Sunday, November 28th, 2021
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

2019 ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton

Posted by Trotsky 
2019 ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: Trotsky (---.washdc.fios.verizon.net)
Date: March 03, 2019 11:24PM

Been bulking up the TBRW Women's page. Included now: Cornell ECAC playoff results.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/09/2019 09:36PM by Trotsky.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.239.191.68.cl.cstel.com)
Date: March 04, 2019 06:50AM

Trotsky
Been bulking up the TBRW Women's page. Included now: Cornell ECAC playoff results.

Thanks

 
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: Trotsky (---.sub-174-204-17.myvzw.com)
Date: March 09, 2019 02:24PM

After 2 periods: Princeton 2 Cornell 1
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 09, 2019 03:01PM

2-2 with about 7 minutes to go in the third.

Cornell's second goal was the result of a really impressive individual effort, ending with a wrap-around goal.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 09, 2019 03:14PM

Heading into OT.

Princeton will have 57 seconds left on a power play to start the OT.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: Trotsky (---.sub-174-204-17.myvzw.com)
Date: March 09, 2019 03:17PM

Third was almost all Cornell. Great fight; I'm really hoping they can pull this off. If they can get over this hump the sky's the limit.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: Trotsky (---.sub-174-204-17.myvzw.com)
Date: March 09, 2019 03:18PM

Also the no checking rule should go the way of corsets and side saddle.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 09, 2019 03:21PM

Trotsky
Also the no checking rule should go the way of corsets and side saddle.

They've been letting so much go I was pretty surprised they whistled that one with 1:03 to go in a tie game.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: imafrshmn (---.hsd1.mi.comcast.net)
Date: March 09, 2019 03:22PM

Quite a game so far. Cornell had the better of the 3rd period but left themselves exposed a few times when defensemen were caught pinching in the offensive zone. The season likely comes down to this overtime, as a loss might put them outside the NCAAs while a win should seal their tourney bid.

 
___________________________
class of '09
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 09, 2019 03:56PM

Going to period 5.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: Trotsky (---.sub-174-204-17.myvzw.com)
Date: March 09, 2019 04:14PM

Cornell wins!!!!!!
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: dag14 (---.dhcp.bhn.net)
Date: March 09, 2019 04:23PM

Gutsy effort by the Cornell team -- to score 3 unanswered goals and win in double OT.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: imafrshmn (---.hsd1.mi.comcast.net)
Date: March 09, 2019 04:26PM

Great game, great effort, and great goals in front of the biggest and loudest crowd of the season! On to ECAC Championship Game and NCAA tournament!

Edit: reported attendance was just over 1100, but I don’t believe it. Looked and sounded like 1600+

 
___________________________
class of '09

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/09/2019 04:40PM by imafrshmn.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 09, 2019 05:06PM

The Cornell women are currently fifth in pairwise, behind Clarkson. The top four host an NCAA first-round game, right? Are Cornell's chances of finishing fourth better if Colgate beats Clarkson or if Clarkson beats Colgate (in which case Cornell would clearly need to beat Clarkson to have any chance of top four.)
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: imafrshmn (---.hsd1.mi.comcast.net)
Date: March 09, 2019 05:20PM

Here is a pairwise calculator. [www.bcinterruption.com]

Cornell can only get the 4th spot if they win the ECAC Championship Game (vs. either Colgate or Clarkson) AND [Northeastern OR Boston University] win Hockey East.

 
___________________________
class of '09

Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/09/2019 05:23PM by imafrshmn.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 09, 2019 05:27PM

imafrshmn
Here is a pairwise calculator. [www.bcinterruption.com]

Cornell can only get the 4th spot if they win the ECAC Championship Game (vs. either Colgate or Clarkson) AND [Northeastern OR Boston University] win Hockey East.

Thanks!
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: imafrshmn (---.hsd1.mi.comcast.net)
Date: March 09, 2019 07:48PM

The potential outcomes have narrowed down considerably given the stratification in the pairwise rankings, even before the result of Ohio State-Wisconsin tonight and the championships tomorrow: (assuming NCAA tournament seeding follows pairwise exactly, which it hasn't always in the past for seeds 5-8).

