Monday, May 20th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Sort of OT: Terps Profanity

Posted by KateThe15Fan 
Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Posted by: KateThe15Fan (---.umd.edu)
Date: January 30, 2004 10:38AM

Thought some of the Faithful might be interested in this recent posting on the University of Maryland website: [www.umd.edu]

I hate to get the "profanity vs. no profanity" argument going again, but as always it's interesting to see that we're not alone in these issues.
 
Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Posted by: Greg Berge (64.49.66.---)
Date: January 30, 2004 10:56AM

Big story on it in the Washington Post today.
 
Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Posted by: mwf14850 (---.cayugamed.org)
Date: January 30, 2004 12:08PM

JUST STICK WITH ROUGH AND FLUFF IN THE 3RD PERIOD CHEER AND THE USHERS WILL LEAVE YOU ALONE
 
Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (---.loyno.edu)
Date: January 30, 2004 12:12PM


wrote:
JUST STICK WITH ROUGH AND FLUFF IN THE 3RD PERIOD CHEER AND THE USHERS WILL LEAVE YOU ALONE
"Fluff 'em up"? Is that some sort of porn reference? 'Cause I don't think being a fluffer is really the right sort of dominant althletic image. help



Post Edited (01-30-04 12:12)
 
Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Posted by: Micaela (---.ri.ri.cox.net)
Date: January 30, 2004 03:34PM

I'm in favor of reserving "fluffer" for referees who, um, suck a lot.
 
Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Posted by: LynahFaithfulS (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: January 30, 2004 04:49PM


John T. Whelan '91 wrote:

"Fluff 'em up"? Is that some sort of porn reference? 'Cause I don't think being a fluffer is really the right sort of dominant althletic image.

laugh !
 
Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Posted by: JDeafvCornell (---.howard01.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2004 06:42PM

In the Washington Time article linked at the bottom of the page ("Terps turn to state to muzzle vulgar fans";) they say:


[The university's chief counsel says] school policy prevents them from stopping fans from screaming expletives at opposing teams or wearing T-shirts that bear vulgar slogans because those actions are protected by the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech.

I didn't realize your rights to free speech extended in a place like a stadium, or is that just Maryland covering their ass-ets.

Does Cornell not protect its student's first amendment right to free speech and that's why they can get away with kicking people out of Lynah?

Has anybody tried to argue their vulgar chants are protected by the first ammendment after getting kicked out of Lynah?

LGR! Beat 'gate.

 
Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Posted by: Shorts (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: January 31, 2004 11:07AM

in response to JDeafvCornell, from the Baltimore Sun [www.sunspot.net]

[Q][University of Maryland Athletic Director Debbie] Yow said there is not much the school can do. She said the university's legal counsel maintains that, since Maryland is a state university and its basketball team plays in a public building, any use of free speech is protected under the First Amendment.[/q]

Although Cornell is partly a state school, I suspect (although I don't know for sure) that the Athletics department is part of the private segment of the school, and so is not constrained by the 1st Amendment.
 
Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Posted by: dss28 (---.client.comcast.net)
Date: February 01, 2004 06:13PM

So does this mean you can use profanity if you're an Ag, Hum Ec, or ILR student? ;-)
 
Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Posted by: Ack (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: February 02, 2004 02:22AM

Being engineers, we swear in numbers...not exactly profanity if no one else in the world understands screwy
 
Re: Sort of OT: Terps Profanity
Posted by: Greg Berge (64.49.66.---)
Date: February 02, 2004 09:18AM


Mike Ack wrote:

Being engineers, we swear in numbers.

Hex, no doubt.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login