Thursday, October 31st, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Polls 11/7

Posted by dbilmes 
Polls 11/7
Posted by: dbilmes (---.37.117.26.adsl.snet.net)
Date: November 07, 2005 03:10PM

USA TODAY/American Hockey men's poll

Nov. 7, 2005

Team (first-place votes) Record Points LW
1. Colorado College (30) 9-1-0 502 1
2. Michigan (2) 7-1-1 474 3
3. Cornell (2) 3-1-0 408 4
4. Maine 8-2-0 392 2
5. Wisconsin 6-1-1 369 10
6. Michigan State 5-1-1 353 8
7. Denver 5-3-0 282 9
8. Vermont 7-1-0 250 7
9. Boston College 3-2-1 197 11
10. Miami (Ohio) 5-1-0 186 15
11. North Dakota 5-4-1 148 5
12. New Hampshire 4-3-1 138 12
13. Minnesota 3-3-2 136 6
14. Boston University 3-2-0 59 NR
15. Alaska-Fairbanks 4-2-2 50 NR
Others receiving votes: St. Lawrence 36, Colgate 32, Providence 22, Bemidji State 19, Quinnipiac 16, Mercyhurst 9, Ohio State 2.


USCHO.com/CSTV Division I Men's Poll
November 7, 2005
Team (First Place Votes) Record Points Last Poll
1 Colorado College (39) 9-1-0 798 1
2 Michigan 7-1-1 740 3
3 Cornell ( 1) 3-1-0 678 4
4 Maine 8-2-0 664 2
5 Wisconsin 6-1-1 631 9
6 Michigan State 5-1-1 608 8
7 Denver 5-3-0 514 10
8 Boston College 3-2-1 465 11
9 Vermont 7-1-0 464 6
10 North Dakota 5-4-1 382 5
11 Miami 5-1-0 376 16
12 Minnesota 3-3-2 356 7
13 New Hampshire 4-3-1 355 12
14 Boston University 3-2-0 244 19
15 Alaska-Fairbanks 4-2-2 225 17
16 St. Lawrence 6-2-0 166 20
17 Colgate 5-1-1 152 NR
18 Bemidji State 5-1-0 129 18
19 Northern Michigan 5-3-0 129 14
20 Quinnipiac 8-2-0 92 NR
Others Receiving Votes: Harvard 82, Providence 52, Ohio State 48, Minnesota-Duluth 16, Mercyhurst 9, Clarkson 8, Rensselaer 8, Nebraska-Omaha 5, Lake Superior 2, Princeton 2



moving up despite unimpressive performances... and Princeton?
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: ugarte (---.cisco.com)
Date: November 07, 2005 03:18PM

Dammit. Alone in the top 15 again. EZAC, say the voters. We have three others in the top 20, though. *sigh*

 
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: Liz '05 (---.pn.at.cox.net)
Date: November 07, 2005 03:22PM

[Q]ugarte Wrote:

Dammit. Alone in the top 15 again. EZAC, say the voters. We have three others in the top 20, though. *sigh*[/q]

Do we still have the best interleague record? If so, we really shouldn't be punished too much for losing to each other (see WCHA teams that lose and lose and still maintain top 15 status for their potential and strength of schedule).

I'd be happier if we had more teams in the poll. I'll accept dominating the "Also receiving votes."
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.raytheon.com)
Date: November 07, 2005 03:46PM

It's funny that QU cracks the "top 20" by beating two teams not in the "top 20" help Go SLU and 'Gate! (except against us)


We have the best inter-conference record (.643) to the CCHA's .588 and HEA's .529 (others under .500).

However, we have the second best record against the Big-4 (.517) to the CCHA's .571 (all under's under .500).

