Monday, April 29th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Cornell's penchant for losing to losers

Posted by billhoward 
Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: February 22, 2010 06:32PM

Does Cornell stand out by doing more of its losing to the league's weakest teams? Look at the top 4 (actually top 5 since it's a tie for fourth) of the 12 teams vs. the lowest 4:
Rank Team   ECAC    Versus bottom 4: Princeton, Brown, Dartmouth, Clarkson 
#1  Yale    14-4-2  0 losses, 0 ties to bottom 4 (vs. sub-.500 teams, only 1 loss, to Harvard)
#2T Union   12-4-4  1 loss, 2 ties to bottom 4 
#2T Cornell 13-5-2  2 losses to bottom 4
#4T RPI     10-8-2  3 losses to bottom 4
#4T Colgate 10-8-2  0 losses, 1 tie to bottom 4
I think this could be as telling about Cornell's quirkiness as the Saturday night-fold theory. Only RPI has lost more games (3) than us against the teams in the bottom third of the ECAC.

(Entering final weekend. Assuming I read the WLT grid correctly: [ecachockey.com])
 
Re: Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: ugarte (---.z75-46-65.customer.algx.net)
Date: February 22, 2010 06:35PM

billhoward
Does Cornell stand out by doing more of its losing to the league's weakest teams? Look at the top 4 (actually top 5 since it's a tie for fourth) of the 12 teams vs. the lowest 4:
Rank Team   ECAC    Versus bottom 4: Princeton, Brown, Dartmouth, Clarkson 
#1  Yale    14-4-2  0 losses, 0 ties to bottom 4 (vs. sub-.500 teams, only 1 loss, to Harvard)
#2T Union   12-4-4  1 loss, 2 ties to bottom 4 
#2T Cornell 13-5-2  2 losses to bottom 4
#4T RPI     10-8-2  3 losses to bottom 4
#4T Colgate 10-8-2  0 losses, 1 tie to bottom 4
I think this could be as telling about Cornell's quirkiness as the Saturday night-fold theory. Only RPI has lost more games (3) than us against the teams in the bottom third of the ECAC.

(Entering final weekend. Assuming I read the WLT grid correctly: [ecachockey.com])
I think you've proven that Yale is the best team in the conference. Which I think everyone believes already.

 
 
Re: Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.res.rr.com)
Date: February 22, 2010 07:53PM

billhoward
Does Cornell stand out by doing more of its losing to the league's weakest teams?
Judging by what you posted, no.
 
Re: Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: RatushnyFan (---.rbccm.com)
Date: February 24, 2010 02:49PM

Doesn't your analysis show that Cornell, Union and RPI have all struggled against some lesser teams? Only Yale and Colgate stand out.
 
Re: Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: February 24, 2010 03:46PM

Yes, the statistics don't make a strong case for my point. Three of the top five teams have given away too many points to the league's basement. I forgot about the two ties Union has and that means both Cornell and Union have given away 4 points. RPI is lucky it has those 2 wins over Yale to balance out its even worse record.
 
Re: Cornell's penchant for losing to losers
Posted by: ebilmes (---.nys.biz.rr.com)
Date: February 24, 2010 09:20PM

Cornell is 2-4-2 against the top 32 teams in D-1 (according to KRACH), and 14-4-1 against the bottom 26 teams in D-1. The 4 includes Quinnipiac, Princeton (x2), and Dartmouth.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login