RPI 1 at Cornell 0
Posted by Trotsky
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: lynah80 (---.MED.UPENN.EDU)
Date: March 14, 2009 12:07AM
His reflexes and gut instincts are excellent. But I agree, he skates out of the net too far sometimes and once he comes well out of the net, he does do things that are unconventional. With more self discipline, he could be really great next year.
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 09:30AM
Kyle - did you mean he should be benched after giving up one goal on 30+ shots 57 minutes into the game, or did you mean we should be skating 6x5?RitaKyle Rose
Scrivens should be looking at the bench from the inside right now... good god.
I just replayed Jason's call of the RPI goal, but it wasn't too descriptive other than went high glove side. Was Scriven's screened at all? Was it poor (no) reaction to the shot?
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: DisplacedCornellian (---.dhcp.sffl.va.charter.com)
Date: March 14, 2009 09:48AM
ugarteKyle - did you mean he should be benched after giving up one goal on 30+ shots 57 minutes into the game, or did you mean we should be skating 6x5?RitaKyle Rose
Scrivens should be looking at the bench from the inside right now... good god.
I just replayed Jason's call of the RPI goal, but it wasn't too descriptive other than went high glove side. Was Scriven's screened at all? Was it poor (no) reaction to the shot?
I think you mean one goal on 10+ shots, since RPI had 14 shots the entire game.
I'm guessing he meant we should be 6x5, but that's just a guess.
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: upperdeck (---.syrcny.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 09:50AM
what were the actual shot counts vs shots on goal.. thats more in showing the actual activity.. seemed like cornell had its usual ton of missed nets.
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: pfm10 (---.ri.ri.cox.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 09:57AM
lynah80
His reflexes and gut instincts are excellent. But I agree, he skates out of the net too far sometimes and once he comes well out of the net, he does do things that are unconventional. With more self discipline, he could be really great next year.
Haven't we been saying this, or at least thinking it, ever since he's worn a Big Red sweater? I would think that he should have had the discipline to be a little more cautious coming out of the net this season. Or at the very least after the Yale and Brown games two weeks ago.
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: lynah80 (---.phlapa.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 10:19AM
pfm10lynah80
His reflexes and gut instincts are excellent. But I agree, he skates out of the net too far sometimes and once he comes well out of the net, he does do things that are unconventional. With more self discipline, he could be really great next year.
Haven't we been saying this, or at least thinking it, ever since he's worn a Big Red sweater? I would think that he should have had the discipline to be a little more cautious coming out of the net this season. Or at the very least after the Yale and Brown games two weeks ago.
Even with this issue, he is still a very good goalie. He isn't playing to his full potential, but you would hope that Cornell would be able to win on a night when he only gave up one goal and his save % was 0.928
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: pfm10 (---.ri.ri.cox.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 10:27AM
lynah80
Even with this issue, he is still a very good goalie. He isn't playing to his full potential, but you would hope that Cornell would be able to win on a night when he only gave up one goal and his save % was 0.928
Oh, fully agreed on all points. I'm not trying to say he shouldn't be between the pipes, but I think next season we're all still going to have to hold our breaths every time we see him push away from the net.
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 11:00AM
No, I mean after nearly giving up that empty net goal when he screwed up skating out of the net to control the puck earlier in the game. He simply shouldn't be making that kind of mental mistake after this long as the starting goalie.DisplacedCornellian
I'm guessing he meant we should be 6x5, but that's just a guess.
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 12:51PM
You can afford to bench a player for stupid mistakes in the middle of the season. In March it's not such a great idea. Especially for a goalie whose backups have had very little ice time.Kyle RoseNo, I mean after nearly giving up that empty net goal when he screwed up skating out of the net to control the puck earlier in the game. He simply shouldn't be making that kind of mental mistake after this long as the starting goalie.DisplacedCornellian
I'm guessing he meant we should be 6x5, but that's just a guess.
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 01:15PM
He certainly can't do it in game 2 or 3. But he could have done it in game 1 with the same outcome.KeithK
You can afford to bench a player for stupid mistakes in the middle of the season. In March it's not such a great idea. Especially for a goalie whose backups have had very little ice time.
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 14, 2009 02:40PM
Yes, knowing the outcome it's easy to say that. However, is there anyone who would have felt great if he had changed goalies? Yes, I know I'm opening a can of worms, but I can only imagine the outcry if he had changed goalies and that goal had been scored.Kyle RoseHe certainly can't do it in game 2 or 3. But he could have done it in game 1 with the same outcome.KeithK
You can afford to bench a player for stupid mistakes in the middle of the season. In March it's not such a great idea. Especially for a goalie whose backups have had very little ice time.
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 03:57PM
Um. Oops?DisplacedCornellianugarteKyle - did you mean he should be benched after giving up one goal on 30+ shots 57 minutes into the game, or did you mean we should be skating 6x5?RitaKyle Rose
Scrivens should be looking at the bench from the inside right now... good god.
I just replayed Jason's call of the RPI goal, but it wasn't too descriptive other than went high glove side. Was Scriven's screened at all? Was it poor (no) reaction to the shot?
I think you mean one goal on 10+ shots, since RPI had 14 shots the entire game.
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: March 14, 2009 06:44PM
I have suspended myself from starting game threads indefinitely based on intemperate statements I made to my cats following the recent loss.
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: tretiak (---.state.gov)
Date: March 17, 2009 04:39PM
scoop85
I've never seen a goalie at this level of hockey who seems so clueless out of the net...while being simultaneously utterly confident in his puckhandling skills.
Patrick Roy was so enraged at being overlooked that he ripped another door off its hinge
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/17/2009 04:40PM by tretiak.
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: CowbellGuy (Moderator)
Date: March 17, 2009 04:46PM
What tretiak said
___________________________
"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy
"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: Beeeej (Moderator)
Date: March 18, 2009 12:04AM
CowbellGuy
What tretiak said
More on Patrick Roy and the hinges.
___________________________
Beeeej, Esq.
"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
Beeeej, Esq.
"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
Re: RPI 0 at Cornell 0 (3rd period)
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 18, 2009 12:56AM
And be sure not to miss the credits at the bottom!
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.