Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by Beeeej
Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: Beeeej (Moderator)
Date: January 04, 2008 09:10PM
Scrivens now with over 153 minutes of shutout hockey at home.
Nice performance by the Big Red. Let's see them do it again tomorrow, prove it wasn't a fluke.
Nice performance by the Big Red. Let's see them do it again tomorrow, prove it wasn't a fluke.
___________________________
Beeeej, Esq.
"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
Beeeej, Esq.
"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 04, 2008 09:13PM
Cornell looked really good, but Niagara looked really, really bad. They were a 10-5-1 team -- either Schafer has connected the team up with a new pharmacist, or the Purple Eagles had an atypically flat night. Echoing Beeeej, tomorrow we'll see.
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: Jordan 04 (---.nyc.res.rr.com)
Date: January 04, 2008 09:28PM
Postgame report is that I'm an idiot.
Loaded up the Niagara audio a few minutes before 7 and it was unavailable. Got caught up in other things and forgot about the game completely.
Nice to see the score!
Loaded up the Niagara audio a few minutes before 7 and it was unavailable. Got caught up in other things and forgot about the game completely.
Nice to see the score!
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: lynah80 (---.phlapa.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 04, 2008 09:32PM
Given the way the schedule is set for January, by the end of this month Cornell will very likely be:
8-4 ECAC
10-5-2 Overall
That's not too bad.
8-4 ECAC
10-5-2 Overall
That's not too bad.
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: mhand06 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 04, 2008 09:34PM
Lets do it again tomorrow we can do it! LGR!
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: Beeeej (Moderator)
Date: January 04, 2008 09:41PM
Let's avoid the chicken-counting, shall we?
___________________________
Beeeej, Esq.
"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
Beeeej, Esq.
"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.hsd1.ma.comcast.net)
Date: January 04, 2008 09:58PM
Well, if we go 4-2 in league games this month (to get to 8-4 ECAC), we'll have at least seven losses overall.lynah80
Given the way the schedule is set for January, by the end of this month Cornell will very likely be:
8-4 ECAC
10-5-2 Overall
That's not too bad.
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
Al DeFlorio '65
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: marty (---.nycap.res.rr.com)
Date: January 04, 2008 10:03PM
lynah80
Given the way the schedule is set for January, by the end of this month Cornell will very likely be:
8-4 ECAC
10-5-2 Overall
That's not too bad.
As an woof negator here, I will predict RIP will bury the Big Red in the Morgue next Friday. See my comments here:
[elf.elynah.com]
Don't get me wrong, the game can go either way and I will be screaming for Cornell, but RIP looks the best it has since the pre-Fridge era. Their new coach is motivating them and I expect them to be very ready to play the remainder of their ECAC schedule.
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.nwrknj.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 04, 2008 10:49PM
marty
As an woof negator here, I will predict RIP will bury the Big Red in the Morgue next Friday.
Reverse woofing is even worse than regular woofing! The woofing gods do not take kindly to attempts at trickery!
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: lynah80 (---.phlapa.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 04, 2008 11:09PM
sorry, my mistake
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.hsd1.ma.comcast.net)
Date: January 05, 2008 09:31AM
We've already hashed out the disappointment over giving up third-period leads, but it's worth noting that in Cornell's last four games--three against ranked opponents--the team has given up just one goal in the first two periods, and that only because of an egregious giveaway. Maybe things are starting to come together.
Mike's new lines are looking pretty good to me, too.
Mike's new lines are looking pretty good to me, too.
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
Al DeFlorio '65
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: Townie (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 05, 2008 10:20AM
I thought Niagara looked really off....very slow and not very physical. Their special teams applied little to no pressure, which made us look great on our PP. (I've noticed we don't do well against aggressive PK units.) Despite being beaten soundly, they showed poise and class by not getting chippy.
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: Doug '08 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 05, 2008 10:27AM
I'd have to say Niagara was the slowest team we've seen all year. They were constantly out of position and their forwards don't seem to like the idea of blocking shots, or playing defense at all for that matter...
Looks like Schafer liked the lines he used at Florida, enough for one more week at least. No lineup surprises either.
Its always great to get a decissive win like that, but I have a feeling things will be a lot closer tonight.
Looks like Schafer liked the lines he used at Florida, enough for one more week at least. No lineup surprises either.
Its always great to get a decissive win like that, but I have a feeling things will be a lot closer tonight.
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: ebilmes (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 05, 2008 10:35AM
Impressive performance last night, but Niagara looked absolutely horrible. Incredibly slow team, unable to win anything along the boards. No way we should have lost this one.
As for Niagara's "not getting chippy," I think we'll see some of that tonight if it looks like they're going to lose.
Riley Nash's goal in the 3rd period...amerks127 remarked that it was the "easiest goal ever." Riley was staring at a wide open net, fumbled the puck for a couple seconds, and was still staring at a wide open net when he finally let off a shot.
Scrivens wasn't challenged much, but almost lost his shutout in the 2nd when a Niagara shot hit the post.
This looked like a lot of those games from 2002-2003 when Cornell was the far better team and LeNeveu only had to make a couple tough saves. Let's hope we see the same effort and full-game effort from Cornell tonight.
As for Niagara's "not getting chippy," I think we'll see some of that tonight if it looks like they're going to lose.
Riley Nash's goal in the 3rd period...amerks127 remarked that it was the "easiest goal ever." Riley was staring at a wide open net, fumbled the puck for a couple seconds, and was still staring at a wide open net when he finally let off a shot.
Scrivens wasn't challenged much, but almost lost his shutout in the 2nd when a Niagara shot hit the post.
This looked like a lot of those games from 2002-2003 when Cornell was the far better team and LeNeveu only had to make a couple tough saves. Let's hope we see the same effort and full-game effort from Cornell tonight.
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: Doug '08 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 05, 2008 10:50AM
ebilmes
Riley Nash's goal in the 3rd period...amerks127 remarked that it was the "easiest goal ever." Riley was staring at a wide open net, fumbled the puck for a couple seconds, and was still staring at a wide open net when he finally let off a shot.
Yeah he had enough time to read the paper, have a cup of coffee, and probably a quick smoke (not to mention bringing the puck around on his forehand) before burying that into a wide open net
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: lynah80 (---.phlapa.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 05, 2008 03:12PM
I agree that Niagara did not skate aggressively, especially during the second half of the game.
Re: Cornell 6, Niagara 0 Postgame
Posted by: nr53 (---.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
Date: January 05, 2008 04:09PM
I thought the power play looked very good, and while it might have been due to lack of pressure by Niagara, I did notice that on a few occasions Cornell didn't just cycle the puck but were actually moving themselves around as well. The passes seemed to flow a lot better during these times as well. Hope they can keep up the good work!
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.