So a decent amount of our best interconference record comes at the expense of the AHA and CHA, but even without that we still top HEA and the WCHA, interconference wise. It'll be interesting to see how those extra wins end up affecting the later season KRACH/RPI. A good Christmas tournament season for the ECAC (and a good Beanpawt... ha! just kidding!) would go a long ways towards solidifying that.
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.res.rr.com)
Date: November 07, 2005 04:37PM

[Q]dbilmes Wrote:
moving up despite unimpressive performances...[/q]I guess the logic is, the wins might have been impressive, but a home loss (Maine to BU yesterday) is still worse.
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: dadeo (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: November 07, 2005 06:29PM

oh wait, vermont is the evil stepchild, i forgot
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: dadeo (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: November 07, 2005 07:22PM

now what coach/writer would give princeton a top 20 spot??
any guesses?
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: November 07, 2005 07:28PM

[Q]now what coach/writer would give princeton a top 20 spot??
any guesses?[/q]Keep in mind that 20th best team in D1 translates to somewhere around a .500 record. In other words, you don't have to be very good to rank that high. That said, I don't think Princeton will be even that good, but who knows?

 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: dadeo (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: November 07, 2005 07:34PM

well top 27 count towards pwr (maybe more now that RIT is herE??)

also - does anyone know when they start the RPI and PWR again?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/07/2005 07:43PM by dadeo.
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.res.rr.com)
Date: November 07, 2005 08:09PM

And the USCHO poll...

1  Colorado College (39) 9-1-0 798  1 
2  Michigan              7-1-1 740  3 
3  Cornell          ( 1) 3-1-0 678  4 
4  Maine                 8-2-0 664  2 
5  Wisconsin             6-1-1 631  9 
6  Michigan State        5-1-1 608  8 
7  Denver                5-3-0 514 10 
8  Boston College        3-2-1 465 11 
9  Vermont               7-1-0 464  6 
10 North Dakota          5-4-1 382  5 
11 Miami                 5-1-0 376 16 
12 Minnesota             3-3-2 356  7 
13 New Hampshire         4-3-1 355 12 
14 Boston University     3-2-0 244 19 
15 Alaska-Fairbanks      4-2-2 225 17 
16 St. Lawrence          6-2-0 166 20 
17 Colgate               5-1-1 152 NR 
18 Bemidji State         5-1-0 129 18 
19 Northern Michigan     5-3-0 129 14 
20 Quinnipiac            8-2-0  92 NR 

Others Receiving Votes: Harvard 82, Providence 52, Ohio State 48,
Minnesota-Duluth 16, Mercyhurst 9, Clarkson 8, Rensselaer 8, 
Nebraska-Omaha 5, Lake Superior 2, Princeton 2 
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: billhoward (---.ziffdavis.com)
Date: November 07, 2005 08:14PM

[Q]KeithK Wrote:

now what coach/writer would give princeton a top 20 spot??
any guesses?[/Q]
Keep in mind that 20th best team in D1 translates to somewhere around a .500 record. In other words, you don't have to be very good to rank that high. That said, I don't think Princeton will be even that good, but who knows?[/q]Among ~ 58 D1 hockey teams, the most likely to be at .500 would be #29, I would think. It's possible those ranked 20 to 40 could all be around .500, but the likeliest to be in the middle is the team in the middle.

 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: November 07, 2005 08:14PM

[q]does anyone know when they start the RPI and PWR again?[/q]Who do you mean by "they"? If you mean USCHO, then they start showing PWR sometime in January. It doesn't really mean very much before then. But I wouldn't be surprised if some of the usual hockey geeks start compiling it earlier, for what it's worth. (NO, Whelan doesn't have it posted yet...)
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: November 07, 2005 08:18PM

[q]Among ~ 58 D1 hockey teams, the most likely to be at .500 would be #29, I would think. It's possible those ranked 20 to 40 could all be around .500, but the likeliest to be in the middle is the team in the middle.[/q]But, of course, poll ranking isn't simply based on winning percentage. It takes into account perceptions of schedule strength, etc. The polls track PWR pretty well later in the season and I'd bet that the team ranked #20 in PWR is not too far from a .500 win pct., esp. since they started using RPI > ,5000 as the cutoff for TUC instead of Pct. > .500.

