Tuesday, April 23rd, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Volume

Posted by Beeeej 
Volume
Posted by: Beeeej (---.udar.columbia.edu)
Date: February 11, 2002 12:54PM

Man, you people yap an awful lot about hockey.

Bad enough I'm taking most Friday afternoons off this winter for hockey-related travel - now it's taking me half of Monday just to catch up on the Forum!! B-]

Beeeej

 
___________________________
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
 
Re: Volume
Posted by: ugarte (63.94.240.---)
Date: February 11, 2002 12:59PM

Tell me about it. I think that Age should be happy. There is much more volume here than in the waning days of CHDF.
 
Re: Volume
Posted by: Josh '99 (207.10.33.---)
Date: February 11, 2002 12:59PM

Jeffrey "Beeeej" Anbinder '94 wrote:

Man, you people yap an awful lot about hockey.
Says the guy who created extra message traffic to complain about the high message traffic. :-P
 
Re: Volume
Posted by: Beeeej (---.udar.columbia.edu)
Date: February 11, 2002 01:09PM

It's called "Irony," Josh. :-{)} See you in New England this weekend?

Beeeej
 
Re: Volume
Posted by: Josh '99 (207.10.33.---)
Date: February 11, 2002 01:41PM

I know. Just messing with ya.

(Crazy English majors with your "irony"... what's an engineer to do?)

See you there, assuming I can find a ticket for UVM.
 
Re: Volume
Posted by: CUlater '89 (64.244.223.---)
Date: February 11, 2002 01:59PM

BRA wrote: "I think that Age should be happy."

Does that mean he's thinking about selling advertising?
 
Re: Volume
Posted by: jeh25 (130.132.105.---)
Date: February 11, 2002 02:03PM

Yeah, 'cause we know banner ads make such a viable business model. Oh wait...

 
Re: Volume
Posted by: CowbellGuy (---.biotech.cornell.edu)
Date: February 12, 2002 01:05PM

No way. Even if you could make money off em any more, they're esthetically repulsive :-D

And Age would have been a lot happier if he weren't puking his guts out all weekend. At least it had the courtesy to wait until after Saturday's game. barf

 
Re: Volume
Posted by: zg88 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 12, 2002 04:51PM

Age -- hope the guts are better! (Cute smiley ("barfey"?)).

Amazing: roughly 1,500 posts in the first 15 days of this forum (that's about 100 posts per day for you English majors) -- no wonder it's so tough to keep up! help
 
Re: Volume
Posted by: AdamGanderson (---.syr.edu)
Date: February 13, 2002 12:33PM

Is anyone else having a problem with the "new" tags being incorrect (messages you KNOW you haven't read not being marked new)?

You don't read for 24 hours and it all gets away from you... : )

 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login