First round oddities
Posted by ugarte
First round oddities
Posted by: ugarte (63.94.240.---)
Date: March 09, 2002 11:37PM
All of the top seeds won, and all won in sweeps. Has that ever happened before?
It is particularly strange that it happened this year, since all of the home teams in the 3/8, 4/7 and 5/6 games were only 1 point ahead of their opponents in the final league standings. (Can't say I am at all surprised by the Cornell and Clarkson sweeps. But it would have been nice to see another el foldo from the Knights.)
It is particularly strange that it happened this year, since all of the home teams in the 3/8, 4/7 and 5/6 games were only 1 point ahead of their opponents in the final league standings. (Can't say I am at all surprised by the Cornell and Clarkson sweeps. But it would have been nice to see another el foldo from the Knights.)
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: First round oddities
Posted by: kingpin248 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: March 09, 2002 11:39PM
All home teams swept two years ago.
Re: First round oddities
Posted by: min '97 (---.res.gatech.edu)
Date: March 09, 2002 11:42PM
moreover, all New York state teams swept two years ago!
that was strange.
that was strange.
Re: First round oddities
Posted by: jy3 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: March 10, 2002 12:45AM
yeah i actually almost predicted all but one sweep but then predicted what a wanted to happen. I am surprised that everyone swept. pretty strange. no brown win or 'gate win happened though 
Keplers Laws
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
Date: March 10, 2002 02:32AM
It just seems to me that Kepler's Third Law (the one about RPI) actually applies to the ECAC in general. Don't ever try to predict the ECAC. The year where we have the most parity all of the home teams sweep their first round series. Amazing.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.