Polls 2/9/04
Posted by Chris 02
Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Chris 02 (---.larc.nasa.gov)
Date: February 09, 2004 03:48PM
USCHO Division I Men's Poll February 9, 2004 Team (First Place) Record Pts Last Week 1 Boston College (36) 20-3-4 596 2 2 North Dakota (4) 19-5-3 544 1 3 Maine 20-6-2 504 3 4 Minnesota 18-9-3 465 5 5 Michigan 19-8-1 414 4 6 Minnesota-Duluth 18-8-3 400 6 7 Wisconsin 17-9-6 376 9 8 Miami 18-9-3 313 7 9 St. Cloud State 16-9-3 274 8 10 New Hampshire 16-10-3 190 10 11 Brown 14-5-4 185 12 12 Denver 16-10-4 170 11 13 Massachusetts 16-6-5 144 14 14 Ohio State 17-13-0 71 13 15 Colgate 15-8-5 55 15 Others Receiving Votes: Colorado College 35, Michigan State 17, Notre Dame 12, Bemidji State 10, Ferris State 6, Niagara 6, Providence 4, Dartmouth 3, Holy Cross 3, Rensselaer 2, Cornell 1
One person thought us befitting of 15th in the country. I wonder if it's the same person who might have RPI 14th and Dartmouth 13th.
USA Today/American Hockey Magazine Top 15 Hockey Poll The USA Today/American Hockey Magazine weekly Top 15 men's college hockey poll with first-place votes in parentheses, total points and previous ranking: (as of February 9, 2004) TEAM W-L-T PTS LW ---- ----- --- -- 1. Boston College (30) 20-3-5 503 2 2. North Dakota (4) 19-5-3 470 1 3. Maine 20-6-2 423 3 4. Minnesota 18-9-3 396 5 5. Michigan 19-8-1 361 4 6. Minnesota-Duluth 18-8-3 342 6 7. Wisconsin 17-9-6 324 9 8. Miami (Ohio) 18-9-3 287 7 9. St. Cloud State 16-9-3 241 9 10. Brown 14-5-4 162 13 11. New Hampshire 16-10-3 160 10 12. Denver 16-10-4 125 11 13. Massachusetts 16-6-5 123 12 14. Colgate 15-8-5 59 15 15. Ohio State 17-13-0 57 14 Others receiving votes: Colorado College 32, Michigan State 9, Holy Cross 4, Cornell 1, Providence 1.
Again, the 15th place vote.
Post Edited (02-10-04 09:46)
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Will (---.cable.mindspring.com)
Date: February 09, 2004 03:59PM
I didn't think Cornell would be able to bounce back into the polls, but I really thought we'd get more than a single vote.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: ugarte (65.217.153.---)
Date: February 09, 2004 04:26PM
I don't exactly think we deserve the vote, but I think we deserve at least as much as what Bemidji St., Niagara or HC gets.
One of the guys who got revenge on Volonnino wrote:
I didn't think Cornell would be able to bounce back into the polls, but I really thought we'd get more than a single vote.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Greg Berge (64.49.66.---)
Date: February 09, 2004 04:33PM
It's drag vs lift.
The voters have finally caught up with how average we were prior to the weekend -- I mean, an 8-7-6 ECAC team having just been swept -- what were we doing getting any votes last week?
Then a little lift from the weekend sweep gets us back in, at #26.
Even with another pair of wins this coming weekend (hope, hope), I wouldn't expect us to move past the Alsos.
The voters have finally caught up with how average we were prior to the weekend -- I mean, an 8-7-6 ECAC team having just been swept -- what were we doing getting any votes last week?
Then a little lift from the weekend sweep gets us back in, at #26.
Even with another pair of wins this coming weekend (hope, hope), I wouldn't expect us to move past the Alsos.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: nyc94 (---.31.19.159.Dial1.NewYork1.Level3.net)
Date: February 09, 2004 04:41PM
It hasn't been mentioned yet - I don't think - but I noticed Harvard is back in the PairWise Rankings I gather as a result of the Yale game and/or improving their SOS by playing BC again. It's only worth noting because it improves our otherwise poor record against TUCs.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: The Rancor (---.syr.east.verizon.net)
Date: February 09, 2004 05:07PM
only teams at or above .500 are TUC's ... thats why they are back in the PWR.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.ny325.east.verizon.net)
Date: February 09, 2004 05:15PM
More accurately, only teams with an RPI above .500 are TUCs.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: nyc94 (---.31.19.159.Dial1.NewYork1.Level3.net)
Date: February 09, 2004 05:25PM
I know WHY they are again a TUC but that was hardly the point. Off the top of my head I couldn't quantify what a win over Yale or a loss to BC does to one's RPI. I just pointed it out because Cornell now has two more wins over TUCs.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: mike (---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: February 09, 2004 05:36PM
the polls, all we have to do to prove ourself is win the ECAC
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: nyc94 (---.31.20.84.Dial1.NewYork1.Level3.net)
Date: February 09, 2004 07:41PM
And Harvard is right back out of the PWR.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.ny325.east.verizon.net)
Date: February 09, 2004 08:15PM
Oh, man. They're so bad.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Keith K '93 (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: February 09, 2004 08:29PM
Ain't no jam in Cambridge...
