Thursday, April 25th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Cornell 4 vs. Brown 2 11/11/16

Posted by Iceberg 
Cornell 4 vs. Brown 2 11/11/16
Posted by: Iceberg (---.nyc.res.rr.com)
Date: November 11, 2016 04:52PM

Another week, another road game. Now what are all the monikers that I've seen for Meehan? Mausoleum, dump, ice box...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/11/2016 11:14PM by Iceberg.
 
Re: Cornell vs. Brown 11/11/16
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: November 11, 2016 07:01PM

Just win, baby.
 
Re: Cornell vs. Brown 11/11/16
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: November 11, 2016 07:02PM

Rut roh. The Brown announcers on ILDN look about 16 years old. Could it be them?
 
Re: Cornell vs. Brown 11/11/16
Posted by: Iceberg (---.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: November 11, 2016 08:02PM

I find it silly that the broadcast can't even show what exactly happened. And haven't we seen a possible goal overturned before at this rink?
 
Re: Cornell vs. Brown 11/11/16
Posted by: BearLover (---.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
Date: November 11, 2016 09:30PM

Brown is pretty bad. Our PP still can't set up a play. We scored some PP goals vs. Harvard, but they came in transition and/or from great individual efforts rather than being the result an offensive set. Tonight, we went 0-for-many on the PP, the worst of which was a minute-plus of a 5-on-3 in which we could only muster two Buckles slappers from the top of the circle.
 
Re: Cornell vs. Brown 11/11/16
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: November 11, 2016 09:30PM

4-2, good guys.

 
 
Re: Cornell vs. Brown 11/11/16
Posted by: Iceberg (---.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: November 11, 2016 11:14PM

BearLover
Brown is pretty bad. Our PP still can't set up a play. We scored some PP goals vs. Harvard, but they came in transition and/or from great individual efforts rather than being the result an offensive set. Tonight, we went 0-for-many on the PP, the worst of which was a minute-plus of a 5-on-3 in which we could only muster two Buckles slappers from the top of the circle.


The big problem that I see is simply guys passing up opportunities that don't look perfect. I lost count of how many times I'd see a guy pass up an opportunity to drive the net, take a close-range sharp-angle shot, or just put the puck on net for a deflection. The most skilled thing I saw throughout the game were attempts at cross-ice tic-tac-toe plays for one-timers (none of which resulted in a goal).

The Brown goaltender was actually good in this game but the team in front of him wasn't when it came to shutting off good shooting lanes. That being said, there were instances where Cornell got caught in a Brown transition/forecheck either from a poor pinch or lackadaisical puck-handling and passing. There's still quite a bit of room for improvement when it comes to puck decisions.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/11/2016 11:14PM by Iceberg.
 
Re: Cornell 4 vs. Brown 2 11/11/16
Posted by: upprdeck (---.syrcny.east.verizon.net)
Date: November 11, 2016 11:42PM

they over turned that goal on far less contact than at least 2 goals that went against us last year where Gillum got mugged. There might have been a smidgen of contact but when i slowed it down it looked like the puck was already past the goalie
 
Re: Cornell 4 vs. Brown 2 11/11/16
Posted by: upprdeck (---.syrcny.east.verizon.net)
Date: November 11, 2016 11:46PM

did we end up like 0 for8 or 0 for 9 on the PP?
 
Re: Cornell 4 vs. Brown 2 11/11/16
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: November 12, 2016 02:57PM

upprdeck
did we end up like 0 for8 or 0 for 9 on the PP?

That's not quite as bad as it sounds, as some of them were pretty short.
 
Re: Cornell 4 vs. Brown 2 11/11/16
Posted by: Jim Hyla (69.195.45.---)
Date: November 12, 2016 04:10PM

andyw2100
upprdeck
did we end up like 0 for8 or 0 for 9 on the PP?

That's not quite as bad as it sounds, as some of them were pretty short.

Yeah, it was pretty bad. 8 PP for 13:13 eapsed time. That's over 1:30 each. The early PP were only reaonable when we had 5/3. Most fans sitting near me were concerned. However they seemed to improve and generated a lot of chances on the later PPs, just didn't get goals, which of course is the only way to win. Overall I'm much more confidant with our PP play this year. We move the puck much better, we're looking for back-door plays, as well as setting up a player in the slot. No longer is it blast a slapshot and hope for something up front.

Regarding our overall play, to me the biggest thing is improving our passes on the breakout. We have good strategy, but our passes aren't crisp enough. Improve that and I think you'll see some great offensive chances.

 
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login