Cornell loss to Clarkson: 6th seed at 3. Northeastern

Cornell beats Clarkson:
---if B.C. beats Northeastern: 5th seed at 4. B.C.
---if Northeastern beats B.C.: 4th seed vs. 5. Clarkson.

 
___________________________
class of '09

Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 03/09/2019 07:58PM by imafrshmn.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: Trotsky (---.washdc.fios.verizon.net)
Date: March 09, 2019 08:30PM

Clarkson 2 Colgate 0, final.

ECAC Final: Clarkson @ Cornell, meeting in the championship game for the 4th time in ten years.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/09/2019 09:35PM by Trotsky.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: George64 (---.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
Date: March 09, 2019 09:58PM

Trotsky
Cornell wins!!!!!!

Gotta love it! LGR
 
Re: 2019 ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: TimV (---.hsd1.ma.comcast.net)
Date: March 10, 2019 01:19AM

I only saw the game after the score was 2-1. Looking at the highlights, I can't understand why the starting goaltender was pulled? The first goal was a dipping shot through a heavy screen. The second just looked to me like a sweet play.

The backup certainly was outstanding though. Great game. Really enjoyed it.

 
___________________________
"Yo Paulie - I don't see no crowd gathering 'round you neither."
 
Re: 2019 ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: imafrshmn (---.hsd1.mi.comcast.net)
Date: March 10, 2019 01:30AM

Boissonault (Cornell’s starting goalie) was not playing poorly, but the team was playing a little too desperately at the start of the 2nd, down 1-0. Princeton’s goal to go up 2-0 resulted from having too many Red players going forward and a turnover on an exit pass, leaving Boissonault a bit exposed. This was a really expert coaching move from Derraugh to get the team to settle down and not take too many risks at that point in the game and connect more passes together. They didn’t want the game to play out like their 5-0 loss to Princeton earlier this year.

 
___________________________
class of '09

Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/10/2019 01:32AM by imafrshmn.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: kevdog8 (---.s3743.c3-0.43d-cbr1.qens-43d.ny.cable.rcncustomer.com)
Date: March 10, 2019 07:57AM

imafrshmn
The potential outcomes have narrowed down considerably given the stratification in the pairwise rankings, even before the result of Ohio State-Wisconsin tonight and the championships tomorrow: (assuming NCAA tournament seeding follows pairwise exactly, which it hasn't always in the past for seeds 5-8).

Cornell loss to Clarkson: 6th seed at 3. Northeastern

Cornell beats Clarkson:
---if B.C. beats Northeastern: 5th seed at 4. B.C.
---if Northeastern beats B.C.: 4th seed vs. 5. Clarkson.
If one of Cornell and Clarkson is in the top 4 and the other is in the unseeded 5-8, the committee will match us up, plain and simple. Both schools would have to fly to many teams, but if you match us up, both can drive. Makes a lot of logistical sense when you consider how much more important location is to the NCAA Whockey selection committee than on the men's side.
 
Re: ECAC SF Women: #1 Cornell vs #4 Princeton
Posted by: Jeff Hopkins '82 (---.102.132.76.res-cmts.sm.ptd.net)
Date: March 10, 2019 01:50PM

kevdog8
imafrshmn
The potential outcomes have narrowed down considerably given the stratification in the pairwise rankings, even before the result of Ohio State-Wisconsin tonight and the championships tomorrow: (assuming NCAA tournament seeding follows pairwise exactly, which it hasn't always in the past for seeds 5-8).

Cornell loss to Clarkson: 6th seed at 3. Northeastern

Cornell beats Clarkson:
---if B.C. beats Northeastern: 5th seed at 4. B.C.
---if Northeastern beats B.C.: 4th seed vs. 5. Clarkson.
If one of Cornell and Clarkson is in the top 4 and the other is in the unseeded 5-8, the committee will match us up, plain and simple. Both schools would have to fly to many teams, but if you match us up, both can drive. Makes a lot of logistical sense when you consider how much more important location is to the NCAA Whockey selection committee than on the men's side.

I'd prefer it if they had the ECAC teams each play at the HE teams, so they didn't repeat the conference finals. Of course they won't do that.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login