Friday, May 3rd, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Spittoon
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Time well spent when your team is idle

Posted by marty 
Time well spent when your team is idle
Posted by: marty (---)
Date: January 12, 2003 08:51AM

Here's something to stir up the pot. Weren't we looking for the rule book last year? I found this when reading a USCHO post.

[www.ncaa.org]

 
___________________________
"When we came off, [Bitz] said, ‘Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."
 
Re: Time well spent when your team is idle
Posted by: kingpin248 (---)
Date: January 12, 2003 02:39PM

Not related to the NCAA rulebook (and I'm not sure if this has already been posted), but the ECAC has reverted to top 4/top 8 for tiebreaker comparisons (instead of the previous top 5/top 10).

[hockey.ecac.org]
 
Top 4/Top 8
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (---)
Date: January 12, 2003 04:53PM

I mentioned it, but I didn't have a reference to back it up. Thanks.

BTW, there was actually an explanation put out by the ECAC a few years ago, explaining what you do if you need to use a top 8 tiebreaker to determine who's in the top 4 and a top 4 tiebreaker to determine who's in the top 8.

BTW, does the Page_for_Men in the ECAC URLs make anyone else think of Hair Club for Men, or Entertainment for Men, or similar silly things?

 
Re: Time well spent when your team is idle
Posted by: Greg Berge (---)
Date: January 12, 2003 05:26PM

"Page for men" reminds me of steamy nights in post-war Singapore, earning steerage fare for the slow boat back to San Francisco. But that's another story.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login