10/25/04 poll
Posted by Avash
10/25/04 poll
Posted by: Avash (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: October 25, 2004 04:59PM
October 25, 2004 Team (First Place) Record Pts Last Week 1 Minnesota-Duluth (31) 5-0-1 570 3 2 Boston College (4) 2-1-0 518 1 3 Michigan (1) 4-1-1 508 4 4 North Dakota (3) 4-1-1 494 2 5 Wisconsin (1) 4-0-0 434 8 6 Minnesota 3-2-0 343 7 7 Maine 4-3-0 314 5 8 Colorado College 4-0-0 303 11 9 New Hampshire 3-1-1 299 10 10 Miami 4-2-0 186 6 11 Denver 3-2-0 186 13 12 Dartmouth 0-0-0 143 12 13 Ohio State 4-2-0 142 NR 14 Cornell 0-0-0 86 15 15 Northern Michigan 3-1-0 81 NR Others Receiving Votes: Colgate 66, Michigan State 55, St. Lawrence 31, Mass.-Lowell 14, Rensselaer 6, Boston University 4, Nebraska-Omaha 4, Notre Dame 3, Providence 3, Holy Cross 2, Massachusetts 2, Alaska-Anchorage 1, Bowling Green 1, Robert Morris 1
Someone thinks Robert Morris is the 15th best team in the country.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/25/2004 05:02PM by Avash '05.
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.rr.com)
Date: October 25, 2004 08:00PM
[Q]Avash '05 Wrote:
Someone thinks Robert Morris is the 15th best team in the country.[/q]Well... not REALLY. Seems like more of an "attaboy" vote for getting their first D-I win.
Someone thinks Robert Morris is the 15th best team in the country.[/q]Well... not REALLY. Seems like more of an "attaboy" vote for getting their first D-I win.
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: Jordan 04 (---.cust.telepacific.net)
Date: October 25, 2004 08:57PM
Sweet. 14 more exhibition victories, and we're #1!!!
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: puff (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: October 25, 2004 09:19PM
I'm just glad we reversed the trend of falling with no explanation besides the fact we hadn't been in a game yet.
___________________________
tewinks '04
stir crazy...
tewinks '04
stir crazy...
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: billhoward (---.ziffdavis.com)
Date: October 25, 2004 11:40PM
[Q]puff Wrote:
I'm just glad we reversed the trend of falling with no explanation besides the fact we hadn't been in a game yet.[/q]
Assuming the voters looked at all the games in some depth, maybe they're reading tea leaf-type signs such as two goals by a moderately not highly heralded rookie (Topher Scott).
I'm just glad we reversed the trend of falling with no explanation besides the fact we hadn't been in a game yet.[/q]
Assuming the voters looked at all the games in some depth, maybe they're reading tea leaf-type signs such as two goals by a moderately not highly heralded rookie (Topher Scott).
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: KP '06 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: October 25, 2004 11:56PM
Anyone else surprised that SLU(t) hasn't gotten more respect after such a respectable start to their season? Yeah, it's still very early on, but their early results seem to show that they're a very dangerous team.
Bah ... polls.
Bah ... polls.
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: calgARI '07 (---.danicacomputing.com)
Date: October 26, 2004 12:00AM
Wow. How 'bout those Black Bears. Sitting at 4-3 with losses to St. Lawrence and 2 to North Dakota. Well I guess they did beat Niagara two times, UVM, and St. Lawrence. They are definitely the 7th best team in the NCAA. What a joke.
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: October 26, 2004 12:02AM
[Q]calgARI '07 Wrote:
Wow. How 'bout those Black Bears. Sitting at 4-3 with losses to St. Lawrence and 2 to North Dakota. Well I guess they did beat Niagara two times, UVM, and St. Lawrence. They are definitely the 7th best team in the NCAA. What a joke.[/q]
My reaction as well, Ari.
Wow. How 'bout those Black Bears. Sitting at 4-3 with losses to St. Lawrence and 2 to North Dakota. Well I guess they did beat Niagara two times, UVM, and St. Lawrence. They are definitely the 7th best team in the NCAA. What a joke.[/q]
My reaction as well, Ari.
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
Al DeFlorio '65
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.rr.com)
Date: October 26, 2004 04:34AM
North Dakota is a very good team. Maine is also a very good team. I'm not sure they're that much better than UNH, but then, they're not all that many poll points ahead of UNH. One loss to St. Lawrence in a game where, by all accounts, Mike McKenna stood on his head, doesn't seem to be that strong a case to knock them. Let's not forget that Maine was in the finals last year and didn't graduate too many players. So they lost two games in one weekend to North Dakota. A lot of other teams are going to do that this year too. But then, #8 Colorado College beat Union twice, Quinnipiac, and Air Force. Ooh, quality wins there too. You honestly believe Maine won't be up there when the dust settles? Come on.
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: Jeff Hopkins '82 (---.airproducts.com)
Date: October 26, 2004 08:16AM
Maine will be there but not necessarily because of their skill. More so because the rest of Hockey East - other than BC and possibly UHN - isn't going to give them much competition. HEA just seems weaker from th emiddle down this year than in the past.
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: October 26, 2004 08:17AM
[Q]jmh30 Wrote:
North Dakota is a very good team. Maine is also a very good team. I'm not sure they're that much better than UNH, but then, they're not all that many poll points ahead of UNH. One loss to St. Lawrence in a game where, by all accounts, Mike McKenna stood on his head, doesn't seem to be that strong a case to knock them. Let's not forget that Maine was in the finals last year and didn't graduate too many players. So they lost two games in one weekend to North Dakota. A lot of other teams are going to do that this year too. But then, #8 Colorado College beat Union twice, Quinnipiac, and Air Force. Ooh, quality wins there too. You honestly believe Maine won't be up there when the dust settles? Come on.[/q]
If a poll is supposed to be a ranking of teams according to what they've done to date, then Ari's right. If it's a prediction of how the season will turn out come April, then it's unnecessary to publish it every week.