Besides, I never defined what "around .500" meant. :-P
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: dadeo (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: November 07, 2005 08:21PM

what about the second accident duplicate post (see post #1 in this thread)
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.res.rr.com)
Date: November 07, 2005 08:25PM

That wasn't an accident, that was formatted. :-P
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: Jeff Hopkins '82 (---.airproducts.com)
Date: November 08, 2005 12:05AM

There were 3 or four teams last year that were TUC with less than a 0.500 record, all of whom were in the WCHA, CCHA (and HEA?). Because the criterion is RPI, not W/L, the mediocre teams that play a lot of games against the top teams (i.e. the conferences with good teams, but few teams) tend to get a bit of TUC favoritism by the current method.
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: RichH (---.chvlva.adelphia.net)
Date: November 08, 2005 12:36AM

[Q]dadeo Wrote:

what about the second accident duplicate post (see post #1 in this thread)[/q]

Post #1 was the USAToday poll. jmh30's post was the USCHO poll.
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: BCrespi (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: November 08, 2005 12:42AM

[Q]RichH Wrote:

dadeo Wrote:

what about the second accident duplicate post (see post #1 in this thread)[/Q]
Post #1 was the USAToday poll. jmh30's post was the USCHO poll.[/q]

and then post #1 was edited to include both.

 
___________________________
Brian Crespi '06
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: Tub(a) (---.hsd1.pa.comcast.net)
Date: November 08, 2005 01:20AM

[Q]BCrespi Wrote:

RichH Wrote:

dadeo Wrote:

what about the second accident duplicate post (see post #1 in this thread)[/Q]
Post #1 was the USAToday poll. jmh30's post was the USCHO poll.[/Q]
and then post #1 was edited to include both.[/q]

and eLynah lived happily ever after!
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: Pete Godenschwager (---.chem.cornell.edu)
Date: November 08, 2005 07:52AM

[Q]also - does anyone know when they start the RPI and PWR again?[/Q]
Doesn't mean much, but here it is: [siouxsports.com]

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/08/2005 07:52AM by Pete Godenschwager.
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: November 08, 2005 08:34AM

[Q]Pete Godenschwager Wrote:

also - does anyone know when they start the RPI and PWR again?[/Q]
Doesn't mean much, but here it is:

Edited 1 times. Last edit at 11/08/05 07:52AM by Pete Godenschwager.[/q]


Hmmmm, while nice of them to attempt it, they need to fix one thing in their script (not sure how much of a difference it'll make): a record of 0-0-0 counts as 0.0000. For instance, in the TUC category. So our TUC record, in the comparison with MSU (since they're the only TUC we faced) is 0.0000 and they win the point. Now, they win the comparision 2-1 without it anyway, but it could be screwing stuff up in other places.
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: Chris 02 (---.aere.iastate.edu)
Date: November 08, 2005 01:16PM

[Q]Pete Godenschwager Wrote:

also - does anyone know when they start the RPI and PWR again?[/Q]
Doesn't mean much, but here it is:





Edited 1 times. Last edit at 11/08/05 07:52AM by Pete Godenschwager.[/q]

And here

[www.rpihockey.net]
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: Paul 84 (66.246.102.---)
Date: November 08, 2005 04:39PM

Having seen last Friday's Princeton shutout of Dartmouth (3-0) and Sklapsky's 41 saves, I'd say Princeton will make a competitive game with pretty much anyone this year (except Cornell, of course). But for coming up a goal short against Harvard last Saturday (with a different netminder -- Leroux), they'd be 3-1. Overall, though, they look much more competitive. Quite a positive change from recent years. Perhaps it's their new hockey jerseys juicing them up -- with their big PU shield emblazened front and center on their chests.

I understand the Harvard game was SRO -- very unusual for their quiet barn. Can't wait for the annual PU vs. CU "home-game-away-from-home" this January. Already have my block of seats paying the extra $3 per seat "Cornell Premium" and will duly outfit my block with red clothing for Christmas.
 
Re: Polls 11/7
Posted by: Lauren '06 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: November 09, 2005 02:58AM

[Q]Paul 84 Wrote:

Having seen last Friday's Princeton shutout of Dartmouth (3-0) and Sklapsky's 41 saves, I'd say Princeton will make a competitive game with pretty much anyone this year (except Cornell, of course). [/q]
Bryan Vernon Sterling Sklapsky actually plays this year?

Fantastic. I can't wait to play Princeton now.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login