Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by billhoward
Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: February 22, 2010 06:32PM
Does Cornell stand out by doing more of its losing to the league's weakest teams? Look at the top 4 (actually top 5 since it's a tie for fourth) of the 12 teams vs. the lowest 4:
(Entering final weekend. Assuming I read the WLT grid correctly: [ecachockey.com])
Rank Team ECAC Versus bottom 4: Princeton, Brown, Dartmouth, Clarkson #1 Yale 14-4-2 0 losses, 0 ties to bottom 4 (vs. sub-.500 teams, only 1 loss, to Harvard) #2T Union 12-4-4 1 loss, 2 ties to bottom 4 #2T Cornell 13-5-2 2 losses to bottom 4 #4T RPI 10-8-2 3 losses to bottom 4 #4T Colgate 10-8-2 0 losses, 1 tie to bottom 4I think this could be as telling about Cornell's quirkiness as the Saturday night-fold theory. Only RPI has lost more games (3) than us against the teams in the bottom third of the ECAC.
(Entering final weekend. Assuming I read the WLT grid correctly: [ecachockey.com])
Re: Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: ugarte (---.z75-46-65.customer.algx.net)
Date: February 22, 2010 06:35PM
I think you've proven that Yale is the best team in the conference. Which I think everyone believes already.billhoward
Does Cornell stand out by doing more of its losing to the league's weakest teams? Look at the top 4 (actually top 5 since it's a tie for fourth) of the 12 teams vs. the lowest 4:
Rank Team ECAC Versus bottom 4: Princeton, Brown, Dartmouth, Clarkson #1 Yale 14-4-2 0 losses, 0 ties to bottom 4 (vs. sub-.500 teams, only 1 loss, to Harvard) #2T Union 12-4-4 1 loss, 2 ties to bottom 4 #2T Cornell 13-5-2 2 losses to bottom 4 #4T RPI 10-8-2 3 losses to bottom 4 #4T Colgate 10-8-2 0 losses, 1 tie to bottom 4I think this could be as telling about Cornell's quirkiness as the Saturday night-fold theory. Only RPI has lost more games (3) than us against the teams in the bottom third of the ECAC.
(Entering final weekend. Assuming I read the WLT grid correctly: [ecachockey.com])
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.res.rr.com)
Date: February 22, 2010 07:53PM
Judging by what you posted, no.billhoward
Does Cornell stand out by doing more of its losing to the league's weakest teams?
Re: Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: RatushnyFan (---.rbccm.com)
Date: February 24, 2010 02:49PM
Doesn't your analysis show that Cornell, Union and RPI have all struggled against some lesser teams? Only Yale and Colgate stand out.
Re: Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: February 24, 2010 03:46PM
Yes, the statistics don't make a strong case for my point. Three of the top five teams have given away too many points to the league's basement. I forgot about the two ties Union has and that means both Cornell and Union have given away 4 points. RPI is lucky it has those 2 wins over Yale to balance out its even worse record.
Re: Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: ebilmes (---.nys.biz.rr.com)
Date: February 24, 2010 09:20PM
Cornell is 2-4-2 against the top 32 teams in D-1 (according to KRACH), and 14-4-1 against the bottom 26 teams in D-1. The 4 includes Quinnipiac, Princeton (x2), and Dartmouth.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.