? I stop paying Con Edison, they stop giving me electricity?Rita
You do not have to pay for the utilities if you don't want to have electricity and the like in your home.
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Jeff Hopkins '82 (82.153.77.---)
Date: April 29, 2008 04:30PM
Is it me, or does "Paulville" sound like communism?
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.cmbrmaks.akamai.com)
Date: April 29, 2008 05:02PM
I think it's just you.Jeff Hopkins '82
Is it me, or does "Paulville" sound like communism?
IMO, it's a dumb name, but if it gets freedom lovers living in closer proximity, thus increasing their political power, I'm all for it.
Kyle
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.net)
Date: April 29, 2008 05:41PM
What, as opposed to all the rest of us freedom haters?kroseI think it's just you.Jeff Hopkins '82
Is it me, or does "Paulville" sound like communism?
IMO, it's a dumb name, but if it gets freedom lovers living in closer proximity, thus increasing their political power, I'm all for it.
Kyle
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.cmbrmaks.akamai.com)
Date: April 29, 2008 05:47PM
In my experience, most people don't understand what freedom really is. They only understand what a lifetime of nationalistic government propaganda tells them freedom is.Josh '99
What, as opposed to all the rest of us freedom haters?
Freedom is very simple: it's the right to be left alone to pursue happiness without interference from others, as long as you respect others' rights to do the same.
It seems pretty clear to me that you don't need 40,000,000 words/100,000 pages/150 copies of The Lord of the Rings---that is, the size of the US Code---to describe that.
Kyle
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: ugarte (38.136.14.---)
Date: April 29, 2008 06:22PM
A good portion of those 40,000,000 words are necessary to enforce the "respecting other people's rights to be left alone" part of the equation. History teaches that people disagree a lot about what that means.kroseIn my experience, most people don't understand what freedom really is. They only understand what a lifetime of nationalistic government propaganda tells them freedom is.Josh '99
What, as opposed to all the rest of us freedom haters?
Freedom is very simple: it's the right to be left alone to pursue happiness without interference from others, as long as you respect others' rights to do the same.
It seems pretty clear to me that you don't need 40,000,000 words/100,000 pages/150 copies of The Lord of the Rings---that is, the size of the US Code---to describe that.
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Beeeej (Moderator)
Date: April 29, 2008 06:26PM
ugarteA good portion of those 40,000,000 words are necessary to enforce the "respecting other people's rights to be left alone" part of the equation. History teaches that people disagree a lot about what that means.kroseIn my experience, most people don't understand what freedom really is. They only understand what a lifetime of nationalistic government propaganda tells them freedom is.Josh '99
What, as opposed to all the rest of us freedom haters?
Freedom is very simple: it's the right to be left alone to pursue happiness without interference from others, as long as you respect others' rights to do the same.
It seems pretty clear to me that you don't need 40,000,000 words/100,000 pages/150 copies of The Lord of the Rings---that is, the size of the US Code---to describe that.
Does not.
___________________________
Beeeej, Esq.
"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
Beeeej, Esq.
"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: April 29, 2008 07:02PM
I'd bet that very few of the words in the US code have much to do with that. Most of them have to do with telling people how to live their lives and businesses and with achieving various social goals that the majority (or at least the majority of leaders) have decided are valuable.ugarteA good portion of those 40,000,000 words are necessary to enforce the "respecting other people's rights to be left alone" part of the equation. History teaches that people disagree a lot about what that means.kroseIn my experience, most people don't understand what freedom really is. They only understand what a lifetime of nationalistic government propaganda tells them freedom is.Josh '99
What, as opposed to all the rest of us freedom haters?
Freedom is very simple: it's the right to be left alone to pursue happiness without interference from others, as long as you respect others' rights to do the same.
It seems pretty clear to me that you don't need 40,000,000 words/100,000 pages/150 copies of The Lord of the Rings---that is, the size of the US Code---to describe that.
Whether the structure of our government is a good thing or not is certainly a valid subject for debate. But if you accept Kyle's definition of freedom and that preserving this freedom should be the highest goal of society it's hard to argue the efficiency and utility of the US code.
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: Beeeej (Moderator)
Date: April 29, 2008 08:06PM
KeithK
Whether the structure of our government is a good thing or not is certainly a valid subject for debate. But if you accept Kyle's definition of freedom and that preserving this freedom should be the highest goal of society it's hard to argue the efficiency and utility of the US code.
If you accept that preserving freedom should be the only goal of society, it's hard to argue the efficiency and utility of the US code.
Hell, it's hard to argue the efficiency of the US code, period. But that's a different story.
___________________________
Beeeej, Esq.
"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
Beeeej, Esq.
"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: RichH (76.28.11.---)
Date: April 29, 2008 08:51PM
KeithK
Whether the structure of our government is a good thing or not is certainly a valid subject for debate.
But what IS a good thing is that it's free cone day at Ben & Jerry's!!!
Threadjacked you back, bitches.
Re: Is Ron Paul a "whack job"?
Posted by: David Harding (---.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
Date: April 29, 2008 09:44PM
Most places you can't get a certificate of occupancy if you don't have electric power, water, and so forth.Josh '99Isn't that the same as it is everywhere? I stop paying Con Edison, they stop giving me electricity?Rita
You do not have to pay for the utilities if you don't want to have electricity and the like in your home.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.