First USCHO PWR of the year are up and bracketology (is that better?)
Posted by ansky629
First USCHO PWR of the year are up and bracketology (is that better?)
Posted by: ansky629 (---.law.umich.edu)
Date: January 16, 2008 09:52AM
And right now ECAC hockey is looking at 2 teams in the top 16, both tied at 12th, Princeton and Cornell are also in there, but it's not looking too pretty for us unless we win the conference tourney. But then I guess we already knew that.
First PWR on USCHO
Bracketology
First PWR on USCHO
Bracketology
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 01/16/2008 01:41PM by ansky629.
Not the first
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (Moderator)
Date: January 16, 2008 10:22AM
They've been on
[www.collegehockeynews.com]
and
[slack.net]
since December.
Also, you can put in hypothetical results and see how things change at
[slack.net]
[www.collegehockeynews.com]
and
[slack.net]
since December.
Also, you can put in hypothetical results and see how things change at
[slack.net]
Re: First PWR of the year are up
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 16, 2008 11:19AM
Never go up against an astrophysicist when math is on the line.
Re: First PWR of the year are up
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.net)
Date: January 16, 2008 11:46AM
But it wasn't math on the line, nobody's debating the numbers. Just the semantics of whether USCHO's PWR was really the "first of the year".Trotsky
Never go up against an astrophysicist when math is on the line.
Never go up against a lawyer when semantics are on the line.
Re: First PWR of the year are up
Posted by: RichH (216.195.201.---)
Date: January 16, 2008 07:49PM
Josh '99But it wasn't math on the line, nobody's debating the numbers. Just the semantics of whether USCHO's PWR was really the "first of the year".Trotsky
Never go up against an astrophysicist when math is on the line.
Never go up against a lawyer when semantics are on the line.
...and that's almost twice as many planes.
Re: First PWR of the year are up
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.res.rr.com)
Date: January 16, 2008 10:14PM
Heh. Fair enough.RichHJosh '99But it wasn't math on the line, nobody's debating the numbers. Just the semantics of whether USCHO's PWR was really the "first of the year".Trotsky
Never go up against an astrophysicist when math is on the line.
Never go up against a lawyer when semantics are on the line.
...and that's almost twice as many planes.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.