Friday, April 19th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Spittoon
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

"For to be an Allstonian..."

Posted by RichH 
"For to be an Allstonian..."
Posted by: RichH (216.195.201.---)
Date: January 12, 2007 10:27AM

Changes are afoot for neighborhood around Lynah East:

[news.yahoo.com]
 
Re: "For to be an Allstonian..."
Posted by: 2 (---.hsd1.ma.comcast.net)
Date: January 12, 2007 11:00AM

Harvard's gone messing around in other people's yards again. Going to be even more angry Allstonians if Boston really allows 50 years of construction. This will make our little sapsucker woods dispute look like a pre-school tussle.
 
Re: "For to be an Allstonian..."
Posted by: Robb (---.northropgrumman.com)
Date: January 15, 2007 07:01PM

2
Harvard's gone messing around in other people's yards again. Going to be even more angry Allstonians if Boston really allows 50 years of construction. This will make our little sapsucker woods dispute look like a pre-school tussle.
Sapsucker Woods? Or do you mean that POS vacant lot on West Campus?
 
Re: "For to be an Allstonian..."
Posted by: RichH (---.hsd1.nh.comcast.net)
Date: January 16, 2007 12:07AM

Robb
Sapsucker Woods? Or do you mean that POS vacant lot on West Campus?

I don't know all the details, but there seems to be some sort of development vs. preservation controversy with the Sapsucker Woods area. The preservation activists had a booth at the Apple Harvest Festival on the Commons in the fall.

[www.cornellsun.com]

The opposition website (lots of links in the right-hand column):
[savesapsuckerwoods.blogspot.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/16/2007 12:07AM by RichH.
 
Re: "For to be an Allstonian..."
Posted by: Robb (---.socal.res.rr.com)
Date: January 16, 2007 01:19AM

Ah thanks - hadn't seen that one.

From a casual perusal, the basic dispute seems to be:

Developers: we'd like to build homes on 18 acres that is currently forested.

Town Board: Okay.

Protesters: But they're building homes on 18 acres that is currently forested.

Town Board: Um, yeah - we already knew that.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login