Tuesday, November 12th, 2024
 
 
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010 2024

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014 2018 2019 2020 2023 2024

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005 2018 2019 2020

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

RPI 1 at Cornell 0

Posted by Trotsky 
Page: Previous1 2 
Current Page: 2 of 2
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: lynah80 (---.MED.UPENN.EDU)
Date: March 14, 2009 12:07AM

His reflexes and gut instincts are excellent. But I agree, he skates out of the net too far sometimes and once he comes well out of the net, he does do things that are unconventional. With more self discipline, he could be really great next year.
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 09:30AM

Rita
Kyle Rose
Scrivens should be looking at the bench from the inside right now... good god.

I just replayed Jason's call of the RPI goal, but it wasn't too descriptive other than went high glove side. Was Scriven's screened at all? Was it poor (no) reaction to the shot?
Kyle - did you mean he should be benched after giving up one goal on 30+ shots 57 minutes into the game, or did you mean we should be skating 6x5?

 
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: DisplacedCornellian (---.dhcp.sffl.va.charter.com)
Date: March 14, 2009 09:48AM

ugarte
Rita
Kyle Rose
Scrivens should be looking at the bench from the inside right now... good god.

I just replayed Jason's call of the RPI goal, but it wasn't too descriptive other than went high glove side. Was Scriven's screened at all? Was it poor (no) reaction to the shot?
Kyle - did you mean he should be benched after giving up one goal on 30+ shots 57 minutes into the game, or did you mean we should be skating 6x5?

I think you mean one goal on 10+ shots, since RPI had 14 shots the entire game.

I'm guessing he meant we should be 6x5, but that's just a guess. :-)
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: upperdeck (---.syrcny.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 09:50AM

what were the actual shot counts vs shots on goal.. thats more in showing the actual activity.. seemed like cornell had its usual ton of missed nets.
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: pfm10 (---.ri.ri.cox.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 09:57AM

lynah80
His reflexes and gut instincts are excellent. But I agree, he skates out of the net too far sometimes and once he comes well out of the net, he does do things that are unconventional. With more self discipline, he could be really great next year.

Haven't we been saying this, or at least thinking it, ever since he's worn a Big Red sweater? I would think that he should have had the discipline to be a little more cautious coming out of the net this season. Or at the very least after the Yale and Brown games two weeks ago.
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: lynah80 (---.phlapa.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 10:19AM

pfm10
lynah80
His reflexes and gut instincts are excellent. But I agree, he skates out of the net too far sometimes and once he comes well out of the net, he does do things that are unconventional. With more self discipline, he could be really great next year.

Haven't we been saying this, or at least thinking it, ever since he's worn a Big Red sweater? I would think that he should have had the discipline to be a little more cautious coming out of the net this season. Or at the very least after the Yale and Brown games two weeks ago.

Even with this issue, he is still a very good goalie. He isn't playing to his full potential, but you would hope that Cornell would be able to win on a night when he only gave up one goal and his save % was 0.928
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: pfm10 (---.ri.ri.cox.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 10:27AM

lynah80
Even with this issue, he is still a very good goalie. He isn't playing to his full potential, but you would hope that Cornell would be able to win on a night when he only gave up one goal and his save % was 0.928

Oh, fully agreed on all points. I'm not trying to say he shouldn't be between the pipes, but I think next season we're all still going to have to hold our breaths every time we see him push away from the net.
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 11:00AM

DisplacedCornellian
I'm guessing he meant we should be 6x5, but that's just a guess. :-)
No, I mean after nearly giving up that empty net goal when he screwed up skating out of the net to control the puck earlier in the game. He simply shouldn't be making that kind of mental mistake after this long as the starting goalie.

 
___________________________
[ home | FB ]
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 12:51PM

Kyle Rose
DisplacedCornellian
I'm guessing he meant we should be 6x5, but that's just a guess. :-)
No, I mean after nearly giving up that empty net goal when he screwed up skating out of the net to control the puck earlier in the game. He simply shouldn't be making that kind of mental mistake after this long as the starting goalie.
You can afford to bench a player for stupid mistakes in the middle of the season. In March it's not such a great idea. Especially for a goalie whose backups have had very little ice time.
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 01:15PM

KeithK
You can afford to bench a player for stupid mistakes in the middle of the season. In March it's not such a great idea. Especially for a goalie whose backups have had very little ice time.
He certainly can't do it in game 2 or 3. But he could have done it in game 1 with the same outcome.

 
___________________________
[ home | FB ]
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 14, 2009 02:40PM

Kyle Rose
KeithK
You can afford to bench a player for stupid mistakes in the middle of the season. In March it's not such a great idea. Especially for a goalie whose backups have had very little ice time.
He certainly can't do it in game 2 or 3. But he could have done it in game 1 with the same outcome.
Yes, knowing the outcome it's easy to say that. However, is there anyone who would have felt great if he had changed goalies? Yes, I know I'm opening a can of worms, but I can only imagine the outcry if he had changed goalies and that goal had been scored.cuss

 
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 03:57PM

DisplacedCornellian
ugarte
Rita
Kyle Rose
Scrivens should be looking at the bench from the inside right now... good god.

I just replayed Jason's call of the RPI goal, but it wasn't too descriptive other than went high glove side. Was Scriven's screened at all? Was it poor (no) reaction to the shot?
Kyle - did you mean he should be benched after giving up one goal on 30+ shots 57 minutes into the game, or did you mean we should be skating 6x5?

I think you mean one goal on 10+ shots, since RPI had 14 shots the entire game.
Um. Oops?

 
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 06:44PM

I have suspended myself from starting game threads indefinitely based on intemperate statements I made to my cats following the recent loss.
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: tretiak (---.state.gov)
Date: March 17, 2009 04:39PM

scoop85
I've never seen a goalie at this level of hockey who seems so clueless out of the net...while being simultaneously utterly confident in his puckhandling skills.


Patrick Roy was so enraged at being overlooked that he ripped another door off its hinge cuss
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/17/2009 04:40PM by tretiak.
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: CowbellGuy (Moderator)
Date: March 17, 2009 04:46PM




What tretiak said

 
___________________________
"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: Beeeej (Moderator)
Date: March 18, 2009 12:04AM

CowbellGuy


What tretiak said

More on Patrick Roy and the hinges.

 
___________________________
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
 
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 18, 2009 12:56AM

Beeeej
CowbellGuy


What tretiak said

More on Patrick Roy and the hinges.

And be sure not to miss the credits at the bottom!
 
Page: Previous1 2 
Current Page: 2 of 2

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login