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: PJS (---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: February 09, 2004 11:03PM
I wonder who would win a game between Cornell and Bemidji State...just more evidence of how meaningless these polls really are.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: David Harding '72 (---.client.comcast.net)
Date: February 09, 2004 11:25PM
[q]I wonder who would win a game between Cornell and Bemidji State...just more evidence of how meaningless these polls really are.[/q]
If you believe the KRACH ratings (http://uscho.com/rankings/?data=krach), at the moment Cornell would win 59% of the time. Cornell 132.7, Bemidji State 90.88,
If you believe the KRACH ratings (http://uscho.com/rankings/?data=krach), at the moment Cornell would win 59% of the time. Cornell 132.7, Bemidji State 90.88,
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Tom Pasniewski 98 (---.c3-0.abr-ubr1.sbo-abr.ma.cable.rcn.)
Date: February 10, 2004 06:58AM
While it may have looked good to top the polls at the end of last season, the polls tell only part of the story that the RPI tells, the RPI tells only part of the story that the Pairwise tells, the Pairwise tells only part of the story that the Krach tells, the Krach tells only part of the story that the committee will tell us in March for the NCAA's and we already know that without winning back-to-back ECAC titles in Albany, the Committee is going to tell us to take the rest of March off. So, let's get our top four finish and our bye, get healthy and let the silly pollsters who somehow thought two road wins was 'good' enough to drop out of all but one voters top 15 and lets win the ECAC tournament, get to the NCAA's and remind the new #1 team in the nation and new Beanpot champions, who beat them in the NCAA tournament last year.
No I didn't just see Miracle but it's an example that at any point any team can rise to the occasion. And on any given night, especially in the ECAC but anywhere, any team can knock off anybody not purely out of luck but by playing like a 'team, team, team' as my beloved Patriots just showed us. So let's get tough guys and let's keep the roll going back home this weekend.
No I didn't just see Miracle but it's an example that at any point any team can rise to the occasion. And on any given night, especially in the ECAC but anywhere, any team can knock off anybody not purely out of luck but by playing like a 'team, team, team' as my beloved Patriots just showed us. So let's get tough guys and let's keep the roll going back home this weekend.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: KenP (---.abrfc.noaa.gov)
Date: February 10, 2004 12:39PM
There's a small difference this year. We get to the NCAA's this year by winning the conference tourney, but unlike last year, I don't feel we have a team that can really win it all.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Greg Berge (64.49.66.---)
Date: February 10, 2004 04:27PM
Which "all"?
The NCAAs? Not a chance in hell.
The ECACs? As good a chance as the '86 or '96 teams, at least.
The NCAAs? Not a chance in hell.
The ECACs? As good a chance as the '86 or '96 teams, at least.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Robb '94 (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: February 10, 2004 05:55PM
Not to mention 1980...
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Keith K '93 (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: February 10, 2004 06:33PM
[Q]The NCAAs? Not a chance in hell.[/Q]You don't think we could if we all got together and found a soul or three to sell?
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: dss28 (---.client.comcast.net)
Date: February 10, 2004 07:36PM
I've got a nomination...
Post Edited (02-10-04 19:36)
Post Edited (02-10-04 19:36)
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: David Harding '72 (---.client.comcast.net)
Date: February 10, 2004 10:55PM
You have to have one to sell it.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: dss28 (---.client.comcast.net)
Date: February 10, 2004 11:15PM
I see we have the same nomination. Point taken.
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Jeff Hopkins '82 (---.airproducts.com)
Date: February 11, 2004 08:00AM
It may actually have a soul. It's a brain that we all agree is AWOL.
JH
JH
Re: Polls 2/9/04
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 11, 2004 08:10PM
As good as we were last year, let's not forget we were this " close to not winning the ECAC's or getting to Buffalo. This team certainly has a decent chance to win the ECAC's and even a NCAA game (or 2??). We will never be a lock to win anything, it's just not in the cards ( or admissions, lack of scholarships, etc. ).
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.