Friday, April 19th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Spittoon
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

1/29 @ Clarkson

Posted by Trotsky 
1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: January 28, 2016 04:39PM

Subscribed because I'm tired of thinking about Dartmouth and Harvard.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.sub-70-209-135.myvzw.com)
Date: January 29, 2016 06:44PM

Free video here:

[www.clarksonathletics.tv]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/29/2016 06:44PM by andyw2100.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 29, 2016 06:47PM

ILDN doesn't have a link for the CU audio. I thought they usually did?
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: Rita (73.54.127.---)
Date: January 29, 2016 06:47PM

andyw2100
Free video here:

[www.clarksonathletics.tv]

Thank you.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: RichH (---.hsd1.ct.comcast.net)
Date: January 29, 2016 06:54PM

Trotsky
ILDN doesn't have a link for the CU audio. I thought they usually did?

Yeah, at some point this season, they stopped posting audio links, regardless if there's a video feed or not. I know they had audio only links posted for the Colgate away game. When I sent a complaint during the Union game, I got the following helpful response:

ILDN Support
If the event you are seeking is not listed please check back within 2 weeks of the event to see if it will be added.

For now, if I want audio, WHCU's feeds have usually been carrying the games live. But the fact that I'm paying for ILDN and not receiving promised service is a significant issue in my book.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: abmarks (---.hsd1.ma.comcast.net)
Date: January 29, 2016 07:40PM

Kinda goofy, kinda cool. Love the graphic here (no, I didn't photoshop this in- it's the actual screengrab) cheer

 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 29, 2016 09:14PM

holy shit the spazzy inability to clear on that last powerplay was embarrassing

 
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: upprdeck (---.syrcny.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 29, 2016 09:15PM

we did that so many times.. simple plays and we dont even hit the puck.. all game that killed us. our stick play is so bad.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: MattShaf (---.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: January 29, 2016 09:17PM

Another loss. 0-4-1 in the last five is rather pathetic. This team has regressed back to mediocrity at this point.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: upprdeck (---.syrcny.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 29, 2016 09:19PM

sad part is we are playing poorly but could easily have won 4 of those games and found a way to win none. at worst we should be 1-2-2.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: TimV (---.nycap.res.rr.com)
Date: January 29, 2016 09:22PM

I think we're averaging 1.2 GPG in our last 6 games. That's embarrassing too.:-(

 
___________________________
"Yo Paulie - I don't see no crowd gathering 'round you neither."
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 29, 2016 09:25PM

they aren't that good at hockey is my takeaway. like, they can get in the way of other people and make it harder for those people to play hockey, which is an important part of the game, but then when they actually have to play hockey, they don't do it very well.

 
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: upprdeck (---.syrcny.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 29, 2016 09:27PM

we have so little team speed the other stuff becomes hard, we dont stress anyones D because we cant skate by anyone.. but the clears we butcher are 5yr old plays
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: Scersk '97 (---.hsd1.ct.comcast.net)
Date: January 29, 2016 09:56PM

upprdeck
we did that so many times.. simple plays and we dont even hit the puck.. all game that killed us. our stick play is so bad.

As long as Hilbrich and Buckles continue to be baffled about how to put the puck in the net, other teams are going to treat us as a one-line team. Right now, we are.

Indeed, I think the Hilbrich-Weidner-[whoever] line (effectively, the Hilbrich/Weidner pairing) is so cold that other teams are sending their defensively-suspect scoring lines out against them. Given that Weidner can't seem to be strong with the puck and keeps taking stupid penalties, that looks to be a great strategy. And I remain baffled about Hilbrich——just doesn't look like the same player. I'd like to see what might shake out from Hilbrich-Yates-Freschi. Perhaps the Hilbrich-Weidner pairing is just "over."

Frankly, the season rests squarely on Hilbrich's (ample) shoulders. If he starts scoring, we'll go far; if not, we're screwed. Our top line can only do so much.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/29/2016 09:57PM by Scersk '97.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: Towerroad (---.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
Date: January 30, 2016 08:07AM

Gosh, if only there was a person who's job it was to figure all this out and make the pieces work. It would also help if there was a person who's job it was to find the right pieces.

If only.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 30, 2016 10:30AM

Towerroad
Gosh, if only there was a person who's job it was to figure all this out and make the pieces work. It would also help if there was a person who's job it was to find the right pieces.

If only.
If it isn't obvious already, I'm starting to crack. The only thing that keeps me from cracking is "athletic success is a shitty priority for the school no matter how much anxiety it causes me".

But seriously, figure out how to score some fucking goals or get someone who can figure it out.

 
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2016 11:15AM

Losing streaks really, really suck. We will actually win again.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.sub-70-209-135.myvzw.com)
Date: January 30, 2016 03:58PM

Trotsky
Losing streaks really, really suck. We will actually win again.

Yes, we will.

I'm hoping the following is not really as bad a sign as I feared.

Earlier today Facebook showed me a post I made from exactly seven years ago, when I was new to Facebook. I had uncharacteristically participated in sharing "25 Random Things About Me." Here are the first two:

1) I normally hate these viral type things, and never participate. I'm making an exception this time.

2) I just finished watching the Cornell hockey team, currently ranked 4th in the country, lose an embarrassing game 8-1 to Saint Lawrence. They won't be ranked 4th on Monday.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: Beeeej (Moderator)
Date: January 30, 2016 05:04PM

MattShaf
Another loss. 0-4-1 in the last five is rather pathetic. This team has regressed back to mediocrity at this point.

I promise I'm not trying to be all pollyanna, and we have had some serious problems in our play the last several games. But knowing what we thought about this team in October, if you'd been offered at that time an 11-6-3 record as of January 30 this season, how many of you would've declined?

 
___________________________
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: marty (---.sub-70-209-136.myvzw.com)
Date: January 30, 2016 06:27PM

Beeeej
MattShaf
Another loss. 0-4-1 in the last five is rather pathetic. This team has regressed back to mediocrity at this point.

I promise I'm not trying to be all pollyanna, and we have had some serious problems in our play the last several games. But knowing what we thought about this team in October, if you'd been offered at that time an 11-6-3 record as of January 30 this season, how many of you would've declined?

I agree but I'm not going to be happy if we are .500 from here on out and we might be worse than that. But if so I'll be ill to some extent.

Seeing them in Troy and Scenectady gives me hope. So here's to hope.
 
Re: 1/29 @ Clarkson
Posted by: Scersk '97 (---.hsd1.ct.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2016 07:44PM

marty
I agree but I'm not going to be happy if we are .500 from here on out and we might be worse than that.

We will likely get the four seed if we are slightly better than .500 from here on out. (I think 4th will require 25 or 26 points this year.) So, any combination that gets us 11 or 12 points. Win the games you gotta win and tie the rest. (Just don't lose, baby!)

So, yeah, I won't be happy with .500, but I think I'll be pretty OK with just a bit better than that.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login