Friday, May 10th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

HockeyCam - Sun Investigative journalism?

Posted by nshapiro 
HockeyCam - Sun Investigative journalism?
Posted by: nshapiro (146.145.226.---)
Date: February 07, 2003 05:26PM

After feeling depressed again about our lack of HockeyCam following the Colgate game (which was actually my first experience with a HockeyCam), I was wondering if some ex-Sun staffers could let me know why this issue wasn't worthy of some investigative journalism.

Wouldn't it have been a great story if an upper-classman actually commented that it stinks that his parents and friends back home can't watch him this year.

Wouldn't it have been even better if a freshman said that watching the games last year was able to give him more exposure to Cornell Hockey.

Do we know if anyone from the Sun even thought to go ask the team questions like this, or was this whole thing considered a total non-issue for people who could just go to the games if they cared enough?



 
___________________________
When Section D was the place to be
 
Re: HockeyCam - Sun Investigative journalism?
Posted by: jeh25 (---)
Date: February 07, 2003 07:32PM

Neil - Based on the letter I wrote, the sun was willing to run a guest editorial. However, I didn't have time at the time and let the matter drop. Why they couldn't use my letter as a starting point, I have no idea.

 
Re: HockeyCam - Sun Investigative journalism?
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---)
Date: February 07, 2003 09:12PM

John E Hayes '98 '00 wrote:

Neil - Based on the letter I wrote, the sun was willing to run a guest editorial. However, I didn't have time at the time and let the matter drop. Why they couldn't use my letter as a starting point, I have no idea.
Too busy investigating "conspiracies," I guess.

 
Re: HockeyCam - Sun Investigative journalism?
Posted by: Robb '94 (---)
Date: February 08, 2003 09:33AM

The reply I got from the Sun said something like, "Thank you for the letter; however, we only publish letters that are responses to columns that we've already published." Somehow, I can't quite believe that that is a) true, or b) a good policy.

Anyway....
 
Re: HockeyCam - Sun Investigative journalism?
Posted by: jeh25 (---)
Date: February 08, 2003 11:56AM

Robb -

They were gonna publish it as a 750 word guest editorial, not a 150 word letter to the editor. But alas I was too busy to trim it to 750 words. :-/

 
Re: HockeyCam - Sun Investigative journalism?
Posted by: Josh '99 (---)
Date: February 08, 2003 01:09PM

Robb '94 wrote:

The reply I got from the Sun said something like, "Thank you for the letter; however, we only publish letters that are responses to columns that we've already published." Somehow, I can't quite believe that that is a) true, or b) a good policy.

Anyway....
Uh, yeah. That's bullshit. (In the "blatantly not true" sense of the word.)

 
Re: HockeyCam - Sun Investigative journalism?
Posted by: Robb '94 (---)
Date: February 08, 2003 02:06PM

Actually, I wrote my own letter, but there was no mention of 150 word limit in their response. I'm sure that my letter was longer than that, though.
 
Re: HockeyCam - Sun Investigative journalism?
Posted by: Section A (---)
Date: February 08, 2003 06:02PM

I write for the Sun (I have a column in the Red Letter Daze section) - anything I can do to help?
 
Re: HockeyCam - Sun Investigative journalism?
Posted by: marty (---)
Date: February 08, 2003 06:23PM

Read these threads and links:

[elf.hockey.cornell.edu]

[www.hockey.cornell.edu]

[elf.hockey.cornell.edu]

There are several stories to be written. Ask for suggestions and I imagine the responses will be numerous.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login