Thursday, October 31st, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Potential NCAA Rule Changes

Posted by ebilmes 
Page: Previous1 2 
Current Page: 2 of 2
Re: Potential NCAA Rule Changes
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (Moderator)
Date: July 08, 2010 06:58PM

Waved off.

 
___________________________
JTW

@jtwcornell91@hostux.social

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/08/2010 06:59PM by jtwcornell91.
 
Re: Potential NCAA Rule Changes
Posted by: Cactus12 (---.med.nyu.edu)
Date: July 10, 2010 07:42PM

good (though not surprising)... do we know which idiot proposed this to begin with?
 
Re: Potential NCAA Rule Changes
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net)
Date: July 10, 2010 07:57PM

Cactus12
good (though not surprising)... do we know which idiot proposed this to begin with?
I think it was Roy '82. :-P
 
Re: Potential NCAA Rule Changes
Posted by: pfibiger (---.186.101.97.cfl.res.rr.com)
Date: July 12, 2010 12:49PM

another potential ncaa change (this one applying to all sports, not just hockey): banning early scholarship offers.

[sports.espn.go.com]

while obviously not impacting the ivy league directly, it seems like this would tilt the ice in favor of major junior hockey.

 
___________________________
Phil Fibiger '01
[www.fibiger.org]
 
Re: Potential NCAA Rule Changes
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: July 12, 2010 12:57PM

pfibiger
another potential ncaa change (this one applying to all sports, not just hockey): banning early scholarship offers....while obviously not impacting the ivy league directly, it seems like this would tilt the ice in favor of major junior hockey.
This strikes me as a good change. It's pretty ridiculous to offer a kid a scholarship who hasn't even finished tenth grade. Kind of makes a mockery of the idea of "student-athletes" (or at least adds to the mockery that the rest of big time college athletics is).
 
Re: Potential NCAA Rule Changes
Posted by: Roy 82 (128.18.14.---)
Date: July 12, 2010 05:15PM

KeithK
Cactus12
good (though not surprising)... do we know which idiot proposed this to begin with?
I think it was Roy '82. :-P

At least they will experiment with it during exhibition games so that they will get to know just how brilliant I am.
 
Re: Potential NCAA Rule Changes
Posted by: polar (---.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
Date: October 20, 2010 06:48PM

As a reminder to anyone going to the exhibition games this weekend, the power play icing rule is in effect. That, and apparently a goal scored on a delayed penalty does not negate the penalty. Forgot that one was approved...
 
Re: Potential NCAA Rule Changes
Posted by: ajh258 (---.citlabs.cornell.edu)
Date: October 20, 2010 07:58PM

polar
As a reminder to anyone going to the exhibition games this weekend, the power play icing rule is in effect. That, and apparently a goal scored on a delayed penalty does not negate the penalty. Forgot that one was approved...

If I'm not wrong, the obtainable pass rule is also gone; now receiving players have to touch the puck.
 
Page: Previous1 2 
Current Page: 2 of 2

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login