Monday, May 6th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Spittoon
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

OT: Hockey Least Thursday Scores

Posted by KenP 
OT: Hockey Least Thursday Scores
Posted by: KenP (---.abrfc.noaa.gov)
Date: March 11, 2004 08:23PM

(8) BU  3,  (1) BC     2
(4) UNH 2,  (5) PC     1
(3) UMA 6,  (6) Lowell 3

Big surprise in Boston. -- BC 0 for 7 on power play, including 2:00 5x3. 2 goals by BC, including a goal with :39.9 left, made the game interesting. BU wins despite huge shot differential.

Age, fyi, this is my last post edit.
Edited 10 time(s). Last edit at 03/11/2004 09:16PM by .
 
Re: OT: Hockey Least Thursday Scores
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: March 11, 2004 09:11PM

[Q]KenP Wrote:

BU 3, BC 1 3rd
UNH 2, PC 1 3rd 7:00 left
UMA 5, Lowell 1 3rd

Big surprise in Boston.



Edited 8 times. Last edit at 03/11/2004 7:51pm. [/Q]

BC makes it 3-2 in the last minute.


 
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
 
Re: OT: Hockey Least Thursday Scores
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: March 11, 2004 09:43PM

BU 3
BC 2

UMA 6
UML 3

UHN 2
PU 1

Finals

 
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
 
Re: OT: Hockey Least Thursday Scores
Posted by: Chris Moberg (---.pivot.net)
Date: March 11, 2004 10:21PM

BU scores 3 goals on 10 shots according to the Box Score on USCHO.
 
Re: OT: Hockey Least Thursday Scores
Posted by: Tom Pasniewski 98 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 12, 2004 10:51AM

Was at the BU-BC game last night. After BU built the 2-0 first period lead, they looked as if that's all they needed rarely getting a shot off. I credit Fields for the win. They had only credited BU with 3 shots on goal over the last two periods at the rink (1 in the second and 2 in the third) but since revised it for the boxscore. BU attempted very few shots even when they had the empty net to try and seal it down the stretch. Meanwhile, BC had so many shots miss the mark, it became a recurring theme. The video board at the Conte Forum showed the number of 'shots off the mark' at one point and I think BC had over 30 and that might have been through 2 periods. BU really had an awesome PK on display especially for a two-minute 5x3.

No matter how bad the opponent is, it's really hard, how many times do you play six times anyway, to go 6-0-0 against an opponent in one season which is what BC would have had to do to sweep BU. But I think it's just as hard to beat an opponent six times in one season and would not be surprised to see BU win this series. BU's been playing do or die games for a bit now and they've been responding. BC clinched the Hockey East RS title and hasn't won since.

Two big rivals, two miles apart from each other and all they can draw is 3,270 to a 7,700 seat arena for a playoff game. BU may be on spring break but they'll be more at Lynah tonight than that.

Not that Cornell's at large chances are very good nor should we pay them any attention with games still going on, but a BU run through Hockey East is not a good thing for teams like Cornell. Who knows, BU's PWR may be up in the top 14 :::-O:: the way BU has moved up to a tie for 20th after last night's win. They still can't finish the HE tournament at .500 even if they win the whole thing.

BU SUCKS, BC SUCKS, HOCKEY LEAST SUCKS, CLARKSON SUCKS.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login