North Dakota is a very good team. Maine is also a very good team. I'm not sure they're that much better than UNH, but then, they're not all that many poll points ahead of UNH. One loss to St. Lawrence in a game where, by all accounts, Mike McKenna stood on his head, doesn't seem to be that strong a case to knock them. Let's not forget that Maine was in the finals last year and didn't graduate too many players. So they lost two games in one weekend to North Dakota. A lot of other teams are going to do that this year too. But then, #8 Colorado College beat Union twice, Quinnipiac, and Air Force. Ooh, quality wins there too. You honestly believe Maine won't be up there when the dust settles? Come on.[/q]
If a poll is supposed to be a ranking of teams according to what they've done to date, then Ari's right. If it's a prediction of how the season will turn out come April, then it's unnecessary to publish it every week.
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
Al DeFlorio '65
USA today Poll
Posted by: puff (128.84.159.---)
Date: October 26, 2004 09:01AM
USA today had UNH above Maine.
And yes, i think polls are a reflection on how a team is currently doing, but you can't count out thier skill/long term potential. Otherwise, Wisconsin and CC should be at the top right now.
USA TODAY/USA Hockey Magazine Top 15 men's hockey poll#
The USA TODAY/USA Hockey Magazine Top 15 men's
college hockey poll with first-place votes
in parentheses, 2004-05 record and rank:
(as of Monday, October 25)
TEAM PTS Record Last week
---- --- ------ ----------
1. Minnesota-Duluth (26) 491 5-0-1 3
2. Boston College (3) 444 2-1-0 1
3. North Dakota (2) 439 4-1-1 2
4. Michigan (1) 410 4-1-1 4
5. Wisconsin 391 4-0-0 6
6. Minnesota 333 3-2-0 7
7. New Hampshire 278 3-1-1 10
8. Colorado 276 4-0-0 11
9. Maine 231 4-3-0 5
10. Miami (Ohio) 168 4-2-0 8
11. Denver 161 3-2-0 13
12. Dartmouth 158 0-0-0 12
13. Ohio State 111 4-2-0 NR
14. Michigan State 42 1-3-0 9
15. Northern Michigan 40 3-1-0 NR
Others receiving votes: Colgate 38, Cornell 37, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 9,
St. Lawrence 9, University of Nebraska-Omaha 5, Sacred Heart 4, Boston University 2,
Notre Dame 2, University of Massachusetts 1.
And yes, i think polls are a reflection on how a team is currently doing, but you can't count out thier skill/long term potential. Otherwise, Wisconsin and CC should be at the top right now.
USA TODAY/USA Hockey Magazine Top 15 men's hockey poll#
The USA TODAY/USA Hockey Magazine Top 15 men's
college hockey poll with first-place votes
in parentheses, 2004-05 record and rank:
(as of Monday, October 25)
TEAM PTS Record Last week
---- --- ------ ----------
1. Minnesota-Duluth (26) 491 5-0-1 3
2. Boston College (3) 444 2-1-0 1
3. North Dakota (2) 439 4-1-1 2
4. Michigan (1) 410 4-1-1 4
5. Wisconsin 391 4-0-0 6
6. Minnesota 333 3-2-0 7
7. New Hampshire 278 3-1-1 10
8. Colorado 276 4-0-0 11
9. Maine 231 4-3-0 5
10. Miami (Ohio) 168 4-2-0 8
11. Denver 161 3-2-0 13
12. Dartmouth 158 0-0-0 12
13. Ohio State 111 4-2-0 NR
14. Michigan State 42 1-3-0 9
15. Northern Michigan 40 3-1-0 NR
Others receiving votes: Colgate 38, Cornell 37, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 9,
St. Lawrence 9, University of Nebraska-Omaha 5, Sacred Heart 4, Boston University 2,
Notre Dame 2, University of Massachusetts 1.
___________________________
tewinks '04
stir crazy...
tewinks '04
stir crazy...
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.rr.com)
Date: October 26, 2004 01:14PM
[Q]Al DeFlorio Wrote:
If a poll is supposed to be a ranking of teams according to what they've done to date, then Ari's right. If it's a prediction of how the season will turn out come April, then it's unnecessary to publish it every week.[/q]If a poll was just a ranking of what teams have done to date, then I'd rather just look at KRACH or the like, and there would be no conceivable reason (or even a way) to publish a preseason poll.
If a poll is supposed to be a ranking of teams according to what they've done to date, then Ari's right. If it's a prediction of how the season will turn out come April, then it's unnecessary to publish it every week.[/q]If a poll was just a ranking of what teams have done to date, then I'd rather just look at KRACH or the like, and there would be no conceivable reason (or even a way) to publish a preseason poll.
Re: 10/25/04 poll
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: October 26, 2004 01:58PM
[q]If a poll is supposed to be a ranking of teams according to what they've done to date, then Ari's right. If it's a prediction of how the season will turn out come April, then it's unnecessary to publish it every week. [/q]The polls are both results to date and expectation. Which makes sense at this point in the season because there really isn't enough data to rank teams meaningfully based on results to date. Most of all polls are usually about reputation, which means a team like Maine is going to get a lot of credit for being Maine.
And yes, it is unnecessary to publish them every week.
And yes, it is unnecessary to publish them every week.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.