CU Goalie System
Posted by The Rancor
Re: CU Goalie System
Posted by: Jacob 03 (---.carlsl01.pa.comcast.net)
Date: November 17, 2004 06:50PM
i guess they couldn't find a more recent photo...
and "ken freakin' dryden" might be my new favorite epithet
and "ken freakin' dryden" might be my new favorite epithet
Re: CU Goalie System
Posted by: calgARI '07 (---.danicacomputing.com)
Date: November 17, 2004 07:08PM
We're better than Quebec? I didn't read that thing, but is that seriously what it said? If it were, that would be a gross exaggeration.
Re: CU Goalie System
Posted by: The Rancor (---.stny.rr.com)
Date: November 18, 2004 05:05AM
no, it did not say we were better tan quebec. it was one of them thar jokes. it would be nice to think that were second only to the frenchies though.
Re: CU Goalie System
Posted by: rstott (---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: November 18, 2004 12:03PM
Interesting that Schafer thinks McKee is a great goaltender. It sure didn't sound like he thought that in the in the interview in the Journal's preaseason issue.
Re: CU Goalie System
Posted by: Lauren '06 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: November 18, 2004 12:09PM
If you pay attention to what Schafer actually says about McKee, it coincides rather well. The big thing Schafer harps on is his tendency to get lazy during easy, low shot total games and let in that one soft goal--and in one article specifically (don't remember if it was the journal preseason one or not, sorry), coach goes on to say that he's a better goaltender than that, and now we've seen that's true. And McKee himself has said in interviews that he flourishes under pressure... and I would guess he probably flourishes in reaction to negative reinforcement as well.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.